Trafikte Ergenlerin Cinsiyet Kalıp Yargıları: Cinsiyet ve Aile İlişkilerinin Rolü

Abstract

Araştırmalar, erkek ve kadın sürücüler arasında, erkek sürücülerin daha fazla trafik cezası alması ve kadın sürücülerin daha fazla hata yapması gibi bir dizi farklılık olduğunu göstermektedir. Gözlemlenen bu cinsiyet farklılığına bağlı olarak, sürüş bağlamında toplumsal cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının ve belirleyicilerinin varlığını inceleyen nispeten az sayıda araştırma yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki ergenlerin kadın ve erkek sürücü algılarını ve cinsiyet farklılıklarının ve ebeveynlerle ilişkilerin cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının onaylanmasına nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu incelemiştir. Çalışma, Sürücülükle İlişkili Cinsiyet Kalıp Yargıları (SSAD) ve demografik bilgi formundan oluşan bir anket paketini dolduran 15-20 yaş arası 128 lise çağındaki ergen (M = 16.25, SD = 1.32) ile yürütülmüştür. Cinsiyet stereotipi onay endeksleri açısından, kız ergenler kadın sürücüleri daha kibar ve riskten kaçınan olarak bildirirken, erkek ergenler erkek sürücüleri daha becerikli olarak bildirmiştir. Babalarla olumlu bir ilişki nezaket ve riskten kaçınma kalıp yargılarının onaylanmasını azaltırken, annelerle daha iyi bir ilişki sürüş becerileri kalıp yargısının daha az onaylanmasıyla sonuçlanmıştır. Sonuçlar, ergenler arasında cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının varlığına ve aile ilişkilerinin cinsiyet kalıp yargılarının onaylanması açısından önemine dair kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Bulgular, erken yaşta kalıp yargılara odaklanan eğitim ve müdahale çalışmalarının tasarlanmasında kullanılabilir.

Keywords

• cinsiyet kalıp yargıları
• sürücü kalıp yargıları
• ergenlik
• cinsiyet farklılığı
• ebeveyn-çocuk ilişkisi

Sex Stereotypes of Adolescents in Traffic: The Role of Sex and Family Relationships

Abstract

Studies have shown a number of differences between male and female drivers, such as male drivers committing more offenses and female drivers making more errors. Related to this persistent sex difference, relatively little research has been conducted to examine the presence of gender stereotypes and determinants in the context of driving. This study examined the perceptions of female and male drivers among adolescents in Türkiye and how sex differences and relationships with parents contributed to the endorsement of sex stereotypes. The study was conducted with 128 high school adolescents aged 15-20 years (M = 16.25, SD = 1.32) who completed a questionnaire package consisting of the Sex Stereotypes Associated with Driving (SSAD) and a demographic information form. In terms of sex stereotype endorsement indices, female adolescents reported female drivers as more polite and risk-averse, whereas male adolescents reported male drivers as more skilled. While a positive relationship with fathers reduced the endorsement of courtesy and risk-avoidance stereotypes, a better relationship with mothers resulted in a lower endorsement of the driving skills stereotype. The results provide evidence for the existence of sex stereotypes among adolescents and for the importance of family relationships in relation to sex stereotype endorsement. The findings can be used to design training and education that focuses on stereotypes at an early age.

Keywords

• sex stereotypes
• driver stereotypes
• adolescence
• sex difference
• parent-child relationship

References

1. Acar, I. H., Pérez-González, S., Kutaka, T. S., & Yıldız, S. (2019). Difficult temperament and children’s peer relations: the moderating role of quality of parent–child relationships. Early Child Development and Care, 189(13), 2141-2155. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1439941
2. Agostinelli, F., Doepke, M., Sorrenti, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2020). It takes a village: the economics of parenting with neighborhood and peer effects (No. w27050). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w27050
3. Akdemir, S., & Gölge, Z. B. (2022). The role of gender stereotypes, sexual myths, and professional experience on the attitudes toward female-perpetrated sexual abuse among Turkish professionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221086571
4. Aktaş, A., & Akgür, S. A. (2023). Road rage behaviours among road users in Turkey. Traffic Safety Research, 4, 000031. doi: 10.55329/guim6548
5. Aunola, K., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2000). Parenting styles and adolescents’ achievement strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 23(2), 205-222. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0308
6. Aznar, A., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2015). Gender and age differences in parent–child emotion talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 148-155. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12069
7. Aznar, A., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2020). Gender comparisons in mother-child emotion talk: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 82, 155-162. doi: 10.1007/s11199-019-01042-y
8. Bandura, A. (2008). Observational learning. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp 1-3). doi: 10.1002/9781405186407.wbieco004

