Şanlıurfa'da Tescilli Bazı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim, Morfolojik ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 152 - 160, 28.01.2023

Dürdane Mart , Ayşe Öktem , Ramazan Akın , Meltem Türkeri , Evren Atmaca , Sezgin Mart , Necda Çankaya , Süreyya Emre Dumlu , Derya Yucel , Tolga Karaköy

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1208010

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Şanlıurfa ekolojik koşullarında bazı nohut çeşitlerinin tarımsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla 2014-2015 yıllarında yürütülen bu çalışma GAP Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsüne ait deneme arazilerinde yürütülmüştür. 3’ü kontrol çeşidi olmak üzere toplam 20 tescilli nohut çeşidi ile yürütülen çalışma tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Araştırmada nohut bitkisinde %50 çıkış sağlandıktan sonra çiçeklenmeye kadar geçen gün sayısı, bakla bağlama, çıkış sağlandıktan sonra kadar geçen gün sayısı ve vejetasyon süresi gibi fenolojik özellikler ile bitki boyu, ilk bakla yüksekliği, hasat olgunluğu, yüz tane ağırlığı, dekara verim gibi ağronomik özellikler incelenmiştir. Çalışma süresince nohut çeşitlerinin iklim koşullarına bağlı olarak Ascochyta solgunluk hastalığı kontrolleri de yapılmıştır. Araştırmada Şanlıurfa ekolojik koşullarında tane verimi bakımından en yüksek değeri 202.32 kg/da ile Sezenbey çeşidinden, en düşük tane verimini ise 117.58 kg/da ile Seçkin çeşidinden elde edilmiştir. Her iki yetiştirme sezonunda ortalama ham protein oranı ise en yüksek Seçkin çeşidinden (%26.45), en düşük oran ise İnci-K çeşidinden (%21.66) elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

Şanlıurfa,, Tescilli Nohut Çeşitleri, Verim, Kalite

Supporting Institution

TUBITAK 1003 Project

Project Number

113O070.

Thanks

TEŞEKKÜRLER

Evaluation of Yield, Morphological and Quality Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in Şanlıurfa

Abstract

This study, which was carried out in 2014-2015 to determine the agronomic characteristics of some chickpea varieties under Şanlıurfa ecological conditions, was conducted in the experimental plots of GAP Agricultural Research Institute. 20 registered chickpea genotypes and 3 control varieties were used in the study, which was established according to the randomized block design with three replications. In the study, phenological traits such as the number of days until flowering after 50% emergence, the number of days until pod tying, the number of days after emergence and vegetation duration and agronomic traits such as plant height, first pod height, harvest maturity, hundred grain weight and yield per decare were examined in chickpea plants. Ascochyta blight disease controls of chickpea varieties were also carried out during the study depending on climatic conditions. In the study, the highest value in terms of grain yield was obtained from Sezenbey variety with 202.32 kg/da and the lowest grain yield was obtained from Seçkin variety with 117.58 kg/da at Şanlıurfa location. In both growing seasons, the highest crude protein rate was obtained from Seçkin variety with 26.45% and the lowest rate was obtained from İnci-K variety with 21.66%.

Keywords

Şanlıurfa, Registered Chickpea Varieties, Yield,, Quality

Project Number

113O070.

References

• Ağsakallı, A. (1995). The Effects of Different Sowing Density and Fertilizer Doses on Yield, Yield Elements and Quality in Some Chickpea Genotypes. Doctoral Thesis (Unpublished). Atatürk University, 163 p., Erzurum.
• Ali, Y., Biswas, P. K., Shahriar, S. A., Nasif, S. O., Raihan, R.R. (2018). Yield and Quality Response of Chickpea at Different Sowing Dates. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science, 1 (4), 1-8.
• Anlarsal, A.E., Yücel, C., Özveren, D. (1999). A research on determination of yield and yield related traits of some chickpea lines under Çukurova conditions. Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress Volume III (Meadow Pasture Forage Crops and Edible Grain Legumes), pp.342- 347, November 15-18, Adana.
• Anonymous, 2022. FAO. https:// www. fao. org/ faostat/
• Atikyılmaz, N. (1997). A Research on the Relationships between Yield and Yield Components and Determination of Some Quality Characteristics in Winter and Summer Chickpea Cultivation. Master's Thesis (Unpublished). Dicle University, 53 p. Diyarbakır.
• Bakoğlu, A. (2009). A study on yield and yield components of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under Elazığ ecological conditions. Harran University Faculty of Agriculture Journal. 13(1): 1-6
• Chen, W., Coyne, C. J., Peever, T. L., Muehlbauer, F. J. (2004). Characterization of chickpea differentials for pathogenicity assay of Ascochyta blight and identification of chickpea accessions resistant to Didymellarabiei. Plant pathology, 53, 759-769.
• Engin, M. (1989). A Research on Determination of High Yielding Anthracnose Resistant Winter Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties Suitable for Çukurova Conditions. Ç.Ü. Zir. Fak. Journal, 4(6), 1-134.
• Gül, M. K., Egesel, C. Ö., Kahrıman, F., Tayyar, Ş., (2006). Possibilities of Winter Cultivation of Chickpea Crops in Çanakkale Region. Uludag. Univ. Zir. Fak. Derg., 20(1): 57-66
• Mart, D., Yücel, D., Türkeri, M. (2015). Evaluation of Yield and Morphological Characteristics of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes at Winter Sowing Time in Çukurova Region. 11th Field Crops Congress, 19-23 September 2015, Çanakkale.
• Mart, D. (2000). A Research on Determination of Genotype x Environment Interactions and Adaptability of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for Some Important Traits in Cukurova Conditions. Ç.Ü. Institute of Science and Technology, Doctoral Thesis, 220s.
• Özdemir, S., Mart, D., Anlarsal, A.E. (1996). Effects of Different Sowing Density on Yield and Yield Components of Three Chickpea Varieties. Ç.Ü. Zir. Fak. Journal, 11(1), 175-184.
• Ray, K., Singh, D., Laljat, B. (2017). Effect of Sowing Time and Seed Rate on Growth and Yield of Chickpea Cultivars. Advance Research Journal of Crop Improvement, 8 (1), 1-16.
• Reddy, M. V. and Sing, K. B. (1984). Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germplasm accessions for resistance to Ascochyta blight. Plant Disease, 65, 586-587.
• Singh, I.S, Hussain, M.A, Gupta, A.K. (1995). Correlation Studies Among Yield and Yield Contributing Traits in F2 and F3 Chickpea Populations. International Chickpea and Pigeon pea Newsletter, 2, 11-13.
• Şanlı, A., Kaya, M. (2008). The Effects of Seed Treatments and Different Sowing Times on Some Agronomic Characteristics of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture, 3(2), 42-51. Toğay, N., Toğay, Y., Çiftçi, V. (2001). A Research on Determination of Hydration Capacity and Hard Seed Shell Ratios of Chickpea Varieties Registered in Turkey. Turkey IVth Field Crops Congress, September 17-21, 2001, 377-379. Tekirdağ.
• Varoğlu, H., Abak, K. (2019). Effect of Sowing Dates on Yield and Quality Characteristics of Chickpea Varieties under Mediterranean Climate Conditions. Legume Research, 42 (3), 360-364.