Effect of Extruder Type, Shore Hardness, and Infill Ratio on the Mechanical Properties of FDM Manufactured TPU Parts

Year 2026, Volume: 18 Issue: 2 , 77 - 96 , 28.03.2026

Lokman Yünlü

https://doi.org/10.29137/ijerad.1855607

https://izlik.org/JA72ND53LP

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of Shore A hardness, extruder type, and infill ratio on ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elastic modulus (E), and elongation at break (%) in FDM-printed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) specimens using a multifactor experimental design, ANOVA, and regression models. Unlike previous studies that often focus on printing parameters or material hardness individually, this work presents a holistic evaluation of how Direct Drive and Bowden Tube extruder systems modify the tensile response across different hardness levels and structural densities. ASTM D638 Type-IV tensile tests indicate that Shore hardness is the most dominant factor governing mechanical performance. Considering extruder configuration, the Direct Drive system outperforms the Bowden setup because its shorter filament path and more stable material flow improve interlayer fusion. Numerically, the strongest mechanical resistance was achieved using the Direct Drive system with 95A hardness and 100% infill, yielding the highest UTS (41.2 MPa) and elastic modulus (43.8 MPa). Conversely, the weakest results occurred with the Bowden Tube system at 70A hardness and 50% infill, resulting in the lowest UTS (22.4 MPa) and elastic modulus (18.7 MPa). Maximum ductility was observed at 70A hardness and 100% infill with the Direct Drive system, reaching 703% elongation at break, while the lowest elongation (285%) was recorded using the Bowden Tube at 95A and 50% infill. Overall, the findings recommend 70A + high infill + Direct Drive for applications requiring flexibility, and 95A + 100% infill for applications demanding high strength.

Keywords

FDM , TPU , Extruder type , Tensile test , Taguchi methods

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval and informed consent were not required, as this study involved no human participants or vertebrate animals.

Supporting Institution

This study was funded by the author.

