Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Dikey Bahçe Sistemleri İçin Bitki Tür Seçimi

Year 2023, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 446 - 462, 14.07.2023

Necmettin Gür , Özgür Kahraman

https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1146322

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Dikey bahçeler, kentsel açık-yeşil alanlar için üretilmiş alternatif yeşil alanlardır. Bu çalışmada, kent ekolojisi için önemli bir yere sahip olan dikey bahçe sistemlerinin sürdürülebilirliğinin artırılması için doğru bitki kullanımının önemi vurgulanmıştır. Doğru türleri belirlemek için çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri kullanıldı. Örnek uygulama alanı olarak İzmir ilinin Bornova ilçesinde bulunan Bornova Metro İstasyonu seçilmiştir. Örnek alanda SWOT analizi yapılarak dikey bahçe uygulama modeli belirlenmiştir. SWOT analizi sonrasında çevresel koşullar, kullanıcı profilleri ve uygulama maliyeti dikkate alınarak uygulama modeli olarak metal çit sistemleri belirlenmiştir. Metal-çit sistemlerinin özellikleri, İzmir iklim normları ve konuyla ilgili uzman görüşleri dikkate alınarak bitki seçim kriterleri oluşturulmuştur. Ardından, çok kriterli karar verme mekanizmaları için 68 alternatif bitki türü listelenmiştir. Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri sonucunda bu bitkiler arasından örnek alanda kullanılabilecek on ideal tür belirlenmiştir. En idealinden başlayacak şekilde belirlenen bitkiler; Trachelospermum jasminoides, Tecomaria carpensis, Hedera helix, Solanum jasminoides, Jasminum officinale, Distictis buccinatoria, Hydrangea petiolaris, Lonicera japonica, Bougainvillea glabra, Vigna caracalla.

Keywords

AHP, SWOT analizi, TOPSIS, Vertical garden systems

Plant Species Selection for Vertical Garden Systems with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques

Abstract

Vertical gardens are alternative green spaces produced for urban open-green spaces. In this study, the importance of correct plant use is emphasized in order to increase the sustainability of vertical garden systems, which have an important place for urban ecology. Multi-criteria decision making methods were used to determine the right plant. Bornova Metro Station, located in Bornova district of İzmir province, was chosen as a sample application area. The vertical garden application model was determined by SWOT analysis in the sample area. After the SWOT analysis, metal fence systems were determined as the application model, taking into account the environmental conditions, user profiles and application cost. Plant selection criteria were created by taking into account the characteristics of metal-fence systems, Izmir climate norms and expert opinions on the subject. Then, 68 alternative plant species are listed for multi-criteria decision making mechanisms. As a result of multi-criteria decision making methods, ten ideal species used in the sampling area were determined among these plants. Plants determined to start from the most ideal; Trachelospermum jasminoides, Tecomaria carpensis, Hedera helix, Solanum jasminoides, Jasminum officinale, Distictis buccinatoria, Hydrangea petiolaris, Lonicera japonica, Bougainvillea glabra, Vigna caracalla.

