Promoting Gender Equality in Educational Settings: The Role of Computer Supported Cooperative Learning

Abstract

New media makes possible new forms of collaboration and interaction in educational settings. Group-based instructional methods, as collaborative and cooperative learning can be mediated by specific computer-based applications and methods.

In this article arguments are presented for differentiating collaborative and cooperative learning methods on offline and computer-mediated environments as well. In comparison to CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning), there is a well-established need for further research into the areas of Computer Supported Cooperative learning (CSCpL), with special attention paid for its impact on peer relationships in general, and social inclusion or reducing gender differences in particular.

Keywords

• -

References

1. AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
2. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning - an empirical-evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174. doi: 10.2307/249763
3. Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 375-397. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., National Research Council, C. o. B., Social, S., & Education, C. o. D. i. t. S. o. L. W. D. C. U. S. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC, US: National Academy Press.
5. Cabrera, A. F., Crissman, J. L., Bernal, E. M., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal Of College Student Development, 43(1), 20-34.
6. Chen, C. H., Chung, M. Y., & Wu, W. C. V. (2013). The Effects of Faded Prompts and Feedback on College Students' Reflective Writing Skills. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 571-583. doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0059-z
7. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van de Ven, A. (2001). Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 71, 531-559.
8. de Groot, E., Endedijk, M. D., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Simons, P. R. J., & van Beukelen, P. (2014). Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(1), 15-37. doi: 10.1080/0158037x.2013.779240

9. Ding, N., Bosker, R. J., & Harskamp, E. G. (2011). Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 56(2), 325-336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004
10. EC. (2008). The use of ICT to support innovation and lifelong learning for all - A report on progress. Brussels: EC.
11. EC. (2011). Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011: Eurydice.
12. Fauville, G., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Saljo, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248-283. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.775220
13. Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers In Human Behavior, 22(2), 163-176. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
14. Garcia-Valcarcel, A., Basilotta, V., & Lopez, C. (2014). ICT in Collaborative Learning in the Classrooms of Primary and Secondary Education. Comunicar(42), 65-74. doi: 10.3916/c42-2014-06
15. George, D. R., & Dellasega, C. (2011). Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: Two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Medical Teacher, 33(8), E429-E434. doi: 10.3109/0142159x.2011.586749
16. Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers In Human Behavior, 26(5), 806-814. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012
17. Guiller, J., Dumdell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001
18. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research And Development, 55(3), 223-252. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
19. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
20. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Holubec, E. J. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
22. Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the Online Cooperative Learning Attitude Scale (OCLAS). Computers & Education, 59(4), 1162-1169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.021
23. Kramer, B. S., Walker, A., & Brill, J. M. (2007). The Underutilization of Internet and Communication Technology-assisted Collaborative Project-Based Learning Among International Educators: A Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 55(5), 527-543.
24. Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. . The J.H.G.I. Giesbers Reports on Education. Department of Educational Sciences. University on Nijmegen.
25. Nam, C. W., & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 680-688. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.010
26. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484-495. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<484::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Q
27. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2008). Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice. Annual Review Of Psychology, 60(1), 339-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
28. Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163-178. doi: 10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00045-8
29. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
30. Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 393-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00224.x
31. Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Wb2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
32. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
33. Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230-253.
34. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3 McGilly, Kate (Ed). (1994). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. (pp. 201 228). . xvi, 317 pp.SEE BOOK.
35. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
36. Sharan, S. (1980). COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN SMALL-GROUPS - RECENT METHODS AND EFFECTS ON ACHIEVEMENT, ATTITUDES, AND ETHNIC-RELATIONS. Review Of Educational Research, 50(2), 241-271. doi: 10.3102/00346543050002241
37. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
38. Smeets, E. (2005). Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? Computers & Education, 44(3), 343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.003
39. Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1393-1421. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00208
40. Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., Radic, K., & Pokrajac, N. (2005). Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(1), 35-39. doi: 10.1152/advan.00026.2004
41. Tomai, M., Mebane, M. E., Rosa, V., & Benedetti, M. (2014). Can Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Promote Counter-stereotypical Gender Communication Styles in Male and Female University Students? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(0), 4384-4392. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.952
42. Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2012). Using reflection triggers while learning in an online course. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1030-1040. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01257.x
43. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review Of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-634. doi: 10.3102/00346543071004613
44. Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 126-143. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.639784
45. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
46. Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001
47. Zsigmond, I. (2013). Blogging for Learning: A Case Study at Sapientia University. Paper presented at the EDULEARN13, Barcelona.