Thanks

-

References

• Adib, A. Z., Pratama, J., Salim, U. A., Suyitno, S., Mahardika, M., & Arifvianto, B. (2024). Effect of Core Material Thickness on the Shore Hardness of the Sandwich-Structured Multi-Material 3D-Printed Parts. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 920, 35-42..
• Albardawil, A., Aditya, A. R. M., Mubarok, M. Y., Islami, L. A., & Mardiyana, D. (2025). Improving the mechanical performance of TPU95A filament in FDM 3D printing via parameter optimization using the taguchi method. Engineering Proceedings, 107(1), 62.
• Amor, R. B., Zrida, M., Laurent, H., & Souissi, S. (2024). Influence of geometry and 3D printing parameters on the mechanical properties of PLA tensile specimens. In International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 199–209).
• Arifvianto, B., Iman, T. N., Prayoga, B. T., Dharmastiti, R., Salim, U. A., Mahardika, M., & Suyitno. (2021). Tensile properties of the FFF-processed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) elastomer. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 117(5), 1709–1719.
• Bacak, S., Özkavak, H. V., & Sofu, M. M. (2021). Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed specimens manufactured via FDM with various inner geometries. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(2), 1444–1454.
• Boğa, C., Seyedzavvar, M., & Zehir, B. (2021). Experimental investigation on the effects of internal architecture on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA components. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (24), 119-124.
• Bruère, V. M., Lion, A., Holtmannspötter, J., & Johlitz, M. (2023). The influence of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of 3D printed TPU-based elastomers. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 8(4), 693–701.
• Chandramohan, P., Bala Santhosh, M. S., & Raghu, R. (2024). Process parameters optimization through response surface methodology for enhanced strength of additively manufactured thermoplastic polyurethane parts. In International Conference on Additive Manufacturing (pp. 351–368).
• Davis, C. S., Hillgartner, K. E., Han, S. H., & Seppala, J. E. (2017). Mechanical strength of welding zones produced by polymer extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 16, 162–166.
• Demir, H. (2022). Novel extruder heat block designs to improve the thermal efficiency of 3D printers. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 38, 491–500.
• Derise, M. R., & Zulkharnain, A. (2020). Effect of infill pattern and density on tensile properties of 3d printed polylactic acid parts via fused deposition modeling (FDM). International Journal of Mechanical, 20(2), 54–63.
• Desai, Shubham M., Rushikesh Y., Sonawane, Aarti P., & More. (2023). Thermoplastic polyurethane for three‐dimensional printing applications: A review. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 34(7), 2061–2082.
• eFLEX. (2026, Mart 11). eSUN. http://www.esun3d.net/products/163.html.
• Evlen, H. (2019). Doluluk oranının 3B yazıcıda üretilen TPU ve TPE numunelerinin mekanik özellikleri üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 21(63), 793–804.
• Evlen, H., Erel, G., & Yılmaz, E. (2018). 3 boyutlu ve yazdırma doluluk oranının mekanik özellikler üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 2(1), 23-31.
• Fadillah, F., Suryanto, H., & Suprayitno, S. (2024). Characteristics of 3D printing products using PLA/nanographite nanocomposite filaments. Bio Web of Conferences, 117, 01016.
• Farashi, S., & Vafaee, F. (2022). Effect of extruder temperature and printing speed on the tensile strength of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed samples: a meta-analysis study. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 16(1), 305–316.
• Farid, M. I., Wu, W., Li, G., Zheng, A., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Superior tensile properties of FDM 3D-printed TPU/E-TPU layered structure. Journal of Materials Research, 39(14), 2051-2066.
• Fenollosa-Artes, F., Jorand, L., Tejo-Otero, A., Lustig-Gainza, P., Romero-Sabat, G., Medel, S., & Uceda, R. (2023). Soft 3D printing of thermoplastic polyurethane: Preliminary study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 237(6-7), 1128-1135.
• Flexfil_95A (2026, Mart 11). Filamentum.https://fillamentum.com/collections/flexfill
• FlexSmart. (2026, Mart 11). SmartMaterials.https://smartmaterials3d.com/es/tienda-smart/20-smartfil-flex.html
• Filaflex_95A (2026, Mart 11). https://recreus.com/es/12-filaflex-original-82a?page=2
• Filaflex_80A (2026, Mart 11). https://filament2print.com/es/filaflex/672-filaflex-natural.html
• Filaflex_70A (2026, Mart 11). https://recreus.com/filamentos/filaflex-70a/
• FlexiSmart (2026, Mart 11). FFF World. https://www.fffworld.com/es/blog/post/como-imprimir-en-3d-filamentos-flexiblescomo-flexismart
• Günay, M., Gündüz, S., Yılmaz, H., Yaşar, N., & Kaçar, R. (2020). PLA esaslı numunelerde çekme dayanımı için 3D baskı işlem parametrelerinin optimizasyonu. Politeknik Dergisi, 23(1), 73–79.
• Hohimer, C., Christ, J., Aliheidari, N., Mo, C., & Ameli, A. (2017). 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane with isotropic material properties. In Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites 2017. 10165, (pp. 213-221). SPIE.
