The Moderating Role of Organizational Agility in the Relationship between Environmental Uncertainty and Organizational Trust

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 477 - 495, 01.10.2025

Yusuf Akkoca

https://doi.org/10.20979/ueyd.1698307

Abstract

In today's business world, rapidly changing market dynamics and technological developments increase the likelihood of businesses encountering environmental uncertainties. In the face of these uncertainties, elements such as organizational trust and organizational agility have become critical for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. This study aims to examine the moderating role of organizational agility in the relationship between environmental uncertainty and organizational trust within private sector organizations. The data were collected through an online questionnaire administered to 453 private sector employees in Kırşehir, using a simple random sampling method between April and May 2025. Statistical analysis programs were used for data analysis and the bootstrap method was used to test the moderating effect. The findings show that agility has a direct positive effect on trust, as well as balancing the negative effect of uncertainty. High agility levels contribute to the sustainability of trust even in an environment of uncertainty. These results show that organizational agility serves as an important buffer in the management of uncertainty. The situation of organizations operating in the private sector against environmental uncertainty and the status of trust in the organization against environmental change has been examined.

Keywords

Organizational Agility , Environmental Uncertainty , Organizational Trust

Çevresel Belirsizlik ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişkide Örgütsel Çevikliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Abstract

Günümüz iş dünyasında hızla değişen piyasa dinamikleri ve teknolojik gelişmeler, işletmelerin çevresel belirsizliklerle karşılaşma olasılığını artırmaktadır. Bu belirsizlikler karşısında örgütsel güven ve örgütsel çeviklik gibi unsurlar, örgütlerin rekabet avantajlarını sürdürebilmeleri için kritik hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, özel sektör örgütleri içinde çevresel belirsizlik ve örgütsel güven arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel çevikliğin düzenleyici rolünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Veriler, Nisan-Mayıs 2025 tarihleri arasında Kırşehir'de 453 özel sektör çalışanına basit rastgele örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak uygulanan çevrimiçi anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Veri analizinde istatistiksel analiz programları kullanılmış ve düzenleyici etkiyi test etmek için bootstrap yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, çevikliğin güven üzerinde doğrudan pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ve belirsizliğin olumsuz etkisini dengelediğini göstermektedir. Yüksek çeviklik düzeyleri, belirsizlik ortamında bile güvenin sürdürülebilirliğine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, örgütsel çevikliğin belirsizliğin yönetiminde önemli bir tampon görevi gördüğünü göstermektedir. Özel sektörde faaliyet gösteren örgütlerin çevresel belirsizliğe karşı durumu ve çevresel değişime karşı örgütteki güvenin durumu incelenmiştir.

