Bir Kadın Yönetmene Ait Sinemasal Dilin İnşası: Ana Yurdu (2015) Örneği

Abstract

Feminist film kuramı, klasik sinemayı kadınları erkek bakışının nesnesi olarak konumlandırmakla eleştirir ve kadın yönetmenlerin sinema dilinin klasik sinema kodlarından farklı olup olmaması gerektiğini tartışır. Kadın yönetmenlerin sinemasal dili ile kadın bakışının inşasını ele alan çalışmalar alanyazında görece sınırlı kalmaktadır. Bu çalışma kadın yönetmene ait sinemasal dilde kadın bakış açısı ve söyleminin görsel, işitsel, anlatısal ve tematik unsurlar açısından nasıl inşa edildiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda öncelikle klasik sinemadan farklılaşan sinema akımları ile feminist sinema literatürüne yer verilmiş, ardından amaçlı ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak, Türk sineması kadın yönetmenlerinden Senem Tüzen’in Ana Yurdu (2015) filmi incelenmek üzere seçilmiştir. Film, sinematografi, mizansen, anlatı yapısı ve tematik analizi bütünsel olarak içeren filmsel anlatı analizi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiş ve geleneksel sinemadan farklılaşan unsurlar tespit edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre, kadın karakterin yaşadığı deneyimleri onun bakış açısından göstermek için uzun plan, tepki planı, orta ve geniş planlar, yakın plan, seçmeli netlik, montaj sekans gibi sinematografik öğeler kullanılmıştır. Karakterin duygularını seyirciye hissettiren aydınlatma, ses, dekor, mekân, kostüm ve oyunculuk gibi mizansen öğeleri gözlenmiştir. Anlatı yapısında filmin belirgin bir sonu olmaması, ana karakterin hedefinin bulanıklaşması, seyirciyi yabancılaştıran öğelerin varlığı ile anne kız ilişkileri ve kadınlar arası dayanışma gibi konuların ele alınması filmi klasik filmsel anlatı dilinden uzaklaştırmaktadır.

Keywords

• Feminist Film Kuramı
• Kadının Sinemasal Dili
• Türk Sineması
• Senem Tüzen
• Ana Yurdu

Construction of a Female Director’s Cinematic Language: The Case of Motherland (2015)

Abstract

Feminist film theory critiques classical cinema for positioning women as objects of the male gaze and questions whether the cinematic language of female directors should diverge from the conventions of classical cinema. Studies that address female directors’ cinematic language and the construction of the female gaze remain relatively limited in the literature. This study aims to reveal how the female perspective and discourse are constructed in visual, auditory, narrative, and thematic elements in the cinematic language of female directors. In this context, after discussing movements diverging from classical cinema and feminist film literature, Senem Tüzen’s Motherland (2015) is selected through a purposeful criterion sampling method as a case from Turkish women’s cinema. The film was analyzed through filmic narrative analysis, encompassing cinematography, mise-en-scène, narrative structure, and thematic elements to identify departures from traditional cinema. Findings indicate that long takes, reaction shots, medium and wide shots, close-ups, selective focus, and montage sequences were used to portray the female character’s experiences from her perspective. Mise-en-scène elements, including lighting, sound, set design, space, costume, and acting, contributed to conveying her emotions. The narrative structure includes an open ending, a protagonist with an unclear goal, alienation effects, and themes such as mother-daughter relationships and female solidarity, all of which deviate from classical cinema.

Keywords

• Feminist Film Theory
• Women’s Cinematic Language
• Turkish Cinema
• Senem Tüzen
• Motherland

