Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Fermentation Quality and Nutritional Traits of Cluster Bean-Maize Mixture Silages

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 1103 - 1109, 24.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.995146

Abstract

In present study, effects of different mixture ratios of cluster bean (CB) and maize (M) on silage fermentation and nutritional traits were investigated. Based on dry matter (DM) ratios, maize and cluster bean plants were mixed in five different ratios (100% M, 75% M+25% CB, 50% M+50% CB, 25% M+75% CB and 100% CB). Pure maize, cluster bean and mixture were ensiled for 60 days. Effects of mixture ratios on investigated traits were found to be highly significant (p≤0.01). Increasing silage DM, ADF (acid detergent fiber), NDF (neutral detergent fiber), lactic acid, gas-methane production, metabolizable energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) values and decreasing pH levels were observed with increasing maize ratio of the mixtures. Increasing silage crude oil (CO), crude ash (CA) and crude protein (CP) content and volatile fatty acids (acetic, butyric and propionic) were observed with increasing cluster bean ratio of the mixtures. Present findings revealed that improvements were achieved in DM, pH, nutritional traits and ME of the silages with mixtures of maize and cluster bean. It was concluded that 25, 50 and 75% maize ratios in mixtures provided significant contributions to silage quality.

Supporting Institution

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University The Scientific Research Coordination Unit

Project Number

FHD-2021-3595.

Thanks

This work was supported by Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University The Scientific Research Coordination Unit, Project number: FHD-2021-3595.