• Hossain, M., Navaratne, R., & Perić, D. (2020). 3D printed elastomeric polyurethane: Viscoelastic experimental characterizations and constitutive modelling with nonlinear viscosity functions. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, (126), 103546.
• Innovatefil. (2026, Mart 11). TPU Hardness + (83D) Smart Materials 3D. https://smartmaterials3d.com/es/tienda-smart/181- innovatefil-tpu-hardness.html
• Jung, I., Shin, E. J., & Lee, S. (2023). Study on CNT/TPU cube under the 3D printing conditions of infill patterns and density. Scientific Reports, 13, 17728.
• Kamer, M. S., Temiz, Ş., Yaykaşlı, H., Kaya, A., & Akay, O. (2022). 3B yazıcıda farklı yazdırma hızlarında ABS ve PLA malzeme ile üretilen çekme test numunelerinin mekanik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 1197–1212.
• Kamer, M. S., Temiz, Ş., Yaykaşlı, H., & Kaya, A. (2021). 3 boyutlu yazici ile farkli renklerde ve farkli dolgu desenlerinde üretilen çekme test numunelerinin mekanik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(3), 829-848.
• Karaman, E. & Çolak, O., (2019). Eriyik biriktirme yönteminde farklı üretim parametrelerinin mekanik özelliklere etkisi. ALKÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 90–99.
• Khatir, O., Bouiadjra, B., A. B., Yerou, A., Bellali, M. A., Mechab, B., Salem, M., & Elmeguenni, M. (2025). Analysis of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed polylactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane multi-materials. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 1(11).
• Kim, Y. J., Choi, J. S., & Yim, J. H. (2022). Effects of infill patterns on resistance-dependent strain and ammonia gas sensing behaviors of 3D-printed thermoplastic polyurethane modified with polypyrrole. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 10(17), 6687–6695.
• Kır, H., & Apay, S. (2020). Elektrolitik yöntemle sert krom kaplanan yapı çeliğinde kaplama parametrelerinin taguchi metodu ile optimizasyonu. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 7–14.
• Kumar, S., Ramesh, M. R., Doddamani, M., Rangappa, S. M., & Siengchin, S (2022). Mechanical characterization of 3D printed MWCNTs/HDPE nanocomposites. Polymer Testing, 114, 107703.
• León-Calero, M., Reyburn Valés, S. C., Marcos-Fernández, Á., & Rodríguez-Hernandez, J. (2021). 3D printing of thermoplastic elastomers: Role of the chemical composition and printing parameters in the production of parts with controlled energy absorption and damping capacity. Polymers, 13(20), 3551.
• Marco, V., Massimo, G., & Manuela, G. (2025). Additive manufacturing of flexible thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU): enhancing the material elongation through process optimisation. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10(4), 2877–2891.
• Nace, S. E., Tiernan, J., Holland, D., & Ni Annaidh, A. (2021). A comparative analysis of the compression characteristics of a thermoplastic polyurethane 3D printed in four infill patterns for comfort applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 27(11), 24–36.
• Nassar, M. A., Hassan, Y. R., Farahaty, M., A. E., & Ibrahim, S. (2019). Design of 3D filament extruder for fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing. International Design Journal. 9(4), 55–62.
• Pagés-Llobet, A., Espinach, F. X., Julián, F., Oliver-Ortega, H., & Méndez, J. A. (2023). Effect of extruder type in the interface of PLA layers in FDM printers: filament extruder versus direct pellet extruder. Polymers, 15(9), 1–19.
• PolyFlex_95A. (2026, Mart 11). Polymaker.http://www.polymaker.com/shop/polyflex
• Rajhi, W., Ali, A. B., Jasim, D. J., Mehrabi, O., Ben Said, L., & Moradi, M. (2024). Mathematical and statistical analysis of fused filament fabrication parameters for thermoplastic polyurethane parts via response surface methodology. Mathematics, 12(19), 3146.
• Rajpurohit, S. R., & Dave, H. K. (2019). Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(5), 1525-1536.
• Raveverma, P. (2018). Mechanical behaviour and compatibility analysis of thermoplastic polyurethane/polycaprolactone-based new fused deposition modelling filament composite.. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2, 116–128.
• Romero-Ramirez, E. (2021). Mechanical properties and durometer testing relationship of thermoplastic polyurethane. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 85697.
• Shin, E. J., Song, Y. J., Jung, Y. S., Jung, I., & Lee, S. (2023). Manufacturing of filament for 4d printing through polyether‐type TPU/PLA blend. Advances in Polymer Technology, 1, 4875625.
• Singh, A. K., & Chauhan, S. (2016). Technique to Enhance FDM 3d metal printing. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 6(4), 128-134.
• Soltanmohammadi, K., Rahmatabadi, D., Aberoumand, M., Soleyman, E., Ghasemi, I., Baniassadi, M., & Baghani, M. (2024). Effects of TPU on the mechanical properties, fracture toughness, morphology, and thermal analysis of 3D-printed ABS-TPU blends by FDM. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology, 30(4), 958–968.
• TPU-Ultimaker. (2026, Mart 11). Ultimaker, Technical and Safety Data Sheet. https://ultimaker.com/en/products/materials/tpu-95a
• Yeşiloğlu, R., Özmen, R., & Günay, M. (2023). The Effects of infill geometry and porosity ratio on mechanical properties of PLA structures produced by additive manufacturing. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 291–303.