JEOTEKSTİL TABAKALARININ ÇAKIL-SİLT KARIŞIMLARININ TAŞIMA KAPASİ-TESİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Year 2015, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 61 - 69, 15.12.2015

Keramat Sadehgi Azar Rouzbeh Dabiri

Abstract

Toprak stabilizasyonu önceden belirlenmiş hedeflere ulaşmak için toprağın fiziksel ve mühendislik bir dizi özelliklerini değiştirmek ve geliştirmek anlamına gelir. Birçok mühendislik uygulamalarında, jeotekstil kullanımı top-rak ıslahı için etkili bir yöntem olarak kabul edilir. Araştırma sonuçları, geosentetik alt zemin ve alt taban katmanları arasına yerleştirildiğinde, ince taneli zeminin dayanma kapasitesini artırmak ta olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalış-manın temel amacı, bir laboratuvar çalışma da jeotekstil tabakasının etkisi çakıl kapasitesine ve katmanların sayısını değerlendirmektir. %15 ila 30 oranında silt içeren çakıllar, Şebister şehrinin Till bölgesinden elde edilmiştir. Deneme-ler üç farklı (%90, 95 ve 100) göreceli yoğunlukta gerçekleştirilmiş ve jeotekstil tabakanın etkisi iki farklı konumda incelenmiştir. İlk pozisyonda, bir jeotekstil tabakası toprak numunesinin orta kısmında yerleştirilmiş ve ikinci ko-numda iki jeotekstil tabakası alternatif olarak toprak numunesine konulmuştur. Laboratuvar çalışmalarının sonuçları numunelere bir jeotekstil tabakası konulmasının taşıma kapasitesinin geliştirmesine yardımcı olduğunu göstermiştir. Meydana gelen artışlar, çakıl ve % 30 silt içeren çakılda gözlenmiştir. Ancak, toprak içine alternatif olarak iki jeoteks-til katmanı koyulması numunelerin taşıma kapasitesi ve direncini azaltmaktadır.

Keywords

Çakıl, Silt, Kaliforniya Taşıma Oranı (CBR) Deneyi, Toprak Stabilizasyonu

THE EFFECTS OF GEOTEXTILE LAYERS ON BEARING CAPACITY OF GRAVEL-SILT MIXTURES

Abstract

Soil stabilization methods to modifying and improving the physical and engineering features of the soil for achieving a set of previously determined goals. In many engineering applications, the use of geotextiles is regarded as an effective method for soil improvement. Research results indicate that, when geosynthetics placed between the subgrade and sub base layers, increase the bearing capacity in fine grain subgrades. The main pur-pose of the present study was evaluating a laboratory study of the effect of geotextile layer and its number of lay-ers on the bearing capacity of the gravel of Til region of Shabestar city, which includes 15 to 30 percent of silt. It should be noted that the mentioned tests were performed in three relative densities of 90, 95, and 100%, and the effect of geotextile layer was studied in two positions. In the first position, one geotextile layer was placed in the middle part of the soil sample, and in the second position two geotextile layers were alternatively placed in the samples. The results of laboratory studies show that putting one geotextile layer in samples helps modify and im-prove the bearing capacity. This increases were observed in the gravel and the gravel with 30% silt. However, putting two geotextile layers in the soil alternatively decreases resistance and bearing capacity of the samples. 

Keywords

Gravel, Silt, California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test, Soil Stabilization

References

• YODER E. J., WITCZAK M. W. Principles of Pavement Design, Second Ed., Wiley Interscience, Newyork, 300-321, 1975.
• RESL, S., WERNER, G., The influence of nonwoven needle- punched geotextiles on the ultimate bearing capacity of the subgrade, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geotextiles, Vol. 4, pp. 1009–1013, 1986, Vienna,
• FANNIN, R.J., O. SIGURDSSON, Field observations on stabilization of unpaved roads with geosyntheticS, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122, 7, 544-553, 1996.
• BERGADO, D.T., S. YOUWAI, C.N. HAI, P. VOOTTIPRUEX, Interaction of nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles under axisymmetric loading conditions, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 19, 299-328, 2001.
• RAYMOND, G., ISMAIL, I., The effect of geogrid reinforcement on unbound aggregates, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21, 355-380, 2003.
• PARK, T. and TAN S.A., Enhanced performance of reinforced soil walls by the inclusion of short fiber, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23, 348–361, 2005.
• YETIMOGLU, T., SALBAS, O., A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21,2, 103-110, 2003.
• PATRA, C.R., DAS, B.M. and ATALAR C., Bearing capacity of embedded strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23, 5, 454-462, 2005.
• VARUSO, R.J., GRIESNABER, J.B.and NATARAJ, M.S., Geosynthetic reinforced levee test section on soft normally consolidated clays, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23, 4, 362-383, 2005.
• HAERI, S.M., NOURZAD R. and Oskrouch A.M., Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sands, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 18, 6, 385-402, 2000.
• ZHANG, M.X., JAVADI, A.A. and MIN X., Triaxial tests of sand reinforced with 3D inclusions, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24, 201-209, 2006.
• LATHA, G.M. and MURTHY V. S., Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25, 23-32, 2007.
• WILLIAMS, E.D. and OKINE, N. A., Effect of geogrid in granular base strength – An experimental investigation, Construction and Building Materials, 22, 2180-2184, 2008.
• NAEINIE S. A. and MIRZAKHANLARI M., The effect of geotextile and grading on the bearing ratio of granular soils, electronic journal of geotechnical engineering (EJGE), 13, 1-10, 2008.
• NAEINIE S. A. and ZIAIE MOAYED R., Effect of plasticity index and reinforcement on the CBR value of soft clay, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 2, 124-130, 2009.
• SENTHIL KUMAR P. and RAJKUMAR R., Effect of geotextile on CBR strength of unpaved road with soft subgrade, electronic journal of geotechnical engineering (EJGE), 17, 1355- 1363, 2012.
• GOHARI M., DABIRI R. and RAZIZADEH F., Evaluation of geotextile effects on bearing capacity of granular soils based on California bearing ratio (CBR) test, MSC thesis of Engineering geology, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, 2010. (In Persian)
• ASTMC25-99, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Limestone, Quicklime, and Hydrated Lime, Annual book of ASTM standards, 1999.
• ASTM D421-85, Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size Analysis and Determination of Soil Constants, Annual book of ASTM standards, 1985(reapproved 1998).
• ASTM D422-63, Standard Test Method for article-Size Analysis of Soils, Annual book of ASTM standards 1963(reapproved 1998).
• SADEGHI AZAR K., DABIRI R. and RAZIZADEH F., Study of geotextile layers effects in bearing capacity of granular soils with non-plastic fines content based on California bearing ratio (CBR) test, MSC thesis of Engineering geology, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, 2010. (In Persian) www.earthgoogle.com, Imagery ©2016 Digital Globe, Cnes/Spot Image, CNES / Astrium, Map data ©2016 Google
• ASTM D 4318-95a, Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit an plasticity index for soils, Annual book of ASTM standards, 1995
• ASTM D1883-93, Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory- compacted soils, Annual book of ASTM standards, 1993.
• ASTM-D 698-00, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)), Annual book of ASTM standards, 2000.