References

  • Aderinola, O.A., Lateef, O.A., Binuomote, R.T., Adeeyo, A., Jekayinfa, O.A. 2014. Nutritional and microbial contents of varied combination of ensiled Panicum maximum and Vetiveria nigritana grass. Int. J. of Food, Agric. and Vet. Sci, 4(1): 141-148.
  • Aman, P. 1993. Composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides in forages. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfeld RD, Ralph J. (Eds). Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI.; pp. 183-199.
  • AOAC 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed., pp.66-88. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Ball, D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield, G.D., Martin, N.P., Mertens, D.A., Olson, K.E., Putnam, D.H., Undersander, D.J. Wolf, M.W. 2001. Understanding forage quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL.
  • Barker, S.B., Summerson, W.H. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 138: 535-554.
  • Batirca, M., Alaturk, F., Gokkus, A. 2017. The Effect of Fertilization on The Yield and Some Properties of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science, 4(1): 79-87.
  • Blount, A. R., Wright, D. L., Sprenkel, R. K., Hewitt, T. D., Hiebsch, C. K., & Myer, B. O. (2003). Forage soybeans for grazing, hay and silage. SS-AGR-180:1-4.
  • Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Fe, Q., Cloutier, D., Martin, R.C., Smith, DL. 2000. Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: silage yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185(3): 177-185.
  • Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Armstrong, K.L., Albrecht, K.A. 2009. Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 150(1-2): 1-8.
  • Demirel, M., Celik, S., Temur, C., Guney, M., Celik, S. 2009. Determination of fermentation properties and digestibility characteristics of combination of corn-soybean and corn silages. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(4): 711-714.
  • Geren, H., Avcioglu, R., Soya, H., Kir, B. 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: Biomass yield and silage quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(22): 4100-4104.
  • Jiang, F. G., Cheng, H. J., Liu, D., Wei, C., An, W. J., Wang, Y. F., Sun, H.T., Song, E. L. (2020). Treatment of whole-plant corn silage with lactic acid bacteria and organic acid enhances quality by elevating acid content, reducing pH, and inhibiting undesirable microorganisms. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11.
  • Kaplan, M., Baran, O., Unlukara, A., Kale, H., Arslan, M., Kara, K., Beyzi, S., Konca, Y., Ulaş, A., 2016. The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 2(1), 100-108.
  • Keshri, J., Chen, Y., Pinto, R., Kroupitski, Y., Weinberg, Z.G., Sela, S. 2018. Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 102 (9): 4025-4037.
  • Kizilsimsek, M., Ozturk, C., Yanar, K., Ertekin, I., Ozkan, C.O., Kamalak, A. 2017. Associative effects of ensiling soybean and corn plant as mixtures on the nutritive value, fermentation and methane emission. Feb-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26: 5754-5760.
  • Kleinschmit, D., Kung, Jr, L. 2006. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J. Dairy Sci, 89 (10): 4005-4013.
  • Kusvuran, A., Can, U., Boğa, M. 2019. Forage Yield and Quality of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) Harvested at Different Growing Stages. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science, 8(1): 1-7.
  • Langston, C.W., Bouma, C., Conner, R.M. 1962. Chemical and bacteriological changes in grass silage during the early stages of fermentation. II. Bacteriological changes. J. Dairy Sci, 45: 618-624.
  • Lima, R., Lourenco, M., Diaz, R.F., Castro, A., Fievez, V. 2010. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 155(2-4): 122-131.
  • Mahanna, B., Chase, L.E. 2003. Practical applications and solutions to silage problems. Silage Science and Technology, 42: 855-895.
  • McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R., Heron, S.J.E. 1991. The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed. Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications.
  • Meyer, H., Bronsch, K., Leibetseder, J. 1984. Supplemente zur Vorlesungen und Übungen in der Tierernaehrung. Hannover: Verlag Sprungmann,
  • Mohd-Setapar, S. H., Abd-Talib, N., & Aziz, R. (2012). Review on crucial parameters of silage quality. Apcbee Procedia, 3, 99-103.
  • Neylon, J.M., Kung, J.L. 2003. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(6): 2163-2169.
  • Oflaz, M., Kilic, U., Yavrucu, O. 2019. Determining Potential Feed Value and Silage Quality of Guar Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) Silages. Open Life Sciences, 14(1): 342-348.
  • Ozturk, D., Kizilsimsek, M., Kamalak, A., Canbolat, O., Ozkan, C.O. 2006. Effects of ensiling alfalfa with whole crop maize on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage mixtures. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci, 19(4): 526-532.
  • Rai, D.K. 2015. Trends and economic dynamics of guar in India, Working Paper, 311.
  • Salvucci, E., LeBlanc, J. G., & Pérez, G. (2016). Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material. LWT, 70, 185-191.,
  • E., LeBlanc, J. G., & Pérez, G. (2016). Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material. LWT, 70, 185-191.
  • Singh Santosh, K. 2014. An analysis of guar crop in India, GAIN Report Number: IN4035, USDA Foreign Agricultural Services.
  • Spanghero, M., Zanfi, C., Signor, M., Davanzo, D., Volpe, V., Venerus, S. 2015. Effects of plant vegetative stage and field drying time on chemical composition and in vitro ruminal degradation of forage soya silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 200: 102-106.
  • Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1999. SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA.
  • Suliman, A.I.A., Daghash H.A., Abd-Elati, M.N.M., Mokhtar, M.H. 2017. Productive Performance of Growing Farafra Lambs Fed Guar Forage or Guar Silage. J. Anim. and Poultry Prod., Mansoura Univ., 8 (3): 41- 47.
  • Umana, R., Staples, C.R., Bates, D.B., Wilcox, C.J., Mahanna, W.C. 1991. Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermudagrass ensiled at two moisture contents. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 4588-4601.
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3583-3597.
  • Weinberg, Z. G., and Muck, R. E. (1996). New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 53–68.
  • Wong, L.J., Parmar, C. 1997. Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taubert. Record from Proseabase. Faridah Hanum, I & Van Der Maesen, L.J.G. (Eds). PROSEA (Plant Resources of South-East Asia) Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia.

