Anthropometric profile, body composition and somatotyping of national Iranian cross-country runners

Year 2015, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 35 - 41, 01.09.2015

Hamid Arazı Bahman Mırzaeı Hadi Nobarı

https://doi.org/10.15314/tjse.49873

Cited By: 34

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the anthropometric profile of selected national athletes. The purpose of this study was to find out anthropometric measurements, body composition and somatotyping of Iranian cross-country runners. The participants were 9 male national Iranian cross-country runners. The age of athletes was between 20 to 32 years. Cross-country personal best 36min 55s (47s); training volume: 120-180 km.wk; All subjects were assessed for height, weight, breadths, lengths, girths and skin-fold thickness. Percentage of body fat was calculated from the sum of 7 measurements of skin-fold thickness. The somatotype and height to weight ratio (HWR) as well as the skin-folds extremity to trunk ratio (E:T) were also calculated. The Mean (SD) of LBM (Lean Body Mass), %BF (Body Fat), WHR (Waist Hip Ratio), HWR (Height to Weight Ratio), E:T (Extremity/Trunk) skin-fold ratio, SAD (Somatotype Attitudinal Distance) and Manourrier were 60.36 (8.25), 8.07 (1.71) %, .82 (.06), 44.01 (1.00), .77 (.17), 0.90 (0.33) and 1.10 (.63), respectively. The Mean (SD) endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph were 1.43 (.43), 4.10 (.56), and 3.63 (.73), respectively. National Iranian cross-country runners seem to have mesomorph and ectomorph are equal (or do not differ by more than one-half unit), and endomorph is smaller. Despite population comparisons would be required to identify any connection between specific anthropometric dimensions, these reference data reported in the present study for useful to practitioners and researchers, carry immense practical application and should be useful for future investigation on endurance runners selection, talent identification in cross-country running and training program development.

Keywords

Anthropometry; cross-country; somatotype; runner

References

• Arrese AL, Ostáriz ES. Skin-fold thicknesses associated with distance running performance in highly trained runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006; 24(1): 69-76.‏
• Bale P, Bradbury D, Colley E. Anthropometric and training variables related to 10km running performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986; 20(4): 170-173.‏
• Bale P, Rowell S, Colley E. Anthropometric and training characteristics of female marathon runners as determinants of distance running performance. Journal of sports sciences, 1985; 3(2):115-126.‏
• Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, Keys A. Densitometric analysis of body composition: Revision of some quantitative assumptions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963; 110: 113-140.
• Butts NK. Physiological profiles of high school female cross-country runners. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 1982; 53(1): 8-14.‏
• Carter JEL, Yuhasz MS. Skinfolds and body composition of Olympic athletes. Physical structure of Olympic athletes, Part II: Kinanthropometry of Olympic athletes, 1984.‏
• Carter JL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: development and applications (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• Esteve-Lanao J, San Juan AF, Earnest CP, Foster C, Lucia A. How do endurance runners actually train? Relationship with competition performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005; 37(3): 496-504.‏
• Hanley B. Senior men’s pacing profiles at the IAAF World Cross Country Championships. Journal of sports sciences, 2014; 32(11): 1060-1065.‏
• Hetland ML, Haarbo J, Christiansen C. Regional body composition determined by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry. Relation to Training, Sex Hormones, and serum lipids in male long‐distance runners. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 1998; 8(2): 102-108.‏
• IAAF. Competition archive. 2013b. Retrieved from http://www.iaaf.org/results?&subcats= WXC
• Ismail MN, Zawiak H. Anthropometric measurements and body composition of selected national athletes. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, 1996; 2(2): 138-147.‏
• Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition, 1978; 40(03): 497-504.
• Knechtle B. Relationship of anthropometric and training characteristics with race performance in endurance and ultra-endurance athletes. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014; 5(2): 73-90.‏
• Knechtle B, Baumgartner S, Knechtle P, Rüst CA, Rosemann T, Bescós R. Changes in single skin-fold thickness in 100 km ultra-marathoners. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012; 3: 147.‏
• Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Andonie JL, Kohler G. Influence of anthropometry on race performance in extreme endurance triathletes: World Challenge Deca Iron Triathlon 2006. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007; 41(10): 644-648.‏
• Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Schulze I, Kohler G. Upper arm circumference is associated with race performance in ultra-endurance runners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008; 42(4): 295-299.‏
• 18- Koley S, Singh J, Sandhu JS. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics on Indian inter-university volleyball players.‏ Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2010; 398-399.
• Landers GJ, Blanksby BA, Ackland TR, Smith D. Morphology and performance of world championship triathletes. Annals of Human Biology, 2000; 27(4): 387-400.‏
• Legaz AA, González BJ, Serrano OE. Differences in skin-fold thicknesses and fat distribution among top-class runners. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2005; 45(4): 512-517.‏
• Legaz A, Eston R. Changes in performance, skin-fold thicknesses, and fat patterning after three years of intense athletic conditioning in high level runners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005; 39(11): 851-856.‏
• Norton KI, Marfell-Jones M, Whittingham N, Kerr D, Carter L, Saddington K, Gore CJ. Anthropometric assessment protocols. 2000.
• Norton K, Whittingham N, Carter L, Kerr D, Gore C, Marfell-Jones M. Measurement techniques in anthropometry. Anthropometrica, 1996; 1: 25-75.‏
• Tanner JM. The Physique of the Olympic Athlete. Rome, George Allen and Unwin Limited,‏ 1964.
• Rahmani A, Locatelli E, Lacour JR. Differences in morphology and force/velocity relationship between Senegalese and Italian sprinters. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2004; 91(4): 399-405.‏
• Sharwood K, Collins M, Goedecke J, Wilson G, Noakes T. Weight changes, sodium levels, and performance in the South African Ironman Triathlon. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2002; 12(6): 391-399.‏
• Singh S, Singh K, Singh M, Singh M. Measurements, body and somatotyping of high jumpers. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity, 2010; 4(4): 266-271.‏
• Stuelcken M, Pyne D, Sinclair P. Anthropometric characteristics of elite cricket fast bowlers. Journal of sports sciences, 2007; 25(14): 1587-1597.‏
• Tanaka K, Matsuura Y. A multivariate analysis of the role of certain anthropometric and physiological attributes in distance running. Annals of Human Biology, 1982; 9(5): 473-482.‏
• Vernillo G, Schena F, Berardelli C, Rosa G, Galvani C, Maggioni M, Agnello L, La Torre A. Anthropometric characteristics of top-class Kenyan marathon runners. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2013; 53(4): 403-408.‏
• Vučetić V, Babić V, Šentija D, Nekić B. Anthropometric and morphological characteristics of runners. Zbornik Radova, 2005; 4: 612-615.‏
• Vučetić VR, Matković B, Šentija D. Morphological differences of elite Croatian track-and-field athletes. Collegium Antropologicum, 2008; 32(3): 863-868.‏