Keywords

Örgütsel Çeviklik , Çevresel Belirsizlik , Örgütsel Güven

References

• Ahammad, M. F., Basu, S., Munjal, S., Clegg, J., and Shoham, O. B. (2021). Strategic agility, environmental uncertainties and international performance: The perspective of Indian firms. Journal of World Business, 56(4), 101218.
• Akkaya, B., and Tabak, A. (2018). Örgütsel çeviklik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2), 185-206.
• Ashill, N. J., and Jobber, D. (2010). Measuring state, effect, and response uncertainty: Theoretical construct development and empirical validation. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1278-1308.
• Asunakutlu, T. (2002). Örgütsel güvenin oluşturulmasına ilişkin unsurlar ve bir değerlendirme. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 1-13.
• Atkinson, P., Hizaji, M., Nazarian, A., and Abasi, A. (2022). Attaining organisational agility through competitive intelligence: The roles of strategic flexibility and organisational innovation. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 33(3-4), 297-317.
• Bagraim, J. F., and Hime, P. (2007). The dimensionality of workplace interpersonal trust and its relationship to workplace affective commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 33(3), 43-48.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Braunscheidel, M. J., and Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140.
• Bruche, G. (2012). Emerging Indian pharma multinationals: latecomer catch-up strategies in a globalised high-tech industry. European Journal of International Management, 6(3), 300-322.
• Çalışkan, A. (2021). Örgütsel Güven: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalişmasi. Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 42-59.
• Çalışkan, A., and Akkoç, İ. (2012). Girişimci ve yenilikçi davranışın iş performansına etkisinde çevresel belirsizliğin rolü. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 1-28.
• Daft, R. L., and Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
• Dess, G. G., and Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73.
• Dove, R. (2002). Response ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise. Wiley.
• Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
• Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
• Fourné, S. P., Jansen, J. J., and Mom, T. J. (2014). Strategic agility in MNEs: Managing tensions to capture opportunities across emerging and established markets. California Management Review, 56(3), 13-38.
• Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., and Singh, D. (2014). Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 12-20.
• Gehani, R. R. (1995). Time‐based management of technology: A taxonomic integration oftactical and strategic roles. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(2), 19-35.
• Gligor, D.M. (2016), “The role of supply chain agility in achieving supply chain fit”, Decision Sciences, 47(3), 524-553.
• Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., and Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer (Vol. 8). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Inman, R. A., and Green, K. W. (2022). Environmental uncertainty and supply chain performance: the effect of agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(2), 239-258.
• Inman, R. A., Sale, R. S., Green Jr, K. W., and Whitten, D. (2011). Agile manufacturing: relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 29(4), 343-355.
• Joiner, B. (2009). Creating a culture of agile leaders: A developmental approach. People and Strategy, 32(4), 29-35.
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1976). The design of organizations. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Korkmazyürek, Y., and Varoğlu, A. (2020). Örgütsel güven ve psikolojik sözleşme ilişkisinde profesyonel bürokrasi etkisi. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 18-32.
• Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569-598.
• Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
• Lee, G., and Kelley, D. (2008). Building dynamic capabilities for innovation: An exploratory study of key management practices. RandD Management, 38(2), 155-168.
• Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., and Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243-255.
• Merdan, E. (2022). Stratejik yönetim sürecinin örgütsel çeviklik ve algılanan çevresel belirsizlik üzerindeki rolünün incelenmesi. Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 93-110.
• Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty about the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133-143.
• Mirghafoori, S. H., Andalib, D., and Keshavarz, P. (2017). Developing green performance through supply chain agility in manufacturing industry: a case study approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(5), 368-381.
• Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
• Nandhakumar, J., and Baskerville, R. (2006). Durability of online teamworking: Patterns of trust. Information Technology and People, 19(4), 371-389.
• Özer, N., Demirtaş, H., Üstüner, M., and Cömert, M. (2006). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel güven algıları. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 7(1), 103-124.
• Pashutan, M., Abdolvand, N., and Harandi, S. R. (2022). The impact of IT resources and strategic alignment on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Digital Business, 2(2), 100026.
• Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. (2015). External control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 355–370). Routledge.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
• Rasi, R. E., Abbasi, R., and Hatami, D. (2019). The Effect of Supply Chain Agility Based on Supplier Innovation and Environmental Uncertainty. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 6(2).
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., and Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS quarterly, 237-263.
• Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., and Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460.
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., and House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative science quarterly, 171-193.
• Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu (SGK). (2022, Temmuz). Kırşehir İl Müdürlüğü 2022 Temmuz Ayı SGK İstatistik Raporu. T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı. https://media.iskur.gov.tr/66907/kirsehir.pdf
• Tallon, P. P., and Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS quarterly, 463-486.
• Taşkın, F., and Dilek, R. (2010). Örgütsel güven ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerine bir alan araştırması. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 37-46.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Teoh, A. P., Lee, K. Y., and Muthuveloo, R. (2017). The impact of enterprise risk management, strategic agility, and quality of internal audit function on firm performance. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 222-229.
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Tokgöz, E., and Aytemiz Seymen, O. (2013). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki: Bir devlet hastanesinde araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Hakemli Dergisi, 10(39), 61-79.
• Tushman, M. L., and Anderson, P. (2018). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. In Organizational innovation (pp. 345-372). Routledge.
• Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G., House, R.J., Puranam, P. (2001). Does Leadership Matter? Ceo Leadership Attributes and Profitability Under Conditions Of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 14-143.
• Weber, Y., and Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California management review, 56(3), 5-12.
• Yıldırım, Y. (2022). Örgütsel çeviklik. Güncel Kavramlarla Örgütsel Davranış (Ed. Üzüm, B.), içinde (ss. 67-76). Ankara: Nobel.
• Zhang, Z., and Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International journal of operations and production management, 20(4), 496-513.