Relationship between some anthropometric indices with dynamic and static balance in sedentary female college students

Year 2016, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 45 - 49, 27.04.2016

Elahe Moeın , Farzaneh Movaseghı

https://doi.org/10.15314/tjse.65406

Cited By: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between some anthropometric characteristics with dynamic and static balance in sedentary female college students. This study was carried out on a sample of 158 Iranian sedentary female college students, aged 18-25 years, during 2013-2014. Participants were selected from volunteers of Chabahar University. Anthropometric indices (body height, weight, lower-extremity lengths and widest perimeter, body mass index, waist-hip ratio) and balance (dynamic and static) were measured. Static balance with open eyes and eyes closed measured with Angel Balance Test on a stable surface and dynamic balance was evaluated by timed up and go test (TUG). Pearson correlation coefficients were used in analysis. There was a weak negative correlation between dynamic balance and lower leg length (r₌ -0.164) and weak positive correlation between dynamic balance and body mass index (r=0.164). In the eye open condition, static balance was related to lower leg length (r=0.172) with dominant leg. In the eye open condition with non-dominant leg and eye closed conditions there was no correlation between static balance and any anthropometric indices. The levels of significance are not high but warrant attention. It seems that there was no single anthropometric index that explained the variations in body balance among healthy sedentary young female and other factors such as the sense of sight, vestibular and proprioceptive systems have a role in the balance.

Keywords

Anthropometric indices; dynamic balance; static balance; female college students

References

• Akbari A, Ghiasi F, Papoli R, Jalali MA. Relationship between static and dynamic postural stability index and anthropometrics index in healthy men and women with normal BMI index. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Science, 2014; 21(2): 241-51.
• Baharlouie H, Nodehi Moghadam A. Correlation between body mass index and postural balances in elderly. Journal of Rehabilitation, 2012; 12(4): 49-54.
• Berenjian Tabrizi H, Abbasi A, Jahadian H. Comparison of static and dynamic balance and its relationship with anthropometric characteristics in athletes of selected sports. Journal of Sport Sciences, 2014; 6(4): 33-6.
• Błaszczyk JW, Cieślinska-Świder J, Plewa M, Zahorska-Markiewicz B, Markiewicz A. Effects of excessive body weight on postural control. Journal of Biomechanics, 2009; 42(9): 1295-300.
• Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM. Comparison of static and dynamic balance in female collegiate soccer, basketball and gymnastics athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 2007; 42(1): 42-6.
• Fabunmi AA, Gbiri CA. Relationship between balance performance in the elderly and some anthropometric variables. African journal of medicine and medical science, 2008; 37(4): 321-26.
• Greve JMDA, Cug M, Dulgeroglu D, Brech GC ,Alonso AC. Relationship between Anthropometric Factors, Gender, and Balance under Unstable Conditions in Young Adults, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, BioMed Research International, 2013.
• Hrysomallis C, McLaughlin P, Goodman C. Relationship between static and dynamic balance tests among elite Australian Footballers. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2006; 9(4): 288-91.
• Hobbs ML. Dynamic Balance and Basketball Playing Ability, Unpublished master’s thesis, Texas State University, 2008.
• Irez GB. The Relationship with Balance, Foot Posture, and Foot Size in School of Physical Education and Sports Students. Academic Journals, Educational Research and Reviews, 2014; 9(16): 551-54.
• Khasawneh A. Anthropometric measurements and their relation to static and dynamic balance among junior tennis players. Journal of Sport Science, 2015; 8(11):87-91.
• Kim BJ, Lee JY .The relationship between some anthropometric characteristics at different levels of difficulty with balance. Aula Orientalis, 2014; (2): 36-48.
• Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Cordova ML, Kinzey SJ, Stone MB, Krause BA. The effect of a simulated knee joint effusion on postural control in healthy subjects. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2003; 84(7): 1076-79.
• Parseh A, Solhjoo MH. Studying the relationship between body mass index with speed, agility and balance in male students of 13-15 years old. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 2015; 5 (S2): 382-387.
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991; 39(2): 142-8.
• Sabbaghian Rad L, Mamashi Z, Sadeghi H. A comparison of common methods for static, semi-dynamic, and dynamic balance assessment in 12 to 15 year old girls with different somatotypes. International Journal of Sport Studies, 2013; 3 (10): 1137-48.
• Sadeghi H, Noori SH. Reliability of functional tests of static, semi dynamic and dynamic balance in ectomorph young women. Sport Medicine, 2015; 7(1): 35-55.
• Shumway-Cook A. Motor Control, theory and practical application (2nd ed). Maryland, William & Wilkins, 1995: 222-8.