Doğu Akdeniz İklim Koşullarında Tescilli Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin Adaptasyonu Ve Kalite Değerlerinin Araştırılması

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 1154 - 1160, 12.10.2024

Dürdane Mart

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1548557

Abstract

Bu araştırma Türkiye’de tescil edilmiş on nohut çeşidi (Diyar-95, Arda, Botan, Aksu, Aslanbey, Ubet, Sezgin, Caner, Onur01 ve Azkan) ile Doğu Akdeniz Adana ekolojik şartlarında verim ve kalite unsurlarını belirlemek amacıyla 2022 ve 2023 yıllarında yapılmıştır. Denemeler, Tesadüf Blokları Deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada çeşitlerin, tane verimi, yüz tane ağırlığı, bitki boyu, %50 çiçeklenme süresi ve kalite parametreleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre çeşitlerin çiçeklenme süresi 76.75-84.25 gün değerleri arasında, Botan-Aslanbey nohut çeşitlerinde; bitki boyu 53.04-60.67cm değerleri arasında Sezgin- Azkan nohut çeşitlerinden; yüz tane ağırlığı 38.70-49.07 g değerleri arasında Diyar95-Aslanbey nohut çeşitlerinden; tane verimi 175.70-286.42 kg/da değerleri arasında Sezgin-Aslanbey nohut çeşitlerinden aralıklarında değerler elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda elde edilen veriler göre tane verimi yönünden en yüksek değere sahip olan Aslanbey, Onur01, Ubet, Botan, Diyar95, Aksu, ve Arda çeşitleri bölge için tavsiye edilebilir çeşitler olarak tespit edilmiştir. Ancak daha sağlıklı karar verebilmek için daha uzun yıllar, ayrıntılı agronomik çalışmalarla desteklenerek tarla çalışmaların yapılması gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Nohut, Adaptasyon, Verim, Kalite

The Research On The Adaptation And Quality Values Of Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties Under Eastern Mediterranean Climatic Conditions

Abstract

This research was carried out in 2022 and 2023 with ten chickpea varieties (Diyar-95, Arda, Botan, Aksu, Aslanbey, Ubet, Sezgin, Caner, Onur01 and Azkan) registered in Turkey to determine yield and quality factors under Eastern Mediterranean Adana ecological conditions. The experiments were carried out according to the Randomized Block Design with three replications. In the study, grain yield, hundred grain weight, plant height, 50% flowering time and quality parameters of the varieties were analyzed. According to the findings of the research, flowering period of the varieties was between 76.75-84.25 days for Botan-Aslanbey chickpea varieties; plant height was between 53.04-60.67 cm for Sezgin-Azkan chickpea varieties; hundred grain weight was between 38.70-49.07 g for Diyar95-Aslanbey chickpea varieties; grain yield was between 175.70-286.42 kg/da for Sezgin-Aslanbey chickpea varieties. According to the data obtained at the end of the research, Aslanbey, Onur01, Ubet, Botan, Diyar95, Aksu, and Arda varieties, which had the highest values in terms of grain yield, were found to be recommended varieties for the region. However, in order to make a better decision, field studies should be carried out for longer years supported by detailed agronomic studies.

