Research Article

TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE'DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI

Volume: 35 Number: 1 April 28, 2022
TR EN

TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE'DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI

Abstract

This descriptive study investigates Turkish academicians' perceptions of the media literacy outcomes, assessment, and challenges of media literacy education, and their recommendations to overcome these challenges in higher education. Data were collected from 41 Turkish academicians working at Turkish universities from seven geographic regions. Data were collected via the "Media Literacy Assessment Questionnaire" which was developed by Schilder (2014). Participants were academicians with subject-area specialisation in English Language Teaching, Computer Education and Instructional Technology in the education faculty, and academicians with subject-area specialisation in the departments of communication faculty as these academicians were interested in media and technology and media literacy education. Results of the study reveal that formative assessment was a prominent assessment method; however, most assessment methods that the academicians used were also identified as time-consuming or complex to develop. Results also show that academicians were unsure about how to interpret students' responses to assess their media literacy and identified teachers' insufficient training as a challenge in assessing outcomes. Based on the data results obtained from this study, specifying learning outcomes beforehand shouldn't be accomplished by the force of administration, but should be determined by the consensus among all parties in the field. Results also reveal that critical literacy and pedagogy should be taken into account in media literacy education so that learners can become critically autonomous citizens in this globalised world.

Keywords

References

  1. Altun, A. (2012). An overview of Unesco activities in connection with media literacy (1977-2009). https://milunesco.unaoc.org/mil-articles/an-overview-of-unesco-activities-in-connection-with-media-literacy-1977-2009/
  2. Belousa, I., & Stakle, A. (2010). Intercultural and media literacy: Global tendencies in metacontent of teacher education in Latvia. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2013-0010
  3. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
  4. Bykov, I., & Medvedeva, M. (2020). Media literacy in the system of the secondary education in Russia. Revista Espacios, 41(48), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a20v41n48p29
  5. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Polity Press.
  6. Buckingham, D. (2019). The media education manifesto. Polity Press.
  7. Bulger, M., & Davison, P. (2018). The promises, challenges, and futures of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-1
  8. Domine, V. (2007). “Doing technology” in the classroom: Media literacy as critical pedagogy. In R. A. Goldstein (Ed.), Useful theory: Making critical education practical (pp. 131–147). Peter Lang.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 28, 2022

Submission Date

December 11, 2021

Acceptance Date

April 4, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 35 Number: 1

APA
Altaş, B., & Ünal, S. (2022). TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(1), 230-261. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1035423
AMA
1.Altaş B, Ünal S. TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education. 2022;35(1):230-261. doi:10.19171/uefad.1035423
Chicago
Altaş, Betül, and Sevda Ünal. 2022. “TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI”. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education 35 (1): 230-61. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1035423.
EndNote
Altaş B, Ünal S (April 1, 2022) TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education 35 1 230–261.
IEEE
[1]B. Altaş and S. Ünal, “TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI”, Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 230–261, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.19171/uefad.1035423.
ISNAD
Altaş, Betül - Ünal, Sevda. “TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI”. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education 35/1 (April 1, 2022): 230-261. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1035423.
JAMA
1.Altaş B, Ünal S. TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education. 2022;35:230–261.
MLA
Altaş, Betül, and Sevda Ünal. “TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI”. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, vol. 35, no. 1, Apr. 2022, pp. 230-61, doi:10.19171/uefad.1035423.
Vancouver
1.Betül Altaş, Sevda Ünal. TÜRK AKADEMİSYENLERİN TÜRKİYE’DE YÜKSEKÖĞRETİMDE MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI DEĞERLENDİRMESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGILARI. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education. 2022 Apr. 1;35(1):230-61. doi:10.19171/uefad.1035423

Cited By


Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education ©2025 by Bursa Uludag University is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0