Keywords

AHP, SWOT Analysis, TOPSIS, Vertical garden systems

References

• Ak Oğuz, M. (2018). Ahp and Topsis Method with Supplier Selection. İstanbul Commerce University Journal of Science, 17 (34), 69-89 .
• Aygencel, M. (2011). Vertical Green Systems, Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Architecture, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
• Bagheri Moghaddam, F., Navarro Delgado, I., Redondo Domínguez, E., Fort Mir, J. M., & Giménez Mateu, L. (2021). Understanding the Performance of Vertical Gardens by Using Building Simulation and its Influences on Urban Landscape. ACE: architecture, city and environment, 16(47). doi: 10.5821/ace.16.47.10321.
• Bates, B. (2017). Straight up: Vertical garden lessons. ReNew: Technology for a Sustainable Future, (138), 48-51.
• Chaipong S., (2020). Indoor plant species survival under different environment in indoor vertical garden. International Journal of Geomate, 18(68), 15-20. doi: 10.21660/2020.68.5572.
• Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 2 (2022), 100021. doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021.
• Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S. & Kılınç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143-8151. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016.
• Eren T., & Gür Ş. (2017). Selection of 3PL Company for online shopping sites with AHP and TOPSIS method. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(2), 819-834. doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.285102.
• Fawad, M., Ullah, F., Irshad, M., Shah, W., Mahmood, Q. & Ahmad, I. (2022). Marble waste site suitability assessment using the GIS-based AHP model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 28386–28401. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18373-7.
• Feng H., & Hewage K. (2014). Lifecycle assessment of living walls: air purification and energy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.041.
• Goel, M., Jha, B., & Khan, S. (2022). Living walls enhancing the urban realm: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19501-7.
• Gür, N. & Kahraman, Ö. (2022). Effect of Vertical Gardens on Urban Biodiversity. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 10 (1), 342-355 . doi: 10.29130/dubited.934578.
• Helms, M. M. & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215,251. doi: 10.1108/17554251011064837.
• Hindle R. L. (2012). A vertical garden: origins of the Vegetation-Bearing Architectonic Structure and System (1938). Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 32(2), 99-110. doi: 10.1080/14601176.2011.653535.
• Hopfe C. J., Augenbroe G. L., & Hensen J. L. (2013). Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment. Building and Environment, 69, 81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.019.
• Hoque, I., & Rohatgi, S. (2022). Identification of Potential Urban Residential Area by Integrating AHP and WCL in RS and GIS Environment: A Case Study of Siliguri Municipal Corporation and Its Buffer of 7 km, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1-20. doi: 10.1007/s12524-022-01534-7.
• Hosseini, S. M., Paydar, M. M., & Triki, C. (2021). Implementing sustainable ecotourism in Lafour region, Iran: Applying a clustering method based on SWOT analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129716. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129716.
• Karakoç, M. (2019). Investigation of the effects of vertical garden use on urban ecology in building facades, Florya transformer building example. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul Aydin University, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Kırıt, N. (2018). Vertical gardens applications on urban landscape design: A case of Istanbul European Side. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.
• Malul, M., Bar-El, R. (2009). The gap between free market and social optimum in the location decision of economic activity. Urban Studies 46(10), 2045-2059. doi: 10.1177/0042098009339427.
• Mao N., Song M., Pan D., & Deng S. (2018). Comparative studies on using RSM and TOPSIS methods to optimize residential air conditioning systems. Energy, 144, 98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.160.
• Örnek, M. A. (2011). A sample based design model suggestion that can be used in the vertical garden design process. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Pérez G., Coma J., Martorell I., & Cabeza L.F. (2014). Vertical greenry system (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39(2014), 139-165. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.055.
• Pérez-Urrestarazu L. (2021). Water consumption of felt-based outdoor living walls in warm climates. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59, 127025. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127025.
• Phonpo S., & Saetiew K. (2017). Selection of appropriate species of plants for indoor vertical garden. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 13(1), 119-129.
• Qasim, S.A.Q. & Güngör, S. (2019). Investigating the vertical garden aplication in Konya City, Turkey: A case study. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 4(1), 63-68.
• Timur, Ö. B. & Karaca, E. (2013) .Vertical gardens. Advances in Landscape Architecture, 587-620. doi: 10.5772/55763.
• Tunç, T. B. (2021). Human-Space Relations in Neoliberal Residential Structures: The Case Of Bornova (Izmir). Master Thesis, Department of Human and Economic Geography, Social Sciences Institute, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
• Uchida, K., Blakey, R. V., Burger, J. R., Cooper, D. S., Niesner, C. A., & Blumstein, D. T. (2021). Urban biodiversity and the importance of scale. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(2), 123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.011.
• URL- 1, (2022) General Directorate of Meteorology of the Republic of Turkey. Seasonal normal of the provinces / Izmir. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=IZMIR (Date of access: 15.06.2022).
• Üçok, E. (2014). A study on vertical garden and its examples in Turkey. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
• Wang, Y., Liu, P., & Yao, Y. (2022). BMW-TOPSIS: a generalized TOPSIS model based on three-way decision. Information Sciences, 607, 799-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.06.018.
• Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wang, J., & Shang, X. (2022). Consensus checking and improving methods for AHP with q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 117902. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117902.
• Yalçın, B., & Ayvaz, B. (2020). Evaluation of Logistic Performance with Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques. İstanbul Commerce University Journal of Science, 19(38), 117-138.