Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyal Ağları Kullanma Durumları ile Cinsiyet ve Kişilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Year 2017, , 705 - 724, 20.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.369236

Abstract

Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının sosyal ağları kullanma sürelerini incelemek ve sosyal ağların kullanım süreleri ile cinsiyet ve kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkileri araştırmak amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada 16 farklı üniversitede öğrenim görmekte olan 621 öğretmen adayından bilgi toplanmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplamak için üç farklı ölçekten faydalanılmıştır. İlk ölçek, öğretmen adaylarının demografik bilgileri ile sosyal ağları kullanma sürelerine ilişkin bilgi toplamak amacıyla geliştirilmiştir. İkinci ölçek olarak, öğretmen adaylarının dışadönüklük puanlarını belirlemek amacıyla Beş Faktör Kişilik Boyutları Anketinin Dışadönüklük faktörü kullanılmıştır. Üçüncü ölçek olarak, öğretmen adaylarının sosyal kaygı puanlarını belirlemek amacıyla Sosyal Durumlarda Kendini Değerlendirme Envanteri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar, sosyal ağların öğretmen adayları tarafından yaygın olarak kullanıldığını ve öğretmen adaylarının yaklaşık beşte birinin sosyal ağ kullanım sürelerinin haftada 15-17 saat arasında olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Buna ek olarak, erkek öğretmen adaylarının sosyal ağları kullanmak için daha az zaman harcadıkları belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının dışadönüklük puanları ile sosyal ağları kullanma süreleri arasında anlamlı ve negatif bir ilişki olduğu ve sosyal kaygı puanları ile sosyal ağları kullanma süreleri arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür.

References

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ve Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295.
  • Asendorpf, J. B. ve Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531-1544.
  • Bakan, U. ve Karaaslan, İ. A. (2017). Bireysel farklılıkların sosyal sermaye oluşumuna etkisi: Facebook ve Linkedin kullanıcıları üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Intermedia International Peer-Reviewed E-Journal of Communication Sciences, 4(6), 77-94.
  • Benet-Martinez, V. ve John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Sypanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
  • Bennett, S., Maton, K. ve Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
  • Blackwell, D., Leaman, C., Tramposch, R., Osborne, C. ve Liss, M. (2017). Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 69-72.
  • Bonds-Raacke, J. ve Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 27-33.
  • Cha, J. (2010). Factors affecting the frequency and amount of social networking site use: Motivations, perceptions, and privacy concerns. First Monday, 15(12).
  • Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. ve De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Boston: Pearson Education-4th edition.
  • Dal, N. E. ve Dal, V. (2014). Kişilik özellikleri ve sosyal ağ sitesi kullanım alışkanlıkları: üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 144-162.
  • Dobrean, A. ve Pasarelu, C.-R. (2016). Impact of social media on social anxiety: A systematic review. In F. Durbano, & B. Marchesi (Eds.), New Developments in Anxiety Disorders (chap. 7). InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65188.Eren-Gümüş, A. (2002). Sosyal kaygıyla başa çıkma grup programın üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Gümüş, A. (2002). Sosyal kaygıyla başa çıkma grup programın üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
  • Doğan, U. ve Karakaş, Y. (2016). Lise öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ sitleri kullanımının yordayıcısı olarak yalnızlık. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 57-71.
  • Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A. ve Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Profiling predicting social anxiety from Facebook profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 706-713.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T., Huber, B. ve Liu, J. (2017). Personality traits and social media use in 20 countries: How personality relates to frequency of social media use, social media news use, and social media use for social interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(9), 540-552.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216.
