BibTex RIS Cite

AB’YE ÜYELİK PERSPEKTİFİNDEN ROMANYA’DA KAMU YÖ- NETİMİ REFORMLARI: YAPISAL BİR ANALİZ

Year 2009, Issue: 3, 0 - , 14.05.2015

Abstract

Küreselleşme süreciyle birlikte yeniden yapılanan AB’de kamu yönetiminde reform alanında süre giden
tartışmalar, yeni bir boyut kazanmıştır. Söz konusu yeni boyut üye ülkeler tarafından ortaya konulan ve
aday ülkelerin merkezi ve yerel yönetimlerinin bir bütün olarak sistematik, yapısal, işlevsel ve etkinlik
gibi noktalarda yönetişim ilkelerine bağlı kalınarak yeniden düzenlenmesini amaçlamaktadır.
Bu bağlamda birliğe en son üye olan Romanya’da gerçekleştirilen kamu yönetimi reformları, yeni dönemde
birliğe katılacak aday ülkelerden beklenen yeni kamu yönetimi işletmeciliği anlayışının güncel bir
perspektifini yansıtmaktadır. Bu çalışma, kamu yönetiminde reform tartışmalarının AB’ye üyelik perspektifinden
hangi esaslara dayandığını ve en son üye ülke olarak Romanya’nın reform sürecinde izlediği
aşamaları ele almaktadır.

