Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Statement of Ethics for the Journal of Toplumsal Tarih Akademi
Toplumsal Tarih Akademi journal adheres to principles of publication ethics. These principles are derived from widely recognized and respected national and international declarations of ethical standards. On a national level, the journal follows the guidelines set forth by the YÖK ÜAK’s Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi. Internationally, the journal upholds the ethical standards articulated by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
Violations of Publication Ethics – YÖK ÜAK Principles
The main violations of publication ethics include plagiarism, falsification, fabrication, redundant publication, slicing, and unfair authorship. In addition, failure to acknowledge research funding, using data from incomplete studies without the permission of the author, also fall under the scope of ethical breaches. The details of these violations are outlined in Article 4 of the Yönerge… issued by the YÖK ÜAK. This article succinctly presents the moral rules authors are expected to follow. We expect authors who submit their valuable works to our journal to act in accordance with Article 4. Authors can access the relevant directive via the link below:
https://bit.ly/4h05Flg  
International Publication Ethics – COPE Principles
At the World Conference on Research Integrity held in Singapore in 2011, scientists convened to reach consensus on certain ethical principles for both authors and editors.
The ethical principles agreed upon for authors are aligned with the YÖK ÜAK directive mentioned in the previous section but are more detailed. These principles include reliability, honesty, balance, originality, transparency, proper attribution of authorship and contributions, accountability, adherence to the peer review process and publishing agreements, and ethical considerations regarding individuals and living subjects related to the publication. Authors can access the detailed authorship principles set forth by COPE via the following link:
https://bit.ly/400bbON    
Reference: Kleinert, S., & Wager, E. (2011). Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors. A Position Statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Chapter 50 in: Mayer, T., & Steneck, N. (eds.) Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment. Imperial College Press / World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (pp. 309-16). (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7)

COPE has also announced ethical guidelines for scientists serving as editors. These include being responsible for journal content, maintaining editorial independence and integrity, ensuring editorial confidentiality, encouraging complete reporting of authorship, responding to critiques, operating a fair peer review process, and managing editorial decisions appropriately. The detailed ethical principles for editors can be accessed via the link below:
https://bit.ly/4dDs7xH    
Reference: Kleinert, S., & Wager, E. (2011). Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Editors. A Position Statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Chapter 51 in: Mayer, T., & Steneck, N. (eds.) Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment. Imperial College Press / World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (pp. 317-28). (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7)
Peer Review Process
Toplumsal Tarih Akademi journal submits research articles to two anonymous reviewers if they pass the editor's evaluation. The anonymous reviewers recommend one of the following decisions: rejection, minor revision, major revision, or acceptance. The editor then makes a final decision based on both reviewers' reports, opting for rejection, minor revision, major revision, or acceptance. In certain cases, the editor may invite a third reviewer. Toplumsal Tarih Akademi journal does not publish peer review reports.
COPE has also outlined ethical principles for scientists acting as reviewers. These include professional responsibility, disclosure of conflicts of interest, timely submission of the review, maintaining confidentiality, and reporting ethical violations by authors. Details regarding these principles can be found via the link below:
https://bit.ly/3TZdHkr    
Reference: COPE Council. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers – English. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9 

Last Update Time: 10/11/24, 12:30:49 AM

Greetings with Our Fifth Issue!

We are delighted to present the latest issue of Toplumsal Tarih Akademi journal. This issue marks the fifth since the journal began its journey in December 2022, but it stands out as the first to not center around a thematic dossier. It also represents our initial experience transitioning from editorial assistants to full editors of the journal. We ask for your forgiveness in advance for any shortcomings.

We extend our gratitude to our former editors, Yaşar Tolga Cora and Nurşen Gürboğa, who rapidly transformed the journal into one of the key publications of the History Foundation. We also thank the former President of the History Foundation and the journal’s former editor-in-chief, Mehmet Ö. Alkan, for his pioneering role in launching the journal. We are fully aware of the responsibility placed on our shoulders to carry the journal forward. With the support of our Editorial Board members and an expanding team of editors, we aim to fulfill this responsibility to the best of our ability.

At this point, we wish to thank our new section editors, who took on the responsibility of shaping the journal with us at the September 2024 Editorial Board meeting, marking the transition in the journal’s management. Our thanks go to Gülhan Balsoy and Cihangir Gündoğdu, who joined as book review editors, and Deniz Türker, who is now overseeing the document review section. We are immensely grateful for their energetic contributions to the process. While Nurşen Gürboğa has passed on the role of editor to us, she continues as the journal’s editor-in-chief. Her guidance and the bridges she builds with the History Foundation’s administration are invaluable to us. We also extend our gratitude to Emre Erkan, our Turkish language editor, who worked meticulously and swiftly to prepare articles for publication, and to our layout editor, Aşkın Yücel Seçkin, for her careful and prompt efforts. Our heartfelt thanks also go to our anonymous referees, the unseen heroes who guide our authors through their revisions.