9. Basfirinci, C., & Cilingir Uk, Z. (2017). Gender-based food stereotypes among Turkish university students. Young Consumers, 18(3), 223-244. doi: 10.1108/YC-12-2016-00653
10. Bianchi, A., & Summala, H. (2004). The “genetics” of driving behavior: parents’ driving style predicts their children’s driving style. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(4), 655-659. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00087-3
11. Cakir, S. G., & Aydin, G. (2005). Parental attitudes and ego identity status of Turkish adolescents. Adolescence, 40 (160), 847-859.
12. Chen, P., & Harris, K. M. (2019). Association of positive family relationships with mental health trajectories from adolescence to midlife. Jama Pediatrics, 173(12), e193336-e193336.
13. Coyne, S. M., Linder, J. R., Booth, M., Keenan‐Kroff, S., Shawcroft, J. E., & Yang, C. (2021). Princess power: Longitudinal associations between engagement with princess culture in preschool and gender stereotypical behavior, body esteem, and hegemonic masculinity in early adolescence. Child Development, 92(6), 2413-2430. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13633
14. Cullen, P., Möller, H., Woodward, M., Senserrick, T., Boufous, S., Rogers, K., Brown, J., & Ivers, R. (2021). Are there sex differences in crash and crash-related injury between men and women? A 13-year cohort study of young drivers in Australia. SSM-Population Health, 14, 100816. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100816
15. de Craen, S., Twisk, D. A., Hagenzieker, M. P., Elffers, H., & Brookhuis, K. A. (2011). Do young novice drivers overestimate their driving skills more than experienced drivers? Different methods lead to different conclusions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1660-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.024
16. de Winter, J. C., & Dodou, D. (2010). The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Safety Research, 41(6), 463-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007
17. del Río, M. F., Strasser, K., Cvencek, D., Susperreguy, M. I., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2019). Chilean kindergarten children’s beliefs about mathematics: Family matters. Developmental Psychology, 55(4), 687–702. doi: 10.1037/dev0000658
18. del Río, M. F., Susperreguy, M. I., Strasser, K., Cvencek, D., Iturra, C., Gallardo, I., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2021). Early sources of children’s math achievement in Chile: The role of parental beliefs and feelings about math. Early Education and Development, 32(5), 637-652. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2020.1799617
19. Deniz, P., Lajunen, T., Özkan, T., & Gaygısız, E. (2021). Masculinity, femininity, and angry drivers: Masculinity and femininity as moderators between driver anger and anger expression style among young drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 161, 106347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106347
20. Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 279–294. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.279
21. Elliott, M. A., & Baughan, C. J. (2004). Developing a self-report method for investigating adolescent road user behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(6), 373-393. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2004.10.002
22. Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., & Mesman, J. (2018). The gendered family process model: An integrative framework of gender in the family. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 877-904. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1185-8
23. Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Mesman, J. (2016). Gender-differentiated parenting revisited: Meta-analysis reveals very few differences in parental control of boys and girls. PloS One, 11(7), e0159193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159193
24. Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., van der Pol, L. D., van Berkel, S. R., Hallers‐Haalboom, E. T., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & Mesman, J. (2017). Gender differences in child aggression: Relations with gender‐differentiated parenting and parents’ gender‐role stereotypes. Child Development, 88(1), 299-316. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12589
25. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
26. Frater, J., Kuijer, R., & Kingham, S. (2017). Why adolescents don’t bicycle to school: Does the prototype/willingness model augment the theory of planned behaviour to explain intentions?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.03.005
27. González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Luengo-Martín, M. Á. (2012). Driving anger and traffic violations: Gender differences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4), 404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.002
28. Granié, M. A., & Papafava, E. (2011). Gender stereotypes associated with vehicle driving among French preadolescents and adolescents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.002
29. Guého, L., Granié, M. A., & Abric, J. C. (2014). French validation of a new version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for drivers of all ages and level of experiences. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 63, 41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.024
30. Guizzo, F., Moè, A., Cadinu, M., & Bertolli, C. (2019). The role of implicit gender spatial stereotyping in mental rotation performance. Acta Psychologica, 194, 63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.013
