Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Mühendislik Öğrencilerinin E-Öğrenmeye Dair Hazır Bulunuşluk ve Memnuniyet Düzeyleri

Year 2017, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 218 - 243, 05.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.280165

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman
Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi İnşaat ve Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü
öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi teknolojiler kullanılarak harmanlanmış olarak
tasarlanan Kalkülüs-2 dersi bağlamında e-öğrenmeye dair beklenti, hazır
bulunuşluk ve memnuniyetlerini değerlendirmektir. Çalışmadan elde edilecek
sonuçların dersin tasarımının iyileştirilmesinde kullanılması planlanmaktadır.
İlişkisel tarama modeli kullanılan çalışmada, katılmıcıalrın beklenti, hazır
bulunuşluk ve memnuniyetleri cinsiyet, bölüm ve daha önceden e-öğrenme deneyimine
sahip olup olmama durumlarına göre incelenmiştir. Amaçlı örneklem
yöntemlerinden ölçüt örnekleme kullanılan araştırmada, dönem başında yapılan
beklenti ve hazır bulunuşluk çalışmasına 102 öğrenci, dönem sonunda yapılan
memnuniyet çalışmasına 95 öğrenci katılmıştır. 
Elde edilen verilere göre Mühendislik Fakültesi öğrencilerinin
e-öğrenmeden beklenti, hazır bulunuşluk ve memnuniyet düzeylerinde devam
ettikleri bölüm, cinsiyet ve daha önceden e-öğrenme deneyimine sahip olma
durumlarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Bu tür
çalışmalardan elde edilen bulguların, Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitim yöntemiyle
verilen ders ve programların niteliğinin artırılmasına katkı sağlayacağı
düşünülmektedir.

References

  • Aydın, C. H. (2011). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme: öğrenci adaylarının bakış açısı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Bates, A. W. (2000). Distance Education in Dual Mode Higher Education Institutions: Challenges and Changes. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. Division of Continuing Studies.
  • Beqiri, M. S., Chase, N. M. & Bishka, A. (2009). Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction. Journal of Education For Business, 85(2), 95-100.
  • Blum, K. D. (1999). Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: learning styles, participation barriers and communication. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(1). URL: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol3_issue1/blum.htm
  • Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-24.
  • Borotis, S. A. & Poulymenakou, A., (2004), E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education 2004. Washington DC, USA.
  • Çelen F.K., Çelik, A., & Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Yükseköğretimde çevrim-içi öğrenme: Sistemde yaşanan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Journal of European Education, 1(1), 25-34.
  • Dada, D. (2006). E-readiness for developing countries: moving the focus from the environment to the users. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(6), 1-14.
  • Davis, A. M. (2014). Measuring student satisfaction in online math courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington: KY.
  • Eom, S. B. (2014). Understanding e-Learners’ Satisfaction with Learning Management Systems. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 16(2/3), 10-13.
  • Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 7– 41
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2012). Study of developing scales for assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of participants in e-learning environments. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 45(2), 119-137. DOI: 10.1501/Egifak_0000001256.
  • Hanafizadeh,P., Hanafizadeh, M. R., & Khodabakhshi, M. (2009).Taxonomy of e-readiness assessment measures. International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals 29(3), 189-195
  • Hung , M.,Chou, C., Chen, C., Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090
  • Hukle, D.R. L. (2009). An Evaluation of Readiness Factors For Online Education, Mississippi State University, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Mississippi.
  • İlhan, M. ve Çetin, B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazır bulunuşluk ölçeği’nin (ÇÖHBÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(2), 72-101.
  • Jung-Wan, L. & Mendlinger, S. (2011). Perceived self-efficacy and its effect on online learning acceptance and student satisfaction. Journal of Service Science & Management, 4(3), 243-252.
  • Kalelioğlu, F. ve Baturay, M. H. (2014). E-Öğrenme için hazır bulunuşluk öz değerlendirme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Başkent University Journal of Education, 1(2). 22-30.
  • Karuppan, C. M. (2001). Web-based teaching materials: a user’s profile. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), 138–148.
  • Koçlar, S. & Doğan, T. G. (2015). Türkiye’deki açık ve uzaktan öğrenme programlarının bir analizi: Eğilimler ve öneriler. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 23-36.
  • Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Tan, S. (2015). Öğrencilerin E-öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk ve Memnuniyet Düzeylerinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 16(3), 219-241.
  • Moore, M. G & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  • Paechter M, Maier B, Macher D (2010) Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education 54: 222–229.
  • Pena, M. & Yeung, A. (2010). Satisfaction with online learning: does students’ computer competence matter? International Journal Of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 6(5), 97-108.
  • Shraim. K., & Khlaif. Z. (2010). An e-learning approach to secondary education in Palestine: Opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 16(3), 159–173
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2009). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Shee, D. Y., & Wang Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50, 894-905.
  • Stephen, M., Mutula, S. M. & Brakel, P. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: Towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 212–223.
  • Sun , P-C, Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction, Computers & Education, 50, I4, 1183-1202.
  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M. & Pelz, W. E. (2000). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. In: Proceedings of WebNet 2000 world conference on the WWW and Internet, San Antonio, TX.
  • Tait, A. (2010). Foreword. Editör M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D.R. Garrison, An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  • Yurdugül, H. & Sırakaya, D. A. (2013). The Scale of Online Learning Readiness: A study of validity and reliability. Education and Science, 38(169), 391-406.
  • Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.
  • Watkins, R., Leigh, D. & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66-79.
  • Wu, J-H., Tennyson, R.D., & Tzyh-lih, H. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning systems. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164.

Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning

Year 2017, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 218 - 243, 05.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.280165

Abstract

This study aims to examine
expectations, and readiness and satisfaction levels of on-campus engineering
students for a blended Calculus course, and to draw implications for course
improvement, through quantitative measurement tools on the basis of gender, department,
and prior exposure to online learning. Designed as a correlational survey, the
study was conducted at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University with freshman students
enrolled in computer and civil engineering departments. Total 102 students
responded to expectancy and readiness survey administered at the beginning of
the semester whilst 95 responded to the satisfaction survey at the end of the
semester. Findings indicate no significant difference statistically for
expectation, readiness and satisfaction levels of the participants as of
gender, department and prior exposure to online learning. It is expected that
findings from such studies will help to improve the design, development and
implementation of online courses and programmes in Turkey.

References

  • Aydın, C. H. (2011). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme: öğrenci adaylarının bakış açısı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Bates, A. W. (2000). Distance Education in Dual Mode Higher Education Institutions: Challenges and Changes. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. Division of Continuing Studies.
  • Beqiri, M. S., Chase, N. M. & Bishka, A. (2009). Online course delivery: An empirical investigation of factors affecting student satisfaction. Journal of Education For Business, 85(2), 95-100.
  • Blum, K. D. (1999). Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: learning styles, participation barriers and communication. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(1). URL: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol3_issue1/blum.htm
  • Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-24.
  • Borotis, S. A. & Poulymenakou, A., (2004), E-Learning Readiness Components: Key Issues to Consider Before Adopting e-Learning Interventions. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education 2004. Washington DC, USA.
  • Çelen F.K., Çelik, A., & Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Yükseköğretimde çevrim-içi öğrenme: Sistemde yaşanan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Journal of European Education, 1(1), 25-34.
  • Dada, D. (2006). E-readiness for developing countries: moving the focus from the environment to the users. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(6), 1-14.
  • Davis, A. M. (2014). Measuring student satisfaction in online math courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington: KY.
  • Eom, S. B. (2014). Understanding e-Learners’ Satisfaction with Learning Management Systems. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 16(2/3), 10-13.
  • Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 7– 41
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2012). Study of developing scales for assessment of the levels of readiness and satisfaction of participants in e-learning environments. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 45(2), 119-137. DOI: 10.1501/Egifak_0000001256.
  • Hanafizadeh,P., Hanafizadeh, M. R., & Khodabakhshi, M. (2009).Taxonomy of e-readiness assessment measures. International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals 29(3), 189-195
  • Hung , M.,Chou, C., Chen, C., Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090
  • Hukle, D.R. L. (2009). An Evaluation of Readiness Factors For Online Education, Mississippi State University, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Mississippi.
  • İlhan, M. ve Çetin, B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazır bulunuşluk ölçeği’nin (ÇÖHBÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(2), 72-101.
  • Jung-Wan, L. & Mendlinger, S. (2011). Perceived self-efficacy and its effect on online learning acceptance and student satisfaction. Journal of Service Science & Management, 4(3), 243-252.
  • Kalelioğlu, F. ve Baturay, M. H. (2014). E-Öğrenme için hazır bulunuşluk öz değerlendirme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Başkent University Journal of Education, 1(2). 22-30.
