Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SUMAK (Rhus coriaria L.) MEYVESİNİN FİZİKOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 87 - 94, 30.12.2020

Abstract

Bu araştırmada sumak meyvelerinin bazı fizikokimyasal özellikleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma materyali olarak, Edirne’nin Keşan ilçesine bağlı Sazlıdere Köyü’nde doğal olarak yetişen sumak bitkileri seçilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda sumak meyvesinin kuru madde oranı ve ham yağ oranı sırasıyla % 96.17 ve % 24.58 olarak bulunmuştur. Yağ asiti bileşimleri incelendiğinde sumak meyvesinin temel yağ asitlerinin oleik asit (% 43.43), linoleik asit (% 30.34 ) ve palmitik asit (% 22.22) olduğu görülmüştür. Serbest yağ asitliği, peroksit sayısı, fenolik madde miktarı ve antioksidan aktivite değerleri sırasıyla % 2.85, 7.09 meqO2/kg, 1470.0 mg GAE/kg yağ ve (EC50) değerinin 84.93 mg/ml olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sumak yağının sterol ve tokoferol kompozisyonları incelendiğinde, en fazla bulunan sterolün β-sitosterol (% 78.51) ve en fazla bulunan tokoferol izomerinin ise α-tokoferol (374.24 mg/kg) olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Supporting Institution

Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi

Project Number

NKUBAP.03YL.18.182

References

  • AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition, The Association of Official Analytical Communities, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Method 925.10.
  • AOCS (1992). Official Methods And Recommended Practices Of The American Oil Chemists’ Society, 4th Edn., American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, Method Ce 2-66.
  • Bloshenko, E.K. & Letchamo, W. (1996). Characterızatıon of natural dıstrıbutıon and some bıologıcal traıts of sumach (Rhus corıarıa) ın central Asıa. Acta Hortic., 426, 113-122.
  • Bozan, B., Koşar, M., Tunalıer, Z., Öztürk, N. & Başer, K.H.C. (2003). Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Rhus coriaria and Cinnamomum cassia extracts. Acta Alimentaria, 32(1),53-61.
  • Chakraborty, A., Ferk, F., Simić, T., Brantner, A., Dušinská, M., Kundi, M., Hoelzl, C., Nersesyan, A. & Knasmüller, S. (2009). DNA-protective effects of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.), a common spice: Results of human and animal studies. Mutation Research, Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 661, 10-17.
  • Çiftçi-Yegin, S. (2017). Farklı yörelere ait sumak (Rhus Coriaria L.) ekşisinin antioksidan kapasitesinin belirlenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniv. Sağ. Bil. Enst. Derg., 2(2), 35-39.
  • Dalby, R. (2003). The sumacs as honey sources. American Bee Journal, 143(7), 553–554.
  • Doğan, M. & Akgül, A. (2005). Characteristics and fatty acid composition of Rhus coriaria cultivars from southeast Turkey. Chem. Nat. Comp., 41, 724-725.
  • Duru, S. & Bozdoğan Konuşkan, D. (2014). Bitkisel yağlarda oleik asit miktarının arttırılması ve yağ kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Gıda, 39: 1-7.
  • Gürbüz, Y. & Salih, Y.G. (2017). Influence of sumac (Rhus Coriaria L.) and ginger (Zingiber Officinale) on egg yolk fatty acid, cholesterol and blood parameters in laying hens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 101(6), 1316-1323.
  • Güvenç, A. & Koyuncu, M. (1994). A study on the main active compounds of leaves and fruits of Rhus coriaria l. Tr. J. Med. Sci., 20, 11-13.
  • Hosseini, S., Ramezan, Y. & Arab, S. (2020). A comparative study on physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.), cumin (Cuminum cyminum), and caraway (Carum carvil) oils. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 183(10), 1-9.
  • ISO 12228 (2014). Determination of individual and total sterols contents- Gas chromatographic method - Part 1: Animal and vegetable fats and oils.
  • ISO 9936 (2016). Animal and vegetable fats and oils - Determination of tocopherol and tocotrienol contents by high-performance liquid chromatography.
  • IUPAC (1987). Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives. International Union Pure and Applied Chemistry Division Commission on Oils, Fats and Derivatives. 7th ed., Blackwell Jevent Publishers, Oxford.
  • Karaca, E. & Aytaç, S. (2007). Yağ bitkilerinde yağ asitleri kompozisyonu üzerine etki eden faktörler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 123- 131.
  • Karadaş, Ö., Yılmaz, İ. & Geçgel, Ü. (2020). Propertıes of sumac plant and ıts ımportance ın nutrıtıon. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4 (3), 377-383.
  • Kızıl, S. & Türk, M. (2010). Microelement contents and fatty acid compositions of Rhus coriaria and Pistacia terebinthus fruits spread commonly in the south eastern anatolia region of Turkey. Nat Prod Res., 24(1), 92-98.
  • Matthaus, B. & Özcan, M.M. (2015). Fatty acid composition, tocopherol, and sterol contents of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit oils. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 117(8), 1301-1302.
  • Mavlyanov, S.M., Islambekov, S.Y., Karimdzhanov, A.K. & Ismaikov, A.I. (1997). Anthocyans and organic acids of the fruits of some species of sumac. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 33(2), 209.
  • Nayebpour, N. & Asadi-Gharneh, H.A. (2019). Variability of fatty acids composition of wild sumac (Rhus coriaria l.) fruit. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 71(18), 118-129.
  • Özcan, M. & Hacıseferoğulları, H. (2004). Acondiment sumac (rhus coriaria l.) fruits: some physico-chemical properties. Bul. J. Plant Physiol, 30, 74-84.
  • Rad, A.H., Khaleghi, M. & Javadi, M. (2020). Sumac in food ındustry: a changing outlook for consumer and producer. Journal of Food Technology & Nutrition Science. 2(1), 1-3.
  • Rayne, S. & Mazza, G. (2007). Biological activities of extracts from sumac (Rhus spp) a review. Plant foods for human nutrition, 62, 165-75.
  • Sabir, P.S. & Aydin, R. (2017). Diet supplemented with sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) ınfluenced fatty acid composition but not the cholesterol content of eggs from Japanese quail. EC Nutrition, 12(2), 103-109.
  • Sakhr, K. & Khatib, S.E. (2020). Physiochemical properties and medicinal, nutritional and industrial applications of Lebanese Sumac (Syrian Sumac - Rhus coriaria): A review. Heliyon, 6(1), e03207.
  • Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R. & Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. (1999). Analysis Of Total Phenols And Other Oxidation Substrates And Antioxidants By Means Of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299, 152-178.
  • Ünder, D. & Saltan, F.Z. (2019). Sumak ve önemli biyolojik etkileri. Çukurova Tarım Gıda Bil. Der., 34(1), 51-60.
  • Ünver, A. & Özcan, M.M. (2006). Türkiye’de yabani olarak yetişen bazı sumak (Rhus coriaria l.) meyvelerinin fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (40), 111-116.
  • Viuda-Martos, M., El Gendy, A.E.G., Sendra, E., Fernandez-Lopez, J., El Razik, K.A.A., Omer, E.A. & Perez-Alvarez, J.A. (2010). Chemical composition and antioxidant and anti- listeria activities of essential oils obtained from some egyptian plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 9063-9070.
  • Yüksel, E. (2018). Tunceli ilinde yetişen sumak bitkisinin fitokimyasal bileşenlerinin incelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Munzur Üniversitesi / Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü / Gıda Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Tunceli.

PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SUMAC (Rhus coriaria L.) FRUIT

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 87 - 94, 30.12.2020

Abstract

In this study, some physicochemical properties of sumac fruits were investigated. Sumac plants grown naturally in Sazlıdere Village of Keşan district of Edirne were selected as research material. As a result of the analysis, the dry matter ratio and crude oil ratio of sumac fruit were found to be 96.17% and 24.58%, respectively. When the fatty acid compositions were examined, it was observed that the essential fatty acids of sumac fruit were oleic acid (43.43%), linoleic acid (30.34%) and palmitic acid (22.22%). Free fatty acidity, peroxide number, phenolic amount and antioxidant activity values were found to be 2.85%, 7.09 meqO2/kg, 1470.0 mg GAE/kg oil and (EC50) value 84.93 mg/ml, respectively. When the sterol and tocopherol compositions of sumac oil were examined, it was determined that the most abundant sterol was β-sitosterol (78.51%) and the most abundant tocopherol was α-tocopherol (374.24 mg/kg).

Project Number

NKUBAP.03YL.18.182

References

  • AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition, The Association of Official Analytical Communities, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Method 925.10.
  • AOCS (1992). Official Methods And Recommended Practices Of The American Oil Chemists’ Society, 4th Edn., American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, Method Ce 2-66.
  • Bloshenko, E.K. & Letchamo, W. (1996). Characterızatıon of natural dıstrıbutıon and some bıologıcal traıts of sumach (Rhus corıarıa) ın central Asıa. Acta Hortic., 426, 113-122.
  • Bozan, B., Koşar, M., Tunalıer, Z., Öztürk, N. & Başer, K.H.C. (2003). Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Rhus coriaria and Cinnamomum cassia extracts. Acta Alimentaria, 32(1),53-61.
  • Chakraborty, A., Ferk, F., Simić, T., Brantner, A., Dušinská, M., Kundi, M., Hoelzl, C., Nersesyan, A. & Knasmüller, S. (2009). DNA-protective effects of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.), a common spice: Results of human and animal studies. Mutation Research, Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 661, 10-17.
  • Çiftçi-Yegin, S. (2017). Farklı yörelere ait sumak (Rhus Coriaria L.) ekşisinin antioksidan kapasitesinin belirlenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniv. Sağ. Bil. Enst. Derg., 2(2), 35-39.
  • Dalby, R. (2003). The sumacs as honey sources. American Bee Journal, 143(7), 553–554.
  • Doğan, M. & Akgül, A. (2005). Characteristics and fatty acid composition of Rhus coriaria cultivars from southeast Turkey. Chem. Nat. Comp., 41, 724-725.
  • Duru, S. & Bozdoğan Konuşkan, D. (2014). Bitkisel yağlarda oleik asit miktarının arttırılması ve yağ kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Gıda, 39: 1-7.
  • Gürbüz, Y. & Salih, Y.G. (2017). Influence of sumac (Rhus Coriaria L.) and ginger (Zingiber Officinale) on egg yolk fatty acid, cholesterol and blood parameters in laying hens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 101(6), 1316-1323.
  • Güvenç, A. & Koyuncu, M. (1994). A study on the main active compounds of leaves and fruits of Rhus coriaria l. Tr. J. Med. Sci., 20, 11-13.
  • Hosseini, S., Ramezan, Y. & Arab, S. (2020). A comparative study on physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.), cumin (Cuminum cyminum), and caraway (Carum carvil) oils. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 183(10), 1-9.
  • ISO 12228 (2014). Determination of individual and total sterols contents- Gas chromatographic method - Part 1: Animal and vegetable fats and oils.
  • ISO 9936 (2016). Animal and vegetable fats and oils - Determination of tocopherol and tocotrienol contents by high-performance liquid chromatography.
  • IUPAC (1987). Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives. International Union Pure and Applied Chemistry Division Commission on Oils, Fats and Derivatives. 7th ed., Blackwell Jevent Publishers, Oxford.
