BibTex RIS Cite

DOĞU OVALIK KİLİKYA'DA DEMİR ÇAĞ - OSMANİYE ARAŞTIRMASI DEMİR ÇAĞ SERAMİKLERİ ÖN DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Year 2013, Issue: 16, 1657 - 1679, 01.01.2013

Abstract

Doğu Ovalık Kilikya Bölgesi'nde yapılan son araştırmalar bölgenin Demir Çağ tarihine ilişkin yeni bilgiler sun­maktadır. 2005 yılından beri yürütülen Osmaniye Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştırması Neolitik dönemden Ortaçağ'a kadar dönemlere ait değişik kültür malzemeleri taşıyan 40 höyük yerleşimini belgelemiştir. Bu çalışmada, araştırmanın tes­piti Demir Çağ seramikleri incelenerek Osmaniye ve bölge dışında tespit edilmiş olanlar ile kıyaslanacaktır. Her ne kadar, komşu bölgelerden etki sürekli ve güçlü olsa da, bu incelemenin sonuçları, siyasi ve ekonomik olarak bölgede hüküm sürmüş ve yerel halka tezat çok fazla yazılı kaynak bırakmış Asur, Grek, Fenike, Kıbrıs ve Pers gibi yabancı kültürlerinin etkileri altında olmayan farklı geleneklerin varlığını vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, Yüzeyden derlenmiş se­ramik örneklerin kesin zaman dizinsel tanımlanmasında çok dikkatli olmak gerekse de, güvenli kültür tabakalarından edinilmiş malzemeler ile karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme yaparak çok değerli bilgi sağlamaktadır.

References

  • ARSLAN, N. 2011. Kilikya Demir Çağ Seramiği. İthal Boyalı Seramikler ve İlişkiler. İstanbul.
  • BING, J. 1969. A History of Cilicia during the Assyrian Period (Indiana University Unpublished PhD Thesis). Ann Arbor.
  • CANEVA, I/SEVİN, V. 2004. Mersin-Yumuktepe: A. Reappraisal. Galatina.
  • CASABONNE, O. 2004. La Cilicie à L'époque achéméninde. Paris.
  • ÇAMBEL, H. 1999. Corpus of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions I I: Karatepe-Aslantaş. Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 8.2. Berlin.
  • ÇAMBEL, H/ÖZYAR, A. 2003. Karatepe-Aslantaş. Azatiwataya. Die Bildwerke. Mainz.
  • COLDSTREAM, J. N. 1977. Geometric Greece. London.
  • DUPRÉ, S. 1983. La céramique de l'Âge du Bronze et de l'Âge du Fer. Paris.
  • FUCHS, A. 1994. Die Inschriften Sargons II. aus Khorsabad. Göttingen.
  • GARSTANG, J. 1937. Prehistoric Mersin. Oxford.
  • GARSTANG, J.1953. Prehistoric Mersin. Yümüktepe in Southeastern Turkey. Oxford.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1950. Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus. The Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Volume I . Princeton.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1956. Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus. From the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. Vol. II. Princeton.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1963. Excavations in Gözlü Kule, Tarsus, Vol. III. Princeton.
  • GRAYSON, A. K. 1996. Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC II (858-745 BC). The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Assyrian Periods, Vol. 3.Toronto.
  • HAWKINS, J.D. 2000. Inscriptions of the Iron Age, in Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Vol. I . New York.
  • KOZAL, E. 2006. Anatolien im 2. Jt. v.u.Z. und die Hinterlassenschaften materieller Kultur aus dem Ostmittelmeerraum, insbesondere Zyperns. Dissertation. Tübingen, in: http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-24811.
  • ORTHMANN, W. 1971. Untersuchungen zur späthethitischen Kunst. Bonn.
  • ÖZYAR, A. 2005. Field Seasons 2001-2003 of the Tarsus-Gözlükule Interdisciplinary Research Project. İstanbul.
  • YAMADA, S. 2000. The Construction of the Assyrian Empire. A Historical Study of the Inscriptions of Shalmaneser III (859-824 BC) Relating to His Campaigns to the West. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 3. Leiden.

THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY

Year 2013, Issue: 16, 1657 - 1679, 01.01.2013

Abstract

New investigations in the region of the East Plain Cilicia offer remarkable insights into the Iron Age history of this ™ region. The Osmaniye Archaeological Survey, being conducted since 2005, comprises more than 40 archaeological mounds that have yielded a large variety of material culture, from the Neolithic period to medieval times. In this article, the Iron Age pottery of the survey will be analyzed and compared with other sources from Osmaniye, as well as from the surrounding areas. Even though the influences of the neighboring areas were continuous and strong, the results of this analysis emphasize the existence of different traditions, mostly independent of the influences offoreign cultures, such as the Assyrian, Greek, Phoenician, Cypriot, and Persian cultures that dominated the area politically or commercially and, unlike the local population, left a large quantity of written sources. Although the pottery survey should be handled with care regarding definite chronological statements, it provides highly valuable information through comparative analysis with stratified material

References

  • ARSLAN, N. 2011. Kilikya Demir Çağ Seramiği. İthal Boyalı Seramikler ve İlişkiler. İstanbul.
  • BING, J. 1969. A History of Cilicia during the Assyrian Period (Indiana University Unpublished PhD Thesis). Ann Arbor.
  • CANEVA, I/SEVİN, V. 2004. Mersin-Yumuktepe: A. Reappraisal. Galatina.
  • CASABONNE, O. 2004. La Cilicie à L'époque achéméninde. Paris.
  • ÇAMBEL, H. 1999. Corpus of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions I I: Karatepe-Aslantaş. Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 8.2. Berlin.
  • ÇAMBEL, H/ÖZYAR, A. 2003. Karatepe-Aslantaş. Azatiwataya. Die Bildwerke. Mainz.
  • COLDSTREAM, J. N. 1977. Geometric Greece. London.
  • DUPRÉ, S. 1983. La céramique de l'Âge du Bronze et de l'Âge du Fer. Paris.
  • FUCHS, A. 1994. Die Inschriften Sargons II. aus Khorsabad. Göttingen.
  • GARSTANG, J. 1937. Prehistoric Mersin. Oxford.
  • GARSTANG, J.1953. Prehistoric Mersin. Yümüktepe in Southeastern Turkey. Oxford.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1950. Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus. The Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Volume I . Princeton.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1956. Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus. From the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. Vol. II. Princeton.
  • GOLDMAN, H. 1963. Excavations in Gözlü Kule, Tarsus, Vol. III. Princeton.
  • GRAYSON, A. K. 1996. Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC II (858-745 BC). The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Assyrian Periods, Vol. 3.Toronto.
  • HAWKINS, J.D. 2000. Inscriptions of the Iron Age, in Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Vol. I . New York.
  • KOZAL, E. 2006. Anatolien im 2. Jt. v.u.Z. und die Hinterlassenschaften materieller Kultur aus dem Ostmittelmeerraum, insbesondere Zyperns. Dissertation. Tübingen, in: http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-24811.
  • ORTHMANN, W. 1971. Untersuchungen zur späthethitischen Kunst. Bonn.
  • ÖZYAR, A. 2005. Field Seasons 2001-2003 of the Tarsus-Gözlükule Interdisciplinary Research Project. İstanbul.
  • YAMADA, S. 2000. The Construction of the Assyrian Empire. A Historical Study of the Inscriptions of Shalmaneser III (859-824 BC) Relating to His Campaigns to the West. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 3. Leiden.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

Füsun Tülek This is me

Birgül Öğüt This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Issue: 16

Cite

APA Tülek, F., & Öğüt, B. (2013). THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi(16), 1657-1679.
AMA Tülek F, Öğüt B. THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY. TÜBA-AR. January 2013;(16):1657-1679.
Chicago Tülek, Füsun, and Birgül Öğüt. “THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 16 (January 2013): 1657-79.
EndNote Tülek F, Öğüt B (January 1, 2013) THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 16 1657–1679.
IEEE F. Tülek and B. Öğüt, “THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY”, TÜBA-AR, no. 16, pp. 1657–1679, January2013.
ISNAD Tülek, Füsun - Öğüt, Birgül. “THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 16 (January2013), 1657-1679.
JAMA Tülek F, Öğüt B. THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY. TÜBA-AR. 2013;:1657–1679.
MLA Tülek, Füsun and Birgül Öğüt. “THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 16, 2013, pp. 1657-79.
Vancouver Tülek F, Öğüt B. THE IRON AGE IN EAST PLAIN CILICIA - A FIRST ASSESSMENT OF THE IRON AGE POTTERY FROM THE OSMANIYE SURVEY. TÜBA-AR. 2013(16):1657-79.

Publisher

34406

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

34047   34057   34059  34410   34061

TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permissions regarding commercial use or licensing exceptions, please contact the journal.