Keywords

Chickpea, Adaptation, Yield, Quality

References

• Açıkgöz, N. 1987. Chickpea Agriculture, T.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs, Aegean Regional Agricultural Research Institute Directorate Publications, No: 76:21.
• Adak, M. S. 2021. Edible Legumes Ankara University Publications 699. Textbook: 53:102 s. Anonim, 2024. FAO. https:// www. fao. org/ faostat/
• Atmaca, E. 2008. The effect of different sowing times and row spacing on yield, yield elements and quality in some chickpea varieties and lines under Eskisehir conditions. Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Field Crops, Master's Thesis, 99 p. Ankara.
• Aydogan, A. 2012. Determination of yield and quality characteristics of broad and narrow leaf Kabuli type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties and lines. Doctoral Thesis. Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology Ankara, 131.
• Bakoğlu, A. 2009. A study on yield and yield components of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under Elazığ ecological conditions. Harran University Faculty of Agriculture Journal. 2009 13(1):1-6
• Ceyhan, E., Önder, M., Harmankaya, M., Hamurcu, M., Gezgin, S. 2007. Response of chickpea cultivars to application of boron in boron-deficient calcareous soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 38: 2381-2399.
• Ceyhan, E., Kahraman, A., Ateş, M.K., Topak, R., Şimşek, D., Avcı, M.A., Önder, M., Dalgıç, H. 2013. Determination of grain yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under Konya conditions. Turkey X. Field Crops Congress. 1: 789-796.
• Craufurd, P. Q., Wheeler, T. R. 2009. Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(9), 2529-2539. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erp196
• Çeker, A. 2008. Molecular characterization of chickpea genotypes collected from some regions of Turkey. Master's Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana.
• Çiftçi, V., Doğan, Y., Togay, N., Karakuş. M. 2004. Determination of yield and yield components of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties registered in Turkey under Van ecological conditions. Ç.Ü. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 19(2):105-110.
• Doğan, Y., Ertaş, M., Doğan, S. 2023. Evaluation of chickpea varieties in terms of yield and yield components under Mardin-Kızıltepe and Şanlıurfa-Bozova conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, 10(3): 739-749
• Erol, O., Özaktan, H., Tosun, Z. 2023. Determination of technological characteristics of some registered chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties grown under Kayseri ecological conditions by multivariate statistical analysis. Çukurova Agriculture Food Bil. Derg., 38(1): 66-75.
• Gülümser, A., Bozoglu, H., Pekşen, E. 2008. Edible legumes (Application Book), 2nd edition, OMU Faculty of Agriculture, Samsun.
• Iliadis, C. 1990. Chickpea production in Greece. Options Mediterraneennes- Serie Seminaires, (9): 141-143.
• Kahraman, A., Önder, M., Ceyhan, E., Ulukuş, F. 2016. Cluster analysis and relationships between important quality parameters in chickpea genotypes. Journal of Central Research Institute of Field Crops, 196-200. DOI: 10.21566/tarbitderg.280383
• Karakan Kaya, F. 2014. Determination of yield and adaptability of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under Elazig conditions. Master's Thesis. Bingöl University Institute of Science and Technology Bingöl, 60.
• Kocalar, H., Kafadar, F. N., Ozkan, A., Talapov, T., Demirel, Ö., Anay, A., Mart, D., Can, C. 2020. Current distribution and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in Turkey. Legume Research - An International Journal, 10.18805/LR-520
• Mart, D., Yücel, D., Türkeri, M. 2017. Yield and yield components and quality values of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lines and varieties under Çukurova Conditions. KSÜ Nature Bil. Derg. 20 (Special Issue):371-374.
• Mart, D., Anlarsal, E. 2001. A research on determination of Genotype X Environment interactions and adaptability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for some important traits under Çukurova conditions. Turkey 4th Field Crops Congress September 17-21, 2001, Tekirdag.
• Mishra, S.K., Brajesh, G., Shrivastava, G.K., Lakhera, M.L., Rathore.A.R., Choubey, N.K., Gupta, B. 2002. Path coefficient analysis in chickpea. Annals of Agricultural Research, 23: 168-170.
• Nalcaci, N., Turan, A., Basbuga, S., Kafadar, F. N., Isler, D., Ceyhan, E., Anay, A., Mart, D., Ogut, E., Sarpkaya, K., Can, C. 2021. Virulence and mating type distribution of Didymella rabiei in chickpea growing areas of Turkey. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (2021) Vol. 23(1): 209-220.
• Özdemir, S. 2002. Edible grain legumes. Hasad Publishing, Istanbul, 142.
• Peñuelas, J., Filella, I. 2001. Responses to a warming world. Science, 294(5543): 793-795. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1066860
• Şahin, N., Gecit, H.H. 2006. The effects of different fertilizing methods on yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(3):252-258.
• Walther, G. R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J., Bairlein, F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416(6879), 389-395. https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a