BibTex RIS Cite

BACTRİA MARGİANA KÜLTÜREL KOMPLEKSİ İÇİNDE ANIT MEZARLARI: KUZEYDOĞU İRAN’DA BİR ÇALIŞMA

Year 2018, Issue: 1, 139 - 148, 01.03.2018
https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR

Abstract

MÖ 2300-1500 yıllarına tarihlenen Bactria Margiana Arkeoloji Kompleksi BMAC günümüzde Kuzeydoğu İran,Güney Türkmenistan, Kuzey Afganistan ve Tacikistan ile Özbekistan’ın bir bölümünü kapsayan geniş bir alandamaddi ve manevi yeniliklerle gelişti.Mezar gelenekleri, geçmiş toplumların maddi olmayan yönlerini anlamayı sağlayabilir. Bu bağlamda, Kuzeydoğuİran’daki Bactria Margiana kültürünün yükselişinin, Anıt Mezar olarak bilinen yeni bir mezar türünün ortaya çıkışıile eşzamanlı olduğu görülmektedir. Bu terim, insan kalıntıları bulunmayan ve sadece merasimi onurlandıran ritüelbağlamda bırakılan bir grup mezar hediyesi içeren bir dizi mezar için geçerlidir.Yeni mezar uygulaması BMAC nüfuslarının inanç ve ritüel sistemlerini yeniden yapılandırmada birincil önemtaşıdıklarından, bu yazı, bu grupların inanç sistemine ışık tutabilecek bir girişim olan Kuzeydoğu İran’da yenidefin türünü tartışmaya başlamıştır. Çalışma alanındaki ilgili gömüler, Neyshabur’daki Shahrak-e Firouzehve Jajarm’daki Chalow yerleşim yerlerinden gelmektedir. Bölgedeki defin türü BMAC inanç ve ideolojisininyaygınlaştırılmasına bağlanabilir.

References

  • ARNE, T.S. 1945. Excavations at Shah Tepe, Iran. Stockholm.
  • ASCALONE, E. 2015. Archeologia dell’Iran antico: interazioni, integrazioni e discontinuità nell’Iran del 3. millenio a.C. (Translated by S.M.S. Sajjadi) Tehran: SAMT. (in Farsi)
  • BASAFA, H. / RAHMATI, M. 2012. Preliminary Report on the Excavation at Shahrak-e Firouzeh, Neyshabur (Eds. J. Kianfar / P. Estakhri Mazdaknameh) vol. 5. 613-523.
  • BASAFA, H. 2014. Late Bronze Age Burial Customs in Neyshabur Plain (Northeast Iran), Proceedings of the 4th Symposium of Young Iranian Archaeologists. (Eds. M.H.A. Kharanaghi/R. Naseri/M.Khanipour) Tehran: 257-266.
  • BISCIONE, R / VAHDATI, A. 2011. “Excavations of Tepe Chalow, Northern Khoarasan Iran”, Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 53: 236-241.
  • BOVINGTON, C.H / DAYSON, J.R / MAHDAVI, A / MASOUMI, R. 1974. “The Radiocarbon Evidence for the Terminal Date of the Hissar IIIC Culture,” Iran 12: 195-199.
  • DESHAYES, J. 1975. “Les fouilles recentes de Tureng Tepe: La terrasse haute de la fin du 3e millenaire,” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions 119: 522-530.
  • DUBOVA, N. 2015. “Animal Burials and Their Cults in Margiana”, Defining the Sacred Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion in the Near East. (Ed. N. Loneri) 13-23.
  • FRANCFORT, H-P. 2005. “La Civilisation de l’Oxus et les Indo-Iraniens et IndoAryens en Asie Centrale”, Āryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale (Eds. G.Fussman/J.Kellans/Z-P. Francfort/X.Tremblay). 253-285.
  • FRANCFORT, H-P. 2013. “Black Stone and Art in Kerman and Central Asia. Archaeology of the Halil Rud Basin, Jiroft. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Halil River Basin Culture. (Eds. Y. Majidzadeh / M.R. Miri). Tehran.
  • HIEBERT, F. / LAMBERG-KARLOVSKY, C.C. 1992. “Central Asia and the Indo-Iranian Borderlands,” Iran 30: 1-17.
  • HIEBERT, F. 1994. Origins of the Bronze Age Oasis Civilization in Central Asia. Cambridge.
  • LECOMTE, O. 2013. “Activités archéologiques françaises au Turkménistan” L’Archeologie Francaise en Asie Centrale. Cahiers d’Asie Centrale 21-22. 165-190.
  • LEMBERG-KARLOVSKY, C.C. 2013. “The Oxus Civilization,” CuPAUAM 39: 21-63. LUNEAU, E. 2015. “A New Assessment of the End of the Oxus Civilization (Southern Central Asia, ca. 1750-1500/1400 BCE): Overview of The Transformations of the Society”, Broadening Horizons 4. BAR International Series 2698. 303-308.
  • MAMEDOV, A. / LECOMTE, O. / BENDEZUSARMIENTO, J. 2012. Ulug Depe a Forgotten City in Central Asia. 1-30. SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2003. “Excavations at Shahr-I Sokhta First Preliminary Report on the Excavations of the Graveyard, 1997-2000,” Iran 41: 21-97.
  • SARIANIDI, V. 2007. Necropolis of Gonur, 2nd edition. Athens.
  • SABOURI, H. / TALA’I, H. / GARAZHIAN, O. 2014. “A Survey of the Post-Depositional Processes: A Case Study of Tepe Farizi in Sabzevar Plain”, Motaleat Bastanshenasi 6/2: 91-111.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2006. Shahr-i Sokhta a Vast Laboratory in a Small Desert. Zabol: Shahr-i Sokhta Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Base
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2007. Reports on Shahr-i Sokhta I (Excavation at the Cemetery 1997-2000). Tehran.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2009. Reports on Shahr-i Sokhta II (Excavation at the Cemetery 2001-2003). Zahedan.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2010. Earliest Cities on the Iranian Plateau. Vol. 2. Tehran.
  • SCHMIDT, E. 1937. Excavations at Tepe Hissar, Damghan 1931-1933. Philadelphia.
  • SCHMIDT, E. 2012. Excavations at Tepe Hissar, Damghan (Translated by K. Roustaei) Semnan. Farsi.
  • SOROUSH, M.R. / YOUSEFI, S. 2014. “Razeh as an Evidence of the 3rd Millennium BC-Historical Period Settlements in South Khorasan” Short Papers of the 12th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology (Eds. K. Roustaei / M. Gholami). Tehran: 271-273.
  • VAHDATI. A.A. / FRANCFORT, H-P. 2010. “Preliminary Report on the Sounding at Tepe Damghani, Sabzevar” Bastanshenasi va Tarikh 24/48: 17-36.
  • VAHDATI, A.A. / BISCIONE, R. 2014. “A Concise Report on the Second Season of Excavation at Tepe Chalow, Jajarm Plain, NE Iran”, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology: 320-324.
  • VAHDATI, A. 2014. “BMAC Grave from Bojnord, North-Eastern Iran” Iran 52: 19-27.

CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN

Year 2018, Issue: 1, 139 - 148, 01.03.2018
https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR

Abstract

Spanning 2300-1500 BC, the Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex BMAC was developed with a series of material and spiritual innovations in a vast region today comprising Northeast Iran, South Turkmenistan, North Afghanistan, and parts of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Burial traditions can provide an understanding of the intangible aspects of past societies. In this context, it is witnessed that the rise of the Bactria Margiana culture in Northeast Iran is concomitant with the appearance of a new burial form come to known as cenotaph. The term applies to a series of graves that lack human remains and only contain a group of burial gifts deposited in ritual context to honor the deceased. Since the new mortuary practice is of primary importance in reconstructing the belief and ritual systems of the BMAC populations, the present paper sets to present and discuss the cenotaphs recorded in NE Iran, an attempt which might shed some light on the belief system of these groups. Related burials in the study area come from the two settlement sites of Shahrak-e Firouzeh in Neyshabur and Chalow in Jajarm. The instigation of cenotaphs in the region can be attributed to the dissemination of the BMAC’s beliefs and ideology.

References

  • ARNE, T.S. 1945. Excavations at Shah Tepe, Iran. Stockholm.
  • ASCALONE, E. 2015. Archeologia dell’Iran antico: interazioni, integrazioni e discontinuità nell’Iran del 3. millenio a.C. (Translated by S.M.S. Sajjadi) Tehran: SAMT. (in Farsi)
  • BASAFA, H. / RAHMATI, M. 2012. Preliminary Report on the Excavation at Shahrak-e Firouzeh, Neyshabur (Eds. J. Kianfar / P. Estakhri Mazdaknameh) vol. 5. 613-523.
  • BASAFA, H. 2014. Late Bronze Age Burial Customs in Neyshabur Plain (Northeast Iran), Proceedings of the 4th Symposium of Young Iranian Archaeologists. (Eds. M.H.A. Kharanaghi/R. Naseri/M.Khanipour) Tehran: 257-266.
  • BISCIONE, R / VAHDATI, A. 2011. “Excavations of Tepe Chalow, Northern Khoarasan Iran”, Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 53: 236-241.
  • BOVINGTON, C.H / DAYSON, J.R / MAHDAVI, A / MASOUMI, R. 1974. “The Radiocarbon Evidence for the Terminal Date of the Hissar IIIC Culture,” Iran 12: 195-199.
  • DESHAYES, J. 1975. “Les fouilles recentes de Tureng Tepe: La terrasse haute de la fin du 3e millenaire,” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions 119: 522-530.
  • DUBOVA, N. 2015. “Animal Burials and Their Cults in Margiana”, Defining the Sacred Approaches to the Archaeology of Religion in the Near East. (Ed. N. Loneri) 13-23.
  • FRANCFORT, H-P. 2005. “La Civilisation de l’Oxus et les Indo-Iraniens et IndoAryens en Asie Centrale”, Āryas, Aryens et Iraniens en Asie Centrale (Eds. G.Fussman/J.Kellans/Z-P. Francfort/X.Tremblay). 253-285.
  • FRANCFORT, H-P. 2013. “Black Stone and Art in Kerman and Central Asia. Archaeology of the Halil Rud Basin, Jiroft. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Halil River Basin Culture. (Eds. Y. Majidzadeh / M.R. Miri). Tehran.
  • HIEBERT, F. / LAMBERG-KARLOVSKY, C.C. 1992. “Central Asia and the Indo-Iranian Borderlands,” Iran 30: 1-17.
  • HIEBERT, F. 1994. Origins of the Bronze Age Oasis Civilization in Central Asia. Cambridge.
  • LECOMTE, O. 2013. “Activités archéologiques françaises au Turkménistan” L’Archeologie Francaise en Asie Centrale. Cahiers d’Asie Centrale 21-22. 165-190.
  • LEMBERG-KARLOVSKY, C.C. 2013. “The Oxus Civilization,” CuPAUAM 39: 21-63. LUNEAU, E. 2015. “A New Assessment of the End of the Oxus Civilization (Southern Central Asia, ca. 1750-1500/1400 BCE): Overview of The Transformations of the Society”, Broadening Horizons 4. BAR International Series 2698. 303-308.
  • MAMEDOV, A. / LECOMTE, O. / BENDEZUSARMIENTO, J. 2012. Ulug Depe a Forgotten City in Central Asia. 1-30. SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2003. “Excavations at Shahr-I Sokhta First Preliminary Report on the Excavations of the Graveyard, 1997-2000,” Iran 41: 21-97.
