Research Article

Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age

Number: 34 June 28, 2024
EN TR

Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age

Abstract

Archaeological excavations have been carried out intermittently since 1989 in Seyitomer Hoyuk, a medium-sized mound located 25 km northwest of Kutahya. Seyitomer Hoyuk excavation, a salvage excavation, aims to excavate the entire pile. The layers unearthed during the excavations are essential in that they are as a whole and reveal the architectural plans. The Middle Bronze (MBA) and Early Bronze III (EBA-III) periods and layers were unearthed during the rescue excavation at the mound. In this study, the mudbrick structures in the structures recovered from the settlements and spaces of the MBA and EBA-III layers were defined and named. 10 mudbrick samples taken from specific periods and locations were characterized, and their periodical properties were analyzed. Chemical compositions of mud brick samples were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and mineralogical, and phase compositions were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The bond structure properties of the mud brick samples were confirmed by comparing them with the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis results. In addition, some of the mudbrick samples, which are thought to have been exposed to periodic fires, were selected and subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and energy dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis, and the differences in the amount of deterioration in the mudbricks and the structural differences in the periodically used clays were revealed.

Keywords

Mudbrick Building Materials, Seyitomer Hoyuk, Early Bronze Age-III, Middle Bronze Age

Project Number

DPU BAP 2021-03

References

  1. Akkas, F., 2011. Investigating the Production Possibilities of Fibre-Reinforced Mud Brick Panel Wall. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, Master’s Thesis, İstanbul.
  2. Bilgen, A. N., 2012. Seyitomer Hoyuk 2011 Excavation Report. Kutahya.
  3. Bilgen, A. N., Bilgen, Z., 2015. Middle Bronze Age Settlement (IV. Layer). Seyitomer Hoyuk I, Pp. 61-118, İstanbul.
  4. Bilgen, A. N., Bilgen, Z., Cırakoglu, S., 2015. Early Bronze Age Settlement (V. Layer). Seyitomer Hoyuk I, Pp. 119-186, İstanbul.
  5. Dirican, T., Akyol, A. A., 2019. A Compilation Study of Mud Brick Wall Construction Methods in Anatolia. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, (23), Pp. 117- 126.
  6. Duran S., Cakırozu Civelek F., Aktuglu Y.K., 2016. Roof and Facade Materials in Adobe Buildings; Aksehir, Erdogdu, and Menderes Examples. 8. National Roof & Facade Symposium, 2– 3 June 2016 Mimar Sinan University of Fine Arts, İstanbul.
  7. İlaslı, A., 1996. Seyitomer Hoyugu 1993 Rescue Excavations, 6. Mkks, 24- 26 Nisan 1995 Didim, Ankara, S. 1-15.
  8. Khale, D., Chaudhary, R., 2007. Mechanism of Geopolymerization and Factors Influencing ıts Development: A Review, J Mater Sci, 42:729–746
  9. Melo, H. P., Cruz, A. J., Candeias, A., Mirão, J., Cardoso, A. M., Oliveira, M. J., & Valadas, S., 2014. Problems of Analysis by FTIR of Calcium Sulphate–Based Preparatory Layers: The Case of a Group of 16th-Century Portuguese Paintings. Archaeometry, 56(3), 513-526.
  10. Ormancı, Ö. Atasayar, Z., & Boso Hanyalı, Ö. 2024. Investigating the Middle Iron Age ceramics of Van Fortress through multi-analytical techniques. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, 313, 124103.
APA
Taşçı, E., Yıldızay, H., Ünan, N., & Dağcı Tekin, M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 34, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.1374064
AMA
1.Taşçı E, Yıldızay H, Ünan N, Dağcı Tekin M. Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age. TÜBA-AR. 2024;(34):37-52. doi:10.22520/tubaar.1374064
Chicago
Taşçı, Eda, Hale Yıldızay, Nazan Ünan, and Merve Dağcı Tekin. 2024. “Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, nos. 34: 37-52. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.1374064.
EndNote
Taşçı E, Yıldızay H, Ünan N, Dağcı Tekin M (June 1, 2024) Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 34 37–52.
IEEE
[1]E. Taşçı, H. Yıldızay, N. Ünan, and M. Dağcı Tekin, “Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age”, TÜBA-AR, no. 34, pp. 37–52, June 2024, doi: 10.22520/tubaar.1374064.
ISNAD
Taşçı, Eda - Yıldızay, Hale - Ünan, Nazan - Dağcı Tekin, Merve. “Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 34 (June 1, 2024): 37-52. https://doi.org/10.22520/tubaar.1374064.
JAMA
1.Taşçı E, Yıldızay H, Ünan N, Dağcı Tekin M. Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age. TÜBA-AR. 2024;:37–52.
MLA
Taşçı, Eda, et al. “Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 34, June 2024, pp. 37-52, doi:10.22520/tubaar.1374064.
Vancouver
1.Eda Taşçı, Hale Yıldızay, Nazan Ünan, Merve Dağcı Tekin. Analysis and Comparison of Mudbrick Building Materials from Seyitomer Hoyuk Early Bronze Age-III and Middle Bronze Age. TÜBA-AR. 2024 Jun. 1;(34):37-52. doi:10.22520/tubaar.1374064