Review
BibTex RIS Cite

THE SCOPE OF META-SYNTHESIS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AND EXAMPLES OF META-SYNTHESIS IN AGING

Year 2021, , 235 - 268, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1036670

Abstract

Meta-synthesis is defined as the systematic review, integration and interpretation of findings from qualitative research. Although there are many studies carried out using the meta-synthesis method in the national and international literature, it has been observed that there is a need for a systematic study explaining the scope and process of meta-synthesis in the national literature. It was thought that it was necessary for practitioners to support the knowledge of meta-synthesis, which was brought together holistically, with examples. With this study, the definition, scope and process of meta-synthesis in qualitative research is explained, together with examples of meta-synthesis in the field of old age, it aims to reveal the body of information as a guide in this field.

References

  • Arai L, Britten N, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A. Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. A Journal of Research Debate and Practice. 2007;3(3):361-383.
  • Aspfors, J, Fransson G. Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and teacher education.2015;48: 75-86.
  • Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 16;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.
  • Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Aug 11;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
  • Booth A, Woods MD, Bonas S, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research. 2006;6(1):27-44.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Baskı 26. Ankara, Türkiye, Vadi Grup Basım, 2017; 1-360.
  • Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine. 2003 Feb;56(4):671-84.
  • CASP 2018: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018) – Qualitative Checklist. [https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/] adresinden 23.05.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Charlton K, Murray CM, Kumar S. Perspectives of older people about contingency planning for falls in the community: A qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0177510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177510.
  • Chenail RC. A compendium of teaching and learning qualitative research resources. TQR Community Qualitative Research Resource Series. 2018. [https://tqr.nova.edu/a-compendium-of-teaching-and-learning-qualitative-research-resources/] adresinden 15.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Chrastina J. Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies: Background, Methodology and Applications. NORDSCI, 2018.
  • Clancy A, Simonsen N, Lind J, Liveng A, Johannessen A. The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis. Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jul 2:969733020928134. doi: 10.1177/0969733020928134.
  • Clemmens D, Adolescent Motherhood. A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(2):93-99.
  • Creswell JW. Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. In:Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Baskı 1, Tarcan Matbaacılık Ankara, Türkiye,2013;69-110.
  • Creswell JW. Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. In:Nitel çalışma tasarımı. Baskı 5, Tarcan Matbaacılık Ankara, Türkiye,2020;43-71.
  • Debout C. La méta-synthèse [Meta-synthesis]. Soins. 2016 Jan-Feb;(802):60-3.
  • Dew K. A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Oct;31(5):433-7.
  • Douglas AC, Mills JE, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Byun S, Ruffini C, Lee SK, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M, Blanton M. Internet addiction: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996–2006. Computers in human behavior. 2008; 24(6): 3027-3044.
  • Edwards J, Girija K. Using meta-synthesis to support application of qualitative methods findings in practice: A discussion of meta-ethnography, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretive synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 2016;51: 30-35.
  • Erwin EJ, Brotherson MJ, Summers JA. Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention. 2011; 33(3): 186-200.
  • Evans D, Pearson A. Systematic reviews of qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 2001;5(3): 111-119.
  • Finfgeld-Connett D, Johnson ED. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jan;69(1):194-204.
  • Finlayson KW, Dixon A. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a guide for the novice. Nurse Res. 2008;15(2):59-71.
  • Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational researcher. 1976;5(10): 3-8.
  • Goins RT, Jones J, Schure M, Rosenberg DE, Phelan EA, Dodson S, Jones DL. Older Adults' Perceptions of Mobility: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies. Gerontologist. 2015 Dec;55(6):929-42.
  • Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2):91-108.
  • Guidelines for the use of foreign field hospitals in the aftermath of sudden-impact disaster. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):278-90. English, Spanish.
