Social Studies Teachers' Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials

Mehmet Şentürk; Fatih Tıkman

doi:10.52134/ueader.1629882

Social Studies Teachers' Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials

Abstract

The change and transformation in the world of technology also affect the field of education. This effect has brought about changes in the teaching materials used by teachers in their classes. Teachers can design effective teaching materials more easily by using the opportunities offered by technology. This study aims to examine social studies teachers’ self-efficacy levels in creating digital materials in terms of various variables. The research was designed according to the survey design, one of the quantitative research designs. A convenience sampling method was used to determine the participants. In the study, the digital material creation competences of 208 (121 female, 87 male) social studies teachers were evaluated according to the variables of gender, age, professional seniority, and region of assignment. The Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Scale for Creating Digital Materials was used as a data collection tool. Independent Samples t-test and One-Way ANOVA were used to analyse the data obtained from this scale. The findings show that teachers generally have self-efficacy above the average. No significant difference was found in terms of gender, age and professional seniority variables. This result shows that social studies teachers have similar self-efficacy levels in terms of gender, age and professional seniority variables. However, in terms of the region of assignment, the self-efficacy levels of teachers working in the Black Sea Region were higher than in some regions (Marmara, Central Anatolia, Eastern Anatolia, and South-eastern Anatolia). These findings suggest that regional disparities may influence the degree of technology integration in educational practices. The researchers suggest that professional development programmes to increase teachers’ digital material development skills should be expanded.

Keywords

References

Atalmış, E. H. (2021). Tarama araştırmaları. In S. Şen and İ. Yıldırım (Ed.), Eğitimde araştırıma yöntemleri (ss. 97-116). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Bariham, I. (2022). Senior high school teachers’ and students’ perception about the integration of online learning and its impact on their application of technology in teaching and learning of social studies in Northern Region, Ghana. Social Education Research, 3(1), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.3120221268
Beck, D., & Eno, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy: A literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 70-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
Bennett, L. (2005). Guidelines for using technology in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 96(1), 38-40.
Berson, M. J., & Balyta, P. (2004). Technological thinking and practice in the social studies: Transcending the tumultuous adolescence of reform. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(4), 141-150.
Byker, E. J. (2014). Needing TPACK without knowing it: integrating educational technology in social studies. Social Studies Research and Practice 9(3), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2014-B0008
Chai, C. S., & Kong, S.-C. (2017). Professional learning for 21st century education. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0069-y
Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri desen ve analiz. Anı Yayıncılık. Crowe, A. R. (2004). Teaching by example: Integrating technology into social studies education courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(4), 159-165.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Çetin, M., & İşçi, T. G. (2022). Relationship between social studies teacher candidates’ digital literacy self-efficacy levels and ınformation and communication technology competencies. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 10(2), 71-80.
Demircioglu, E., & Yurt, E. (2024). The importance of digital material design skills for classroom teachers’ perceptions of professional competence: a relational study. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 13(2), 489-499. https://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.1346916
Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216 Duplass, J. A. (2020). The essence of teaching social studies: Methods for secondary and elementary teacher candidates. Routledge.
Erginer, E. (2021) Eğitim-öğretim-Milli Eğitim ilkeleri-program. In A. Uzunöz and V. Aktepe (Ed), Özel öğretim yöntemleri cilt 1 (s. 1-23). Pegem A Yayınları.
Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A. J., & Oreopoulos, P. (2017). Education technology: An evidence-based review. NBER Working Paper (23744).
Farris, P. J. (2015). Social studies and integrated instruction: A look at interdisciplinary instruction. In P. J. Farris (Ed), Elementary and middle school social studies: An interdisciplinary, multicultural approach, (pp. 52-79). Waveland Press.
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
Friedman, A. M., & Hicks, D. (2006). Guest editorial: The state of the field: Technology, social studies, and teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), 246-258.
Gökbulut, B., & Keserci, G. (2024). The relationship between teaching motivation of teachers working at science and art centers (BİLSEM) and their competence in designing digital materials. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1474393
Gökbulut, B., Keserci, G., & Akyüz, A. (2021). Artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik materyal tasarımı eğitimine yönelik öğretmen ve akademisyen görüşleri [Conference presentation abstract]. 14. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, Rize, Türkiye. Retrieved from http://icits2021.erdogan.edu.tr/index.php/tr
Heafner, T. (2004). Using technology to motivate students to learn social studies. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 4(1), 42-53.
Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology a primer for the 21st century. Springer.
Kalaian, S. A. (2017). Distance and Online Learning. T. Kidd, R. Lonnie and J. Morris (ed.), In Handbook of Research on Instructional Systems and Educational Technology (pp. 23-36). IGI Global.
Kaya, B. (2008). The using of technology in the social studies classroom. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 28(3), 189-205.
Kaya, E. (2020). Hayat bilgisi, sosyal bilgiler ve fen bilgisi derslerinin temeli: Toplu öğretim sistemi. (2. Baskı). Pegem A Yayınları.
Khoiron, M., Harmanto., Kasdi, A., & Rizki, A. (2021). Development of digital social studies teaching materials in the era of pandemic emergency learning. The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 4(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v4n1.p36-44
Kormos, E. (2019). An examination of social studies educators to facilitate preservice teacher development of technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 19(1), 45-61.
Martorella, P. H. (1997). Technology and the social studies-or: Which way to the sleeping giant?. Theory & Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1997.10505828
Mason, C., Berson, M., Diem, R., Hicks, D., Lee, J., & Dralle, T. (2000). Guidelines for using technology to prepare social studies teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 107-116.
NCSS (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for the social studies. National Council for the Social Studies.
Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Anderson, A. B. (2013). Sample surveys: history, current practice, and future prospects. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.) Handbook of survey research (pp. 1-20). Academic Press.
Sariyatun, S., Hermanu J., & Akhyar, M. (2018). Teachers’ perception on digital teaching material development in social science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 13-21.
Stobaugh, R., & Gandy, S. K. (2014). Seamless integration of technology into an Industrialization unit of study. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9(1), 146-153.
Suryani, N., Sutimin, L. A., Abidin, N. F., & Akmal, A. (2021). The effect of digital learning material on students’ social skills in social studies learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 417-432. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14324a
Swan, K. and Hofer, M. (2008). Technology in social studies. In L. S. Levstik and C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education (pp. 304–324). Routledge Press.
Tabachnick, B. G. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Alyn and Bacon.
Torrez, C. A. (2010). “Because I was curious”: Oral histories and web 2.0 in elementary social studies methods. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 146-156.
Underwood, J. J. (2022). Teachers’ technology self-efficacy and technology integration in social studies classes in rural and non-rural schools (Publication No. 29206243) [Doctoral Dissertation, Grand Canyon University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Uzun, B. N., & Akay, C. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy scale for creating digital materials. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 7(26), 240-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/kesit.48166
Whitworth, S., & Berson, M.J. (2002). Computer technology in the social studies: an examination of the effectiveness literature (1996-2001). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(4), 471-508.
Yıldırım, M. (2021). Örneklem ve örnekleme yöntemleri. In S. Şen & İ. Yıldırım (Ed.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (pp. 61-93). Nobel.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Instructional Technologies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Şentürk
0000-0003-0748-5234
Türkiye