  • Karuppan, C. M. (2001). Web-based teaching materials: a user’s profile. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), 138–148.
  • Koçlar, S. & Doğan, T. G. (2015). Türkiye’deki açık ve uzaktan öğrenme programlarının bir analizi: Eğilimler ve öneriler. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 23-36.
  • Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Tan, S. (2015). Öğrencilerin E-öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk ve Memnuniyet Düzeylerinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 16(3), 219-241.
  • Moore, M. G & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  • Paechter M, Maier B, Macher D (2010) Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education 54: 222–229.
  • Pena, M. & Yeung, A. (2010). Satisfaction with online learning: does students’ computer competence matter? International Journal Of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 6(5), 97-108.
  • Shraim. K., & Khlaif. Z. (2010). An e-learning approach to secondary education in Palestine: Opportunities and challenges. Information Technology for Development, 16(3), 159–173
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2009). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Shee, D. Y., & Wang Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50, 894-905.
  • Stephen, M., Mutula, S. M. & Brakel, P. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: Towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 212–223.
  • Sun , P-C, Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction, Computers & Education, 50, I4, 1183-1202.
  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M. & Pelz, W. E. (2000). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. In: Proceedings of WebNet 2000 world conference on the WWW and Internet, San Antonio, TX.
  • Tait, A. (2010). Foreword. Editör M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D.R. Garrison, An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a new era (pp. ix-xi). New York: Routledge.
  • Yurdugül, H. & Sırakaya, D. A. (2013). The Scale of Online Learning Readiness: A study of validity and reliability. Education and Science, 38(169), 391-406.
  • Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including on-line learning. Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.
  • Watkins, R., Leigh, D. & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66-79.
  • Wu, J-H., Tennyson, R.D., & Tzyh-lih, H. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning systems. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Müge Adnan This is me

Burçak Boz-yaman

Publication Date June 5, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Adnan, M., & Boz-yaman, B. (2017). Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 8(2), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.280165
AMA Adnan M, Boz-yaman B. Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). August 2017;8(2):218-243. doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.280165
Chicago Adnan, Müge, and Burçak Boz-yaman. “Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning”. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 8, no. 2 (August 2017): 218-43. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.280165.
EndNote Adnan M, Boz-yaman B (August 1, 2017) Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 8 2 218–243.
IEEE M. Adnan and B. Boz-yaman, “Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning”, Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 218–243, 2017, doi: 10.16949/turkbilmat.280165.
ISNAD Adnan, Müge - Boz-yaman, Burçak. “Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning”. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 8/2 (August 2017), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.280165.
JAMA Adnan M, Boz-yaman B. Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 2017;8:218–243.
MLA Adnan, Müge and Burçak Boz-yaman. “Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning”. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), vol. 8, no. 2, 2017, pp. 218-43, doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.280165.
Vancouver Adnan M, Boz-yaman B. Profile of Engineering Undergraduates on Readiness and Satisfaction for E-Learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). 2017;8(2):218-43.