  • Hannes K, Macaıtıs K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research, 2012;12(4): 402-442.
  • Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43.
  • Hansen, Emily C. Successful qualitative health research: a practical introduction. NewYork, ABD, 2020.
  • Hirshon JM, Risko N, Calvello EJ, Stewart de Ramirez S, Narayan M, Theodosis C, O'Neill J; Acute Care Research Collaborative at the University of Maryland Global Health Initiative. Health systems and services: the role of acute care. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 May 1;91(5):386-8.
  • Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings Qualitative Health Research. First PublishedNovember, 1996;6(4): 553-560.
  • Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 edition. Systematic review; protocol; effectiveness; qualitative; economic; and methods. [http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf.] adresinden 23.05.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(3):271-8.
  • Kinn LG, Holgersen H, Ekeland TJ, Davidson L. Metasynthesis and bricolage: an artistic exercise of creating a collage of meaning. Qual Health Res. 2013 Sep;23(9):1285-92.
  • Kümbetoğlu, B. Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma. Baskı 6. İstanbul, Türkiye, 2019; 33-48.
  • Lachal J, Revah-Levy A, Orri M, Moro MR. Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;8:269.
  • Lee RP, Hart RI, Watson RV, Rapley T. Qualitative synthesis in practice: some pragmatics of meta-ethnography. Qualitative Research. 2015;15(3): 334-350.
  • Lıncoln YS, Susan AL, Egon GG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2011;4: 97-128.
  • Ludvigsen MS, Hall EO, Meyer G, Fegran L, Aagaard H, Uhrenfeldt L. Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence. Qual Health Res. 2016 Feb;26(3):320-9.
  • Luo L. Experiencing evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP): Academic Librarians' perspective. College & Research Libraries. 2018;79(4): 554.
  • Mays N, Pope C. Observational methods in health care settings. Br Med J. 1995;311:182-4.
  • Mohammed MA, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):695-704.
  • Moore K, O'Shea E, Kenny L, Barton J, Tedesco S, Sica M, Crowe C, Alamäki A, Condell J, Nordström A, Timmons S. Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 3;9(6):e23832.
  • Morse J. Qualitative verification. London. The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. 2001;203–220.
  • Noah JR, Philip D. A systematıc approach to the qualıtatıve meta-synthesıs. Issues in Information Systems. 2017;18(2):18.2.
  • Noblıt GW, Hare RD. Meta-etnografi: Nitel çalışmaların sentezlenmesi. London, UK, Sage Publication 1988.
  • Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C. Supplemental Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group; 2016. Available from: http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/supplemental-handbook-guidance.
  • Öz S. The meta-synthesis of digital storytelling studies in K-12. Doktora tezi. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.
  • Polat S ve Ay O. Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education.2016;4(1);52-64.
  • Purssell E, McCrae N. Reviewing Qualitative Studies and Metasynthesis. How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review. 2020;103-111.
  • Rıng NA, Ritchie K, Mandava L, Jepson R. A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. 2011.
  • Sandelowskı M, Barroso J. Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV‐positive women. Research in nursing & health. 2003;26(2): 153-170.
  • Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Sci 1993; 16: 1–8.
  • Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. NewYork, ABD, Springer Publishing Company, 2006.
  • Stern PN, Harris CC. Women's health and the self-care paradox: a model to guide self-care readiness. Health Care Women Int. 1985;6(1-3):151-63.
  • Sullivan GJ, Williams C. Older Adult Transitions into Long-Term Care: A Meta-Synthesis. J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Mar 1;43(3):41-49. Systematic Reviews & Other Review Types.[ https://guides.temple.edu/c.php?g=78618&p=4178716] adresinden 10.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Tang X. Qualitative meta-synthesis techniques for analysis of public opinions for in-depth study. In: International Conference on Complex Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. p. 2338-2353.
  • Tımulak L. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19(4-5): 591-600.
  • Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
  • Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 21;14:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80.
  • Walsh D, Soo D. Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing.2005; 50(2): 204-211.
  • Weed M. Meta interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2005.
  • Whıtey R, Crawford M. Psikiyatride nitel araştırma. Kanada Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2005;50(2):108-114.
  • Willig C, Wirth L. A meta-synthesis of studies of patients' experience of living with terminal cancer. Health Psychol. 2018 Mar;37(3):228-237.

