HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER

Number: 25 March 1, 2019
Fatma Kaynar
TR EN

HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the place of locusts in Hittite culture by comparing the Mesopotamian and Egyptian samples. Locusts appear in the Egyptian and Mesopotamian texts as an expression of multiplicity or in texts including locust invasions. In Hittite documents, the word is written with its Sumerian equivalent, BURU5, or Hittite equivalent maša-. The documents that include the expression locust are letters, prayers, ritual texts, mythological texts and omens. It is commonly seen to be included in religious texts. In addition, a letter mentioning that Kaškaeans’ grain was eaten by locusts is the only document in the Hittite archives that shows the concrete example of locust invasion. The less frequent mention of invasions suggests that documents mentioning them may have been written on wooden tablets.

Keywords

Locust,BURU5,Hittite,Anatolia,Invasion

References

  1. ALP, S. 1991. Maşat-Höyük’te Bulunan Çivi Yazılı Hitit Tabletleri / Hethitische Keilschrifttafeln aus Maşat-Höyük. Ankara.
  2. BOROWSKI, O. 2002. “Animals in the Literatures of Syria-Palestine” A History of the Animal World in the Ancient Near East (Ed. B. J. Collins). Leiden-Boston-Köln: 289-306.
  3. BRYCE, T. 2009. The Routledge Handbook of the Peoples and Places of Ancient Western Asia. The Near East from the Early Bronze Age to the Fall of the Persian Empire. London-New York.
  4. DARDANO, P. 2006. Die hethitischen Tontafelkataloge aus Ḫattuša (CTH 276-282) (StBoT 47). Wiesbaden.
  5. FUSCAGNI, F. 2012sqq. “Fragment eines eliminatorischen Analogierituals mit Erwähnung des „Roten Flusses“ und des MaraššantaFlusses (CTH 458.6)” hethiter.net/: CTH 458.6.
  6. HAWKINS, J. D. 2000. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, I. Inscriptions of the Iron Age. Berlin-New York.
  7. VAN DEN HOUT, TH. P. J. 2013. “Hitit Krallığı ve İmparatorluğu’nun Kısa Tarihi/A Short History of the Hittite Kingdom” Hititler, Bir Anadolu İmparatorluğu/Hittites An Anatolian Empire (Eds. M. Doğan-Alparslan/M. Alparslan). İstanbul: 22-44.
  8. HUNGER, H. 1972–75. “Heuschrecke”, Reallexicon der Assyriologie 4: 389-390.
  9. KELHOFFER, J. A. 2004. “Did John the Baptist Eat Like a Former Essene? Locust-Eating in the Ancient Near East and at Qumran”, Dead Sea Discoveries 11/3: 293-314.
  10. KENAWY, M. A./ABDEL-HAMİD, Y. M. 2015. “Insects in ancient (Pharaonic) Egypt: a review of fauna, their mythological and religious significance and associated diseases” Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 8/1: 15-32.
APA
Kaynar, F. (2019). HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 25, 77-84. https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG
AMA
1.Kaynar F. HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER. TÜBA-AR. 2019;(25):77-84. https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG
Chicago
Kaynar, Fatma. 2019. “HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, nos. 25: 77-84. https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG.
EndNote
Kaynar F (March 1, 2019) HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 25 77–84.
IEEE
[1]F. Kaynar, “HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER”, TÜBA-AR, no. 25, pp. 77–84, Mar. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG
ISNAD
Kaynar, Fatma. “HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 25 (March 1, 2019): 77-84. https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG.
JAMA
1.Kaynar F. HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER. TÜBA-AR. 2019;:77–84.
MLA
Kaynar, Fatma. “HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 25, Mar. 2019, pp. 77-84, https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG.
Vancouver
1.Fatma Kaynar. HİTİT KÜLTÜRÜNDE ÇEKİRGELER. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 2019 Mar. 1;(25):77-84. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA36WK45WG