EVALUATION OF MONTESSORI METHOD FOR TEACHING MENTALLY RETARDED STUDENTS BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 91 - 114, 01.02.2019

Ahmet Kurnaz , Gökçen Bengi Gündoğdu

Öz

The present study aims to evaluate the use of Montessori Method for teaching
Mentally Retarded Students (MRS) based on the opinions of special education teachers.
Opinions of special education teachers on the use of Montessori Method for teaching
MRS were analyzed based on the following criteria: gender of special education
teachers, whether they are informed about Montessori Method, whether they are trained
about Montessori Method, being employed in an educational institution having adopted
Montessori Method, their bachelor degree, their seniority and length of service, the
duration of their service in a special education institution, type of the special education
institution they are working for. Furthermore the opinions of the special education
teachers were collected on following issues: the comparison of the effect of Montessori
Method on people of normal intelligence and people with MR, practicability of
Montessori Method in Turkey, student-centered educational practices, setting the
students free for their choices, presence of older and younger students in the same
classroom. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used together in the survey
model of the research. Participants of the study were composed of 163 special education
teachers working with students who have mental retardation in special education
institutions and special education and rehabilitation centers affiliated to the Ministry of
National Education. Of the participants, 108 were male and 54 were female. Of the special education teachers, 109 have been working for 1-5 years; 23 have been working
for 6-10 years; 15 have been working for 11-15 years; 16 have been working for 16
years and more. Of the teachers, 36 have been working for mild special education
classrooms; 38 have been working for independent Special Education Schools; 13 have
been working for Special Vocational Schools; 23 have been working for moderatesevere special education classrooms and 64 have been working for Rehabilitation
Centers. Questionnaire developed by researches for practicability of Montessori Method
for teaching MRS by special education teachers was used as data collection tool.
Cronbach’s Alpha was 0,831 according to reliability study conducted with 258 people
for the questionnaire. Researchers visited the schools and met the teachers and
questionnaires were filled by participants. Qualitative data of the research was analyzed
through descriptive approach. Data were analyzed for quantitative data and they were
determined to be normally distributed. Afterwards, of the parametrical tests, t test,
Anova and Tukey’s test were used for analysis. According to research results, special
education teachers have moderate opinions about the use of Montessori Method in
teaching MRS. Factors such as special education teachers’ being trained about
Montessori Method, being informed about Montessori Method, being employed in an
educational institution having adopted Montessori Method and the duration of their
service as special education teacher did not create any difference in the opinions of
teachers on practicability of Montessori Method in teaching MRS. Female special
education teachers think that Montessori Method may be adopted in teaching MRS
more commonly. Opinions held by the teachers graduated from the department of child
development are more positive than the opinions of teachers graduated from the
department of special education for using Montessori Method in teaching MRS. There
is difference in the opinions of the teachers about the use of Montessori Method in
teaching MRS according to the type of educational institution they are working for.
Accordingly, teachers working in special-education classroom within a regular school
have more positive attitudes than teachers working in independent special education
institutions, moderate-severe special education classrooms, rehabilitation centers and
special vocational schools. The majority of the participants think that Montessori
Method may be applied in Turkey for teaching MRS. Special education teachers
approve walking freely around according to this method however they point out that presence of older and younger students in the same classroom may result in
disciplinary problems. Participants indicate that Montessori education may be effective
for people of normal intelligence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maria Montessori, Montessori Method, Mentally Retarded Students

Kaynakça

• Asher, JJ. (2010). The story of Maria Montessori. Discoveries by ordinary people that change the world içinde (143-155). Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Production, Inc.
• Brehony, K. (2000). Montessori, individual work and ındividuality in the elementary school classroom. Hıstory of Educatıon, 2(29),115-128.
• Durakoğlu, A. (2011). Maria Montessori’ye göre okul öncesi çocukluk döneminin özellikleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 133-145.
• Erben, S. (2005). “Montessori Materyallerinin Zihin Engelli ve İşitme Engelli Çocukların Alıcı Dil Gelişiminden Görsel Algı Düzeyine Etkisi.” Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2005.
• Gürsoy, F. ve Yıldız Bıçakçı, M. (2009). Okul Öncesi Eğitimde FarklıYaklaşımlar. Erken Çocukluk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi. (Ed: Y.Fazlıoğlu, ). KriterYayınları, 153- 157,İstanbul.
• Korkmaz, E. (2006). Montessori metodu özgür çocuklar için eğitim. Algı Yayın, İstanbul.
• Köksal Akyol, A. (2005). 36-72 aylık çocuklar için okul öncesi eğitim programı ile Montessori yaklaşımı arasındaki benzerlikler. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi.Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi,XIV. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Kongre Kitabı, s. 1,913-919,Denizli.
• Montessori, M. (1995). The absorbent mind (Çev. C.A. Claremont). New York: Henry Holt and Company. ( Orjinal olarak 1967’de yayınlandı).
• Oğuz, V. & Köksal Akyol, A. (2006). Çocuk eğitiminde Montessori yaklaşımı. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 243-256.
• Sarıaydın, M., Tekbaş, S., Tuncay, G. & Akgün, C. (2009). Montessori eğitimi uygulaması raporu. www.Shcek.gov.tr/userfiles/MontessoriEgitimiuygulamaRaporu.pdf (Erişim Tarihi, 2012, 20 Ekim).
• Seldin, T. (2000). Montessori 101: Some basic information that every Montessori parent should know. Tomorrow’s Child Magazine, back to School, 8(5), 5-6.
• Seldin, T.D. (2002). Maria Montessori’s biography. Gale Enchclopedia of Education. http://www.asnwers.com/topic/maria-montessori (Erişim Tarihi, 2012,22 Ekim)
• Singh, R. (2005). The Montessori method. Seminar- New Delhi, 546, 38-43.
• Temel, Z. F. (1994). Montessori'nin görüşleri ve egitim yaklaşımı. Okul Öncesi Eğitimi Dergisi, 26(47),18-22.
• Tubaki, M. & Matsuishi, T. (2008). On the pedegogical theory of Maria Montessori. Journal of Disability and Medico- Pedagogy, 18,1-4.
• Tuckman, W. B. (1991). Educational pscyhology. Harcourt Brace Javanovich College Publication, New York.