YÖNETİM YAZININDAKİ NÖROBİLİM ÇALIŞMALARINA GENEL BAKIŞ

Year 2017, 16. UIK Special Issue, 403 - 412, 09.10.2017

Hakan Erkal , Ceren Deniz Tatarlar , Jülide Kesken

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.325917

Cited By: 3

Abstract

1900’lü yılların başlarında psikoloji alanının gelişmesi ile birlikte
gelen düşünsel değişim, insan beyinin nasıl işlediği konusunda birçok
çalışmanın ortaya konmasına dayanak sağlamıştır. Tıbbi teknoloji ve nöroloji
alanındaki ilerlemeler bilim insanlarının beynin nasıl işlediği konusunda deneye
dayalı veriler elde etmesini sağlamış, bir çalışma alanı olarak nörobilim
yazında kendisine yer bulmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bilimsel yazında hızlıca
gelişen bir alan olan nörobilim çalışmalarının yönetim bilimi yazınını nasıl
etkilediğini ve yazın içerisinde nasıl bir gelişim gösterdiğini incelemektir. Çalışmada
yöntem olarak ikinci el veri alanizi kullanılmıştır. Veriler, yönetim ve organizasyon
bilimsel çalışma alanı içerisine giren SSCI tarafından taranan dergilerde yer
alan nörobilim ile ilgili makalerin anahtar kelimeleri ve konu başlıklarından
elde edilmiştir. Bu veriler Nvivo 11 programı ile temalara ayrılmış, mevcut
yazında nörobilim çalışmalarının hangi alt temalarda yoğunlaşığı ortaya
konulmuştur. Buna göre örgütsel davranış konuları içerisinde liderlik en çok
çalışılan alan olarak öne çıkmıştır. Daha sonra örgüt çalışmaları ve kuram
tartışmaları en çok yoğunlaşmanın olduğu alanlar olarak göze çarpmaktadır.