Sakız Fasulyesi Ve Mısır Karışım Silajının Fermantasyon Kalitesi Ve Besleme Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 1103 - 1109, 24.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.995146

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı farklı oranlarda karıştırılan sakız fasulyesi (CB) ve mısır (M) silajının fermentasyonu, besinsel özellikleri üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla mısır ve guar bitkileri kuru madde oranları esas alınarak beş farklı oranda 100%M, 75%M+25% CB, 50%M+50%CB, 25%M+75%CB and 100%CB) karıştırılmıştır. Karışım oranının incelenen tüm özellikler üzerine etkisi çok önemli çıkmıştır (p≤0.01). Araştırmadan elde edilen verilere göre karışımdaki mısır oranının artmasıyla kuru madde, ADF (asit deterjanda çözünmeyen lif), NDF (nötr deterjanda çözünmeyen lif), laktik asit ve etanol değerlerinde artış, pH değerinde azalma olmuştur. Karşımda sakız fasulyesi oranındaki artış ile silajın ham yağ, ham kül, ham protein oranları ile uçucu yağ oranlarında (asetik, bütirik ve propiyonik) artış gözlemlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda sakız fasulyesi ve mısır karışımı ile kuru madde, pH, besinsel özellikler ve metabolize edilebilir enerji gibi birçok konuda avantaj sağlandığı görülmüştür. Karışımda mısır oranının %25, %50 ve %75 oranlarda bulunması silaj kalitesi açısından önemli katkılar sağlamıştır.

Project Number

FHD-2021-3595.