  • Karaca, E. & Aytaç, S. (2007). Yağ bitkilerinde yağ asitleri kompozisyonu üzerine etki eden faktörler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 123- 131.
  • Karadaş, Ö., Yılmaz, İ. & Geçgel, Ü. (2020). Propertıes of sumac plant and ıts ımportance ın nutrıtıon. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 4 (3), 377-383.
  • Kızıl, S. & Türk, M. (2010). Microelement contents and fatty acid compositions of Rhus coriaria and Pistacia terebinthus fruits spread commonly in the south eastern anatolia region of Turkey. Nat Prod Res., 24(1), 92-98.
  • Matthaus, B. & Özcan, M.M. (2015). Fatty acid composition, tocopherol, and sterol contents of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit oils. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 117(8), 1301-1302.
  • Mavlyanov, S.M., Islambekov, S.Y., Karimdzhanov, A.K. & Ismaikov, A.I. (1997). Anthocyans and organic acids of the fruits of some species of sumac. Chemistry of Natural Compounds, 33(2), 209.
  • Nayebpour, N. & Asadi-Gharneh, H.A. (2019). Variability of fatty acids composition of wild sumac (Rhus coriaria l.) fruit. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 71(18), 118-129.
  • Özcan, M. & Hacıseferoğulları, H. (2004). Acondiment sumac (rhus coriaria l.) fruits: some physico-chemical properties. Bul. J. Plant Physiol, 30, 74-84.
  • Rad, A.H., Khaleghi, M. & Javadi, M. (2020). Sumac in food ındustry: a changing outlook for consumer and producer. Journal of Food Technology & Nutrition Science. 2(1), 1-3.
  • Rayne, S. & Mazza, G. (2007). Biological activities of extracts from sumac (Rhus spp) a review. Plant foods for human nutrition, 62, 165-75.
  • Sabir, P.S. & Aydin, R. (2017). Diet supplemented with sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) ınfluenced fatty acid composition but not the cholesterol content of eggs from Japanese quail. EC Nutrition, 12(2), 103-109.
  • Sakhr, K. & Khatib, S.E. (2020). Physiochemical properties and medicinal, nutritional and industrial applications of Lebanese Sumac (Syrian Sumac - Rhus coriaria): A review. Heliyon, 6(1), e03207.
  • Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R. & Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. (1999). Analysis Of Total Phenols And Other Oxidation Substrates And Antioxidants By Means Of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299, 152-178.
  • Ünder, D. & Saltan, F.Z. (2019). Sumak ve önemli biyolojik etkileri. Çukurova Tarım Gıda Bil. Der., 34(1), 51-60.
  • Ünver, A. & Özcan, M.M. (2006). Türkiye’de yabani olarak yetişen bazı sumak (Rhus coriaria l.) meyvelerinin fiziksel ve kimyasal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (40), 111-116.
  • Viuda-Martos, M., El Gendy, A.E.G., Sendra, E., Fernandez-Lopez, J., El Razik, K.A.A., Omer, E.A. & Perez-Alvarez, J.A. (2010). Chemical composition and antioxidant and anti- listeria activities of essential oils obtained from some egyptian plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 9063-9070.
  • Yüksel, E. (2018). Tunceli ilinde yetişen sumak bitkisinin fitokimyasal bileşenlerinin incelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Munzur Üniversitesi / Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü / Gıda Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Tunceli.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Özgür Karadaş 0000-0002-7379-7845

İsmail Yılmaz 0000-0003-1116-0934

Umit Geçgel 0000-0002-7092-5899

Project Number NKUBAP.03YL.18.182
Publication Date December 30, 2020
Acceptance Date December 11, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

IEEE Ö. Karadaş, İ. Yılmaz, and U. Geçgel, “SUMAK (Rhus coriaria L.) MEYVESİNİN FİZİKOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİ”, Trakya Univ J Eng Sci, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2020.