Yükseköğretimde Sürdürülebilirlik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi: İlişkisel Bir Analiz

Öz

Üniversitelerin sürdürülebilirlik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılan bu araştırma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel modele göre tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’nin Orta Anadolu bölgesinde yer alan bir üniversitede görev yapan ve evren içerisinden basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenen akademik ve idari personeller (370) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler, “Sürdürülebilir Okul Özellikleri Ölçeği (SOÖÖ)” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Veriler ikili ve çoklu karşılaştırma teknikleri (bağımsız örneklemler t-testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA)) yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Katılımcıların algıladıkları sürdürülebilir okul özellikleri cinsiyet, medeni durum, mesleki kıdem, yaş, görev türü ve görev yapılan birim değişkenlerine göre belirlenerek değişkenler arası ilişkiler ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Üniversitenin sürdürülebilirlik özelliklerinin “katılıyorum” düzeyinde nispeten yüksek bulunması araştırmanın en önemli bulgusu olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bulgular araştırmanın sınırlılıkları bağlamında tartışılarak çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• üniversite
• yükseköğretim
• sürdürülebilir üniversite

Determining Sustainability Characteristics in Higher Education: A Relational Analysis

Abstract

This research, which was conducted to determine the sustainability features of universities, was designed according to the relational model, one of the quantitative research methods. The sample comprises 370 academic and administrative staff from a university in Central Anatolia, Türkiye and selected from the universe using the simple random sampling method. Data in the research were collected through the “Sustainable School Characteristics Scale (SPS)”. Data were analyzed with the help of pairwise and multiple comparison techniques (independent samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)). The sustainable school characteristics perceived by the participants were determined according to the variables of gender, marital status, professional seniority, age, type of duty and unit of duty and the relationships between the variables were tried to be revealed. The fact that the sustainability features of the university were found to be relatively high at the “I agree” level is evaluated as the most important finding of the research. The findings were discussed in the context of the limitations of the research and various suggestions were made.

Keywords

• Sustainability
• university
• sustainable university
• higher education

References

1. Ağı Günerhan, S., & Günerhan, H. (2016). Sustainable university model for Turkey. Engineers and Machinery, 57 (682).
2. Akpolat, T., & Demirbilek, M. (2024). Sustainable school characteristics scale. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1331929
3. Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving Campus sustainability: assessment of the Current Campus environmental management practices Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (16), 1777-1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002
4. Amaral, A.R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A.R., & Gomes, A. (2020). A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university Campus operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119558
5. Berberoglu, G., & Tosunoglu, C. (1995). exploration and confirmatory factor environmental analyses Attitude scale (EAS) for Turkish university students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26 (3), 40-43.
6. Bozlagan, R. (2002). Introduction to the idea of sustainable development. Contemporary Local Governments, 11(1), 56-72.
7. Bozoğlu, O., & Ciğerim, E. (2022). Sustainability, sustainable development and sustainable universities. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 18, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.51293/socrates.273
8. Bulut, M. (2021). Building a sustainable university campus in Turkey: The case of Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 1, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2021.12013

9. Dagiliūtė, R., Liobikienė, G., & Minelgaitė, A. (2018). Sustainability at universities: Students ' perceptions from Green and Non-Green universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.213
10. de Miranda Azeiteiro, UM, & Davim, J.P. (2019). Higher education and sustainability: Opportunities and challenges for achieving sustainable development goals. CRC Press.
11. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U.M., & Leal Filho, W. (2013). Sustainability science and education for sustainable development in universities: A way for transition. Springer.
12. Filho, W.L., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Veiga Ávila, L., Londero Brandli, L., ... & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2019). Sustainable development goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309
13. Filho, W. L., & Brandli, L. L. (2022). Sustainable development in higher education institutions: Current state and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131004
14. Filho, W.L., Paço, A., & Londero Brandli, L. (2023). Sustainability education in universities: A global overview and the role of sustainability managers. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 17(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408223110123
15. Giovanelli, L., Rotondo, F., & Ezza, A. (2021). Business models for integration of sustainability in universities: An explorative analysis of Italian state universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129227
16. Godemann, J., Bebbington, J., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2014). Higher education and sustainable development: Exploring possibilities for organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1553
17. Gungor Tanc, S., Tanc, A., Cardak, D., & Yagli, I. (2022). Universities in Turkey sustainability of his works Review of Accounting and Auditing, 22 (66), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1063261
18. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structure equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
19. Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Byun, W. J. (2018). Introduction. In Issues and Trends in Education for sustainable development (7-16). France: UNESCO.
20. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., & Seatter, C. S. (2015). Teaching organizational change management for sustainability: Designing and delivering a course at the University of Leeds to better prepare future sustainability change agents. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.031
21. Madsen, L., & Borch, K. (2023). Building sustainability in higher education institutions: Key success factors. Higher Education Policy, 37(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00155-x
22. McKeown, R. (2002). Education for sustainable development toolkit. Energy, Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee Knoxville.
23. Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2022). Modeling the enablers of sustainability in higher education institutions. Journal of Modeling in Management, 17 (2), 405-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-07-2019-0169
24. Mifsud, M., & Vella, P. (2022). The role of universities in achieving the SDGs: The importance of sustainability in education. Sustainability, 14(2), 408-422. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020408
25. Ozsoy, S., Ozsoy, G., & Kuruyer, H. G. (2011, December). Turkish pre-service primary school teachers' environmental attitudes: Effects of gender and grade level. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 12(2).
26. Özdemir, O. (2007). A new perspective on environmental education: Education for sustainable development. Education and Science, 32 (145).
27. Öztürk, M. (2017). Education focused on sustainable development: Theoretical framework, historical development and practical suggestions. Primary Education Online, 16 (4), 1849-1859. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.342997
28. Ramísio, P.J., Pinto, LMC, Gouveia, N., Costa, H., & Arezes, D. (2019). Sustainability Strategy in Higher Education Institutions: Lessons learned from a nine-year case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.257
29. Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to Transform the world: Key competencies in education for Sustainable Issues in Development. and Trends in Education for sustainable development (39-60).
30. Sterling, S., & Scott, W. (2022). Education for sustainability in higher education: The need for a new paradigm. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2022-0003
31. Şengül, M. (2001). Education for the environment as an environmental management tool. Public Administration Journal, 34 (4), 137-155.
32. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2020). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
33. Teksöz, G., Şahin, E., & Ertepınar, H. (2010). Environmental literacy, prospective teachers and a sustainable future. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 39 (39), 307-320.
34. UNESCO (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
35. Vare, P., & Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the Relationship between education and sustainable development Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(2), 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820700100
36. Velazquez, L., Munguia, N., Platt, A., & Taddei, J. (2006). Sustainable university: What can be matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (9-11), 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.008
37. Yapıcı, M. (2003). Sustainable development and education. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, V (1), 223-229.
38. Yeni, O. (2014). Sustainability and sustainability development: A in summer Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 16(3), 181-208.
39. Yıldırım, G. (2020). A thematic review of education research on sustainability. Mediterranean Journal of Education Research, 14(33), 70-106. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.272.4
40. Yuksel, F. (2020). Sustainability in accounting Curriculum of Turkey Higher education institutions. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.688337