NİTEL ARAŞTIRMALARDA META-SENTEZİN KAPSAMI VE YAŞLILIK ALANINDA META-SENTEZ ÖRNEKLERİ

Year 2021, , 235 - 268, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1036670

Abstract

Meta-sentez, nitel araştırmalardan elde edilen bulguların sistematik olarak gözden geçirilmesi, bütünleştirilmesi ve yorumlanması olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Ulusal ve uluslararası literatürde meta-sentez yöntemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen birçok araştırma bulunmakla birlikte, ulusal literatürde meta-sentezin kapsamını ve sürecini açıklayan sistematik bir çalışmaya ihtiyaç olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Özellikle bütünsel olarak bir araya getirilen meta-senteze ait bilginin örneklerle de desteklenmesi uygulayıcılar için gerekli olduğu düşünülmüştür. Bu çalışma ile nitel araştırmalarda meta-sentezin tanımı, kapsamı ve sürecinin açıklanması ile birlikte, yaşlılık alanında yapılmış meta-sentez örneklerine yer vererek, bu alanda rehber niteliğinde bilgi bütününü ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

References

  • Arai L, Britten N, Roberts H, Petticrew M, Rodgers M, Sowden A. Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions. A Journal of Research Debate and Practice. 2007;3(3):361-383.
  • Aspfors, J, Fransson G. Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and teacher education.2015;48: 75-86.
  • Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 16;8:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21.
  • Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Aug 11;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
  • Booth A, Woods MD, Bonas S, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research. 2006;6(1):27-44.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Baskı 26. Ankara, Türkiye, Vadi Grup Basım, 2017; 1-360.
  • Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine. 2003 Feb;56(4):671-84.
  • CASP 2018: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018) – Qualitative Checklist. [https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/] adresinden 23.05.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Charlton K, Murray CM, Kumar S. Perspectives of older people about contingency planning for falls in the community: A qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0177510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177510.
  • Chenail RC. A compendium of teaching and learning qualitative research resources. TQR Community Qualitative Research Resource Series. 2018. [https://tqr.nova.edu/a-compendium-of-teaching-and-learning-qualitative-research-resources/] adresinden 15.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Chrastina J. Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies: Background, Methodology and Applications. NORDSCI, 2018.
  • Clancy A, Simonsen N, Lind J, Liveng A, Johannessen A. The meaning of dignity for older adults: A meta-synthesis. Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jul 2:969733020928134. doi: 10.1177/0969733020928134.
  • Clemmens D, Adolescent Motherhood. A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(2):93-99.
  • Creswell JW. Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. In:Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Baskı 1, Tarcan Matbaacılık Ankara, Türkiye,2013;69-110.
  • Creswell JW. Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. In:Nitel çalışma tasarımı. Baskı 5, Tarcan Matbaacılık Ankara, Türkiye,2020;43-71.
  • Debout C. La méta-synthèse [Meta-synthesis]. Soins. 2016 Jan-Feb;(802):60-3.
  • Dew K. A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Oct;31(5):433-7.
  • Douglas AC, Mills JE, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Byun S, Ruffini C, Lee SK, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M, Blanton M. Internet addiction: Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996–2006. Computers in human behavior. 2008; 24(6): 3027-3044.
  • Edwards J, Girija K. Using meta-synthesis to support application of qualitative methods findings in practice: A discussion of meta-ethnography, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretive synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 2016;51: 30-35.
  • Erwin EJ, Brotherson MJ, Summers JA. Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention. 2011; 33(3): 186-200.
  • Evans D, Pearson A. Systematic reviews of qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 2001;5(3): 111-119.
  • Finfgeld-Connett D, Johnson ED. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jan;69(1):194-204.
  • Finlayson KW, Dixon A. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a guide for the novice. Nurse Res. 2008;15(2):59-71.
  • Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational researcher. 1976;5(10): 3-8.
  • Goins RT, Jones J, Schure M, Rosenberg DE, Phelan EA, Dodson S, Jones DL. Older Adults' Perceptions of Mobility: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies. Gerontologist. 2015 Dec;55(6):929-42.
  • Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2):91-108.
  • Guidelines for the use of foreign field hospitals in the aftermath of sudden-impact disaster. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):278-90. English, Spanish.
  • Hannes K, Macaıtıs K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research, 2012;12(4): 402-442.
  • Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43.
  • Hansen, Emily C. Successful qualitative health research: a practical introduction. NewYork, ABD, 2020.