31. Hair, E. C., Moore, K. A., Garrett, S. B., Kinukawa, A., Lippman, L. H., & Michelson, E. (2005). The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 183–202). Springer Science + Business Media. doi: 10.1007/0-387-23823-9_12
32. Halpern, H. P., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2016). Parents’ gender ideology and gendered behavior as predictors of children’s gender-role attitudes: A longitudinal exploration. Sex Roles, 74, 527-542. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0539-0
33. Hastings, P. D., McShane, K. E., Parker, R., & Ladha, F. (2007). Ready to make nice: Parental socialization of young sons’ and daughters’ prosocial behaviors with peers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168 (2), 177–200. https ://doi.org/10.3200/gntp.168.2.177-200.
34. Haustein, S., Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2009). Car use of young adults: The role of travel socialization. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(2), 168-178. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.10.003
35. Hinde, R. A., & Stevenson‐Hinde, J. (1987). Implications of a relationships approach for the study of gender differences. Infant Mental Health Journal, 8(3), 221-236.
36. Hofstede Insights (n.d.). Country comparison tool. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool?countries=france%2Cturkey
37. Işık-Baş, H., Şahin-Acar, B., & Özen-Çıplak, A. (2018). Anne-ergen çiftlerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rolleriyle ilgili algısının içerik analizi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 21(41), 41-56.
38. Jacobs, J. E., Chhin, C. S., & Shaver, K. (2005). Longitudinal links between perceptions of adolescence and the social beliefs of adolescents: Are parents’ stereotypes related to beliefs held about and by their children?. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 61-72. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-3206-x
39. Jovanović, V. (2016). The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Quality of life Research, 25, 3173-3180. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5
40. Kågesten, A., Gibbs, S., Blum, R. W., Moreau, C., Chandra-Mouli, V., Herbert, A., & Amin, A. (2016). Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PloS One, 11(6), e0157805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157805
41. Kulik, L. (2002). Like-sex versus opposite-sex effects in transmission of gender role ideology from parents to adolescents in Israel. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6), 451-457. doi: 10.1023/A:1020263120774
42. Laapotti, S., & Keskinen, E. (2004). Has the difference in accident patterns between male and female drivers changed between 1984 and 2000?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(4), 577-584. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00064-2
43. Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2021). Driving behavior and skills. In: Vickerman, Roger (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Transportation. vol. 7 (pp. 59-64). UK: Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10657-8
44. Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers’ self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 307-318. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00068-H
45. Lukoševičiūtė, J., Gariepy, G., Mabelis, J., Gaspar, T., Joffė-Luinienė, R., & Šmigelskas, K. (2022). Single-item happiness measure features adequate validity among adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 884520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884520
46. Malmberg, L. E., Ehrman, J., & Lithén, T. (2005). Adolescents’ and parents’ future beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 28(6), 709-723. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.12.007
47. Mandic, S., Flaherty, C., Pocock, T., Mintoft-Jones, A., Frater, J., Chillón, P., & Bengoechea, E. G. (2016). Attitudes towards cycle skills training in New Zealand adolescents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.08.002
48. Martinussen, L. M., Møller, M., & Prato, C. G. (2014). Assessing the relationship between the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and the Driver Skill Inventory: Revealing sub-groups of drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.008
49. Martinussen, L. M., Møller, M., & Prato, C. G. (2017). Accuracy of young male drivers’ self-assessments of driving skill. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.03.001
50. Moè, A., Cadinu, M., & Maass, A. (2015). Women drive better if not stereotyped. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 85, 199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.021
51. Morrissey, K., Hallett, D., Bakhtiar, A., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2019). Implicit math-gender stereotype present in adults but not in 8th grade. Journal of Adolescence, 74, 173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.003
52. Morrongiello, B. A., & Hogg, K. (2004). Mothers’ reactions to children misbehaving in ways that can lead to injury: Implications for gender differences in children’s risk taking and injuries. Sex Roles, 50, 103–118. doi: 10.1023/b:sers.0000011076.43831.a6
53. Musaağaoğlu, C., & Güre, A. (2005). Ergenlerde davranışsal özerklik ile algılanan ana-baba tutumları arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(55), 95-98.
54. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). The promise of adolescence: realizing opportunity for all youth. The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25388.
55. Nordfjærn, T., & Şimşekoğlu, Ö. (2014). Empathy, conformity, and cultural factors related to aberrant driving behaviour in a sample of Urban Turkish drivers. Safety Science, 68, 55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.020