Our decision to produce this issue with free-topic articles, coupled with changes in our management structure during the process, resulted in some delays. We are particularly grateful to our authors for their patience and understanding.

This issue features four research articles, three document reviews, four book reviews, and an obituary. Let us first introduce the research articles in our fifth issue. The first, authored by Nurhan Davutyan, is titled “The Ottoman Moratorium of 1875 could have been Prevented.” This study provides a fresh perspective on the developments leading to the establishment of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration, which violated the fiscal sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire. Drawing on extensive resources and statistical analysis, Davutyan argues that financial measures proposed by Mehmed Emin Ali Pasha in 1867 could have averted the moratorium if implemented earlier, rather than in 1879.

The second article is a collaborative work by Murat Tülek, Jean-François Pérouse, and Funda Ferhanoğlu, titled “Jacques Pervititch before 1922.” This detailed study focuses on the early life and career of Pervititch, a pivotal figure in Istanbul’s cartographic history, before he began creating insurance maps of the city. Rich with visual materials, including one featured on our cover, the article offers valuable insights into Pervititch’s family life, professional development, and early maps.

Our third research article, “Governing the Exception, Negotiating Justice: The Law of the Mountains, Feud Settlements, and Hybrid Punishments in Shkodra,” takes us to the Albanian lands of the late Ottoman period. In this study, Ebru Aykut examines Ottoman governance strategies amidst local mountain laws and centralization efforts. By applying Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality to a series of cases, the article sheds light on fascinating historical events in Shkodra, offering a rewarding read for our audience.

The fourth article bridges natural history and historical research. Titled ““Why the Cormorant?” A 19th-Century Ottoman Intellectual's Perspective on the Lexical History of Karabatak,” Tarkan Murat Akkaya analyzes an 1899 newspaper article on the cormorant bird. This engaging piece explores the origins of bird names, contributing a unique perspective to the field of nomenclature, specifically regarding the cormorant.

Under the editorial guidance of Deniz Türker, our document review section aims to draw attention to overlooked historical documents and present creative interpretations of them. Filiz Yazıcıoğlu’s study highlights the significance of petitions as sources, examining those written by a telegraph operator, Mehmet Tevfik Bey, during the reign of Abdul Hamid II. Mertkan Karaca reviews a 1909 article by Halil Edhem Bey, brother of Osman Hamdi Bey, shedding light on the history of the Imperial Museum, now the Istanbul Archaeological Museum. Aysel Yıldız examines two letters that narrate the remarkable life of a Janissary, İbrahim Ben Ali, born in Istanbul in 1756, who endured captivity in Russia and eventually emigrated to the United States.

Our book review section, edited by Gülhan Balsoy and Cihangir Gündoğdu, features analyses of recent publications focusing on various periods of Ottoman and Republican history. Ekrem Yener reviews Ümit Kurt’s Kanun ve Nizam Dairesi’nde Soykırım Teknokratı Mustafa Reşat Mimaroğlu’nun İzinde Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e Devlet Mekanizması, while Melis Cankara critiques Uğur Zekeriya Peçe’s Island and Empire: How Civil War in Crete Mobilized the Ottoman World. Ayşe Hilal Uğurlu examines Ali Akyıldız’s Mabeyn-i Hümayun: Osmanlı Saray Teşkilatının Modernleşmesi, and Numan Deniz discusses Nir Shafir’s The Order and Disorder of Communication: Pamphlets and Polemics in Seventeenth-Century Ottoman Empire.

Finally, our obituary section commemorates historian, teacher, and writer Necdet Sakaoğlu, known for his work on local, urban, Seljuk, Ottoman, and educational history. Fahri Aral honors his memory with a heartfelt piece.

According to our Editorial Board's decision, the journal will now publish themed issues in June and open-call issues in December. We encourage you to follow the calls for papers announced on DergiPark and the History Foundation’s website. The deadline for submissions to our December 2025 issue is June 15, 2025, through the DergiPark system.

We value the development of social historiography and the creation of platforms for free and critical thought, especially for publishing high-quality Turkish articles. Toplumsal Tarih Akademi aims to combine the History Foundation’s long-standing tradition of critical publishing with the international standards of academic publishing. To this end, we are actively pursuing the indexing of our journal in national and international databases. Your constructive criticism and contributions are vital to us, and we eagerly await your feedback.

Enjoy reading and have a wonderful year ahead.

Editors of Toplumsal Tarih Akademi
Firuzan Melike Sümertaş & Sırrı Emrah Üçer