Matt painted pottery, along with Minyan ware, forms an important group of finds in the ceramic development of the Aegean region, especially on Mainland Greece in the Middle Helladic Period. When the history of research on matt painted pottery is taken into consideration, the definition and classification of the ware has been undertaken according to its fabric, its surface treatment and decoration style. Generally, matt painted wares, which are classified under fine and coarse fabric groups, have a reddish-buff, greenish-yellow or cream paste. The surface is usually white or cream slipped and bears red, brown-red or darker painted decoration. The motifs, usually bordered by horizontal or vertical bands and concentrated on the neck or the body, include hatching, zig-zags, triangles and circles. Zig-zags or circles bordered by horizontal lines are frequently found on large-sized vessels like amphorae and pithoi. Cross-hatching, wavy lines, concentric circles and thin lines forming a cross-like pattern surrounded by a circle are also present among decorative motifs. Flecks of "gold-mica", present among the inclusions found in the fabric of matt painted ceramics, have enabled interpretations on the production of this pottery group. The matt painted pottery from the island of Aegina in the Saronic Gulf has played an important role in the research in this field. The preponderance of matt painted ceramics from Kolonna on Aegina, as well as the results obtained from clay analyses, concentrated attention on Aegina and even led to interpretations that this island was a centre of production for this group of ceramics. The inclusion of Western Anatolia within the area of distribution of matt painted ceramics in the Aegean is undoubtedly important for demonstrating the extent and development of interregional cultural relationships. The matt painted ceramics from the Middle Bronze Age levels of Liman Tepe (Urla-İzmir), have supplied new data which reflect these relationships. The Middle Bronze Age Levels 3-4 of Liman Tepe, with oval-plan buildings, have yielded matt painted ceramics. The fabric is sandy and of medium quality, varying in colour from yellow and greenish-yellow to pink. The surface of the vessels were slipped in the same colour as the fabric and bears decoration in reddish-brown, brown or purple paint. The motifs faithfully reflect the decoration style of the Middle Helladic matt painted wares. All these characteristics support the view that the matt painted pottery of Liman Tepe can be interpreted as of Aeginetan origin. Final conclusions and interpretation, however, can only be reached when clay analysis is undertaken.
Liman Tepe, with its Minyan and matt painted wares, proves itself to be an important centre in understanding interregional relations of the Aegean world both chronologically and culturally.
Matt painted pottery, along with Minyan ware, forms an important group of finds in the ceramic development of the Aegean region, especially on Mainland Greece in the Middle Helladic Period. When the history of research on matt painted pottery is taken into consideration, the definition and classification of the ware has been undertaken according to its fabric, its surface treatment and decoration style. Generally, matt painted wares, which are classified under fine and coarse fabric groups, have a reddish-buff, greenish-yellow or cream paste. The surface is usually white or cream slipped and bears red, brown-red or darker painted decoration. The motifs, usually bordered by horizontal or vertical bands and concentrated on the neck or the body, include hatching, zig-zags, triangles and circles. Zig-zags or circles bordered by horizontal lines are frequently found on large-sized vessels like amphorae and pithoi. Cross-hatching, wavy lines, concentric circles and thin lines forming a cross-like pattern surrounded by a circle are also present among decorative motifs. Flecks of "gold-mica", present among the inclusions found in the fabric of matt painted ceramics, have enabled interpretations on the production of this pottery group. The matt painted pottery from the island of Aegina in the Saronic Gulf has played an important role in the research in this field. The preponderance of matt painted ceramics from Kolonna on Aegina, as well as the results obtained from clay analyses, concentrated attention on Aegina and even led to interpretations that this island was a centre of production for this group of ceramics. The inclusion of Western Anatolia within the area of distribution of matt painted ceramics in the Aegean is undoubtedly important for demonstrating the extent and development of interregional cultural relationships. The matt painted ceramics from the Middle Bronze Age levels of Liman Tepe (Urla-İzmir), have supplied new data which reflect these relationships. The Middle Bronze Age Levels 3-4 of Liman Tepe, with oval-plan buildings, have yielded matt painted ceramics. The fabric is sandy and of medium quality, varying in colour from yellow and greenish-yellow to pink. The surface of the vessels were slipped in the same colour as the fabric and bears decoration in reddish-brown, brown or purple paint. The motifs faithfully reflect the decoration style of the Middle Helladic matt painted wares. All these characteristics support the view that the matt painted pottery of Liman Tepe can be interpreted as of Aeginetan origin. Final conclusions and interpretation, however, can only be reached when clay analysis is undertaken.
Liman Tepe, with its Minyan and matt painted wares, proves itself to be an important centre in understanding interregional relations of the Aegean world both chronologically and culturally.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Ceramics in Archeology, Archaeology of Europe, The Mediterranean and The Levant, Archeology of Turks, Habitat Archeology, The Archaeology of Middle Bronze Age |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | August 10, 2004 |
Submission Date | February 10, 2004 |
Published in Issue | Year 2004 Issue: 7 |
Publisher
Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA
TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.
Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.
In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permission regarding commercial use, please contact the publisher.