References

  • AKTAN, C.Can (2000), Politik İktisat, Anadolu Matbaacılık, İzmir.
  • ARCHICK, Kristin, KIM, Julie (2008), “European Union Enlargement”,
  • Congressional Research Service- The Library of Congress, Text Paper, Internet Adresi:
  • http://italy.usembassy.gov/pdf/other/RS21344.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 08.09.2008.
  • BRIGGS, Asa (1999), The Welfare State at Historical Perspective, “Archives
  • Europeennes de Sociologie”, Vol.: 2, Issue: 2, 221–259.
  • CARSTENS, Martin, THORNHILL, Crish (2000), “The Relationship
  • Between Administrative Reform and New Public Management,” Journal of Public
  • Administration, Vol:35, No:3, September, 177-192.
  • CIA, İnternet Adresi: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook.
  • html, Erişim Tarihi: 05.10.2008.
  • Commision of European Communities (1996), “Commission İnterim Report
  • To The European Concil on the Application. of the Subsidiarity and Proportionality
  • Principle”, CSE (96) 2 Final, Brussels, İnternet Adresi:
  • http://aei.pitt.edu/923/01/subsidiarity_CSE_96_2.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • COMAN, Pena, CRAI, Eugen, RADULESCU, Monica, STANCIULESCU,
  • Gabriella (2006), Local Government in Romania, Local Governments Central and
  • Eastern Europe Studies, 351-413).
  • CUPAR (2006), Public Administration Reform in Romania, Ministry of
  • Administration and Interior, Buchurest.
  • DİLEKLİ, Selin, YEŞİLKAYA, Kadri (2002), Maastricht Kriterleri, DPT
  • Yayınları, Ankara.
  • DPT (1996), Florence European Council 21 And 22 June 1996
  • Presidency Conclusions, İnternet Adresi:http://www.dpt.gov.tr/abigm/abtb/Zirveler/
  • Erişim Adresi: 10.09.2008.
  • IONITA, Alexandru L. ve FREYBERG Inan, Anette (2008), Public
  • Administration Reform in the Context of European Integration: Continuing
  • Problems of the Civil Service in Romania, Southeast European and Black Sea
  • Studies Vol. 8, No. 3, 205–226.
  • IONATA Alexandru L. (2005), “Changing Values: The Case of Civil Servant
  • in Romania”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.nispa.sk/_portal/files/conferences/2005/
  • papers/200504011456230.Leonard%20Ionita%20Paper, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2009.
  • European Commision (1993), European Council in Copenhagen 21-22 June
  • , Conclusions of Presidency, SN 180/1/93 Rev:1.
  • Euroean Commision (1995), Madrit European Council, 15-16 December
  • , Conclusions of Presidency, İnternet Adresi: www.europarl.europa.eu/summits
  • /mad1_en.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • European Commision, Personnal and Administration Directory General, İnternet
  • Adresi: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/publications_en.htm,
  • Erişim Tarihi:10.09.2008.
  • European Commision (1997), Agenda 2000, “Commission Opinion on
  • Romania’s Application for Membership of the EU”, Bulletin of the EU, Supplement
  • /97.
  • European Council (1996), Presidency Conclusions, Florence (21-22 June),
  • İnternet Adresi: http://www.dpt.gov.tr/abigm/abtb/Zirveler/1996%20Florence%2021
  • -22%20Haziran.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008
  • European Council (2002), 624, 13 Kasım 2002, Roadsmaps for Bulgaria and
  • Romania, Brussels.
  • FILIP, Petru, ve BOLOS, Marcel Ioan, A (2007), Proactive Perspective on
  • Reform in Public Administration, Theoretical and Apliied Economics, Vol:10,
  • Issue:10, October, 41-48.
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis (2004), Devletin Yeniden İnşası, (Çeviren: Devrim
  • Çetinkasap), Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul.
  • GREENWAY, David, MILNER, Chris (2007), “Implıcatıons Of European
  • Union Enlargement for Carıcom Countries”, Report of a Policy Study Under the
  • Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery (RNM) and InterAmerican
  • Development Bank (IDB) Regional Technical Cooperation Project [ATN/JF/SF-
  • -RG], UK, 1-92.
  • GOUGH, Roger, REID, Anna (2004), “The Perfect Union”, Policy Exchange
  • Press. London.
  • GÜLSOY, Ebru (2007), “Romanya Ülke Profili”, Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret
  • Müsteşarlığı, İhracatı Geliştirme Etüt Merkezi, Ankara.
  • KAVALALI, Murat (2005), “AB Genişleme Süreci”, DPT AB İle İlişkiler
  • Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KAVALALI, Murat (2006), “AB Genişleme Süreci: Avrupa Birliği Romanya
  • İlişkileri”, DPT AB İle İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KETTL, Donald F.(1998), “Reinventing Government: A Fifth Year Report
  • Card”, Center of Public Management, The Brookings Insitution, Washington DC.
