Research Article

Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences

Number: 4 December 15, 2001
  • Ivan Gatsov
EN TR

Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences

Abstract

Bu yazıda Güney Bulgaristan'da ve Türkiye'nin Avrupa bölgesinde ele geçen Epipaleolitik ve Neolitik dönemlere ait yontma taş buluntu toplulukları anlatılmaktadır.Bu bölgelerdeki yontma taş buluntu toplulukları arasındaki benzerlik ve ayrılıkların incelenmesi, yapım teknolojisinde ve bir ölçüye kadar da tip ayırımında bir boşluk bulunduğuna işaret etmektedir. Neolitik Devre ait en erken yontma taş topluluğuna uygulanan makro-teknoloji, bu bölge için tipik bir kültürel ve kronolojik göstergeyi oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords

References

  1. BENECKE, N., 1998. "Animal remains from the Neolithic and Bronze Age Settlements at Kırklareli(Turkish Thrace)". Eds. H. BUITENHUIS, L.BARTOSIEWICH, .AM. CHYKE Archaeology of the Near East. ARC- publications 18, III, Groeningen: 172-179.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Archaeology of Europe, The Mediterranean and The Levant, Neolithic Age Archeology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ivan Gatsov This is me
Bulgaria

Publication Date

December 15, 2001

Submission Date

July 20, 2001

Acceptance Date

October 30, 2001

Published in Issue

Year 2001 Number: 4

APA
Gatsov, I. (2001). Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 4, 101-112. https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD
AMA
1.Gatsov I. Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences. TÜBA-AR. 2001;(4):101-112. https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD
Chicago
Gatsov, Ivan. 2001. “Epipalaeolithic//Mesolithic,/Neolithic/Periods/Chipped-Stone/Assemblages/from/Southern/Bulgaria/and/Northwest/Turkey:/Similarities/and/Differences”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, nos. 4: 101-12. https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD.
EndNote
Gatsov I (December 1, 2001) Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 4 101–112.
IEEE
[1]I. Gatsov, “Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences”, TÜBA-AR, no. 4, pp. 101–112, Dec. 2001, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD
ISNAD
Gatsov, Ivan. “Epipalaeolithic//Mesolithic,/Neolithic/Periods/Chipped-Stone/Assemblages/from/Southern/Bulgaria/and/Northwest/Turkey:/Similarities/and/Differences”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 4 (December 1, 2001): 101-112. https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD.
JAMA
1.Gatsov I. Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences. TÜBA-AR. 2001;:101–112.
MLA
Gatsov, Ivan. “Epipalaeolithic//Mesolithic,/Neolithic/Periods/Chipped-Stone/Assemblages/from/Southern/Bulgaria/and/Northwest/Turkey:/Similarities/and/Differences”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 4, Dec. 2001, pp. 101-12, https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD.
Vancouver
1.Ivan Gatsov. Epipalaeolithic/ Mesolithic, Neolithic Periods Chipped-Stone Assemblages from Southern Bulgaria and Northwest Turkey: Similarities and Differences. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 2001 Dec. 1;(4):101-12. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA47PF77HD

Publisher

34406

https://tuba.gov.tr/en 

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

 

34047   34057     34410   34061

 

TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permissions regarding commercial use or licensing exceptions, please contact the journal.