Kentlerde Sessiz/Sakin Alanların Önemi Ve Eskişehir Kurşunlu Cami ve Külliyesi Bahçesinin İşitsel Peyzaj Yaklaşımıyla Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2022, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 69 - 77, 31.12.2022

Gülşen Akın Güler , Aslı Özçevik Bilen

https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1202473

Abstract

Hızla büyüyen, kalabalıklaşan, karmaşıklaşan ve daha gürültülü hale gelen kentlerde yaşam kalitesi giderek düşmekte ve kentte yaşayan insanlar sessiz/sakin bir ortamda dinlenme, rahatlama ve rehabilite olma ihtiyacı hissetmektedir. Bu anlamda kentsel bölgelerdeki park, bahçe, avlu vb. açık alanlar sessiz/sakin alan olarak, bu ihtiyacın karşılanması için kullanılabilecek öneme sahip mekanlardır. Bu tür yerlere örnek bir alan olarak Eskişehir Kurşunlu Camii ve Külliyesi bahçesi bu çalışmada konu edilmiştir. Eskişehir Odunpazarı Kentsel Sit Alanı içerisinde bulunan ve bir Osmanlı Dönemi yapı grubu olan külliye, tarihi değeri ve turistik kullanımı ile ön plana çıksa da külliyeyi oluşturan binaların arasında kalan yeşil alan, çevresine göre sessiz/sakin bir yer olma potansiyeline sahiptir. Bu bağlamda bahçe, alana sessizlik/sakinlik niteliği kazandıran özellikleri açısından işitsel peyzaj yaklaşımıyla alan çalışması üzerinden incelenerek sessiz/sakin alan olma potansiyeli değerlendirilmiş, sessizlik/sakinlik algısını etkileyen faktörler (akustik özellikler, mekânsal özelikler, işlev) belirlenmiştir. Alan çalışmasında akustik ölçüm ve anket yapılmıştır.
Akustik ölçüm sonuçlarına göre alandaki ses basınç düzeyi (LAeq) kabul edilebilir düzeyin (55 dB’in) altındadır. Anket sonuçlarına göre ise beklenene paralel olarak alan, çoğunluk tarafından sessiz/sakin olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Alanda sessizlik/sakinlik algısını etkileyen faktörler alan özelliklerine göre; alanda su sesinin, kuş seslerinin ve dini seslerin duyulması; ses kaynağı sayısının ve çeşidinin az olması; yetişkin ağaçların bulunması, alanın tarihi ve kültürel değere sahip olması şeklinde ifade edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak Kurşunlu Camii ve Külliyesi bahçesinin sessiz/sakin alan olarak kullanılabileceği ve dolayısıyla farklı kentsel bölgelerde bu alan ile benzer özelliklere sahip açık alanların da ergonomik kent koşullarının oluşturulmasına katkı sağlayan alanlar olarak değerlendirilebileceği ortaya konulmuştur

Keywords

Sessiz/Sakin Alanlar, İşitsel Peyzaj, Sessizlik/Sakinlik Algısı, Kent Ergonomisi, Eskişehir Kurşunlu Camii ve Külliyesi

Thanks

Bu çalışma 28. Ulusal Ergonomi Kongresi’nde sunulmuştur.

The Importance of Quiet/Calm Areas in Cities and an Assessment of the Eskisehir Kursunlu Mosque and Complex with Soundscape Approach

Abstract

The quality of life in rapidly growing, crowded, complex and noisy cities is gradually decreasing and people living in the city feel the need to rest, relax and rehabilitate in a quiet/calm environment. In this sense, open spaces such as parks, gardens, courtyards, etc. in urban areas are places of importance that can be used as quiet/calm spaces to meet this need. Eskisehir Kursunlu Mosque and Complex garden, as an example area for such places, is the subject of this study. Although the complex, which is an Ottoman Period building group and located in the Eskisehir Odunpazarı Historical and Urban Conservation Site, comes to the fore with its historical value and touristic use, the green area between the buildings that make up the complex has the potential to be a quiet place compared to its surroundings. In this context, the garden was examined through fieldwork with soundscape approach in terms of the features that give the area the quality of quietness/calmness, its potential to be a quiet/calm area has been evaluated, and the factors affecting the perception of quietness/ calmness (acoustic features, spatial features, function) have been determined. During the field study, acoustic measurements and questionnaire have been made. According to the acoustic measurement results, the sound pressure level (LAeq) in the area is below the acceptable level (55 dB). In parallel with the expectations, as to the results of the survey, the area has been evaluated as quiet/calm by the majority. The factors affecting the perception of quietness/calmness in the area, depending on the characteristics of the area; expressed as hearing water sounds, bird sounds, and religious sounds in the area; low number and variety of sound sources; the presence of mature trees, the historical and cultural value of the area. As a result, it has been revealed that the garden of Kursunlu Mosque and Complex can be used as a quiet/calm area, and therefore, open spaces with similar characteristics in different urban regions can also be considered as areas that contribute to the creation of ergonomic urban condition.

