DETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL FACTORS AFFECTING ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE USE OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

Year 2024, , 231 - 244, 31.10.2024

Ayten Turan Kurtaran , Ahmet Y. Yeşildağ , Şafak Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1526306

Abstract

Health information technologies (HIT) provide time and cost savings as well as increasing efficiency. In this study, the factors affecting the use of HIT are discussed from the perspective of healthcare personnel, who are an important stakeholder of these technologies. The study was conducted with 219 employees of a university hospital. The HIT Utilization Questionnaire (CITAM Model) was used as a data collection tool. The questionnaire consists of 13 descriptive and an attitude scale with 49 statements. As a result of the study, it was determined that the attitude of the surveyed group towards the use of HIT was at the level of x̄=5.05 ± 0.86. In the study, it was also found that the attitude levels of the participants towards the use of HIT had statistically significant differences in terms of having an IT usage certificate, age, education, occupation, duration of internet use and having a computer at home. However, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the participants' income, gender, marital status, duration of computer use at work and at home. The findings suggest that attitudes towards HIT are influenced by various demographic and occupational factors, including age, education, occupation, IT certification, and computer and internet use.

Keywords

Health Information Technologies, CITAM Model, Health Personnel Attitudes, HIT, IT

SAĞLIK BİLGİ TEKNOLOJİLERİ KULLANIMINA YÖNELİK TUTUMLARI ETKİLEYEN BİREYSEL FAKTÖRLERİN BELİRLENMESİ

Abstract

Sağlık bilgi teknolojileri (SBT), verimliliği artırmanın yanı sıra zaman ve maliyet tasarrufu sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, SBT kullanımını etkileyen faktörler, bu teknolojilerin önemli bir paydaşı olan sağlık personeli perspektifinden ele alınmıştır. Çalışma, bir üniversite hastanesinde görev yapan 219 personel ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak, SBT Kullanım Anketi (CITAM Modeli) kullanılmıştır. Anket, 13 tanımlayıcı ve 49 ifadeye sahip olan SBT Kullanımı Tutum Ölçeği’nden oluşmaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda, araştırma yapılan grubun SBT kullanımına yönelik tutumunun x̄=5,05 ± 0,86 düzeyinde olduğu saptanmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca, katılımcıların SBT kullanımı tutum düzeylerinin; BT kullanım sertifikasına sahip olma, yaş, eğitim, meslek, internet kullanma süresi ve evde bilgisayar bulunma durumları yönünden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklara sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte katılımcıların geliri, cinsiyeti, medeni durumu, iş yerinde ve evde bilgisayar kullanma süresi yönüyle SBT kullanım tutumlarına ilişkin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılığa rastlanılmamıştır. Bulgular, SBT'ye yönelik tutumların yaş, eğitim, meslek, BT sertifikası, bilgisayar ve internet kullanımı gibi çeşitli demografik ve mesleki faktörlerden etkilendiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Sağlık Bilgi Teknolojileri, CITAM Modeli, Sağlık Personeli Tutumları, SBT, BT