  • KURT, Mustafa, UĞURLU, YAŞAR, Özlem (2007), “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi
  • ve Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Yaklaşımının Gelişiminde Avrupa Birliğinin Rolü: İlerleme
  • Raporları içerik Analizi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, C.IX,
  • S:11, 81-109
  • KUTLU, Önder (2004), “Kamu Reformu ve Yönetimin Yeniden Düzenlenmesi”,
  • Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
  • MARIUS, Profiroiu, TUDOREL, Andrei, CARP, Radu ve DRAGOS, Dinca
  • (2006), “Public Administration Reform in the Perspective Of Romania’s Accession
  • to the European Union”, European Institute of Romania – Pre-Accession Impact
  • Studies III Study No. 3, Bucharest.
  • MARIUS, Profiroiu (2006), “Publıc Administration Reform And The Policy
  • Making Process In Romania”, Academy of Economic Studies, April, Bucharest.
  • MATEOC-SÎRP, Nicoletta, MATEOC, Teodor (2005), Rural and Regional
  • Development in Romania: An Importance Goal in the Process of Integration in the
  • EU Structures, Rural Development, 15-17.
  • MIHAI, Alexandra (2005), Romanian Central Public Administration and the
  • Challanges of Europeanisation, SWP Working Paper, Berlin.
  • MORARU, Adrian ve IORGA, Elena (2004), Romanian Civil Service
  • Barometers, DAI-GRASP Pres, Bucuresti.
  • Romanya Anayasası (1991), İnternet Erişim Adresi: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/
  • dic/site.page?id=339&idl=2, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • The Ministry of Public Administration (2001), “The Governments Strategy”,
  • Buchurest Transparency International (2007), Report on the Transparency
  • International Global Corruption Barometer 2007, Internet Adresi: http://www.ccpm
  • .pt/GCBarometer-TI2007Report%5B1%5D.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2009.
  • WARAKAULLE, C. Lindberg (2002), “Denmark: In and Out”, The World
  • Today, Vol:58, No:7, 7.
  • YILMAZ, Osman (2001) “Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Genel Eğilimler ve Ülke
  • Deneyimleri”, DPT Yayınları, Ankara,
Year 2009, Issue: 3, 0 - , 14.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • AKTAN, C.Can (2000), Politik İktisat, Anadolu Matbaacılık, İzmir.
  • ARCHICK, Kristin, KIM, Julie (2008), “European Union Enlargement”,
  • Congressional Research Service- The Library of Congress, Text Paper, Internet Adresi:
  • http://italy.usembassy.gov/pdf/other/RS21344.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 08.09.2008.
  • BRIGGS, Asa (1999), The Welfare State at Historical Perspective, “Archives
  • Europeennes de Sociologie”, Vol.: 2, Issue: 2, 221–259.
  • CARSTENS, Martin, THORNHILL, Crish (2000), “The Relationship
  • Between Administrative Reform and New Public Management,” Journal of Public
  • Administration, Vol:35, No:3, September, 177-192.
  • CIA, İnternet Adresi: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook.
  • html, Erişim Tarihi: 05.10.2008.
  • Commision of European Communities (1996), “Commission İnterim Report
  • To The European Concil on the Application. of the Subsidiarity and Proportionality
  • Principle”, CSE (96) 2 Final, Brussels, İnternet Adresi:
  • http://aei.pitt.edu/923/01/subsidiarity_CSE_96_2.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • COMAN, Pena, CRAI, Eugen, RADULESCU, Monica, STANCIULESCU,
  • Gabriella (2006), Local Government in Romania, Local Governments Central and
  • Eastern Europe Studies, 351-413).
  • CUPAR (2006), Public Administration Reform in Romania, Ministry of
  • Administration and Interior, Buchurest.
  • DİLEKLİ, Selin, YEŞİLKAYA, Kadri (2002), Maastricht Kriterleri, DPT
  • Yayınları, Ankara.
  • DPT (1996), Florence European Council 21 And 22 June 1996
  • Presidency Conclusions, İnternet Adresi:http://www.dpt.gov.tr/abigm/abtb/Zirveler/
  • Erişim Adresi: 10.09.2008.
  • IONITA, Alexandru L. ve FREYBERG Inan, Anette (2008), Public
  • Administration Reform in the Context of European Integration: Continuing
  • Problems of the Civil Service in Romania, Southeast European and Black Sea
  • Studies Vol. 8, No. 3, 205–226.
  • IONATA Alexandru L. (2005), “Changing Values: The Case of Civil Servant
  • in Romania”, İnternet Adresi: http://www.nispa.sk/_portal/files/conferences/2005/
  • papers/200504011456230.Leonard%20Ionita%20Paper, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2009.
  • European Commision (1993), European Council in Copenhagen 21-22 June
  • , Conclusions of Presidency, SN 180/1/93 Rev:1.
  • Euroean Commision (1995), Madrit European Council, 15-16 December
  • , Conclusions of Presidency, İnternet Adresi: www.europarl.europa.eu/summits
