Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad

Year 2004, Volume: 68 Issue: 252, 423 - 430, 20.08.2004
https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2004.423

Abstract

In the middle of the sixth century, a new nomad power emerged in central Asia. A federation led by Turkic groups which rapidly impinged on the Persian empire after the subjugation of the Hephtalites and had an impact on the Roman empire through the flight westwards of the Avars. As a result, both Romans and Persians were soon in diplomatic contact with the Turkish Kagan, and considerable evidence for this process is presented in the fragments of the Greek historian Menandros Protector, with useful supporting material in the historian Theophylact Simocatta and the Syriac author John of Ephesus. This diplomacy had both an economic aspect, the ability of the Turks to intervene in the silk trade, and a strategic one, since both Roman and Persian empires could view the Turks as useful allies against their traditional rival in the Near East. The Turks could attack Persia through the former territory of the Hephtalites, while they could take over Roman possesions in the Crimea.

References

  • Anderson, A. Runni, Alexander's Gate, Gog and Magog, and the Inclosed Nations's, Massachusetts 1982.
  • Chrysos, E., "Byzantine Diplomacy, AD. 300-800: means and ends", In Byzantine Diplomacy, edited by Jonathan Shephard and Simon Franklin, Hampshire 1992.
  • Corripus, In Laudem Iustini, translated by Averil Cameron, London 1976.
  • H. W. Haussig, "Theophylakts Exkurs über die Skythischen Volkes", Byzantion, 23 (1953), 275-462.
  • Herodotus, The Historia, translated by George Rawlinson, London 1936.
  • Kafesoğlu, İbrahim, Türk Milli Kültürü, Boğaziçi yayınları, dördüncü baskı (İstanbul) 1986.
  • Maurice, Strategicon, translated by George T. Dennis, Philadelphia 1984.
  • Menandros, The History of Menandros the Guardsman, edited & translated by R.C. Blockley, Liverpool 1985.
  • Orhun Abideleri, translated by Muharrem Ergin, Istanbul 1984.
  • Ostrogorsky, J., History of the Byzantine State, translated by Joan Hussey, Oxford 1968.
  • Procopius, The Secret History, translated by G. A. Williamson, Penguin Series, London 1988.
  • Wars, translated by H. B. Dewing, Loeb Series, Vol I and VIII, Norwich 1979.
  • Sertkaya, Osman Fikri, Göktürk Tarihinin Meseleleri, Probleme der köktürkischen Geschichte: Der Name "Gross (=Byzanz)" in den köktürkischen Inschriften, Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü yayınları seri IV, sayı A 40, Ankara 1995, 134-152 (aynı makale Central Asiatic Journal, 26/1-2, 1982, s. 122-130'de basılmıştır).
  • Theophylactus Simocattes, The History of Theophylactus Simocatta, translated by Michael and Mary Whitby, Oxford 1986.
Year 2004, Volume: 68 Issue: 252, 423 - 430, 20.08.2004
https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2004.423

Abstract

References

  • Anderson, A. Runni, Alexander's Gate, Gog and Magog, and the Inclosed Nations's, Massachusetts 1982.
  • Chrysos, E., "Byzantine Diplomacy, AD. 300-800: means and ends", In Byzantine Diplomacy, edited by Jonathan Shephard and Simon Franklin, Hampshire 1992.
  • Corripus, In Laudem Iustini, translated by Averil Cameron, London 1976.
  • H. W. Haussig, "Theophylakts Exkurs über die Skythischen Volkes", Byzantion, 23 (1953), 275-462.
  • Herodotus, The Historia, translated by George Rawlinson, London 1936.
  • Kafesoğlu, İbrahim, Türk Milli Kültürü, Boğaziçi yayınları, dördüncü baskı (İstanbul) 1986.
  • Maurice, Strategicon, translated by George T. Dennis, Philadelphia 1984.
  • Menandros, The History of Menandros the Guardsman, edited & translated by R.C. Blockley, Liverpool 1985.
  • Orhun Abideleri, translated by Muharrem Ergin, Istanbul 1984.
  • Ostrogorsky, J., History of the Byzantine State, translated by Joan Hussey, Oxford 1968.
  • Procopius, The Secret History, translated by G. A. Williamson, Penguin Series, London 1988.
  • Wars, translated by H. B. Dewing, Loeb Series, Vol I and VIII, Norwich 1979.
  • Sertkaya, Osman Fikri, Göktürk Tarihinin Meseleleri, Probleme der köktürkischen Geschichte: Der Name "Gross (=Byzanz)" in den köktürkischen Inschriften, Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü yayınları seri IV, sayı A 40, Ankara 1995, 134-152 (aynı makale Central Asiatic Journal, 26/1-2, 1982, s. 122-130'de basılmıştır).
  • Theophylactus Simocattes, The History of Theophylactus Simocatta, translated by Michael and Mary Whitby, Oxford 1986.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Archaeology
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri
Authors

Hatice Erdemir This is me

Publication Date August 20, 2004
Published in Issue Year 2004 Volume: 68 Issue: 252

Cite

APA Erdemir, H. (2004). The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad. BELLETEN, 68(252), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2004.423
AMA Erdemir H. The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad. TTK BELLETEN. August 2004;68(252):423-430. doi:10.37879/belleten.2004.423
Chicago Erdemir, Hatice. “The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad”. BELLETEN 68, no. 252 (August 2004): 423-30. https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2004.423.
EndNote Erdemir H (August 1, 2004) The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad. BELLETEN 68 252 423–430.
IEEE H. Erdemir, “The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad”, TTK BELLETEN, vol. 68, no. 252, pp. 423–430, 2004, doi: 10.37879/belleten.2004.423.
ISNAD Erdemir, Hatice. “The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad”. BELLETEN 68/252 (August 2004), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2004.423.
JAMA Erdemir H. The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad. TTK BELLETEN. 2004;68:423–430.
MLA Erdemir, Hatice. “The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad”. BELLETEN, vol. 68, no. 252, 2004, pp. 423-30, doi:10.37879/belleten.2004.423.
Vancouver Erdemir H. The Nature of Turko-Byzantine Relations in the Sixth Century Ad. TTK BELLETEN. 2004;68(252):423-30.