LİDERİN YUMUŞAK VE SERT GÜÇ KAYNAKLARI İLE ÇALIŞAN PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA: TARAFLARIN CİNSİYETİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Year 2017, , 1 - 20, 15.09.2017

Deniz Dirik , İnan Eryılmaz , Asena Altın Gülova

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.316149

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, kadın ve erkek liderlerin kullandıkları güç kaynakları
bağlamında takipçilerin algıladıkları rol uyuşmazlıklarının belirlenmesi ve bu
sürecin çeşitli örgütsel sonuçlar üzerindeki yansımaları incelenmektedir. Spesifik
olarak, kadın bir lider yumuşak güç kaynağı kullandığında izleyicilerin
performansı nasıl etkilenmektedir? Peki ya sert güç kaynakları kullandığında?
Çalışanların perspektifinden bakıldığında, kadınlar daha az etkili liderlik
sergilemekte midir? Nihayetinde, kadınların yönetsel pozisyonlarda temsiliyet
oranlarının halen arzulanan düzeylerde olmamasını daha az etkili liderlik ile
açıklayabilir miyiz? Çalışma, lider ve takipçi cinsiyetinin, liderin kullandığı
güç kaynakları ile çalışan performansı –görev ve bağlamsal- arasındaki
ilişkideki rolünü 2 (yumuşak ve sert güç) x 2 (kadın lider ve erkek lider) x 2
(kadın çalışan ve erkek çalışan) şeklindeki bir model üzerinde problematize
etmektedir. Çalışmada aynı zamanda liderin güç kaynakları kullanımına ilişkin
toplumsal cinsiyet kalıp yargılarına dayanan farklılıkların (yumuşak güç
kullanımının kadınlara; sert güç kullanımının erkeklere atfedilmesi gibi)
Türkiye’deki liderlik süreçleri bağlamında geçerli olup olmadığı
araştırılmaktadır. Araştırma hipotezleri, 650 kişilik beyaz yakalılardan oluşan
bir çalışma grubu üzerinde sınanmakta ve bulgular, kuramsal ve uygulamaya dönük
katkılar bağlamında tartışılmaktadır.    