References

  • Aderinola, O.A., Lateef, O.A., Binuomote, R.T., Adeeyo, A., Jekayinfa, O.A. 2014. Nutritional and microbial contents of varied combination of ensiled Panicum maximum and Vetiveria nigritana grass. Int. J. of Food, Agric. and Vet. Sci, 4(1): 141-148.
  • Aman, P. 1993. Composition and structure of cell wall polysaccharides in forages. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfeld RD, Ralph J. (Eds). Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI.; pp. 183-199.
  • AOAC 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed., pp.66-88. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Ball, D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield, G.D., Martin, N.P., Mertens, D.A., Olson, K.E., Putnam, D.H., Undersander, D.J. Wolf, M.W. 2001. Understanding forage quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL.
  • Barker, S.B., Summerson, W.H. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 138: 535-554.
  • Batirca, M., Alaturk, F., Gokkus, A. 2017. The Effect of Fertilization on The Yield and Some Properties of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.]. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Science, 4(1): 79-87.
  • Blount, A. R., Wright, D. L., Sprenkel, R. K., Hewitt, T. D., Hiebsch, C. K., & Myer, B. O. (2003). Forage soybeans for grazing, hay and silage. SS-AGR-180:1-4.
  • Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Fe, Q., Cloutier, D., Martin, R.C., Smith, DL. 2000. Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: silage yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185(3): 177-185.
  • Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Armstrong, K.L., Albrecht, K.A. 2009. Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 150(1-2): 1-8.
  • Demirel, M., Celik, S., Temur, C., Guney, M., Celik, S. 2009. Determination of fermentation properties and digestibility characteristics of combination of corn-soybean and corn silages. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(4): 711-714.
  • Geren, H., Avcioglu, R., Soya, H., Kir, B. 2008. Intercropping of corn with cowpea and bean: Biomass yield and silage quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(22): 4100-4104.
  • Jiang, F. G., Cheng, H. J., Liu, D., Wei, C., An, W. J., Wang, Y. F., Sun, H.T., Song, E. L. (2020). Treatment of whole-plant corn silage with lactic acid bacteria and organic acid enhances quality by elevating acid content, reducing pH, and inhibiting undesirable microorganisms. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11.
  • Kaplan, M., Baran, O., Unlukara, A., Kale, H., Arslan, M., Kara, K., Beyzi, S., Konca, Y., Ulaş, A., 2016. The effects of different nitrogen doses and irrigation levels on yield, nutritive value, fermentation and gas production of corn silage. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 2(1), 100-108.
  • Keshri, J., Chen, Y., Pinto, R., Kroupitski, Y., Weinberg, Z.G., Sela, S. 2018. Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 102 (9): 4025-4037.
  • Kizilsimsek, M., Ozturk, C., Yanar, K., Ertekin, I., Ozkan, C.O., Kamalak, A. 2017. Associative effects of ensiling soybean and corn plant as mixtures on the nutritive value, fermentation and methane emission. Feb-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26: 5754-5760.
  • Kleinschmit, D., Kung, Jr, L. 2006. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J. Dairy Sci, 89 (10): 4005-4013.
  • Kusvuran, A., Can, U., Boğa, M. 2019. Forage Yield and Quality of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) Harvested at Different Growing Stages. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science, 8(1): 1-7.
  • Langston, C.W., Bouma, C., Conner, R.M. 1962. Chemical and bacteriological changes in grass silage during the early stages of fermentation. II. Bacteriological changes. J. Dairy Sci, 45: 618-624.
  • Lima, R., Lourenco, M., Diaz, R.F., Castro, A., Fievez, V. 2010. Effect of combined ensiling of sorghum and soybean with or without molasses and lactobacilli on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 155(2-4): 122-131.
  • Mahanna, B., Chase, L.E. 2003. Practical applications and solutions to silage problems. Silage Science and Technology, 42: 855-895.
  • McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R., Heron, S.J.E. 1991. The biochemistry of silage, 2nd ed. Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications.
  • Meyer, H., Bronsch, K., Leibetseder, J. 1984. Supplemente zur Vorlesungen und Übungen in der Tierernaehrung. Hannover: Verlag Sprungmann,
  • Mohd-Setapar, S. H., Abd-Talib, N., & Aziz, R. (2012). Review on crucial parameters of silage quality. Apcbee Procedia, 3, 99-103.
  • Neylon, J.M., Kung, J.L. 2003. Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(6): 2163-2169.
  • Oflaz, M., Kilic, U., Yavrucu, O. 2019. Determining Potential Feed Value and Silage Quality of Guar Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) Silages. Open Life Sciences, 14(1): 342-348.
  • Ozturk, D., Kizilsimsek, M., Kamalak, A., Canbolat, O., Ozkan, C.O. 2006. Effects of ensiling alfalfa with whole crop maize on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage mixtures. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci, 19(4): 526-532.
  • Rai, D.K. 2015. Trends and economic dynamics of guar in India, Working Paper, 311.
  • Salvucci, E., LeBlanc, J. G., & Pérez, G. (2016). Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material. LWT, 70, 185-191.,
  • E., LeBlanc, J. G., & Pérez, G. (2016). Technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cereal material. LWT, 70, 185-191.
  • Singh Santosh, K. 2014. An analysis of guar crop in India, GAIN Report Number: IN4035, USDA Foreign Agricultural Services.
  • Spanghero, M., Zanfi, C., Signor, M., Davanzo, D., Volpe, V., Venerus, S. 2015. Effects of plant vegetative stage and field drying time on chemical composition and in vitro ruminal degradation of forage soya silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 200: 102-106.
  • Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1999. SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA.
  • Suliman, A.I.A., Daghash H.A., Abd-Elati, M.N.M., Mokhtar, M.H. 2017. Productive Performance of Growing Farafra Lambs Fed Guar Forage or Guar Silage. J. Anim. and Poultry Prod., Mansoura Univ., 8 (3): 41- 47.
  • Umana, R., Staples, C.R., Bates, D.B., Wilcox, C.J., Mahanna, W.C. 1991. Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermudagrass ensiled at two moisture contents. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 4588-4601.
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3583-3597.
  • Weinberg, Z. G., and Muck, R. E. (1996). New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 53–68.
  • Wong, L.J., Parmar, C. 1997. Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taubert. Record from Proseabase. Faridah Hanum, I & Van Der Maesen, L.J.G. (Eds). PROSEA (Plant Resources of South-East Asia) Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mahmut Kaplan 0000-0002-6717-4115

Mevlüt Akçura 0000-0001-7828-5163

Project Number FHD-2021-3595.
Publication Date October 24, 2021
Submission Date September 14, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Kaplan, M., & Akçura, M. (2021). Fermentation Quality and Nutritional Traits of Cluster Bean-Maize Mixture Silages. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 8(4), 1103-1109. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.995146