References

• Alolayyan, M. N., Alyahya, M. S., Alalawin, A. H., Shoukat, A., & Nusairat, F. T. (2020). Health Information Technology and Hospital Performance The Role Of Health Information Quality in Teaching Hospitals. Heliyon, 6(10).
• Arshad, A., Noordin, M. F. B., & Bint Othman, R. (2016, November). A Comprehensive Knowledge Management Process Framework for Healthcare Information Systems in Healthcare Industry of Pakistan. In 2016 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for The Muslim World (ICT4M) (pp. 30-35). IEEE.
• Avgar, A. C., Litwin, A. S., & Pronovost, P. J. (2012). Drivers and Barriers in Health IT Adoption. Applied Clinical Informatics, 3(04), 488-500.
• Bleich, H. L., & Slack, W. V. (2010). Reflections On Electronic Medical Records: When Doctors Will Use Them and When They Will Not. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(1), 1-4.
• Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2011). The Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results. Health Affairs, 30(3), 464-471.
• Chong, A. Y. L., Liu, M. J., Luo, J., & Keng-Boon, O. (2015). Predicting RFID Adoption In Healthcare Supply Chain From The Perspectives of Users. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 66-75.
• Coffetti, E., Paans, W., Roodbol, P. F., & Zuidersma, J. (2022). Individual and Team Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology by Nurses.
• Dasho, E., Kuneshka, L., & Toci, E. (2022). Information Technology in Health-Care Systems and Primary Health Care. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 1919-1926.
• Gagnon, M. P., Simonyan, D., Godin, G., Labrecque, M., Ouimet, M., & Rousseau, M. (2016). Factors Influencing Electronic Health Record Adoption by Physicians: A Multilevel Analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 258-270.
• Gagnon, M. P., Talla, P. K., Simonyan, D., Godin, G., Labrecque, M., Ouimet, M., & Rousseau, M. (2014). Electronic Health Record Acceptance by Physicians: Testing An Integrated Theoretical Model. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 48, 17-27.
• Ghoochani, M., Kahouei, M., Hemmat, M., Majdabadi, H. A., & Valinejadi, A. (2017). Health Information Technology and Health Care Activists: Where Is The Place of Iranians?. Electronic Physician, 9(10), 5657.
• Hamdan, R. (2018). Human Factors for IOT Services Utilization for Health Information Exchange. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(8), 2095-2105.
• Hatcher, M., & Heetebry, I. (2004). Information Technology In The Future of Health Care. Journal of Medical Systems, 28, 673-688.
• Hikmet N. (1999). Factors Affecting the Use of Information Technology. University of Rhode Island, Phd Thesis, Rhode Island, ABD.
• Hossain, A., Quaresma, R., & Rahman, H. (2019). Investigating Factors Influencing The Physicians’ Adoption of Electronic Health Record (EHR) in Healthcare System of Bangladesh: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 76-87.
• Ifinedo, P. (2016). The Moderating Effects of Demographic and Individual Characteristics on Nurses' Acceptance of Information Systems: A Canadian Study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 87, 27-35.
• Ilie, V., Van Slyke, C., Parikh, M. A., & Courtney, J. F. (2009). Paper Versus Electronic Medical Records: The Effects of Access on Physicians' Decisions To Use Complex Information Technologies. Decision Sciences, 40(2), 213-241.
• Kalmuk, G., Yıldız, A., & Tütüncü, D. (2023). Sağlık Çalışanlarında Teknolojiye Karşı Tutumun Değerlendirilmesi: Özel Bir Zincir Hastane Örneği. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(10), 1404-1415.
• Kaya, B., İleri, Y.Y. (2022). Sağlık Bilgi Teknolojilerine Yönelik Tutumların Belirlenmesi: Bir Üniversite Hastanesi Örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 813- 830. doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.858657
• Kim, S., Lee, K. H., Hwang, H., & Yoo, S. (2015). Analysis of The Factors Influencing Healthcare Professionals’ Adoption of Mobile Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Using The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in A Tertiary Hospital. BMC Medical İnformatics And Decision Making, 16(1), 1-12.
• Kimani, J., & Namusonge, S. (2015). Factors Affecting The Utilization of Health Information Technology Projects in Nairobi County. Strat J Bus Chang Manag, 2(57), 286-315.
• Koçak, K., Semiz, T., & Tırpan, E. C. (2022). Sağlık Profesyonellerinin Bilişim Teknolojilerine İlişkin Algılarını İncelemeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 7-12.
• Kuek, A., & Hakkennes, S. (2020). Healthcare Staff Digital Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards İnformation Systems. Health Informatics Journal, 26(1), 592-612.
• Kuffour, E. A. (2023). The Attitude of Health Professionals on Electronic Health System in Developing Countries: A Review Article. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 43(3), 74-85.
• Lee, J. J., Carson, M. N., Clarke, C. L., Yang, S. C., & Nam, S. J. (2019). Nursing Students' Learning Dynamics With Clinical Information and Communication Technology: A Constructive Grounded Theory Approach. Nurse Education Today, 73, 41-47.
• Mengestie, N. D., Yeneneh, A., Baymot, A. B., Kalayou, M. H., Melaku, M. S., Guadie, H. A., ... & Awol, S. M. (2023). Health Information Technologies in A Resource-Limited Setting: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Health Professionals. BioMed Research International, 2023.
• Natsis, C., Chrysanthopoulos, S., & Stamouli, M. A. (2020). Health Professionals’ Attitudes towards Digital Transformation through the Use of Hospital Information Systems: The Case of a General Oncology Hospital of Attica. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(10), 321-335.
• Phichitchaisopa, N., & Naenna, T. (2013). Factors Affecting The Adoption of Healthcare Information Technology. EXCLI journal, 12, 413.
• Rahman, M. S., Ko, M., Warren, J., & Carpenter, D. (2016). Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 12-24.
• Sadoughi, F., Hemmat, M., Valinejadi, A., Mohammadi, A., & Majdabadi, H. A. (2017). Assessment of Health Information Technology Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Among Healthcare Activists in Tehran Hospitals. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 17(1), 155.
• Seboka, B. T., Yilma, T. M., & Birhanu, A. Y. (2021). Factors influencing Healthcare Providers’ Attitude and Willingness to Use İnformation Technology in Diabetes Management. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 1-10.
• Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S., Casadei, B., Franklin, B. D., Richards, M., ... & Mossialos, E. (2021). Health Information Technology and Digital Innovation for National Learning Health and Care Systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(6), e383-e396.
• Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A New Socio-Technical Model for Studying Health Information Technology in Complex Adaptive Healthcare Systems. Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine: Human Computer Interaction in Healthcare, 59-80.
• Sittig, D. F., Wright, A., Coiera, E., Magrabi, F., Ratwani, R., Bates, D. W., & Singh, H. (2020). Current Challenges in Health Information Technology–Related Patient Safety. Health Informatics Journal, 26(1), 181-189.
• Tsai, M. F., Hung, S. Y., Yu, W. J., Chen, C. C., & Yen, D. C. (2019). Understanding Physicians’ Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy, Service Level and Risk Perspectives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 66, 103342.
• Yaghmaie, F., Caputi, P., & Jayasuriya, R. (2002). The Effect of Individual Psychological Characteristics in The Use Of Computerised Information Systems. In R. Ribbons, V. Dall & R. Webb (Eds.), HIC 2002 Handbook of Abstracts: Improving quality by lowering barriers (pp. 55-56). Australia: Health Informatics Society of Australia.
• Yorgancıoğlu Tarcan, G. & Çelik, Y. (2016). Hastane yöneticilerinin sağlık bilgi teknolojilerine yönelik tutumlarını etkileyen bireysel faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 19(1), 35-55.