Keywords

Yönetim Bilimleri, Nörobilim, Nöropsikoloji, Kuram

References

• Antonakis, J., Ashkanasy, N.M. ve Dasborough, M.T. (2009). Does Leadership Need Emotional In-telligence? Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 247-261.
• Ashkanasy, N.M. (2013). Neuroscience and Leadership: Take Care Not to Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 311-313.
• Ashkanasy, N.M., Becker, W.J. ve Waldman, D.A. (2014). Neuroscience And Organizational Behav-ior: Avoiding Both Neuro-Euphoria And Neuro-Phobia. Journal of Organizational Behav-ior. 35(7), 909-920.
• Balthazard, P.A., Waldman, D.A., Thatcher, R.W. ve Hannah, S.T. (2012). Differentiating Trans-formational And Non-Transformational Leaders On The Basis Of Neurological Imaging. Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 244-258.
• Bear, M.F., Connors, B.W. ve Paradiso, M.A. (2001). Neuroscience: Exploring The Brain (3. Basım). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Becker, W.J. ve Cropanzano, R. (2010). Organizational Neuroscience: The Promise And Prospects Of An Emerging Discipline. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31(7), 1055-1059.
• Becker, W.J., Cropanzano, R. ve Sanfey, A.G. (2011). Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organi-zational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933-961.
• Becker, W.J. ve Jochen, I.M. (2013). Biological Implicit Measures in HRM And OB: A Question Of How Not If. Human Resource Management Review. 23(3), 219-228.
• Becker, W.J., Volk, S. ve Ward, M.K. (2015). Leveraging Neuroscience For Smarter Approaches To Workplace Intelligence. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 56-67.
• Beugre, C.D. (2009). Exploring The Neural Basis Of Fairness: A Model Of Neuro-Organizational Justice. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes; 110(2), 129-139.
• Boyatzis, R.E., Passarelli, A.M., Koenig, K., Lowe, M., Mathew, B., Phillips, M. ve Stoller, J.K. (2012). Examination Of The Neural Substrates Activated In Memories Of Experiences With Resonant And Dissonant Leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 259-272.
• Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. ve Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can In-form Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 43(1): 9-64.
• Christopoulos, G.I., Liu, X.-X. ve Hong, Y.-Y. (2016). Toward an Understanding of Dynamic Moral Decision Making: Model-Free and Model-Based Learning. Journal of Business Ethics, I February 2016, 1-17.
• Clithero, J.A., Tankersley, D. ve Huettel, S.A. (2008). Foundations of Neuroeconomics: From Phi-losophy to Practice. PLOS Biology. 6(11): e298.
• Cropanzano, R.S. ve Becker, W.J. (2013). The Promise and Peril of Organizational Neuroscience: Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 306-310.
• Cropanzano, R.S., Massaro, S. ve Becker, W.J. (2016). Deontic Justice and Organizational Neuro-science. Journal of Business Ethics, March 2016, 1-22.
• Dane, E., Rockmann, K.W. ve Pratt, M.G. (2012). When Should I Trust My Gut? Linking Domain Expertise To Intuitive Decision-Making Effectiveness. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes; 119(2), 187-194.
• Goleman, D. (2006). Socially Inteligent Leaders. Educational Leadership; 64(1), 76-81.
• Healey, M.P. ve Hodgkinson, G.P. (2014). Rethinking the philosophical and theoretical foundations of organizational neuroscience: A critical realist alternative. Human Relations, 67(7), 765-792.
• Hodgkinson, G.P. (2013). Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Critical Realist Design Science Perspective. Group & Organization Management; 38(1), 145-157.
• Hodgkinson, G.P. ve Healey, M.P. (2011). Psychological Foundations Of Dynamic Capabilities: Re-flexion And Reflection In Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500-1516.
• Holan, P. M. (2014). It's All in Your Head: Why We Need Neuroentrepreneurship. Journal of Ma-nagement Inquiry, 23(1), 93-97.
• Houdek, P. (2017). Puppet Master: Possıble Influence Of The Parasıte Toxoplasma Gondıı On Ma-nagers And Employees. Academy of Management Perspective, 31(1), 163-81.
• Jamieson, D.W. (2013). Editor’s Introduction. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 294-294. Kathleen, C. (2013). Minds on Fire. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 38-43.
• Lawrence, P.R. ve Pirson, M. (2015). Economistic and Humanistic Narratives of Leadership in the Age of Globality: Toward a Renewed Darwinian Theory of Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. 128(2), 383-395.
• Lebbon, A.R. ve Austin, J. A. (2013). Preliminary Examination of the Effects of Observer Presence on Work-Related Behavior in a Simulated Office. Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management; 33(3), 185-199.
• Lee, N., Butler, M. ve Senior, C. (2012a). Leadership Research And Cognitive Neuroscience: The State Of This Union. Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 213-218.
• Lee, N., Senior, C. ve Butler M. (2012b). The Domain of Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges. Journal of Management, 38(4), 921-931.
• Lindebaum, D. (2013a). Ethics and the Neuroscientific Study of Leadership: A Synthesis and Re-joinder to Ashkanasy, Cropanzano and Becker, and McLagan. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 317-323.
