Uzmanlar ve uzman sözlükbilimi: bakış açıları ve ihtiyaçlar

Year 2014, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 1 - 22, 01.04.2014

Besharat Fathı Ezgi Aslan

https://doi.org/10.1501/Trkol_0000000280

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışma iki temel amacı gerçekleştirmek üzere yapılmıştır: İlki, uzmanların iletişim koşullarındaki sözlükbilimsel ihtiyaçlarını anlamak ve tahmin etmek, ikincisi ise uzman sözlüklerini uzmanların gözünden, onların bilgi yeterliliklerini de hesaba katarak ve öncelikle uzmanların uzman sözlüklerine olan ihtiyaçlarını göz önünde bulundurarak değerlendirmektir. Bu makale iki ana bölümden oluşmaktadır: birinci bölümde uzmanların ihtiyaçlarıyla ilgili kuramsal bir zemin oluşturulacak, bunlar, sözlükbiliminin işlevsel kuramına1 (Bergenholtz, Tarp, Nielsen ve Kauffman) ve yanı sıra terminolojinin iletişimsel kuramı2na (Cabré) dayanılarak tanıtılacak, ikinci bölümde ise uzmanlık sözlükleri hakkında uzmanların beklentileri deneysel araştırmalara dayanılarak gözden geçirilecektir. İkinci bölümde uzmanlara anket soruları yöneltilmiş ve her birine kendilerinin profesyonel işleri için en çok ihtiyaç duydukları bilgiler sorulmuş ve ayrıca var olan uzmanlık sözlüklerinin puanlanması istenmiştir

Keywords

terminolojinin iletişimsel kuramı, sözlük kullanımı, uzmanlar, uzmanlık sözlükbilimi

EXPERTS AND SPECIALISED LEXICOGRAPHY

Abstract

This study was performed with two main purposes in mind the first was to understand and predict the lexicographical needs of experts in communicative situations, while the second was to evaluate specialised dictionaries from experts’ point of view, considering their knowledge proficiency and the lack of dictionaries aimed primarily at experts. This paper consists of two main parts. The first presents the theorotical background on experts’ needs based on functional theory of lexicography (Bergenholtz, Tarp, Nielsen and Kauffman) as well as communicative theory of terminology (Cabré), while the second looks at experts’ expectations about specialised dictionaries based on empirical research. We conducted evaluation experiments where experts were asked to complete a questionnaire either for selecting the most needed information related to their proffesional tasks or for rating existing specialised dictionaries

Keywords

commmunicative theory of terminology, dictionary use, experts, specialised lexicography

References

• Antia, Bassey E. (2001), “Competence and quality in the translation of specialized texts: investigating the role of terminology resources”, Quaderns, Revista de traducció 6: 16-21.
• Bergenholtz, Henning (2003), “User-oriented understanding of descriptive, proscriptive and prescriptive lexicography”, Lexikos 13 (AFRILEX- reeks/series 13: 2003): 1-16.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Bothma, Theo J. D. (2011), “Needs-adapted data presentation in e-information tools”, Lexikos 21 (AFRILEX-reeks/series 21: 2011): 53-77.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Gouws, Rufus (2010), “A new perspective on the access process”, Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 44: 103- 127.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Kauffman, Uwe (1997), “Terminography and lexicography: A critical survey of dictionaries from a single specialised field”, Hermes – Journal of Linguistics18: 91-125.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Nielsen, Sandro (2006), “Subject-field components as integrated parts of ÖAD dictionary”, Terminology 12:2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Tarp, Sven (2002), “Die moderne lexikographische Funktionslehre. Diskussionsbeitrag zu neuen und alten Paradigmen, die Wörterbücher als Gebrauchsgegenstände verstehen”, Lexicographica 18: 253- 263.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Tarp, Sven (2003), “Two opposing theories: On H.E. Wiegand’s recent discovery of lexicographic functions”, Hermes – Journal of Linguistics 31: 171-196.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Tarp, Sven (2004), “The concept of dictionary usage”, Nordic Journal of English Studies 3: 23-36.
• Bergenholtz, Henning; Tarp, Sven (2010), “Lexicography or terminography? The lexicographer’s point of view”, In Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A. (ed.) (2010), Specialized Dictionaries for Learners, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 27-36.
• Cabré Castellví, M. Teresa (1999a), Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Cabré Castellví, M. Teresa (1999b), La terminología: representación y comunicación,Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada.
• Cook, David A.; Beck man, Thomas J. (2006), “Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application”, The American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 119, No 2: 166.e7- 166.e16.
• Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A.; Nielsen, Sandro (2011), “The dynamics of terms in accounting: What the construction of the accounting dictionaries reveals about metaphorical terms in vulture-bound subject fields”, In Temmerman, Rita & Campenhoudt, Marc Van (eds.), “The dynamics of terms in specialized communication. terminology”, International Journal of Applied Issues inSpecialized Communication 17(1): 157-180. perspective. Special issue of
• Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A.; Tarp, Sven (2011), “Lexicography for the third millennium: Cognitive-oriented specialized dictionaries for learners”, Ibérica 21: 141-162.
• Karpova, Olga; Kartashko va, Faina (eds.). (2010), New trends in lexicography: Ways of registrating and describing lexis, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Martínez Motos, Raquel (2011), “The role of interdisciplinarity in lexicography and
• Lexicology”, In Balteiro, Isabel (ed.), New approaches to specialized English lexicology and lexicography, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Nielsen, Sandro (2006), “Monolingual accounting dictionaries for EFL text production”,Ibérica 12: 43-64.
• Nielsen, Sandro; Mourier, Lise (2005), “Internet accounting dictionaries: Present solutions and future opportunities”, Hermes 34: 83-116.
• Sager, Juan Carlos (1990), A practical course in terminology processing, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Welker, Herbert Andreas (2010), Dictionary use: A general survey of empirical studies, Brasilia, Author’s edition: an updated English version of Welker’s earlier monograph, published in 2006 under the title O uso de dicionários: panorama geral das pesquisas empíricas (reviewed in IJL 20.4).