Türkiye'deki Süt Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinin Ekonomik Analizi: Karacabey İlçesi Örneği

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 759 - 765, 16.10.2019

Damla Özsayın

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.633588

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin Bursa ili Karacabey
ilçesindeki süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinin ekonomik yapısının analiz edilmesi
amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma alanındaki işletmeler tabakalı tesadüfi örnekleme
yöntemiyle belirlenmiştir. Veriler, 208 işletmeden anket yöntemiyle
toplanmıştır. İşletmeler üç gruba ayrılmıştır (5-11 sığıra sahip olan
işletmeler, 12-26 sığıra sahip olan işletmeler ve 27 ve üzeri sığıra sahip
işletmeler).  Veriler,  2017 üretim dönemini kapsamaktadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre; işletmelerin inek
başına günlük süt verimi ve laktasyondaki süt verimi 18.72 kg ve 4835.81 kg/yıl
olarak belirlenmiştir. İşletmelerin toplam üretim maliyeti $49103.07 olarak
hesaplanmıştır. İşletmelerin ortalama yem maliyeti, toplam üretim maliyetinin
%52.11'ini oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, araştırma bulgularının Karacabey
ilçesindeki süt sığırcılığı faaliyetinin geliştirilmesine ve onların süt üretim
miktarlarının artmasına katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Süt sığırı, Karacabey, üretim maliyeti

Economic Analysis of Dairy Cattle Farms in Turkey: A Case of Karacabey District

Abstract

The aim of this study was
to analyse the economic structure of dairy cattle farms in Karacabey district of Bursa province
in Turkey. The number of farms in the research area was determined through
stratified random sampling method. The data were collected from a total of 208
selected farms by means of survey method. The selected farms were divided into
three groups (5 to≤11 cattle, 12 to ≤26 cattle and equal 27 and >27 cattle).
The data were based on the 2017 production period. The study concluded that the
average daily
milk yield and lactatiton milk yield per cow of farms were 18.72 kg
and 4835.81 kg year^-1. The total
production cost was found to be $49103.07. The average feed cost per farm was
accounted for 52.11% of the total production costs. As a result, the
study will potentially contribute to the increase of the amount of milk
production in farms and the development of dairy farming in Karacabey district,
which is the research are of this study.

Keywords

Dairy cattle, Karacabey, production cost

References

• Aktürk, D., Bayramoğlu, Z., Savran, F., Tatlıdil, F.F. 2010. The factors affecting milk production and milk production cost: Çanakkale case-Biga. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 16(2): 329-335.
• Anonymus. 2017. Statistical Data. Records of Bursa Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry. CBRT. 2017. Statistical Data. Exchanges rates. Retrieved in January, 11, 2017 from http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/.
• Dağıstan, E., Koç, B., Gül, M., Parlakay, O., Akpınar, M.G. 2009. Identifying technical efficiency of dairy cattle management in rural areas through a non-parametric method: a case study for the East Mediterranean in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(5): 863-867.
• Daş, A., İnci, H., Karakaya, E., Şengül, A.Y. 2014. Bingöl ili damızlık sığır yetiştiricileri birliğine bağlı sığırcılık işletmelerinin mevcut durumu. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3): 421-429.
• Demircan, V., Köknaroğlu, H., Yılmaz, H., Dernek, Z. 2007. Economic analysis of beef cattle farms in Turkey. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 31(2): 143-148.
• Faostat. 2017. Statistical Data. Retrieved in May, 24, 2017 from http://www.fao.org/.
• Gençdal, F., Yıldırım, İ. 2018. Gross and net profit of dairy cattle farms - a case study in Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 18(4): 121-127.
• Gündüz, D., Dağdeviren, M. 2011. Determination of production cost of cow milk and functional analysis of factors affecting milk production in the Bafra district. YuzuncuYıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2): 104-111.
• Jabir, A. 2007. Livestock sector development and implications for rural poverty alleviation in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(2): 1-13.
• Keskin, G., Dellal, İ. 2011. Gross margin analysis for dairy cattle in Trakya Region. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 17(2): 177-182.
• Kıral, T., Kasnakoğlu, H., Tatlıdil, F., Fidan, H., Gündoğmuş, E. 1999. Data Base Guide and Production Cost Methodology for Agricultural Products. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Ankara.
• Oğuz, F. K., Oğuz, M. N., Sipahi, C. 2013. The structural situation related to animal nutrition and nutritional diseases at dairy cattle farms in Burdur province. Journal ofVeterinary Medical Science, 84(2): 7-19.
• Oğuz, C., Yener, A. 2017. Economic analysis of dairy cattle enterprises: the case of Konya province. European Countryside, 9(2): 263-273.
• Schaik, G.V., Perry, B.D., Muhkebi, A.W., Gitau, G.K., Dijkhuizen, A.A. 1996. An economic study of smallholder dairy farms in Muranga district, Kenya. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 29(1): 21-36.
• Semerci, A., Parlakay, O., Çelik, A.D. 2014. Gross margin analysis in dairy cattle: a case study of Hatay Province, Turkey. Custos e Agronegócio Online, 10(4): 154-170.
• Semerci, A., Parlakay, O., Çelik, A.D. 2015. Economic analysis of dairy farms: the case of Hatay province. Journal of Tekirdag Agriculture Faculty, 12(3): 8-17.
• Sharma, K.R., Leung, P., Zaleski, H.M. 1999. Technical, allocative and economic efficiencies in Swine production in Hawaii: a comparison of parametric andnonparametric approaches. Agricultural Economics, 20(1): 23-35.
• Turkstat. 2017. Statistical Indicators. Turkish Statistical Institute. Retrieved in March, 18, 2017 from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/.
• Vallapureddy, M. 2013. Socio economics aspects of the women dairy farmers in A.P. Indian Economic Review, 22(1): 45-48.
• Yamane, T. 1967. Elementary Sampling Theory, Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey.
• Yılmaz, H., Gül, M., Akkoyun, S., Parlakay, O., Bilgili, M.E., Vurarak, Y., Hızlı, H., Kılıçalp,N. 2016. Economic analysis of dairy cattle farms in East Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia,45(7): 409-416.