Yeni Aile Türleri ve Değişen Değerler: Etik Açıdan Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 91 - 96, 27.09.2024

Tılsım Gülbu Kadıoğlu

Abstract

Günümüzde geleneksel anlayışın dışında yer alan yeni aile türleri giderek yaygınlaşmakta; çokaşklı (poliamorik) aileler bu yeni türlerden birisi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Birden fazla romantik partner ve ebeveyn figürünü içeren poliamorik aileler, evli anne – baba ve biyolojik çocuklarından oluşan çekirdek aile normuna uymamakta ve bu nedenle çeşitli zorluluklarla karşılaşmaktadır. Bahsi geçen zorluklar, kimi etik sorunları beraberinde getirmektedir. Çokaşklı aileler sayılarının her geçen gün artmasına karşın toplum tarafından yeterince tanınmamaktadır. Bahsi geçen etik sorunların altında bu bilgi eksikliğinin yattığı düşünülmektedir. Bireylerin cinsel veya romantik yönelimleri sebebiyle ayrımcılığa uğramasını engellemek ve etik bağlamda bir farkındalık yaratmak amaçlarıyla bu konu seçilmiştir. Dolayısıyla poliamorik ailelere yönelik sosyal damgalanma, yasal hakların tanınması, sağlık hizmetlerine erişim ve çocuklar ile yetişkinlerin refahı gibi çeşitli etik kaygılar bu çalışmada ele alınmıştır. Poliamorik aileler açık fikirli ve iletişimci ortamlar oluşturma konusunda daha avantajlı olmalarına karşın, özellikle yasal ve sosyal bağlamlarda önemli engellerle karşılaşmaları söz konusudur. Bu çalışmada, poliamorik aileleri kapsayan yasal düzenlemeler yapılmasının, iyileştirilmiş sağlık hizmetlerine erişimin sağlanmasının ve toplumsal ayrımcılığın azaltılmasına yönelik çabaların önemi vurgulanarak adalet, eşitlik ve saygıyı teşvik eden bir biyoetik yaklaşımın benimsenmesi tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

Biyoetik, Rızaya Dayalı Tekeşli Olmayan İlişkiler, Poliamorik Aileler, Sosyal Damgalama, Yasal Tanınma

New Family Types and Changing Values: An Evaluation from an Ethical Perspective

Abstract

This paper examines the ethical implications and challenges faced by polyamorous families within the broader context of evolving family structures. It highlights how polyamorous relationships, which involve multiple romantic and parental figures, challenge traditional nuclear family norms. Despite their growing numbers and the opportunities for fostering open-minded and communicative environment, significant barriers remain, particularly in legal and social contexts for polyamorous families. The paper explores various ethical concerns, including social stigma, legal recognition, access to healthcare, and the well-being of children and adults in polyamorous families. It is thought that these concerns are due to lack of recognition of polyamory in the society. This topic was chosen to prevent individuals from being discriminated against due to their sexual or romantic orientation and to raise awareness in an ethical context. The paper advocates for a bioethical approach that promotes justice, equality, and respect for diverse family forms, emphasizing the need for legal reforms, improved healthcare access, and efforts to reduce societal discrimination against polyamorous families.

Keywords

Bioethics, Ethical Non-Monogamy, Polyamorous Families, Social Stigma, Legal Recognition

