Determining the Economic Contribution of Citrus Fruits to Türkiye's Foreign Trade with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 1153 - 1165, 17.10.2025

Muhammed Fatih Aydemir

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1663724

Abstract

Citrus fruits account for one-third of Türkiye's fresh fruit and vegetable exports and are of great economic importance due to their wide range of uses. The objective of this study is to ascertain the citrus sub-products with the highest and lowest economic contribution to Türkiye's foreign trade for the period 2015-2024 using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The LOPCOW method was used to weight the criteria, while the WASPAS method was used to rank the alternatives. According to the ten-year average results, the following criteria were used to determine the ranking (from highest to lowest): production quantity and import value, export quantity, export value, and import quantity. When considered on an individual basis, production quantity has been the most significant criterion from 2018 to the present. Based on the ten-year average, the ranking of citrus fruits with the highest economic contribution to foreign trade (from highest to lowest) was as follows: lemon, mandarin, orange, and grapefruit. Notably, there have been substantial shifts in the ranking over recent years, with oranges assuming the leading position in 2024. In order to increase the economic contribution of citrus fruits to foreign trade, it is necessary to increase production quantity while decreasing import value. To achieve this, the citrus production season should be spread throughout the year, storage infrastructure should be improved, market diversity should be prioritized, and the production of value-added and processed products should be increased.

Keywords

Citrus Fruits , LOPCOW , WASPAS , International trade

Ethical Statement

This study does not require ethical declaration.