  • Gümüş, A. E. (2006). Sosyal kaygının benlik saygısına ve işlevsel olmayan tutumlara göre yordanması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(26), 63-75.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
  • Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kashdan, T. B. (2002). Social anxiety dimensions, neuroticism, and the contours of positive psychological functioning. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(6), 789-810.
  • Kumar, S. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: survey development. In Proceedings of 8th European Conference on E-learning (ECEL), Italy.
  • Landers, R. N. ve Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283-293.
  • Liebowitz, M.R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22,141-173.
  • Mazman, S. G. ve Koçak Usluel, Y. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
  • Mcandrew, F. T. ve Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359-2365.
  • McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L. ve Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 23-27.
  • Murphy, E. C. ve Tasker, T. E. (2011). Lost in a crowded room: A correlational study of Facebook & social anxiety. The Journal of Education, Community, and Values, 11, 89-94.
  • Müller, K. W., Dreier, M., Beutel, M. E., Duven, E., Giralt, S. ve Wölfling, K. (2016). A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 172-177.
  • Öztürk, M. ve Akgün, Ö. E. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal paylaşım sitelerini kullanma amaçları ve bu sitelerin eğitimlerinde kullanılması ile ilgili görüşleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(3), 49-67.
  • Quan-Haase, A. ve Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Rubin, A. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 75–196.
  • Rizvi, A. Z. (2016). Personality, social anxiety and excessive use of Facebook. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 119-127.
  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. ve Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134-140.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. ve Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586.
  • Ryan, T. ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.
  • Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67-75.
  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. ve Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212.
  • Selfhout, M. H., Branje, S. J., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F. ve Meeus, W. H. (2009). Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: The role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 819-833.
  • Shaw, A. M., Timpano, K. R., Tran, T. B., & Joormann, J. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575-580.
  • Somyürek, S. ve Atasoy, B. (2012). How can Web 2.0 technologies provide innovative and effective learning opportunities?, S. Abramovich, (Ed.), Computers in Education (1. Baskı). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-62100-621-3
  • Somyürek, S. ve Karabulut Çoşkun, B. (2013). Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed?. British Journal of Educational Technology. 44(5). E163-E166.
  • Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2005). Big Five Personality Traits as the distal predictors of road accident. Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and Application, 215-227.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the developmental of higher psychological processes, cambridge massachusetts. London, England: Harvard University Press.
  • Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H. ve Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7-12.
  • Wehrli,S. (2008), Personality on social network site: an application of the five factor model. http://129.132.120.237/ets/papers/wehrli_studivz_big5.pdf adresinden 14.11.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Weidman, A. C., Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., Augustine, A. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 191-195.