References

• Sheff E. Polyamory is deviant–but not for the reasons you may think. Deviant Behav, 2020; 41 (7): 882-892.
• Cartwright PC, Farnsworth V, Mobley V. Relationships with step-parents in the life stories of young adults of divorce. Fam Matters, 2009; (82): 30-37.
• Zeleznikow L, Zeleznikow J. Supporting blended families to remain intact: A case study. J Divorce Remarriage, 2015; 56 (4): 317-335.
• Pallotta-Chiarolli M, Haydon P, Hunter A. “These are our children”: Polyamorous parenting. In: Goldberg AE, Allen KR, editors. LGBT-parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 117-131.
• Ben-Ze’ev A, Brunning L. How complex is your love? The case of romantic compromises and polyamory. J Theory Soc Behav, 2017; 48 (1): 98-116.
• Jiang HV. Different types of love in polyamory: Between primary and secondary [Honors Thesis]. Western University; 2017. p. 1-34.
• Balzarini RN, Muise A. Beyond the dyad: A review of the novel insights gained from studying consensual non- monogamy. Curr Sex Health Rep, 2020; 12 (4): 398-404.
• Cohen MT, Wilson K. Development of the consensual non-monogamy attitude scale (CNAS). Sex Cult, 2017; 21 (1): 1-14.
• Schadler C. Ever more parents in polyamorous families: A new materialist typology of parenting practices and division of work. Sex, 2021; online first: 1-17.
• Sheff E. Resilience in polyamorous families. In: Diamond LM, Hicks AM, Barker MJ, et al, editors. Critical & experiential: Dimensions in gender and sexual diversity. United Kingdom: Resonance Publications; 2016. p. 257- 280.
• Klesse C. Polyamorous parenting: Stigma, social regulation, and queer bonds of resistance. Sociol Res Online, 2019; 24 (4): 625-643.
• Shapiro D. Stepparents and parenting stress: The roles of gender, marital quality, and views about gender roles. Fam Process, 2014; 53 (1): 97-108.
• Arseneau E, Landry S, Darling EK. The polyamorous childbearing and birth experiences study (POLYBABES): A qualitative study of the health care experiences of polyamorous families during pregnancy and birth. Can Med Assoc J, 2019; 191 (41): 1120-1127.
• Landry S, Arseneau E, Darling EK. “It’s a little bit tricky”: Results from the POLYamorous childbearing and birth experiences study (POLYBABES). Arch Sex Behav, 2021; 50: 1479-1490.
• Black DM. Beyond child bride polygamy: Polyamory, unique familial constructions, and the law. J Law Fam Stud, 2006; 8 (2): 497-508.
• Noël MJ. Progressive polyamory: Considering issues of diversity. Sex, 2006; 9 (5): 602-620.
• Boyd J-PE. Polyamorous relationships and family law in Canada. Calgary (AB): Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family; 2017. Report No: 1.
• Fineman MA. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. Routledge; 2014.
• Jordan LS, Grogan C, Muruthi B, Bermúdez JM. Polyamory: Experiences of power from without, from within, and in between. J Couple Relatsh Ther, 2017; 16 (1): 1-19.
• Williams DJ, Prior EE. Contemporary polyamory: A call for awareness and sensitivity in social work. Soc Work, 2015; 60 (3): 268-270.
• Henrich R, Trawinski C. Social and therapeutic challenges facing polyamorous clients. Sex Relatsh Ther, 2016; 31 (3): 376-90.
• Bevacqua J. Adding to the rainbow of diversity: Caring for children of polyamorous families. J Pediatr Health Care, 2018; 32 (5): 490-493.
• Pallotta-Chiarolli M. Polyparents having children, raising children, schooling children. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 2006; 7 (1): 48-53.
• Roth A. (Queer) Family values and “reciprocal IVF”: What difference does sexual identity make? Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 2017; 27 (3): 443-473.
• Digoix M. Same-Sex Families and Legal Recognition in Europe. Switzerland: Springer; 2020. 178 p. (European Studies of Population).
• Mackenzie SC, Wickins-Drazilova D, Wickins J. The ethics of fertility treatment for same-sex male couples: Considerations for a modern fertility clinic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020; 244: 71-75.
• Pralat R. More natural does not equal more normal: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people’s views about different pathways to parenthood. J Fam Issues, 2018; 39 (18): 4179-4203.
• Strehovec T. Redefined family as a challenge for modern society and bioethics. Fam Forum, 2012; 2: 31-44.
• Kadioglu TG. Attitudes towards non-nuclear families: Case on multi-parent households [Master's dissertation]. Leuven: KU Leuven, Faculty of Social Sciences; 2023.