  • Hirshon JM, Risko N, Calvello EJ, Stewart de Ramirez S, Narayan M, Theodosis C, O'Neill J; Acute Care Research Collaborative at the University of Maryland Global Health Initiative. Health systems and services: the role of acute care. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 May 1;91(5):386-8.
  • Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings Qualitative Health Research. First PublishedNovember, 1996;6(4): 553-560.
  • Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 edition. Systematic review; protocol; effectiveness; qualitative; economic; and methods. [http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf.] adresinden 23.05.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(3):271-8.
  • Kinn LG, Holgersen H, Ekeland TJ, Davidson L. Metasynthesis and bricolage: an artistic exercise of creating a collage of meaning. Qual Health Res. 2013 Sep;23(9):1285-92.
  • Kümbetoğlu, B. Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma. Baskı 6. İstanbul, Türkiye, 2019; 33-48.
  • Lachal J, Revah-Levy A, Orri M, Moro MR. Metasynthesis: An Original Method to Synthesize Qualitative Literature in Psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;8:269.
  • Lee RP, Hart RI, Watson RV, Rapley T. Qualitative synthesis in practice: some pragmatics of meta-ethnography. Qualitative Research. 2015;15(3): 334-350.
  • Lıncoln YS, Susan AL, Egon GG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2011;4: 97-128.
  • Ludvigsen MS, Hall EO, Meyer G, Fegran L, Aagaard H, Uhrenfeldt L. Using Sandelowski and Barroso's Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence. Qual Health Res. 2016 Feb;26(3):320-9.
  • Luo L. Experiencing evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP): Academic Librarians' perspective. College & Research Libraries. 2018;79(4): 554.
  • Mays N, Pope C. Observational methods in health care settings. Br Med J. 1995;311:182-4.
  • Mohammed MA, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):695-704.
  • Moore K, O'Shea E, Kenny L, Barton J, Tedesco S, Sica M, Crowe C, Alamäki A, Condell J, Nordström A, Timmons S. Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 3;9(6):e23832.
  • Morse J. Qualitative verification. London. The Nature of Qualitative Evidence. 2001;203–220.
  • Noah JR, Philip D. A systematıc approach to the qualıtatıve meta-synthesıs. Issues in Information Systems. 2017;18(2):18.2.
  • Noblıt GW, Hare RD. Meta-etnografi: Nitel çalışmaların sentezlenmesi. London, UK, Sage Publication 1988.
  • Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C. Supplemental Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group; 2016. Available from: http://methods.cochrane.org/qi/supplemental-handbook-guidance.
  • Öz S. The meta-synthesis of digital storytelling studies in K-12. Doktora tezi. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.
  • Polat S ve Ay O. Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education.2016;4(1);52-64.
  • Purssell E, McCrae N. Reviewing Qualitative Studies and Metasynthesis. How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review. 2020;103-111.
  • Rıng NA, Ritchie K, Mandava L, Jepson R. A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. 2011.
  • Sandelowskı M, Barroso J. Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV‐positive women. Research in nursing & health. 2003;26(2): 153-170.
  • Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Sci 1993; 16: 1–8.
  • Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. NewYork, ABD, Springer Publishing Company, 2006.
  • Stern PN, Harris CC. Women's health and the self-care paradox: a model to guide self-care readiness. Health Care Women Int. 1985;6(1-3):151-63.
  • Sullivan GJ, Williams C. Older Adult Transitions into Long-Term Care: A Meta-Synthesis. J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Mar 1;43(3):41-49. Systematic Reviews & Other Review Types.[ https://guides.temple.edu/c.php?g=78618&p=4178716] adresinden 10.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  • Tang X. Qualitative meta-synthesis techniques for analysis of public opinions for in-depth study. In: International Conference on Complex Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. p. 2338-2353.
  • Tımulak L. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19(4-5): 591-600.
  • Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
  • Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, Briggs M, Carr E, Barker K. Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 21;14:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80.
  • Walsh D, Soo D. Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing.2005; 50(2): 204-211.
  • Weed M. Meta interpretation: A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2005.
  • Whıtey R, Crawford M. Psikiyatride nitel araştırma. Kanada Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2005;50(2):108-114.
  • Willig C, Wirth L. A meta-synthesis of studies of patients' experience of living with terminal cancer. Health Psychol. 2018 Mar;37(3):228-237.
There are 65 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Collection
Authors

Melike Tekindal 0000-0002-3453-3273

Kübra Tonbalak 0000-0002-6483-1132

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Submission Date December 15, 2021
Acceptance Date December 25, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Tekindal, M., & Tonbalak, K. (2021). NİTEL ARAŞTIRMALARDA META-SENTEZİN KAPSAMI VE YAŞLILIK ALANINDA META-SENTEZ ÖRNEKLERİ. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 21(2), 235-268. https://doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1036670

Cited By


Women School Principals: Career Stories
Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1466767