  • /mad1_en.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • European Commision, Personnal and Administration Directory General, İnternet
  • Adresi: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/publications_en.htm,
  • Erişim Tarihi:10.09.2008.
  • European Commision (1997), Agenda 2000, “Commission Opinion on
  • Romania’s Application for Membership of the EU”, Bulletin of the EU, Supplement
  • /97.
  • European Council (1996), Presidency Conclusions, Florence (21-22 June),
  • İnternet Adresi: http://www.dpt.gov.tr/abigm/abtb/Zirveler/1996%20Florence%2021
  • -22%20Haziran.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008
  • European Council (2002), 624, 13 Kasım 2002, Roadsmaps for Bulgaria and
  • Romania, Brussels.
  • FILIP, Petru, ve BOLOS, Marcel Ioan, A (2007), Proactive Perspective on
  • Reform in Public Administration, Theoretical and Apliied Economics, Vol:10,
  • Issue:10, October, 41-48.
  • FUKUYAMA, Francis (2004), Devletin Yeniden İnşası, (Çeviren: Devrim
  • Çetinkasap), Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul.
  • GREENWAY, David, MILNER, Chris (2007), “Implıcatıons Of European
  • Union Enlargement for Carıcom Countries”, Report of a Policy Study Under the
  • Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery (RNM) and InterAmerican
  • Development Bank (IDB) Regional Technical Cooperation Project [ATN/JF/SF-
  • -RG], UK, 1-92.
  • GOUGH, Roger, REID, Anna (2004), “The Perfect Union”, Policy Exchange
  • Press. London.
  • GÜLSOY, Ebru (2007), “Romanya Ülke Profili”, Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret
  • Müsteşarlığı, İhracatı Geliştirme Etüt Merkezi, Ankara.
  • KAVALALI, Murat (2005), “AB Genişleme Süreci”, DPT AB İle İlişkiler
  • Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KAVALALI, Murat (2006), “AB Genişleme Süreci: Avrupa Birliği Romanya
  • İlişkileri”, DPT AB İle İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KETTL, Donald F.(1998), “Reinventing Government: A Fifth Year Report
  • Card”, Center of Public Management, The Brookings Insitution, Washington DC.
  • KURT, Mustafa, UĞURLU, YAŞAR, Özlem (2007), “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi
  • ve Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Yaklaşımının Gelişiminde Avrupa Birliğinin Rolü: İlerleme
  • Raporları içerik Analizi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, C.IX,
  • S:11, 81-109
  • KUTLU, Önder (2004), “Kamu Reformu ve Yönetimin Yeniden Düzenlenmesi”,
  • Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
  • MARIUS, Profiroiu, TUDOREL, Andrei, CARP, Radu ve DRAGOS, Dinca
  • (2006), “Public Administration Reform in the Perspective Of Romania’s Accession
  • to the European Union”, European Institute of Romania – Pre-Accession Impact
  • Studies III Study No. 3, Bucharest.
  • MARIUS, Profiroiu (2006), “Publıc Administration Reform And The Policy
  • Making Process In Romania”, Academy of Economic Studies, April, Bucharest.
  • MATEOC-SÎRP, Nicoletta, MATEOC, Teodor (2005), Rural and Regional
  • Development in Romania: An Importance Goal in the Process of Integration in the
  • EU Structures, Rural Development, 15-17.
  • MIHAI, Alexandra (2005), Romanian Central Public Administration and the
  • Challanges of Europeanisation, SWP Working Paper, Berlin.
  • MORARU, Adrian ve IORGA, Elena (2004), Romanian Civil Service
  • Barometers, DAI-GRASP Pres, Bucuresti.
  • Romanya Anayasası (1991), İnternet Erişim Adresi: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/
  • dic/site.page?id=339&idl=2, Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.2008.
  • The Ministry of Public Administration (2001), “The Governments Strategy”,
  • Buchurest Transparency International (2007), Report on the Transparency
  • International Global Corruption Barometer 2007, Internet Adresi: http://www.ccpm
  • .pt/GCBarometer-TI2007Report%5B1%5D.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2009.
  • WARAKAULLE, C. Lindberg (2002), “Denmark: In and Out”, The World
  • Today, Vol:58, No:7, 7.
  • YILMAZ, Osman (2001) “Kamu Yönetimi Reformu: Genel Eğilimler ve Ülke
  • Deneyimleri”, DPT Yayınları, Ankara,
There are 97 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Cantürk Caner This is me

Publication Date May 14, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Caner, C. (2015). AB’YE ÜYELİK PERSPEKTİFİNDEN ROMANYA’DA KAMU YÖ- NETİMİ REFORMLARI: YAPISAL BİR ANALİZ. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi(3). https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.51206

______________________________________________________

Address: Karadeniz Technical University Department of Economics Room Number 213  

61080 Trabzon / Turkey

e-mail : uiiidergisi@gmail.com