Katı Atık Depolama Tesisi Yer Seçimi için Birleştirilmiş Hedef Programlama ve AHP yaklaşımı

Year 2019, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 211 - 225, 31.01.2019

Ayyuce Aydemir-karadag

https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.412446

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Tüm
dünyada, nüfus ve kentleşmenin artması ve gelişen teknoloji ile beraber
üretilen atık miktarı da artmaktadır. Katı atıkların bertarafı, büyük oranda
düzenli depolama yöntemiyle sağlanmaktadır. Bir düzenli depolama sahasının
uygun şekilde projelendirilmesi ve işletilmesi için en önemli ön şart uygun
kuruluş yeri seçiminin yapılmasıdır. Sağlıklı, verimli, uzun ömürlü,
sürdürülebilir ve yasal düzenlere uygun düzenli depolama yer seçimi çok
kriterli bir karar problemidir. Bu çalışmada; Ankara ili ve çevresinde
kurulabilecek katı atık düzenli depolama tesisi kuruluş yeri alternatifleri,
çevresel, ekonomik, sosyal ve zeminsel kriterler açısından Analitik Hiyerarşi
Prosesi (AHP) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Düzenli depolanan yıllık atık talebini
karşılayacak alternatiflerin seçimi; AHP ile hesaplanan kriter ağırlıklarını,
alternatif önceliklerini kullanan ve sistem gerçeklerini yansıtan hedef programlama
(HP) modeli ile gerçekleştirilir.

Keywords

Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi, Hedef Programlama, Yer Seçimi, Düzenli Depolama, Katık Atık

A Combined Goal Programming and AHP Approach for Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection

Abstract

All
over the world, the amount of waste produced has increased with population,
urbanization and developing technology. Landfill has been used as the most
common method for the disposal of solid waste. The most important prerequisite
for the proper design and operation of a landfill is the selection of an
appropriate site. A sanitary, efficient, long-lasting, sustainable landfill
selection in accordance with legal regulations is a multi-criteria
decision-making problem. In this study; alternatives for solid waste landfills
in and around the province of Ankara are evaluated by the Analytical Hierarchy
Process (AHP) in terms of environmental, economic, social and geological
criteria. The selection among alternatives to meet Ankara's annual stored waste
demand is achieved by the goal programming (HP) model, which uses criteria
weights and alternative priorities calculated with AHP, and reflects system
realities.

Keywords

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Goal Programming, Site Selection, Landfill, Solid Waste