References

1. Akbulut, H. (2020). Film festivalleri bağlamında Ana Yurdu filminin çerçevelenişi: Bir Türkiye metaforu olarak Ana Yurdu [The framing of the film Motherland in the context of film festivals—Motherland as a metaphor of Turkey]. İlef, 7(2), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.24955/ilef.822756
2. Akçay Katıksız, D. (Director). (2013). Köksüz [Nobody’s Home] [Film]. Zoe.
3. AntraktSinema. (n.d.). Antrakt sinema gazetesi film arşivi. https://www.antraktsinema.com/
4. Arslan, G. (2016, May 13). Senem Tüzen: Annem izin vermese bu filmi çekmeyecektim. Hürriyet Kelebek. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kelebek/keyif/senem-tuzen-annem-izin-vermese-bu-filmi-cekmeyecektim-40103366
5. Aslan, M. (2019). Sinemada kadın: Başka Dilde Aşk filmi üzerine bir inceleme [Woman in cinema: A review on Love in Another Language]. Selçuk İletişim [Journal of Selçuk Communication], 12(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.18094/josc.457945
6. Ataman, A. (2017). İki “kişilik” düello Anayurdu; Anne kız çatışması üzerine bir inceleme [Duel of two Motherland; A study of mother daughter conflict]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 1182–1196. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.317129
7. Aytas, M., & Koca, S. (2019). An evaluation on minimalist narrative on the example of “Ana Yurdu” movie. In S. E. Dinçer, S. Sönmez, M. Bostancı, & E. Özçoban (Eds.), Research & reviews in social, human and administrative sciences (pp. 45–57). Gece Kitabevi.
8. Barrowman, K. (2025). Contesting feminism: Pedagogical problems in classical Hollywood cinema, feminist theory, and media studies. Feminist Media Studies, 25(1), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2268305