Fatih Tıkman ^*
0000-0002-1853-6722
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

July 1, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

January 30, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 25, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1629882

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43SH62NZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şentürk, M., & Tıkman, F. (2025). Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 8(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1629882

AMA

1.Şentürk M, Tıkman F. Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials. IJSE. 2025;8(1):49-58. doi:10.52134/ueader.1629882

Chicago

Şentürk, Mehmet, and Fatih Tıkman. 2025. “Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials”. International Journal of Scholars in Education 8 (1): 49-58. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1629882.

EndNote

Şentürk M, Tıkman F (June 1, 2025) Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials. International Journal of Scholars in Education 8 1 49–58.

IEEE

[1]M. Şentürk and F. Tıkman, “Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials”, IJSE, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–58, June 2025, doi: 10.52134/ueader.1629882.

ISNAD

Şentürk, Mehmet - Tıkman, Fatih. “Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials”. International Journal of Scholars in Education 8/1 (June 1, 2025): 49-58. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1629882.

JAMA

1.Şentürk M, Tıkman F. Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials. IJSE. 2025;8:49–58.

MLA

Şentürk, Mehmet, and Fatih Tıkman. “Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials”. International Journal of Scholars in Education, vol. 8, no. 1, June 2025, pp. 49-58, doi:10.52134/ueader.1629882.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Şentürk, Fatih Tıkman. Social Studies Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Levels of Creating Digital Materials. IJSE. 2025 Jun. 1;8(1):49-58. doi:10.52134/ueader.1629882