References

• Alpaslan, M.N. (2005). Katı Atık Yönetiminin Temel Prensipleri. Alpaslan, M.N. (Eds). Katı Atık Yönetimi içinde (ss. 1-10). İzmir: Emre Basımevi.
• Badri, M.A., (1999).Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. Int. J. Production Economics, 62, 237-248.
• Banar, M., Acar, I.P., Özkan, A.,& Köse, B.M. (2006). Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) Kullanılarak Katı atık Düzenli Depolama Saha Yer Seçimi. Katı Atık ve Çevre Dergisi, 63, 17-27.
• Beltran, P.A., Fernando, J.P.P., Garcia, F.G., & Agullo A.P. (2010). An Analytic Network Process Approach for Siting a Municipal Solid Waste Plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain), Journal of Environmental Management. 91(5), 1071–1086.
• Bertolini, M., & Bevilacqua, M. (2006). A combined goal programming—AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 839–848.
• Carroll, S., Goonetilleke, A., & Dawes, L. (2004). Framework for Soil Suitability Evaluation for Sewage Effluent Renovation. Environmental Geology. 46(2), 195–208.
• Chang, N.B., Parvathinathan, G., & Breeden, J.B. (2008). Combining GIS with Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making for Landfill Siting in A Fast Growing Urban Region. Journal of Environmental Management, 87, 139-153.
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1961).Management model and industrial application of linear programming . New York: Wiley.
• Cheng, S., Chan, C.W., & Huang, G.H. (2003). An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Inexact Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach for Solid Waste Management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16 (5–6), 543–554.
• Colebrook, M., & Sicilia, J., (2007). Undesirable facility location problems on multi criteria networks. Computers & Operations Research, 34, 1491–1514.De Feo, G., & De Gisi, S. (2010). Using an Innovative Criteria Weighting Tool for Stakeholders Involvement to Rank MSW Facility Sites with the AHP. Waste Management, 30 (11), 2370–2382.
• Dipanjan, S., Vinod, T., & Onkar, D. (1997). Ranking Potential Solid Wastes Disposal Sites Using Geographic Information System Techniques and AHP. National Seminar on Applications of GIS for Solving Environmental Problems, Chennai, 98-106.
• Ekmekçioğlu, M., Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Fuzzy Multicriteria Disposal Method and Site Selection for Municipal Solid Waste. Waste Management, 30, 1729-1736.
• Erkut, E., & Moran, S. (1991). Locating Obnoxious Facilities in The Public Sector: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Municipal Landfill Siting Decisions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 25 (2), 89–102.
• Felek, S., Yuluğkural, Y., & Aladağ, Z. (2007). Mobil İletişim Sektöründe Pazar Paylaşımının Tahmininde AHP ve ANP Yöntemlerinin Kıyaslanması. Makine Mühendisleri Odası Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 18(1), 8.
• Gorsevski, P.A., Donevska, K.R., Mitrovski, C.D., Joseph, P., & Frizado, J.P. (2011). Integrating Multicriteria Evaluation Techniques with Geographic Information Systems for Landfill Site Selection: A case study using ordered weighted average, Article in Waste Management. Waste Management, 32,287–296.
• Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a Solid Waste Management System Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98,19-36.
• Kapepula, K.M., Colson, G., & Sabri, K. (2007). A Multiple Criteria Analysis for Household Solid Waste Management in the Urban Community of Dakar. Waste Management, 27(11), 1690–1705.
• Karagiannidis, A., Perkoulidis, G., & Moussiopoulos, N. (2004). Facility Location for Solid Waste Management Through Compilation and Multicriterial Ranking of Optimal Decentralised Scenarios: A Case Study for the Region of Peloponesse in Southern Greece, Engineering Research,1, 7–18.
• Karaman, B., & Çerçioğlu, H. (2015). 0-1 Hedef Programlama Destekli Bütünleşik Ahp–Vikor Yöntemi: Hastane Yatırımı Projeleri Seçimi. Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., 30(4), 567-576.
• Khan, S., & Faisal, M.N. (2008). An Analytic Network Process Model for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Options. Waste Management, 28, 1500-1508.
• Kirimi, F.K., & Waithaka, E.H. (2014). Determination of Suitable Landfill Site Using Geospatial Techniques and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Case Study of Nakuru Town. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3 (11), 500-505.
• Kumar, V., Yadav, K., & Rajamani, V. (2014). Selection of Suitable Site for Solid Waste Management in Part of Lucknow City, Uttar Pradesh using Remote Sensing, GIS and AHP Method. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3(3), 1461-1472.
• Massam, B.H. (1991). The Location of Waste Transfer Stations in Ashdod, Israel, Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Support System. Geoforum, 22(1), 27-37.
• Norese, M.F. (2006). ELECTRE III as a Support for Participatory Decision-Making on the Localisation of Waste-Treatment Plants. Land Use Policy, 23, 76-85.
• Ohman, K.V.H., Hettiaratchi, J.P., Ruwanpura, J., Balakrishnan, J., & Achari, G. (2007). Development of A Landfill Model to Prioritize Design and Operating Objective. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135, 85-97.
• Özcan, E. C., Ünlüsoy, S., & Eren, T. (2017). A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1410–1423.
