Research Article

A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes

Volume: 3 Number: 2 December 29, 2020
EN TR

A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes

Abstract

The unique decentralized nature of blockchain technologies leads investors to international arbitration. However, lingering issues necessitates further analysis regarding how arbitration should be conducted on a smart contract-based dispute. To this end, this study proposes that traditional arbitration rules should adjust to be suitable to resolve disputes arising from smart contract transactions. Current smart contract dispute resolution methods should also evolve by either implementation of arbitration rules in the smart contracts on the blockchain, or development of a blockchain based arbitration institution specialized in arbitration of smart contract disputes. In the alternative, a completely decentralized arbitration system should be considered for the resolution of decentralized markets dealing with smart contracts on blockchain platforms.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew, Paul. Who is Nick Szabo?, Coin Central (15.04.2019), Retrieved from https://coincentral.com/who-is-nick-szabo/.
  2. Blackaby, Nigel; Partasides, Constantine; Redfern, Alan; and Hunter, Martin (2015). Redfern and Hunter on Int’l Arbitration 71 (Oxford Univ. Press, 6th ed.).
  3. Brummer, Chris; Yadav, Yesha. (2019). Fintech and the Innovation Trilemma, 107 Geo. L.J. 235, 258.
  4. Garrie, Daniel B. Mediators Need to Become ‘Bilingual’ to Resolve Smart Contracts (04.03,2019), Retrieved from https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2018/12/05/mediators-need-to-become-bilingual-to-resolve-smart-contracts/?slreturn=20190226202407.
  5. Givari, Dena. How Does Arbitration Intersect with the Blockchain Technology that underlies Cryptocurrencies?. (20.02.2019), Retrieved from Kluwer Arbitration Blog http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/05/05/scheduled-blockchain-arbitration-april-17-2018/.
  6. Haber, Stuart; Stornetta, (1991). Scott, How to Time Stamp a Digital Document, Journal of Cryptology 99.
  7. Interview with Jason Velez, Esq., 1LAW CEO and Platform Architect, Cross Campus (27.03.2019).
  8. Interview with Professor Bhaskar Krishnamachari, Professor of Electrical Engineering-Systems and Computer Science, University of Southern California, School of Engineering (08.04.2019).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Law in Context

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

December 29, 2020

Submission Date

February 18, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 8, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Ozekın, Esq., O. B. (2020). A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi, 3(2), 35-54. https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA
AMA
1.Ozekın, Esq. OB. A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi. 2020;3(2):35-54. https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA
Chicago
Ozekın, Esq., Olca Buke. 2020. “A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi 3 (2): 35-54. https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA.
EndNote
Ozekın, Esq. OB (December 1, 2020) A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi 3 2 35–54.
IEEE
[1]O. B. Ozekın, Esq., “A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes”, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–54, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA
ISNAD
Ozekın, Esq., Olca Buke. “A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes”. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi 3/2 (December 1, 2020): 35-54. https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA.
JAMA
1.Ozekın, Esq. OB. A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi. 2020;3:35–54.
MLA
Ozekın, Esq., Olca Buke. “A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes”. Uluslararası İlişkiler Ve Diplomasi, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 35-54, https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA.
Vancouver
1.Olca Buke Ozekın, Esq. A Critique on Current Dispute Resolution Methods of Smart Contract Disputes. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;3(2):35-54. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA94LA74GA