Sosyal Çalışmada Kesişimsellik

Year 2020, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 699 - 725, 27.04.2020

Meliha Funda Afyonoğlu

https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.689618

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırma, feminist teoride gelişen yaklaşımlardan biri olan kesişimselliğe ve sosyal çalışma disiplini ve mesleği için kesişimselliğin ihtiva ettiklerine yönelik bir alan-yazın değerlendirmesi yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, öncelikle sosyal çalışmada kesişimselliğin neden gerekli olduğu gelişen sosyal çalışma tanımları üzerinden tartışılmakta, daha sonra kesişimsellik sınıflandırmalarına yönelik teorik bilgi verilmekte ve son olarak kesişimselliğin sosyal çalışma disiplinine yönelik katkılarına odaklanılmaktadır. Sosyal çalışmanın epistemolojik temelini güçlendirmesinin yanı sıra, hizmet verilen nüfusu farklılık ve çeşitlilik zemininde tanımak, sosyal çalışmacının kendisine ve mesleki rolüne dair öz-farkındalık kazanması ve sosyal çalışmacının sorun ve ihtiyaçlara yönelik çözüm önerileriyle sosyal politika geliştirilmesine zemin hazırlayarak sosyal adalete katkı sunması kesişimsellik yaklaşımının sosyal çalışmaya en önemli katkıları olarak sunulmaktadır.

Keywords

kesişimsellik, sosyal çalışmanın tanımlanması, feminist sosyal çalışma, sistematik kesişimsellik, sosyal inşacı kesişimsellik

Intersectionality in Social Work

Abstract

This research aims to make a literature review on intersectionality which is one of the developing approaches in feminist theory and on the implications of intersectionality for social work discipline and profession. In this respect, firstly the reasons why intersectionality is necessary in social work are discussed through the developing definitions of social work. This section tries to reveal the theoretical justification of the adoption of the intersectional approach in social work by focusing on the development of social work definitions of the International Federation of Social Workers and the International Association of Schools of Social Work and the standards of Council on Social Work Education. The following section focuses on definitions and classifications of the intersectionality, which are classified as "systematic intersectionality” and "constructionist intersectionality", through the differences and similarities between them. The final part focuses on the contributions of intersectionality to social work. Besides strengthening the epistemological basis of social work, the most important contributions are presented to know the clients on the ground of difference and diversity, to enhance self-awareness of the social worker and of her/his professional role, and to contribute to social justice agenda by producing solutions to the problems and needs of the clients.

Keywords

Intersectionality, defining social work, feminist social work, systematic intersectionality, constructionist intersectionality