The Use of Teacher Candidates' Social Networks and Its Relationship between Their Gender and Personality Traits

Year 2017, , 705 - 724, 20.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.369236

Abstract

The aims of this study are to investigate the time teacher candidates spend on social networks and to examine its relationship between their gender and personality traits. The data were collected from 621 teacher candidates studying at 16 different universities through three different scales. The first scale was developed to collect demographic information and the time spent on social network. Extraversion factor from Big Five Inventory was used as the second scale to determine the teacher candidates’ extraversion points. In order to obtain social anxiety scores of the teacher candidates, Inventory of Self-Evaluation in Social Situations was used as the third scale. The results showed that social networks were widely used by teacher candidates, and that approximately one fifth of the students used social networks for 15-17 hours per week. It was also found that male teacher candidates spend less time on social networks. Furthermore, the results indicated a statistically significant negative correlation between teacher candidates’ extraversion scores and the amount of time teacher candidates spent on social networks, and a statistically significant positive correlation between the teacher candidates’ social anxiety scores and the amount of time they spent on social networks.

References

  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ve Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295.
  • Asendorpf, J. B. ve Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531-1544.
  • Bakan, U. ve Karaaslan, İ. A. (2017). Bireysel farklılıkların sosyal sermaye oluşumuna etkisi: Facebook ve Linkedin kullanıcıları üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Intermedia International Peer-Reviewed E-Journal of Communication Sciences, 4(6), 77-94.
  • Benet-Martinez, V. ve John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Sypanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
  • Bennett, S., Maton, K. ve Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
  • Blackwell, D., Leaman, C., Tramposch, R., Osborne, C. ve Liss, M. (2017). Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 69-72.
  • Bonds-Raacke, J. ve Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 27-33.
  • Cha, J. (2010). Factors affecting the frequency and amount of social networking site use: Motivations, perceptions, and privacy concerns. First Monday, 15(12).
  • Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. ve De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Boston: Pearson Education-4th edition.
  • Dal, N. E. ve Dal, V. (2014). Kişilik özellikleri ve sosyal ağ sitesi kullanım alışkanlıkları: üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 144-162.
  • Dobrean, A. ve Pasarelu, C.-R. (2016). Impact of social media on social anxiety: A systematic review. In F. Durbano, & B. Marchesi (Eds.), New Developments in Anxiety Disorders (chap. 7). InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65188.Eren-Gümüş, A. (2002). Sosyal kaygıyla başa çıkma grup programın üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Gümüş, A. (2002). Sosyal kaygıyla başa çıkma grup programın üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal kaygı düzeylerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
  • Doğan, U. ve Karakaş, Y. (2016). Lise öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ sitleri kullanımının yordayıcısı olarak yalnızlık. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 57-71.
  • Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A. ve Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Profiling predicting social anxiety from Facebook profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 706-713.
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T., Huber, B. ve Liu, J. (2017). Personality traits and social media use in 20 countries: How personality relates to frequency of social media use, social media news use, and social media use for social interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(9), 540-552.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216.
  • Gümüş, A. E. (2006). Sosyal kaygının benlik saygısına ve işlevsel olmayan tutumlara göre yordanması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(26), 63-75.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
  • Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kashdan, T. B. (2002). Social anxiety dimensions, neuroticism, and the contours of positive psychological functioning. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(6), 789-810.
  • Kumar, S. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: survey development. In Proceedings of 8th European Conference on E-learning (ECEL), Italy.
  • Landers, R. N. ve Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283-293.
  • Liebowitz, M.R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22,141-173.
  • Mazman, S. G. ve Koçak Usluel, Y. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
  • Mcandrew, F. T. ve Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359-2365.
  • McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L. ve Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 23-27.
  • Murphy, E. C. ve Tasker, T. E. (2011). Lost in a crowded room: A correlational study of Facebook & social anxiety. The Journal of Education, Community, and Values, 11, 89-94.
  • Müller, K. W., Dreier, M., Beutel, M. E., Duven, E., Giralt, S. ve Wölfling, K. (2016). A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 172-177.
  • Öztürk, M. ve Akgün, Ö. E. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal paylaşım sitelerini kullanma amaçları ve bu sitelerin eğitimlerinde kullanılması ile ilgili görüşleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(3), 49-67.
  • Quan-Haase, A. ve Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Rubin, A. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 75–196.
  • Rizvi, A. Z. (2016). Personality, social anxiety and excessive use of Facebook. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 119-127.
  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. ve Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134-140.
  • Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G. ve Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586.
  • Ryan, T. ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664.
  • Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(2), 67-75.
  • Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R. ve Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173-212.
  • Selfhout, M. H., Branje, S. J., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F. ve Meeus, W. H. (2009). Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: The role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 819-833.
  • Shaw, A. M., Timpano, K. R., Tran, T. B., & Joormann, J. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575-580.
  • Somyürek, S. ve Atasoy, B. (2012). How can Web 2.0 technologies provide innovative and effective learning opportunities?, S. Abramovich, (Ed.), Computers in Education (1. Baskı). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-62100-621-3
  • Somyürek, S. ve Karabulut Çoşkun, B. (2013). Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed?. British Journal of Educational Technology. 44(5). E163-E166.
  • Sümer, N., Lajunen, T. ve Özkan, T. (2005). Big Five Personality Traits as the distal predictors of road accident. Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and Application, 215-227.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the developmental of higher psychological processes, cambridge massachusetts. London, England: Harvard University Press.
  • Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H. ve Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7-12.
  • Wehrli,S. (2008), Personality on social network site: an application of the five factor model. http://129.132.120.237/ets/papers/wehrli_studivz_big5.pdf adresinden 14.11.2016 tarihinde alınmıştır.
  • Weidman, A. C., Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., Augustine, A. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 191-195.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sibel Somyürek

Ezgi Tosik Gün

Publication Date December 20, 2017
Submission Date December 19, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Somyürek, S., & Tosik Gün, E. (2017). The Use of Teacher Candidates’ Social Networks and Its Relationship between Their Gender and Personality Traits. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 30(2), 705-724. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.369236