Keywords

Quiet/Calm Areas, Soundscape, Perception of Quietness /Calmness, Urban Ergonomics, Eskisehir Kursunlu Mosque and Complex, Sessiz/Sakin Alanlar, İşitsel Peyzaj, Sessizlik/Sakinlik Algısı, Kent Ergonomisi, Eskişehir Kurşunlu Camii ve Külliyesi

References

• Akın Güler, G., Özçevik Bilen, A., Masullo, M. & Maffei, L. (2019). The potential of being the quiet place of the khans courtyards in Istanbul Historic Peninsula. Presented at the ICA 2019, Aachen.
• Aletta, F. & Kang, J. (2019). Promoting Healthy and Supportive Acoustic Environments: Going beyond the Quietness. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019 Dec 8, 16(24), 4988.
• Brambilla, G., Gallo, V., Zambon, G. (2013). The soundscape quality in some urban parks in Milan, Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 2348–2369.
• Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2010). Çevresel Gürültünün Değerlendirilmesi ve Yönetimi Yönetmeliği (Vol. 27601). Ankara. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=14012&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (Erişim tarihi: 20.10.2022)
• Duguet, P., Mietlicki, F., Da Silva, R., Ribeiro, C. & Gaucher, E. (2012). Implemented comprehensive approach for the ıdentification of quiet areas ın the city of paris. Inter Noise 2012, New York. Dul, J., & Weerdmeester B.A. (2001). Ergonomics for Beginners: A Quick Reference Guide. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis EBB, 2020. Eskişehir Stratejik Gürültü Haritaları Sonuçlarına Göre Eskişehir Gürültü Eylem Planı Final Raporu. Eskişehir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Çevre Koruma ve Kontrol Dairesi Başkanlığı, Eskişehir.
• EC. (2002). Directive (2002/49/EC) of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 June 2002 Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise.
• Filipan, K., Boes, M., De Coensel, B., Lavandier, C., Delaitre, P., Domitrović, H. & Botteldooren, D. (2017). The personal viewpoint on the meaning of tranquility affects the appraisal of the urban park soundscape. Applied Sciences, 7 (1), 91.
• Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. Am. J. Prev. Med., 20 (3), 234-240.
• Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A. & Öhrström, E. (2010). “Quiet” courtyards: a potential modifier of urban residents’ responses to road traffic noise?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 3359-3375.
• Hartig, T., A. van den Berg, C. Hagerhall, M. Tomalak, N. Bauer, R. Hansmann, A. Ojala, E. Syngollitou, G. Carrus, A. van Herzele, S. Bell, M. T. Camilleri Podesta, & G. Waaseth. (2011). Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes. In Forests, Trees, and Human Health, edited by K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. de Vries, K. Seeland, and J. Schipperijn, 127–168. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Hartig, T., M. Mang, & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment and Behavior 23 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/0013916591231001.
• Herranz-Pascual, K., Aspuru, I., Iraurgi, I., Santander, Á., Eguiguren, J.L. & García, I. (2019). Going beyond quietness: determining the emotionally restorative effect of acoustic environments in urban open public spaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(7), 1284.
• Hunter, M.D., Eickhoff, S.B., Pheasant, R.J., Douglas, M.J., Watts, G.R., Farrow, T.F.D. Hyland, D., Kang, J., Wilkinson, I.D., Horoshenkov, K.V., et al. (2010). The state of tranquility: Subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity. NeuroImage 2010, 53, 611–618.
• IEA, The International Ergonomics Association. www.iea.cc/.
• Jabben, J., Weber,M., Verheijen, E. (2015) A framework for rating environmental value of urban parks. Sci. Total Environ. 508, 395–401.
• Jackson, L. E. (2003). The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and urban planning, 64(4), 191-200.
• Jeon, J.Y., Hwang, I.H., Hong, J.Y. (2014). Soundscape evaluation in a Catholic cathedral and Buddhist temple precincts through social surveys and soundwalks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2014, 135, 1863–1874.
• Kang, J., Aletta, F., Gjestland, T.T., Brown, L.A., Botteldooren, D., Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Lercher, P.,Van Kamp, I., Genuit, K., Fiebig, A., et al. (2016). Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment. Build. Environ., 108, 284–294.
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.