References

• Afyonoğlu, M. F. (2019). Konya’da yaşayan Suriyeli kadınların sorun ve ihtiyaçlarıyla şekillenen şiddet deneyimi: Kesişimsellik perspektifinden bir sosyal çalışma değerlendirmesi. (Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya).
• Akbaş, E. (2014). Sosyal çalışmada çağdaş eleştirel perspektifler. Ankara: SABEV Yayınları.
• Atasü-Toğçuoğlu, R. (2016). Kadın hareketleri ve feminist bilgi birikiminin sosyal hizmetlere ve sosyal çalışmaya getirdiği açılımlar üstüne düşünceler. Şaşman Kaylı, D. & Şahin, F. (Ed.), Sosyal politikanın cinsiyet halleri: Toplumsal cinsiyet ve sosyal hizmet, içinde (s. 9-27). Ankara: Nika.
• Brah, A. & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5 (3), 75-86.
• Chan, CD. & Henesy, RK. (2018). Navigating intersectional approaches: Methods, and interdisciplinarity to health equity in LGBTQ+ communities. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 12 (4), 230-247.
• Choo, HY. & Ferree, MM. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28 (2), 129-49.
• Council on Social Work Education. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Erişim adresi: http://www.cswe.org/File.aspx?id=81660 , Erişim tarihi: 29.07.2018.
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist theory, 9(1), 67-85.
• Dill, BT., McLaughlin, AE., & Nieves, A. D. (2007). Future directions of feminist research: Intersectionality. Hesse-Biber, SN. (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist research, içinde (s. 629-327). Calif: SAGE.
• Erez, E., Adelman, M. & Gregory, C. (2009). Intersections of immigration and domestic violence: Voices of battered immigrant women. Feminist Criminology, 4 (1), 32–56.
• Grzanka, PR. (2014). Praise for Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader. London: Routledge.
• Hulko, W. (2009). The time- and context-contingent nature of intersectionality and interlocking oppressions. Affilia, 24(1), 44–55.
• Hunting, G. Grace, D.& Hankivsky, O. (2015). Taking action on stigma and discrimination: An intersectionality-informed model of social inclusion and exclusion. A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Policy, and Practice, 4 (2), 101–125.
• International Association of Social Workers. Global Definition of Social Work. (2011). Erişim linki: https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-definition-of-social-work-review-of-the-global-definition/ ,Erişim tarihi 03.01.2019.
• International Association of Social Workers. Global Definition of Social Work. (2014). Erişim linki: https://www.iassw-aiets.org/global-definition-of-social-work-review-of-the-global-definition/,Erişim tarihi 03.01.2019.
• Irene, YH. (2014). New social work definition, new research opportunities, new perspectives. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 24(3), 127-128.
• Jani, J. Pierce, D. Ortiz, L.& Sowbel, L. (2011). Access to intersectionality, content to competence: deconstructing social work education diversity standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(2), 283-301.
• Jordan-Zachery, J. (2007). Am I a black woman or a woman who is black? A few thoughts on the meaning of intersectionality. Politics & Gender, 3(2), 254-263.
• Ken, I. (2008). Beyond the intersection: a new culinary metaphor for race-class-gender studies. Sociological Theory, 26 (2), 152-172.
• Lee, E.& Brotman, S. (2013). Speak out! Structural ıntersectionality and anti-oppressive practice with LGBTQ refugees in Canada. Canadian Social Work Review, 30 (2), 157-183.
• Lutz, H. (2014). Intersectionality's (brilliant) career-how to understand the attraction of the concept? Erişim adresi: https://www.fb03.uni-frankfurt.de/51634119/Lutz_WP.pdf , Erişim tarihi: 05.04.2018.
• Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to ıntersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York: Routledge.
• Mattsson, T. (2014). Intersectionality as a useful tool: Anti-oppressive social work and critical reflection. Affilia, 29 (1), 8–17.
• McCall, L. (2008). The complexity of intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800.
• Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia, 25(4), 417–430.
• Murphy, Y., Hunt, V., Zajicek, A. M., Norris, A. N., & Hamilton, L. (2009). Incorporating intersectionality in social work practice. research, policy, and education. Washington Dc: NASW Press.
• Nash, JC. (2008).Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89 (1), 1-15.
• Ornellas, A., Spolander, G, & Engelbrecht LK. (2018). The global social work definition: Ontology, implications and challenges. Journal of Social Work, 18 (2), 222–240.
• Özgür, Ö. (2014). Çokkültürcü sosyal çalışma. Ankara: SABEV Yayınları.
• Phoenix, A. & Pattynama, P. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13 (3), 187-192.
• Phoenix, A. (2006). Interrogating intersectionality: Productive ways of theorising multiple positioning. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 2 (3), 21-30.
• Prins, B. (2006). Narrative accounts of origins: a blind spot in the intersectional approach? European Journal of Women's Studies, 13 (3), 277-90.
• Roland, JC. (2017). Measuring receptivity to intersectionality: Bridging theory and practice. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Texas Woman’s University, Texas).
• Samuels, GM.& Ross-Sheriff, F. (2008). Identity, oppression, and power: Feminisms and intersectionality theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• Shields, SA. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex roles, 59 (5), 301-311.
• Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 11(2), 101-110.
• Thompson, N. (2016). Güç ve güçlendirme. Ankara: NİKA Yayınları.
• Truell, R. (2014). Report to the IFSW 2014 general meeting on the review of the global definition of social work. Erişim adresi: http://cdn.ifsw.org/assets/ifsw_94359-2.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 20.12.2019.
• Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: a challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 10-21.
• Vidales, GT. (2010). Arrested justice the multifaceted plight of immigrant latinas who faced domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25 (6), 533-544.
• Warner, LR. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59 (5), 454-463.
• Women’s Rights and Economic Change. (2004). Intersectionality: a tool for gender and economic justice. Erişim adresi:https://www.awid.org/publications/intersectionality-tool-gender-and-economic-justice ,Erişim tarihi: 15.05.2019.
• Yates, HT.& Rai, A. (2018). A scoping review of feminism in u.s. social work education: Strategies and implications for the contemporary classroom. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 1-13.
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13 (3), 193-209.