Research Article

Relationship Between Undrained Shear Strength with Atterberg Limits of Kaolinite/Bentonite – Quartz Mixtures

Volume: 10 Number: 3 December 31, 2018
EN

Relationship Between Undrained Shear Strength with Atterberg Limits of Kaolinite/Bentonite – Quartz Mixtures

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the undrained shear strength and the Atterberg limits of quartz clay mixtures using the falling cone test and the casagrande method. As a result, the penetration depth of the fall cone, which determines the liquid limit close to the value obtained by the casagrande method, was changed by the presence or absence of fine grained soils. It was shown that the same clay type with a much higher quartz content led to smaller undrained shear strength values. The undrained shear strength value with a small amount of quartz was the lowest; it then increased with the increase in fine content. The relationship between the undrained shear strength and the Atterberg limits for all the samples can be divided into three parts: (1) quartz clay (kaolinite/bentonite) mixtures ratio, (2) type of clay (plasticity; high - low plasticity), and (3) plastic limit value. Finally, an equation for the fall cone test used to determine the Atterberg limit of quartz clay mixtures, was proposed based on the undrained shear strength and initial water content.

Keywords

Kaolinite,Bentonite,Quartz,Undrained Shear Strength

References

  1. Berilgen SA, Kılıç¸, H, Ozaydın K. (2007) Determination of undrained shear strength for dredged golden horn marine clay with laboratory tests. Proceedings of the Sri Lankan geotechnical society’s first international conference on soil & rock engineering, August 5–11, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  2. Belvisco, R., Clampoli, S., Cotecchia, V., and Federico, A. (1985). ‘‘Use of cone penetrometer to determine consistency limits.’’ Ground Eng., 18~5, 21–22.British Standards Institution. 1990. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes (BS 1377). British Standards Institution,London.
  3. Casagrande A (1932) Research on the atterberg limits of soils. Public Roads 13(3):121–130 (136)
  4. Federico A (1983) Relationships (Cu–w) and (Cu–s) for remolded clayey soils at high water content. Riv Ital Geotech 17(1):38–41
  5. Hansbo, S. 1957. A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall-cone test. Royal Swedish
  6. Hong Z, Liuz S, Shen S, Negami T (2006) Comparison in Undrained Shear Strength between Undisturbed and Remolded Ariake Clays. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 132(2):272–275
  7. Koumoto T, Houlsby GT (2001) Theory and practice of the fall cone test. Geˆotechnique 51(8):701–712
  8. Lambe, T.W. (1960). A mechanistic picture of shear strength in clay. In Proceedings of the Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., pp. 555–580.
  9. Lee LT (2004) Predicting geotechnical parameters for dredged materials using the slump test method and index property correlations. DOER Technical Notes collection (ERDC TNDOER- D-1), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi. http://www.wes.army. mil/el/dots/doer
  10. Nagaraj, T. S., Srinivasa Murthy, B. R., and Vatsala A. (1994). Analysis and prediction of soil behaviour, Wiley Eastern Limited, India.