9. Baş, B. (Director). (2010). Zefir [Zephyr] [Film]. Filmik.
10. Başçı, P. (2015). Gender and memory in the films of Tomris Giritlioğlu and Yeşim Ustaoğlu. New Perspectives on Turkey, 53(1), 137–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2015.21
11. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. The University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Bordwell, D., Thompson, K., & Smith, J. (2017). Film art – An introduction. McGraw-Hill Education.
13. Bozdemir, B. (2016, May 24). Senem Tüzen’le Anayurdu üzerine: ‘Asıl mesele Nesrin’in muhafazakâr olmaması.’ Öteki Sinema. https://www.otekisinema.com/senem-tuzenle-anayurdu-uzerine-asil-mesele-nesrinin-muhafazakar-olmamasi/
14. Büyükgöze, S. (2017). Understanding women’s stories through spatial relations: On Until I Lose My Breath, Motherland and Clair-Obscur. In S. Koç Akgül & B. Küçüksaraç (Eds.), II. International Communication Science & Media Studies Congress (pp. 17–24). İstanbul Ayvansaray Üniversitesi. https://www.topkapi.edu.tr/resources/files/kutuphane/ICSMSC_II_FullText.pdf
15. Cabrera Campoy, J. (2017). Is it necessary to “be” a feminist to “make” feminist cinema? Icíar Bollaín and her cinematographic representation of gender. Investigaciones Feministas [Feminist Research], 8(2), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54954
16. Cantaş, A. (2023). Minör sinemada kadın-oluş ve Hayaletler filmi [The film Ghosts and becoming-woman in minor cinema]. İlef, 10(2), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.24955/ilef.1383418
17. Chaudhuri, S. (2006). Feminist film theorists, Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa De Lauretis, Barbara Creed. Routledge.
18. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. University of California Press.
19. Cixous, H. (2008). My text is written in white and black, in ‘milk and night.’ In S. Sellers (Ed.), White ink: Interviews on sex, text and politics (pp. 58–78). Columbia University Press.
20. Cixous, H., Cohen, K., & Cohen, P. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
21. De Lauretis, T. (1985). Aesthetic and feminist theory: Rethinking women’s cinema. New German Critique, 34, 154–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/488343
22. Dubois, D. (2015). The perfect human: An avant-garde rebellion against classical Hollywood style. Short Film Studies, 5(2), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1386/sfs.5.2.141_1
23. Ekinci, B. T. (2018). Sinemada yeni dil arayışları. Gece Kitaplığı.
24. Fabian, R. (2018). Reconsidering the work of Claire Johnston. Feminist Media Histories, 4(3), 244–273. https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2018.4.3.244
25. Fenghi, F. (2025). Auteur cinema beyond the iron curtain: On the relationship between the French and Soviet new waves. Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema, 19(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503132.2024.2448413
26. Fernández Escareño, I. G. (1996). Diez estudios de caso de directoras de largometrajes de ficción, dentro de los canones industriales, en la historia del cine mexicano 1935–1992 [Ten case studies of women directors of fiction feature films within industrial canons in the history of Mexican cinema 1935–1992] [Bachelor’s thesis]. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana at Azcapotzalco.
27. Finn, H. (2023). Cinematic modernism and contemporary film. Bloomsbury Academic.
28. Fischer, L. (1989). Shot/counter shot – Film tradition and women’s cinema. Princeton University Press.
29. French, L. (2021). The female gaze in documentary film: An international perspective. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68094-7
30. Gilbert, S., & Gubar, S. (1980). The mad woman in the attic. Yale University Press.
31. Gürkan, H., & Biga, N. T. (2023). Women’s narratives inhibiting scopophilic and voyeuristic views: Woman as the saviour in contemporary Turkish women’s films. Feminist Media Studies, 23(5), 2407–2422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2055106
32. Gürkan, H., & Ozan, R. (2015). Feminist cinema as counter cinema: Is feminist cinema counter cinema? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(3), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2517
33. Hu, L. (2022). Becoming modern: Stories of rural women in Chinese women’s cinema. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 19(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2022.2096912
34. IMDb. (n.d.). Senem Tüzen. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4127109/
35. Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Cornell University Press.
36. Jenkins, C. (2021). “Counter cinema” in the mainstream. Feminist Media Studies, 22(5), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1877767
37. Johnston, C. (1973). Women’s cinema as counter-cinema. In C. Johnston (Ed.), Notes on Women’s Cinema (pp. 24–37). Society for Education in Film and Television.
38. Kaplan, E. A. (2001). Women & film both sides of the camera. Routledge.
39. Kristeva, J. (1977). Polylogue. Seuil.
40. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language—A semiotic approach to literature and art (T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
41. Malone, A. (2018). The female gaze – Essential movies made by women. Mango Publishing Group.
42. Mantziari, D. (2022). Beyond gender inclusivity: Susanne Bier, feminism and female authorship. Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 12(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1386/jsca_00071_1
43. Mayne, J. (1990). The women at the keyhole – Feminism and women’s cinema. Indiana University Press.
44. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
45. Nelmes, J. (2012). Introduction to film studies. Routledge.