• Palabıyık, H. (2001). Belediyelerde Kentsel Katı Atık Yönetimi: İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Örneği. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Pires, A., Chang, N., & Martinho, G. (2011). An AHP-based Fuzzy Interval TOPSIS Assessment for Sustainable Expansion of the Solid Waste Management System in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 56, 7-21.
• Pradhan, U.P. (2008). Sustainable solid waste management ın a mountaın ecosystem: Darjeeling, West Bengal, India. Master Thesis, University of Manitoba Faculty of Graduate Studıes, Manitoba.
• Queiruga, D., Walther, G., Benito, J.G., & Spengler, T. (2008). Evaluation of Sites for The Location of WEEE Recycling Plants in Spain. Waste Management, 28(1), 181-190.
• Raisi, S.A., Sulaiman, H., Abdallah, O., & Suliman, F. (2014). Landfill Suitability Analysis Using AHP Method and State of Heavy Metals Pollution in Selected Landfills in Oman. European Scientific Journal,10(17), 309-326.
• Resmi Gazete, 26 Mart 2010, Sayı : 27533 Yönetmelik, Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığından: Atıkların Düzenli Depolanmasına Dair Yönetmelik, Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara.
• Rodriguez, J.J.S., Garcia, C.G., Perez, J.M., & Casermeiro, E.M. (2006). A general model for the undesirable single facility location problem. Operations Research Letters, 34, 427–436.
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, ABD.
• Saaty, T.L. (1988). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, British Library Catalogue, University of Pittsburgh.
• Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Interfaces, 24(6), 19-43.
• Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision Making with The Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1,) 83-98.
• Samanlioglu, F., (2013). A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 332–340.
• Shariati, S., Yazdani, A., Salsani, A., & Tamosaitiene, J. (2014). Proposing a New Model for Waste Dump Site Selection: Case Study of Ayerma Phosphate Mine. Engineering Economics, 25(4), 410-419.
• Şener, Ş., Şener, E., Nas, B., & Karagüzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in The Lake Beyşehir Catchment Area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30, 2037-2046.
• Şener, Ş., Şener, E., & Karagüzel, R. (2011). Solid Waste Disposal Site Selection with GIS and AHP Methodology: A Case Study in Senirkent–Uluborlu (Isparta). Turkey Environ Monit Assess, 173, 533–554.
• Tamiz, M. & Jones, D.F. (1996). An Overview of Current Solution Methods and Modelling Practices N Goal Programming”, Multi Objective Programming and Goal Programming: Theories and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Germany, 198-211.
• Taş, M., Özlemiş, Ş.N., Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2017). Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve Hedef Programlama Karma Modeli Kullanılarak Monoray Projelerinin Seçimi. HU Muh. Der. 02, 24-34.
• Tavares, G., Zsigraiova, Z., & Semiao, V. (2011). Multi-Criteria GIS-based Siting of an Incineration Plant for Municipal Solid. Waste Management, 31(9), 1960-72.
• Tchobanoglous, G., & Kreith, F. (2002). Handbook of Solid Waste Management, McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-135633-1, NewYork.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevre Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü, Düzenli Depolama Tesisleri Saha Yönetimi Ve İşletme Klavuzu, (2014).
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevresel Etki Değerlendirmesi, İzin ve Denetim Genel Müdürlüğü Çevre Envanteri ve Bilgi Yönetimi Dairesi Başkanlığı, (2016). Çevre Durum Raporu (Çevre Durum Raporu 2016 yılı Özeti-İller).
• Terzi, Ü., Hacaloglu, S.E., & Aladag, Z. (2006). Otomobil Satin Alma Problemi İçin Bir Karar Destek Modeli. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10, 43-49.
• Tuzkaya, G., Önüt, S., Tuzkaya, U.R., & Gülsün, B. (2008). An Analytic Network Process Approach for Locating Undesirable Facilities: An Example from Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 970–984.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), Belediye Atık İstatistikleri, (2016). Sayı: 24876, 29 Kasım 2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24876.
• Türkiye İstatistik Krumu (TÜİK), Ankara İlçelere göre Nüfus İstatistikleri, (2017). https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr.
• Vaillancourt, K., & Waaub, J.P. (2002). Environmental Site Evaluation of Waste Management Facilities Embedded into EUGENE Model: A Multicriteria Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 436–448.
• Vego, G., Kucar, D.S. & Koprivanac, N. (2008). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Strategic Municipal Solid Waste Management in Dalmatia, Croatia, Waste Management, 28, 2192-2201.
• Younes, M.K., Basri, N.E.A., Nopiah, Z.M., Basri, A.,& Abushammala, M.F.M. (2015). Use of a Combination of MRSS-ANP for Making an Innovative Landfill Siting Decision Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 381926, 13 pages, doi:10.1155/2015/381926
• Yetis, U., & Lenkaitis, R. (2005). Directive Specific Plan for the Council Directive on Hazardous Waste. MoEF. Ankara: Envest Planners.
• Wang, G., Qin, L., & Li, Q. (2009). Landfill Site Selection Using Spatial Information Technologies and AHP: A Case Study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2414–2421.