Keywords

: Liderin güç kaynakları, görev performansı, bağlamsal performans, cinsiyet

References

• Adams, J.S. (1965), Inequity in social exchange, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
• Adler, N., & Izraeli, D. (1994), Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy. In N. Adler, & D. Izraeli (Eds.), Competitive frontiers: Women managers in a global economy (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2009), Is transformational leadership always perceived as effective? Male subordinates' devaluation of female transformational leaders, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 852–879.
• Bachman, J. G., Smith, C. B., & Slesinger, J. A. (1966), Control, performance, and satisfaction: An analysis of structural and individual effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 127–136.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990), The implication of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, teams, and organizational development, Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 231-272.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993), Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 49-80). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Bass, B., Waldman, D., Avolio, B. & Bebb, M. (1987), Transformational leadership and falling dominoes effect, Group and Organization Studies, 12(1),73-88.
• Bass, B.M. (1981), Stodgill’s Handbook of Leadership, Rev. ed., The Free Press, New York, NY. Bem, S.L. (1981), Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing, Psychological Review, 88, 354‐364.
• Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life, New York: John Wiley.
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993), Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance, In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). New York: Jossey-Bass.
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997), Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
• Brown, J. H., & Raven, B. H. (1994), Power and compliance in doc- tor/patient relationships, Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 3–22.
• Carli, L. L. (2001), Gender and social influence, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725–742.
• Carli, L. L. (2015), Social influence and gender, In K. Williams & S. Harkins (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social influence, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Carli, L.L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016), Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ Scientists, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244-260.
• Carli, LL. (1999), Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence, Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99.
• Conger, J.A., & Kanungo, R.N. (1988), The empowerment process: integrating theory and Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
• Conger, J.A., Kanungo, R.N. & Menon, S.T. (2000), Charismatic leadership and follower effects, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 747-767.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010), Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik. SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Deaux, K. (1984), From individual differences to social categories. Analysis of a decade's research on gender, American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.
• Deluga, R.J. (1992),The relationship of leader-member exchange with laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership in naval environments, In Clark, K.E., Clark, M.B., & Campbell, D.P. (Eds.), Impact of leadership, Center for Creative Leadership (pp. 237-247), Greensboro, NC.
• Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. & Shamir, B. (2002), Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744.
• Eagly, A. H. (2003), The rise of female leaders. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 123-132.
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003), The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence, The Leadership Quarterly,14, 807-834.
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002), Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders, Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
• Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992), Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
• Eagly, A.H. (1987), Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Elias, S. (2008), Fifty years of influence in the workplace: The evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy, Journal of Management History, 14(3), 267-283.
• Elias, S. M. (2007), Influence in the ivory tower: Examining the appropriate use of social power in the university classroom, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2532–2548.
• Elias, S.M. & Loomis, R.J. (2004), The effect of instructor gender and race/ethnicity on gaining compliance in the classroom, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(5), 937-958.
• Ferrario, M. (1991), Sex differences in leadership style: Myth or reality?, Women in Management Review, 6(3).
• Ferris, G.R., & Rowland, K.M. (1981), Leadership, job perceptions, and influence: A conceptual integration, Human Relations, 34, 1069-78.
• Fiske, S.T., & Berdahl, J. (2007), Social power, In, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins, Social Psychology, Second Edition: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York: Guilford Publications.
• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959), The basis of power, In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 529-569). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Gold, G. J., & Raven, B. H. (1992), Interpersonal influence strategies in the Churchill–Roosevelt bases-for-destroyers exchange, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 245–272.
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995), Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi- domain perspective, Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.
• Greene, C. N. (1976), A longitudinal investigation of performance- reinforcing leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction and performance, Proceedings of the Midwest Academy of Management, 157-185.
• Heilman, M. E. (2001), Description and prescription: How gender stereo- types prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J, & Martell, R. F. (1995), Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237-252.
• Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related attitudes, CA, Sage: Beverly Hills.
• House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A., Dorfman, P.W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M.W., & Gupta, V. (1999), Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE, In Mobley, W.H., Gessner, M.J., & Arnold, V. (Eds), Advances in Global Leadership (pp. 171-233), JAI Press, Stamford, CN.
• Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999), The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational leadership and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680-694.
• Karakurum, M. (2005), The Effects of Person-Organization Fit on Employee Job Satisfaction, Performance and Organizational Commitment in A Turkish Public Organization, A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Kelley, H. H. (1972), Attribution in social interaction, In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1–26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
• Kelman, H. C. (1958), Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-56.
• Kipnis, D. (1984), The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings, In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual, Vol. 5, (pp. 179-210), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S., & Wilkinson, I. (1980), Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440– 452.
• Kirkpatrick, S.A., & Locke, E.A. (1996), Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
• Kline, R.B. (2011), Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. (3rd. Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001), The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications, In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.) The Use and Abuse of Power (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Koslowsky, M., Schwarzwald, J., & Ashuri, S. (2001), On the relationship between subordinates’ compliance to power sources and organisational attitudes, Applied Psychology:An International Review, 50, 455–476.
• Lemons, M., & Parzinger, M. (2007), Gender schemas: A cognitive explanation of discrimination of women in technology, Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(1), 91-98.
• MacKenzie, S.B., Podssakoff, P.M., & Rich, G.A. (2001), Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 2, 115-34.
• Meydan, C. H. (2010), Örgüt kültürü, örgütsel güç ve örgütsel adalet algilarinin bireyin iş tatmini ve örgüte bağliliği üzerine etkisi: Kamuda bir araştirma, Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, Kara Harp Okulu, Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Mittal, R., & Elias, S. M. (2016), Social power and leadership in cross-cultural context, Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 58-74.
• Naktiyok, A., & Yekeler, K. (2016), Dönüştürücü liderliğin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkisinde etkileşimci liderlik davranışlarının rolü: Bir kamu kurumu örneği, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 49(2), 105-143.
• Northouse, P. G. (2007), Leadership: Theory and practice, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
• Pierro, A., Cicero, L., & Raven, B. H. (2008), Motivated compliance with bases of social power, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1921–1944.
• Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A.W., & Raven, B.H. (2012), Motivational underpinnings of social influence in work settings: Bases of social power and the need for cognitive closure, European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 41–52.
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985), Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research, Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 387–411.
• Podsakoff, P.M., Todor, W.D., & Skov, R. (1982), Effects of leader performance contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction, Academy of Management Journal, 25, 812-821.
• Podsakoff, P.M., Todor, W.D., Grover, R.A., & Huber, V.L. (1984), Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behavior: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21-63.
• Powell, G. N. (1999), Reflections on the glass ceiling. Recent trends and future prospects, In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 325-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Randolph, W. A., & Kemery, E. R. (2011), Managerial use of power bases in a model of managerial empowerment practices and employee psychological empowerment, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(1), 95–106.
• Raven, B.H. (1965), Social influence and power, In I.D. Steiner, & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371–382), New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
• Raven, B.H. (1993), The bases of power: origins and recent developments, Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227-251.
• Raven, B.H. (1999), Influence, power, religion, and the mechanisms of social control, Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 161–186.
• Raven, B.H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998), Conceptualizing and measuring a power/ interaction model of interperpersonal influence, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–332.
• Ridgeway, C. L. (1997), Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment, American Sociological Review, 62(2), 218-235.
• Sargut, A. S. (2015), Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim, Ankara, İmge Kitabevi.
• Schein, V. E. (2001), A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.
• Schein, V.E., Mueller, E., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996), Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41.
• Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, B. (2004), Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison, Sex Roles, 51(11), 631-645.
• Student, K. R. (1968), Supervisory influence and work-group performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 188–194.
• Thamhain, H. J., & Gemmil, G. R. (1974), Influence styles of project managers: Some project performance correlates, Academy of Management Journal, 17, 216–224.
• Twenge, J.M. (1997), Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis, Sex Roles, 36, (5), 305-25.
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007), Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance an empirical examination of two competing models, Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683.
• Wang, A., Chiang, J., Tsai, C., Lin, T., & Cheng, B. (2013), Gender makes the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122 (2), 101-113.
• Wang, H., Law, K.S., Hackett, R.D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z.X. (2005), Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-32.
• Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993), Transformational leadership and performance: A longitudinal investigation, Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 81–102.
• Yukl, G. (2013), Leadership in organizations, 8th global ed., Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
• Yukl, G., & Tracey, J.B. (1992), Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525–535.
• Zaleznik, A. (1998), Managers and leaders: Are they different?, Harvard Business Review on Leadership, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Zigarmi, D., Roberts, T.P., & Randolph, W.A. (2015), Employees’ perceived use of leader power and implications for affect and work intentions, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(4), 349–462.