46. Oroz, E., & Binimelis, M. (2020). Who counts? The presence of women directors in Spanish independent cinema through a data analysis of film circulation (2013-2018). Communication & Society, 33(3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.101-118
47. Özdemir, B. G. (2018). Şimdiki Zaman: Kadın karakterlerin film mekânlarındaki temsilinin feminist film eleştirisi çerçevesinde incelenmesi [Present Tense: Analyzing women characters’ representation in spaces within the scope of feminist film criticism]. Sinecine: Sinema Araştırmaları Dergisi [Sinecine: Journal of Film Studies], 9(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.32001/sinecine.471856
48. Öztürk, S. R. (2018). Yerli kadın yönetmenler ve yeni filmlerde anne-kız ilişkisi. In Perdeyi aralamak (pp. 292–304). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
49. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
50. Petty, S. (2012). Aesthetic and narrative strategies in the films of selected African women directors. Journal of African Cinemas, 4(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1386/jac.4.2.145_1
51. Pop, D. (2011). Feminism, feminine discourse and the representation of women in the new Romanian cinema. Ekphrasis. Images, Cinema, Theory, Media, 5(1), 12–37.
52. Rashkin, E. J. (2001). Women filmmakers in Mexico: The country of which we dream. University of Texas Press. Sistach, M. (Director). (1991). Los pasos de Ana [Anna’s Steps] [Film]. Imcine.
53. Sönmez, S. (2019). Ana yurdunda bir anne ve bir kız; Nesrin ve Halise. In S. Sönmez & H. Satıcı (Eds.), Kadının kamerasından—2000 sonrası Türkiye’de kadın yönetmenler (pp. 171–183). Doruk Yayınları.
54. Sorolla-Romero, T. (2018). El relato tiembla. Narrativas fracturadas contemporáneas en el cine de Alejandro Amenábar y Pedro Almodóvar [The story trembles. Contemporary fractured narratives in the films by Alejandro Amenábar and Pedro Almodóvar]. Cuadernos.Info, 43, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.43.1466
55. Stewart, K. (2015). Establishing the female gaze: Narrative subversion in Lucrecia Martel’s La niña santa (2004) and La ciénaga (2001). Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies, 21(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14701847.2015.1179850
56. Tanrıöver, H. U. (2016). Women as film directors in Turkish cinema. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(4), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816649985
57. Telfer, T. (2018, August 2). How do we define the female gaze in 2018? Vulture. https://www.vulture.com/2018/08/how-do-we-define-the-female-gaze-in-2018.html
58. Thanouli, E. (2006). Post-classical narration: A new paradigm in contemporary cinema. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300600981900
59. TIFF Originals. (2016, September 11). Joey Soloway on the female gaze/ Master Class/ TIFF 2016 [Video recording]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnBvppooD9I/
60. Tüzen, S. (Director). (2015). Ana Yurdu [Motherland] [Film]. Zela Film.
61. Tüzen, S., Isenberg, A., & Arjomand, N. A. (Directors). (2021). Eat Your Catfish [Film]. Zela Film.
62. Tzioumakis, Y. (2011). Academic discourses and American independent cinema: In search of a field of studies. Part 1: from the beginnings to the 1980s. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 9(2), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2011.556928
63. Uğuz, B. (2022). Sinemada dişil dilin imkânı: Yakın dönem Türk sinemasında kadın yönetmenlerin filmlerine sosyolojik bir bakış [Cinematic possibility of feminine language: A sociological approach to the films of women directors in the last decade of Turkish cinema] [Doctoral dissertation]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
64. Velioğlu Metin, Ö. (2019). “Annem izin vermese bu filmi çekmeyecektim”: Foucault’nun iktidar kavramı üzerinden Ana Yurdu filmi okuması [“I would not shoot this movie if my mother had not permitted”: Reading the Motherland (Ana Yurdu) movie through Foucault’s concept of power]. SineFilozofi [SineFilozofi Journal], Özel Sayı 1, 474–492. https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.515242
65. Weil, K. (2006). French feminism’s écriture féminine. In E. Rooney (Ed.), Feminist literary theory (pp. 153–171). Cambridge University Press.
66. Wikipedia. (n.d.). SIYAD Best Director Awards. Wikipekia. tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_İyi_Yönetmen_Sinema_Yazarları_Derneği_Ödülü
67. Wollen, P. (2009). Godard and counter cinema: Vent d’est. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film, theory and criticism—Introductory readings (pp. 418–426). Oxford University Press.
68. Yaşartürk, G. (2023). Sinema ve toplumsal cinsiyet – Türk sinemasında ev, emek, cinsiyet ve iktidar ilişkileri. Nika Yayınevi.
69. Yeşilyurt, A. (2024). “Panzehir” filminin Tzvetan Todorov’un denge modeli ve Peter Wollen’in Hollywood anlatısı bağlamında çözümlenmesi [Analysis of “Antidote” in the context of Tzvetan Todorov’s equilibrium model and Peter Wollen’s Hollywood narrative]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi [Anadolu University Journal of Art & Design], 14(1), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1506028
70. Yetik, Z. (Director). (2020). Dirlik Düzenlik [It’s All About Peace and Harmony] [Film]. Özminimalist Film.
71. Zaatari, A., & Sfeir, M. (1999). Questionnaire for women film and video makers. AL-Raida, XVI(86–87), 19–22. https://alraidajournal.lau.edu.lb/_includes/viewer.html?pdf=https://alraidajournal.lau.edu.lb/images/issue086-087-page019.pdf
72. Zengin, G. G. (2017). Feminist bir film pratiği olarak Geriye Kalan filmine bakmak: Kadın karakterler üzerinden bir inceleme [A Study of a feminist film titled Geriye Kalan: An examination of female characters]. Kadın/Woman 2000, 18(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v18i2.252