56. Nurmi, J. E., & Pulliainen, H. (1991). The changing parent-child relationship, self-esteem, and intelligence as determinants of orientation to the future during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 14(1), 35-51. doi: 10.1016/0140-1971(91)90044-r
57. Odden, H., & Rochat, P. (2004). Observational learning and enculturation. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(2), 39-50.
58. Öz, B., & Demirutku, K. (2018). Trafikte çocuk güvenliği: Temel unsurlar, tespitler ve öneriler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
59. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender‐role on aggressive driving, traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive behavior, 31(6), 547-558. doi: 10.1002/ab.20062
60. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers’ driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(4), 269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.005
61. Öztürk, İ., & Öz, B. (2021). Investigating young male and female road users’ pedestrian and driver behaviours. Psikoloji Çalışmaları - Studies in Psychology, 41(2), 581–614. doi: 10.26650/SP2020-0045
62. Öztürk, İ., & Öz, B. (under review). Female and male drivers’ stereotypes in relation to sex roles and driver skills.
63. Öztürk, İ., & Özkan, T. (2018). The relationship between driving skills and driver behaviors among young drivers. Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 1–15. doi: 10.38002/tuad.418260
64. Öztürk, İ., Özkan, Ö., & Öz, B. (2021). Investigating sex, masculinity and femininity in relation to impulsive driving and driving anger expression. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81, 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.009
65. Pojani, E., Van Acker, V., & Pojani, D. (2018). Cars as a status symbol: Youth attitudes toward sustainable transport in a post-socialist city Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 210-227. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.003
66. Portengen, C. M., van Baar, A. L., & Endendijk, J. J. (2023). A neurocognitive approach to studying processes underlying parents’ gender socialization. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1054886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054886
67. Pravossoudovitch, K. (2016). Hommes au volant, femmes au volant: l'influence des stéréotypes de sexe sur les comportements de conduite déclarés et effectifs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Marseille: Aix-Marseille Université.
68. Pravossoudovitch, K., Martha, C., Cury, F., & Granié, M. A. (2015). Sex and age differences in the endorsement of sex stereotypes associated with driving. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.94
69. Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?. Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315-1332. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335
70. Rowe, R., Roman, G. D., McKenna, F. P., Barker, E., & Poulter, D. (2015). Measuring errors and violations on the road: A bifactor modeling approach to the Driver Behavior Questionnaire. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, 118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.012
71. Sakallı Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A., & Gupta, A. (2021). Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Current Psychology, 40, 213-225. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9
72. Sanson, A. V., Letcher, P. L., & Havighurst, S. S. (2018). Child characteristics and their reciprocal effects on parenting. In M. R. Sanders & A. Morawska, Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan (pp. 337-370). Springer, Cham.
73. Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Emotions, behaviour, and the adolescent driver: A literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 50, 1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.019
74. Solbes-Canales, I., Valverde-Montesino, S., & Herranz-Hernández, P. (2020). Socialization of gender stereotypes related to attributes and professions among young Spanish school-aged children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00609
75. Steiger, S., Sowislo, J. F., Moeller, J., Lieb, R., Lang, U. E., & Huber, C. G. (2022). Personality, self-esteem, familiarity, and mental health stigmatization: a cross-sectional vignette-based study. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 10347.
76. Tarhan, Ö. (2022). Children’s understanding of the concept of social stereotypes. Child Indicators Research, 1-35. doi: 10.1007/s12187-021-09897-y
77. Taubman - Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., & Gillath, O. (2005). From parents to children—similarity in parents and offspring driving styles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(1), 19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2004.11.001
78. Thomsen, T., Kappes, C., Schwerdt, L., Sander, J., & Poller, C. (2017). Modelling goal adjustment in social relationships: Two experimental studies with children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 267-287. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12162
79. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2022). Karayolu Trafik Kaza İstatistikleri, 2021. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Karayolu-Trafik-Kaza-Istatistikleri-2021-45658
80. Üzümcüoğlu, Y. (2021). Trafik ortamında çocuklar ve trafik güvenliği. In Işık, H., Gönül, B., Türe Şakar, D., Gelişim psikolojisi bakış açısı ile toplum içinde çocuklar (pp. 187-204). Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.