• Krause, B., Farina, A. (2016). Using ecoacoustic methods to survey the impacts of climate change on biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 195, 245–254.
• Krzywicka, P. & Byrka, K. (2017). Restorative qualities of and preference for natural and urban soundscapes. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1705.
• Largo-Wright, E., W.W.Chen, V. Dodd, & Weiler, R. (2011). Healthy Workplaces: The Effects of Nature Contact at Work on Employee Stress and Health. Public Health Report 1 (126): 124–130. Losiak, R. (2016). The soundscape as the city’s intangible heritage. Study, protection and restoration, ıntangible heritage of the city musealisation, preservation, education. The Historical Museum of the City of Kraków, Kraków, 61-72.
• Maffei, L., Masullo, M. and Oliviero, A. (2017). Quiet areas inside historical city centers. Internoise 2017. Hong Kong, China. 27 – 30 August 2017.
• Masullo, M., Özçevik Bilen, A., Toma, R. A., Akın Güler, G. & Maffei, L. (2021). The Restorativeness of Outdoor Historical Sites in Urban Areas Physical and Perceptual Correlations. Sustainability, 13(5603), 0–0.
• Matsinos, G. Y., Tsaligopoulos, A. & Economou, C. (2017). Identifying the Quiet Areas of a Small Urban Setting: The Case of Mytilene. Global NEST Journal, 19 (4), 674 – 681.
• Mori, M., Horino, S., Kitajima, S., Ueyama, M., Ebara, T., Itani, T. (2008). Ergonomics solution for crossing collisions based on field assessment of visual environment at urban intersections in Japan. Applied ergonomics, 39(6), 697-709.
• Nielsen, H. W., Jørgensen, G. & Braae, E. (2016). Big cities – ‘quiet places’ tracing relationships between material and immaterial qualities of urban spaces. Landscape Metropolis #2, 3 (1).
• Payne, S. R. & Bruce, N. (2019). Exploring the relationship between urban quiet areas and perceived restorative benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16 (9).
• Rådsten-Ekman, M., Axelsson, Ö. & Nilsson, M. E. (2013). Effects of Sounds from Water on Perception of Acoustic Environments Dominated by Road-Traffic Noise. Acta Acoustica united with Acustica, 99(2), 218-225
• Rehan, R.M. The phonic identity of the city urban soundscape for sustainable spaces. HBRC J. 2016, 12, 337–349.
• Richardson, M., Maspero, M., Golightly, D., Sheffield D., Staples V., Lumber, R. (2017). Nature: a new paradigm for well-being and ergonomics, Ergonomics, 60:2, 292-305, DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1157213
• Schafer R. M. (1977)a. The tuning of the world. McClelland&Stewart, Toronto.
• Schafer, R. M. (1977)b. Our sonic environment and the soundscape: the tuning of the World. DestinyBooks. Rochester. Vermont.
• Schafer, R. M. (1993) The soundscape: our sonic environment and the tuning of the World. Destiny Books. Rochester. Vermont.
• Simpson, P. (2009).Failing on Deaf Ears: A Postphenomenology of Sonorous Presence. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2009, 41, 2556–2575.
• Sona, B. (2017). With all my senses: restorative environments through holistic sensory impressions. PHD Thesis. Stuttgart: University of Hohenheim.
• Southworth, M. (1969).The sonic environment of cities. Environ. Behav. 49–70.
• Taghipour A. and Pelizzari E. (2019). Effects of background sounds on annoyance reaction to foreground sounds in psychoacoustic experiments in the laboratory: limits and consequences. Appl. Sci. 9, 1872.
• Tsaligopoulos, A., Karapostoli A., Radicchi, A., Economou, C., Kyvelou, S. and Matsinos, Y.G. (2021). Ecological connectivity of urban quiet areas: The case of Mytilene, Greece. Cities Health, 5, 20–32.
• Ulrich, R.S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes. The Biophilia Hypothesis. (Kellert, S.R. & Wilson, E.O. eds) p.73‐137.
• url 1 https://eskisehir.ktb.gov.tr/TR-149935/kursunlu-camii-ve-kulliyesi.html
• Votsi, N.-E.P., Kallimanis, A.S., Mazaris, A.D., Pantis, J.D. (2013). Integrating environmental policies towards a network of protected and quiet areas. Environ. Conserv. 2013, 41, 321–329.
• Watts, G.R., Pheasant, R.J. (2015). Tranquillity in the Scottish Highlands and Dartmoor National Park—The importance of soundscapes and emotional factors. Appl. Acoust. 2015, 89, 297–305.
• Wolf, K. L. (2003). Ergonomics of the City: Green Infrastructure and Social Benefits. In C. Kollin (ed.), Engineering Green: Proceedings of the 11th National Urban Forest Conference. Washington D.C.: American Forests.
• Zhang, Y., Kang, J. & Kang, J. (2017). Effects of soundscape on the environmental restoration in urban natural environments. Noise and Health, 19 (87). pp. 65-72.