  • SARIANIDI, V. 2007. Necropolis of Gonur, 2nd edition. Athens.
  • SABOURI, H. / TALA’I, H. / GARAZHIAN, O. 2014. “A Survey of the Post-Depositional Processes: A Case Study of Tepe Farizi in Sabzevar Plain”, Motaleat Bastanshenasi 6/2: 91-111.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2006. Shahr-i Sokhta a Vast Laboratory in a Small Desert. Zabol: Shahr-i Sokhta Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Base
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2007. Reports on Shahr-i Sokhta I (Excavation at the Cemetery 1997-2000). Tehran.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2009. Reports on Shahr-i Sokhta II (Excavation at the Cemetery 2001-2003). Zahedan.
  • SAJJADI, S.M.S. 2010. Earliest Cities on the Iranian Plateau. Vol. 2. Tehran.
  • SCHMIDT, E. 1937. Excavations at Tepe Hissar, Damghan 1931-1933. Philadelphia.
  • SCHMIDT, E. 2012. Excavations at Tepe Hissar, Damghan (Translated by K. Roustaei) Semnan. Farsi.
  • SOROUSH, M.R. / YOUSEFI, S. 2014. “Razeh as an Evidence of the 3rd Millennium BC-Historical Period Settlements in South Khorasan” Short Papers of the 12th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology (Eds. K. Roustaei / M. Gholami). Tehran: 271-273.
  • VAHDATI. A.A. / FRANCFORT, H-P. 2010. “Preliminary Report on the Sounding at Tepe Damghani, Sabzevar” Bastanshenasi va Tarikh 24/48: 17-36.
  • VAHDATI, A.A. / BISCIONE, R. 2014. “A Concise Report on the Second Season of Excavation at Tepe Chalow, Jajarm Plain, NE Iran”, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology: 320-324.
  • VAHDATI, A. 2014. “BMAC Grave from Bojnord, North-Eastern Iran” Iran 52: 19-27.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

Farshid Iravanı Ghadım

Hamed Tahmasebı Zave This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2018
IZ https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Iravanı Ghadım, F., & Tahmasebı Zave, H. (2018). CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 1, 139-148. https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR
AMA 1.Iravanı Ghadım F, Tahmasebı Zave H. CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN. TÜBA-AR. 2018;(1):139-148. https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR
Chicago Iravanı Ghadım, Farshid, and Hamed Tahmasebı Zave. 2018. “CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 1: 139-48. https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR.
EndNote Iravanı Ghadım F, Tahmasebı Zave H (March 1, 2018) CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 1 139–148.
IEEE [1]F. Iravanı Ghadım and H. Tahmasebı Zave, “CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN”, TÜBA-AR, no. 1, pp. 139–148, Mar. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR
ISNAD Iravanı Ghadım, Farshid - Tahmasebı Zave, Hamed. “CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 1 (March 1, 2018): 139-148. https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR.
JAMA 1.Iravanı Ghadım F, Tahmasebı Zave H. CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN. TÜBA-AR. 2018;:139–148.
MLA Iravanı Ghadım, Farshid, and Hamed Tahmasebı Zave. “CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 139-48, https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR.
Vancouver 1.Farshid Iravanı Ghadım, Hamed Tahmasebı Zave. CENOTAPHS IN THE BACTRIA MARGIANA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX DOMAIN: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHEAST IRAN. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 2018 Mar. 1;(1):139-48. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA73PZ28GR

Publisher

34406

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

34047   34057   34059  34410   34061

TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permissions regarding commercial use or licensing exceptions, please contact the journal.