References

• Akmermer, B. & Çelik, P. (2021). Contribution of fishery and aquaculture products to Turkish foreign trade: An evaluation by a hybrid multi-criteria decision making method. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38(3), 275-282. https://doi.org/10.12714/egejfas.38.3.03
• Anonymous. (2021). Citrus fruit fresh and processed, statistical bulletin 2020. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4760a5b5-f3b2-41c7-8713 ccdb1a5f8c08/content (Accessed date: 16.02.2025)
• Anonymous. (2024a). The state of agricultural commodity markets 2024. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2144en (Accessed date: 25.01.2025)
• Anonymous. (2024b). TEPGE, Turunçgiller ürün raporu 2024. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge/Belgeler/PDF%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCn%20Raporlar%C4%B1/2024%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCn%20Raporlar%C4%B1/Turun%C3%A7giller%20%C3%9Cr%C3%BCn%20Raporu%202024-408%20TEPGE.pdf#page=29.66 (Accessed date: 13.10.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025a). Markets and trade, benefits of citrus. https://www.fao.org/markets-and-trade/commodities-overview/food-and-agriculture-market-analysis-(FAMA)/citrus/en (Accessed date: 26.02.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025b). FAOSTAT, countries by commodity. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_commodity, (Accessed date: 29.01.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025c). ComTradePlus, trade data. https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow?Frequency=A&Flows=X&CommodityCodes=TOTAL&Partners=0&Reporters=792&period=2024&AggregateBy=none&BreakdownMode=plus (Accessed date: 10.01.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025d). Yaş meyve sebze sektörü Türkiye geneli değerlendirme raporu. http://www.yms.org.tr/files/downloads/istatistikler/2025/subat-2025.pdf, (Accessed date: 13.03.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025e). Crop production statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 (Accessed date: 13.01.2025)
• Anonymous. (2025f). United states department of agriculture foreign agricultural service (USDA), citrus: world markets and trade. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/citrus.pdf (Accessed date: 10.02.2025)
• Aslan, H., Zereyak, E., & Rad, S. T. (2020). Turunçgil üretim ve ihracat sürecinin modellenmesi: Doğu Akdeniz örneği. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 48, 169-187. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.801203
• Aşık, B., & Ellibeş, E. (2020). Türkiye ve AB üye ülkeleri arasında narenciye sektörünün rekabet analizi. İstatistik ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 11-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsas/issue/56108/706650
• Aydemir, M. F. (2025). Evaluation of foreign direct investment attractiveness of BRICS-T countries: The CRITIC-LOPCOW based ARAS approach. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 9(1), 372-392. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1613421
• Baykasoğlu, A., & Gölcük, İ. (2020). Revisiting ranking accuracy within WASPAS method. Kybernetes, 49(3), 885-895. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2019-0052
• Bayram, B.Ç. (2020). Evaluation of forest products trade economic contribution by Entropy-TOPSIS: Case study of Turkey. BioResources, 15(1), 1419-1429. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1419-1429
• Behun, M., Gavurova, B., Tkacova, A., & Kotaskova, A. (2018). The impact of the manufacturing industry on the economic cycle of European Union countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.01.02
• Çelik, H., Ertürkmen, G., & Erdemli, M. (2025). The affect of agricultural export and employment on economic growth in Turkiye: Evidence from ARDL approach. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 12(1), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1591184
• Duru, S., Hayran, S., & Gül, A. (2022). The analysis of competitiveness of Mediterranean countries in the world citrus trade. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 35(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.1012466
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW‐DOBI multi‐criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690
• Erdinç, Z., & Aydınbaş, G. (2023). Yapısal kırılmalar dahilinde tarımsal ürün ihracatı ile iktisadi büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 7(2), 552-564. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1373874
• Ersen, N. (2021). Analysis of Furniture Products' Contribution to Turkey's Economy with a Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision Making Method. BioResources, 16(1), 339-353. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.1.339-354
• Ersen, N. (2024). Assessment of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants’ Contribution to the Country's Economy by Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 30(2), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1308059
• Fidan, H. (2009). Comparison of citrus sector competitiveness between Turkey and EU-15 member countries. HortScience, 44(1), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.89
• Gökkuş, Z., Şentürk, S., & Alatürk, F. (2023). Ranking Çanakkale Districts in terms of rangeland quality with multi-criteria decision making methods. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3), 605-614. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1183698
• Gupta, S., Jha, B., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Decision making framework for foreign direct investment: Analytic hierarchy process and weighted aggregated sum product assessment integrated approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2771. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2771
• Kadanalı, E. (2019). Türkiye turunçgiller ihracatının rekabet gücünün analizi. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 25(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.470684
• Kara, M. A., Aksu, T., & Tanış, Ş. (2024). Türkiye ekonomisinde tarım ve sanayi ihraç ürünlerinin ekonomik büyümeye katkısı. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 615-632. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1383865
• Kopuk, E., & Meçik, O. (2020). Türkiye’de imalat sanayi ve tarım sektörlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: 1998-2020 dönemi analizi. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 27(2), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.693387
• Liu, Y., Heying, E., & Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2012). History, global distribution, and nutritional importance of citrus fruits. Comprehensive reviews in Food Science and Food safety, 11(6), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00201.x
• Özdemir, M. B. & Kösekahyaoğlu, L. (2019). Türkiye’nin portakal, mandalina, limon ve yaş kayısı ürünlerinde karşılaştırmalı ihracat performansı ve rekabet gücü analizi. ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 6 (14), 84-105. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/assam/issue/48179/571530
• Özözen, S. (2023). Türkiye’nin narenciye sektöründe karşılaştırmalı rekabet gücü. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı), 944-967. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1345934
• Öztürkçü, N., & Özcan, S. (2024). Bütünleşik ANP, MARCOS, WASPAS ve MAIRCA yöntemleri kullanılarak proje lojistiği operasyonlarında üçüncü parti lojistik hizmet sağlayıcı seçimi. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(27), 98-125. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1308549
• Şahin, D. (2016). Yaş Meyve ve Sebze Sektörünün Dış Ticaret Yapısının Analizi: Türkiye ve BRIC ülkeleri örneği. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.287985
• Tat, A., & Sarıca, D. (2021). Turunçgiller İhracatı Yapan Firmaların Yapısal Analizi: Antalya İli Örneği. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(1), 101-110. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cutarim/issue/63288/910142
• Turgut, M., & Ersöz, C. (2024). Narenciye sektörünün ihracat performansı: hedef pazar analizi. Tarsus Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 62-79. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tauubf/issue/84223/1460750
• Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810