ADIYAMAN SİYASAL DAVRANIŞ HARİTASI

Year 2019, Issue: 25, 1 - 16, 25.10.2019

Rahman Dağ

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.549146

Abstract

Siyasal davranış, sadece oy kullanma ile
sınırlandırılmayıp siyasi karar verme mekanizmalarını etkileyecek tüm davranış
ve tutumları da kapsar hale gelmiştir. Özellikle sivil toplumun siyaseten
etkili olması siyaseti etkime yollarını genişletmiştir. Aynı zamanda çeşitlenen
siyasal davranışları etkileyen faktörler ayrı bir çalışma konusu haline gelmiştir.
Bu çalışmada, siyasal sistem, medya, din, çevre, aile, etnisite ve ekonomi
faktörlerinin Adıyaman seçmenlerinin siyasal davranışını ne derece etkilediğine
bakılmaktadır. Yapılan anket çalışması ile elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda
söz konusu faktörlerin frekans aralıkları üzerinden hangi faktörün daha fazla
etkili olduğu ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ifadeci ve araçsal oy
kavramları ışığında değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Adıyaman ilinin tüm ilçe ve
köylerinde anket uygulanmasına rağmen bu makale Adıyaman geneline odaklanmış ve
sadece Adıyaman siyasal davranış haritası tablosu üzerine analiz yapılmıştır. 

Keywords

Siyasal Davranış, İfadeci Oy, Araçsal Oy, Adıyaman, Türkiye

References

• Anderson, C. ve Paskeviciute, A. (2005). Macro-politics and Micro-behavior: Mainstream Politics and the Frequency of Political Discussion in Contemporary Democracies. İçinde, Alan Zuckerman. The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Tample University Press, 228-48.
• Anderson, M. (2010). Community Identity and Political Behavior. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.
• Angrist, M. P. (2004). Party Systems and Regime Formation in the Modern Middle East: Explaining Turkish Exceptionalism. Comparative Politics, 36(2): 229-249.
• Başlevent, C. ve Kirmanoğlu, H. (2005). Empirical Investigation of Party Preferences and Economic Voting in Turkey. European Journal of Political Research, 44(4): 547-562.
• Brennan, Geoffrey (2008). Psychological Dimensions in Voter Choice. Public Choice, 137(3): 475-489.
• Brewer, P. (2001). Value Words and Lizard Brains: Do Citizens Deliberate about Appeals to their Core Values?. Political Psychology, 22(1): 45-64.
• Campbell, A. (1980). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Caplan, B. (2011). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton ve New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Copeland, C. ve Laband, D. (2002). Expressiveness and Voting. Public Choice, 110(3-4): 351-363.
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2007). The Nature of Left–right Ideological Self‐placement in the Turkish Context. Turkish Studies, 8(2): 253-271.
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2008). Ideology or Economic Pragmatism?: Profiling Turkish Voters in 2007. Turkish Studies, 9(2): 317-344.
• Çiğdem, A. (2009). Muhafazakarlık, Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): 135-150.
• Green, D., Palmqist, B. ve Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven ve London: Yale University Press.
• Green, D. ve Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. Binghamton ve New York: Yale University Press.
• Hamlin, A. ve Jennings, C. (2011). Expressive Political Behaviour: Foundations, Scope and Implications. British Journal of Political Science, 41(3): 645-670.
• Hampsher-Monk, I. (2003). A History of Modern Political Thought: Major Political Thinkers from Hobbes to Marx. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Harrop, M. ve Miller, W.L. (1987). Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction. London: Macmillan Education.
• Jones, P. ve Hudson, J. (2000). Civic Duty and Expressive Voting: Is Virtue its Own Reward?. Kyklos, 53(1): 3-16.
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2007). Politics of Conservatism in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 8(2): 233-252.
• Kavanagh, D. (1983). Political Science and Political Behaviour. London: George Allen ve Unwin.
• Long, S. (1981). The Handbook of Political Behaviour. Volume 1. New York ve London: Plenum Press.
• Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ökten, Ş. (2009). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve İktidar: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Düzeni. Journal of International Social Research, 2(8): 302-312.
• Özbudun, E. (1981). The Turkish Party System: Institutionalization, Polarization, and Fragmentation. Middle Eastern Studies, 17(2): 228-240.
• Pasek, J. ve Krosnick, J.A. (2010) Optimizing Survey Questionnaire Design in Political Science. Editör Jan E. Leighley. The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-50.
• Saha, D. (2005). Political Behaviour. New Delhi: Global Vision Publishing House.
• Simon, H.A. (1995). Rationality in Political Behavior. Political Psychology. 16(1): 45-61.
• Sinemillioğlu, M.O. (2009). Sürdürülebilir Bölgesel Kalkınma ve Türkiye Süreci. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(27): 245-268.
• Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, Routines and Temporalities of Consumption: From Individual Behaviours to the Reproduction of Everyday Practices. Time ve Society, 22(3): 335-355.
• Şahin, İ. ve Gümez, Y. (2000). Efficiency of Education: The Case in Eastern and South-eastern Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 49(2): 213-236.
• Tachau, F. (2002). An Overview of Electoral Behavvior: Towards Protest or Consolidation of Democracy. Politics and Elections in Turkey. İçinde, Sabri Sayarı ve
• Yılmaz Esmer (Ed). Politics, Parties and Elections in Turkey. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 33-54.
• Tullock, G. ve Perlman, M. (1976). The Vote Motive: An Essays in the Economics of Politics, with Applications to the British Economy. London: Institution of Economic Affairs.
• Verba, S., Schlozman, L.K., ve Burns, N. (2005). Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Participation. İçinde, Alan Zuckerman. The Social Logic of Politics:Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Tample University Press, 95-114.
• Woshinsky, O.H. (2008). Explaining Politics: Culture, Institutions, and Political Behavior. New York: Routledge.
• Yamane, T. (2001). Temel Örnekleme Yöntemleri. Çev. Esin A., Bakır, M.A., Aydın C. ve Gürbüzsel, E. İstanbul: Literatür: Yayıncılık, Dağıtım.
• Yavuz, M.H. (2003). Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford ve New York: Oxford University Press.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yüceşahin, M.M. ve Özgür, M.E. (2008). Regional Fertility Differences in Turkey: Persistent High Fertility in the Southeast. Population, Space and Place, 14(2): 135-158.
• Zuckerman, A. (2005). The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behaviour. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.