• Lindebaum, D. (2013b). Pathologizing the Healthy But Ineffective: Some Ethical Reflections on Using Neuroscience in Leadership Research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 295-305.
• Lindebaum, D. (2016). Critical Essay: Building New Management Theories On Sound Data? The Case Of Neuroscience. Human Relations, 69(3), 537-550.
• Lindebaum, D. ve Zundel, M. (2013). Not Quite A Revolution: Scrutinizing Organizational Neuros-cience İn Leadership Studies. Human Relations, 66(6), 857-877.
• Lindebaum, D. ve Jordan, P.J. (2014). A Critique On Neuroscientific Methodologies In Organiza-tional Behavior And Management Studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 35(7), 898-909.
• Lindebaum, D. ve Raftopoulou, E. (2014). What Would John Stuart Mill Say? A Utilitarian Perspec-tive on Contemporary Neuroscience Debates in Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, June 2014.
• Lindstrom, M. (2008). Buy-ology. İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
• Mansfield, N. (2006). "Öznellik: Freud'dan Haraway'e Kendilik Kuramı". Çev. H. Çetinkaya ve R. Durmaz. İzmir: Aralık Yayınları.
• Mason, M.F., Dyer, R. ve Norton, M.I. (2009). Neural Mechanisms Of Social Influence. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 152-159.
• McDonald, P. ve Tang, Y. (2014). Neuroscientific Insights Into Management Development: Theo-retical Propositions and Practical Implications. Group & Organization Management. 39(5), 475-503.
• McLagan, P. A. (2013). A Call to Watch Our Paradigms! Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 314-316. Nicolaou, N. ve Shane, S. (2014). Biology, Neuroscience, and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Mana-gement Inquiry, 23(1), 98-100.
• Niven, K. ve Boorman, L. (2016). Assumptions Beyond The Science: Encouraging Cautious Conclu-sions About Functional Magnetic Resonance İmaging Research On Organizational Beha-vior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37 (8), 1150-1177.
• Pavlovich, K. ve Krahnke, K. (2012). Empathy, Connectedness and Organisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 131-137.
• Powell, T. C. (2011). Neurostrategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (13), 1484-1499.
• Price, M.C. ve Norman, E. (2008). Intuitive Decisions On The Fringes Of Consciousness: Are They Conscious And Does It Matter? Judgment And Decision Making, 3(1), 28-41.
• Richard, P.B., Willem, J.M, Roeland, C. D., Frank, D. B., Wouter, E. ve Wim J R. (2013). Theory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machiavellianism: A Neuroscience Perspective. Jour-nal of Management. 39(7), 1760-1798.
• Robertson, D.C.; Voegtlin, C. ve Maak, T. (2016). Business Ethics: The Promise of Neuroscience. Journal of Business Ethics, September 2016, 1-19.
• Rochford, K.C., Jack, A.I., Boyatzis, R.E. ve French, S.E. (2016). Ethical Leadership as a Balance Be-tween Opposing Neural Networks. Journal of Business Ethics, July 2016, 1-16.
• Salas, E., Rosen, M.A. ve DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations. Journal Of Management, 36(4), 941-973.
• Scherbaum, C. A. ve Goldstein, H.W. (2015). Intelligence and The Modern World of Work. Human Resource Management Review. 25(1), 1-3.
• Schoeneborn, D, Blaschke, S. ve Kaufmann, I.M. (2013). Recontextualizing Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Organization Studies: The Pathology of Organizational Insomnia. Journal Of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 435-450.
• Senior, C., Lee, N. ve Butler, M. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organization Sci-ence. 22(3), 804-816.
• Spector, P.E. (2014). Point/Counterpoint Introduction: Two Views Of Organizational Neuroscience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014.
• Stanton, S.J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W. ve Huettel, S.A. (2016). Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse. Journal of Business Ethics, February 2016, 1-13.
• Tee, E.Y.J. (2015). The Emotional Link: Leadership And The Role Of Implicit And Explicit Emotional Contagion Processes Across Multiple Organizational Levels. Leadership Quarterly, 26(4), 654-670.
• Trichas, S., Schyns, B., Lord, R. ve Hall, R. (2017). “Facing” Leaders: Facial Expression And Leader-ship Perception. Leadership Quarterly. 28(2), 317-333.
• Uhlmann, E.L., Leavitt, K., Menges, J.I., Koopman, J., Howe, M. ve Johnson, R.E. (2012). Getting Explicit About the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for Their Use in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods; 15(4), 553-601.
• Volk, S. ve Köhler, T. (2012). Brains and Games: Applying Neuroeconomics to Organizational Re-search. Organizational Research Methods. 15(4), 522-552.
• Waldman, D.A., Balthazard, P.A. ve Peterson, S.J. (2011a). Leadership and Neuroscience: Can We Revolutionize the Way That Inspirational Leaders Are Identified and Developed?. Acad-emy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 60-74.
• Waldman, D.A., Peterson, S.J. ve Balthazard, P.A. (2011b). Social Cognitive Neuroscience And Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1092-1106.
• Weaver, G.R., Reynolds, S.J. ve Brown, M.E. (2014). Moral Intuition: Connecting Current Knowledge to Future Organizational Research and Practice. Journal Of Management; 40(1), 100-129.
• Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A Model for Ethical Decision Making in Business: Reasoning, Intuition, and Rational Moral Principles. Journal of Business Ethics. 104(3), 311-323.