The relationship between fruit color and fruit quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L. cv. ‘0900 Ziraat’)

Year 2019, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 30.06.2019

Erdal Aglar Onur Saracoglu Orhan Karakaya Burhan Ozturk Sefa Gun

Abstract

The study was carried out to determine the
relationship between fruit color on the fruit quality and bioactive compounds
of sweet cherry. The highest mass, width and length of fruit were obtained when
harvested in CTIFL 2,  whereas the lowest
values were recorded in CTIFL 6. With the increase in color intensity, the
softening in fruit occurred. The firmness of CTIFL 6 was about half of the
CTIFL 2. With the darkening of the color, SSC significantly increased in fruit.
The highest SSC value was determined in CTIFL 6, but the lowest SSC was
recorded in CTIFL 2. The fruit of CTIFL 3, had significantly higher vitamin C
than the other fruit. The lowest vitamin C was measured in CTIFL 2. The fruit
of CTIFL 4-6 had higher total phenolics and total flavonoids content than other
color levels. In both DPPH and FRAP assays, the highest antioxidant activity
was measured in CTIFL 6, whereas the lowest was determined in CTIFL 2. The
effect on color levels of phenolic compounds was  significant. 
Catechin and chlorogenic acid were major phenolic acids in fruit. As a
result, it was revealed that color levels had significant effect on bioactive
compounds of sweet cherry. 

Keywords

Antioxidant activity, bioactive compounds, firmness, vitamin C

Supporting Institution

Scientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University

Project Number

STKMYO-005

Thanks

This work is supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund of Cumhuriyet University under the Project number STKMYO-005

References

• Beever, D. J., & Hopkirk, G. (1990). Fruit development and fruit physiology. Kiwifruit: science and management. Warrington, I. J. ; Weston, G. C. ed. Wellington, New Zea Soci Hortic Sci., 97-126.
• Benzie, I. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem, 239, 70-76.
• Blois, M. S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181, 1199-1200.
• Bohner, J., & Bangerth, F. (1988). Cell number, cell size and hormone levels in semi-isogenic mutants of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium differing in fruit size. Physiol Plant, 72, 316-320.
• Crisosto, C. H., Crisosto, G. M., & Metheney, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Tec., 28, 159-167.
• Erbas, D., Koyuncu, M. A., Ozusoy, F., Onursal, C. E. (2018). Effects of pre-harvest putrescine treatment on fruit quality of sweet cherry cv. 0900 Ziraat. Academic Journal of Agriculture, 7, 151-156.
• Esti, M., Cinquante, L., Sinesio, F., Moneta, E., & Matteo, M. (2002). Physicochemical and sensory fruit characteristics of two sweet cherry cultivars after cool storage. Food Chem., 76, 399-405.
• Faniadis, D., Drogoudi, P. D., & Vasilakakis, M. (2010). Effects of cultivar, orchard elevation, and storage on fruit quality characters of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Sci Hortic., 125, 301-304.
• Hagermann, A., Harvey-Mueller, I., & Makkar, H. P. S. (2000). Quantification of tannins in tree foliage-a laboratory manual. Vienna: FAO/IAEA Working Document.
• Kappel, F., Fisher-Fleming, B., & Hogue, E. (1996). Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortSci, 31, 443-446.
• Looney, N. E., Webster, A. D., & Kupperman, E. M. (1996). Harvest and handling sweet cherries for the fresh market. Cherries, Crop. Physiology, Production and Uses. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 411-441.
• Mahmood, Z., Ishtiag, A., Saeed, M. U. Q., & Sheikh, M. A. (2013). Investigation of physico-chimical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil extracted from lignin-containing cupressus sempervirens. BioResources, 8, 1625-1633.
• Meda, A., Lamien, C. E., Romito, M., Millogo, J., & Nacoulma, O. G. (2005). Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chem, 91, 571-577.
• Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Schmitzer, V., Slatnar, A., Stampar, F., & Veberic, R. (2012). Composition of sugars, organic acids, and total phenolics in 25 wild or cultivated berry species. J Food Sci., 77, 1064-1070.
• Ozturk, B., Yıldız, K., & Kucuker, E. (2015). Effect of preharvest methyl jasmonate treatments on ethylene production, water soluble phenolic compounds and fruit quality of Japanese plums. J Sci Food Agric., 95, 583-591.
• Ruck, J. A. (1963). Chemical method for analysis of fruit and vegetable products. Contribution No. B7. Publication no. 1154. Research station, Summerland B.C. Department of Agriculture, Canada.
• Sen, F., Oksar, R. E., Golkarian, M., & Yaldiz, S. (2014). Quality changes of different sweet cherry cultivars at various stages of the supply chain. Not Bot Horti Agro., 42, 501-506.
• Serra, A. T., Duarte, R. O., Bronze, M. R., & Duarte, C. M. M. (2011). Identification of bioactive response in traditional cherries from Portugal. Food Chem, 125, 318-325. Serradilla, M. J., Martin, A., Ruiz-Moyano, S., Hernandez, A., Lopez-Corrales, M., & De Cordoba, M. G. (2012). Physicochemical and sensorial characterization of four sweet cherry cultivars grown in Jerte Valley (Spain). Food Chem., 133, 1551-1559.
• Serrano, M., Guillen, F., Martinez-Romero, D., Castillo, S., & Valero, D. (2005). Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. J Agric Food Chem., 53, 2741-2745.
• Tomás-Barberán, F. A., & Espín, J. C. (2001). Phenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruit and vegetables. J Sci Food Agric., 81, 853-876.
• Usenik, V., Stampar, F., & Kastelec, D. (2013). Phytochemicals in fruits of two Prunus domestica L. plum cultivars during ripening. J Sci Food Agric., 93, 681-692.
• Usenik, V., Stampar, F., Petkovsek, M., & Kastelec, D. (2014). The effect of fruit size and fruit color on chemical composition in ‘Kordia’ sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). J Food Compos Anal, 38, 121-130.
• Wermund, U., Fearne, A., & Hornibrook, S. A. (2005). Consumer purchasing behaviour with respect to cherries in the United Kingdom. Acta Hortic, 667,539– 544.
• Whiting, M. D., Lang, G., & Ophardt, D. (2005). Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. HortSci., 40, 582-586.
• Yoo, K. M., Al-Farsi, M., Lee, H., Yoon, H., & Lee, C. Y. (2010). Antiproliferative effects of cherry juice and wine in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells and their phenolic constituents and antioxidant activities. Food Chem, 123, 734-740.