“Rotasyonlu Dinamik Elementler”de Elit Ritmik Cimnastikçilerin Tercih Ettikleri Rotasyonlar ve Rotasyon Yönleri

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ritmik cimnastikçilerin tüm rutinlerinde “rotasyonlu dinamik elemenler” içindeki rotasyon çeşitleri, sayıları, sıklıkları ve tercih edilen rotasyon yönleri analiz edildi. Yöntem: 2023 yılında düzenlenen 39. Avrupa Ritmik Cimnastik Şampiyonası’nda cimnastikçilerin (n = 96, 19,8±3,3 yaş) bireysel All-around Final yarışma rutinleri incelenmiştir. Veriler yarışmalar sırasında kaydedilen rutinlerin analiz edilmesiyle elde edilmiştir. Analizlerde Ritmik Cimnastik değerlendirme kuralları dikkate alınmıştır. Tanımlayıcı bütün istatistiksel analizler IBM SPSS 25.0 istatistik programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Tüm rotasyonlu dinamik elemenlerde; rotasyon çeşidi sayısı, 8,3±0,95 olarak saptanmıştır. En yüksek rotasyon sayısı çember rutinlerinde gözlenmiştir. Her bir rotasyon dikkate alındığında, gerçekleştirilen rotasyon sayısı 14,4±1,6 olarak belirlenmiştir. Tüm cimnastikçilerin dört rutinde gerçekleştirdiği toplam vücut rotasyon sayısı 57,5±6,5 olarak saptanmıştır. Preakrobatik elementlerden 1, 2, 3 ve 4 numaralı ve dikey rotasyonlardan 1, 2 ve 4 numaralı rotasyonlar en fazla tercih edilen rotasyonlar olarak belirlenmiştir. İllüzyon tüm rotasyon hareketlerinde en çok tercih edilen hareket olmuştur. Cimnastikçiler rotasyonlu dinamik elemenlerde sağ yönü sol yöne göre yaklaşık iki kat daha fazla tercih etmişlerdir. Sonuç: Mükemmel zamanlama ve doğru vücut tekniği ile hareketleri hatasız gerçekleştirmek için aşırı tekrarlar yapmak vücutta yüklenmelere, mikro travmalara, kas hasarlarına ve asimetrilere neden olabilir. Kompozisyonun koreografik tasarımları oluşturulurken vücudun her iki tarafındaki yük dengesine dikkat edilerek koruyucu önlemler alınabilir.

Keywords

• Rotasyonlu dinamik elementler
• Rotasyon yönü tercihleri
• Bireysel rutinler
• Performans analizi
• Ritmik cimnastik

The Rotations and Rotation Directions Preferred by Elite Rhythmic Gymnasts in “Dynamic Elements with Rotation”

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study is to analyze the rotation types, numbers, frequencies, and preferred rotation directions in “dynamic elements with rotation” in all routines of rhythmic gymnasts. Methods: The gymnasts' individual All-around Final competition routines (n = 96, 19.8±3.3 years old) at the 39th European Championships in Rhythmic Gymnastics in 2023 were investigated. The data were derived from an analysis of the routines documented throughout the competitions. In the analysis the Rhythmic Gymnastics evaluation rules were considered. The IBM SPSS 25.0 statistics program was used for all descriptive analyses. Results: The number of rotation types was 8.3±0.95. The highest number of rotations was found in the hoop routines. Considering each rotation, executed the number of rotations was determined as 14.4±1.6. The total number of body rotations performed by all gymnasts on four routines was determined as 57.5 ± 6.5. In the pre-acrobatic elements, rotation no 1, 2, 3, 4 and in the vertical rotations rotation no 1, 2, 4 were mostly preferred. The Illusion was the most preferred in all rotational movements. In dynamic elements with rotation, gymnasts preferred the right direction approximately twice as much as the left direction. Conclusion: Excessive repetitions to perform movements without mistakes with perfect timing and correct body technique may cause loads, micro-traumas, muscle damage, and asymmetries on the body. While creating the choreographic designs of the composition, protective measures can be taken by paying attention to the load balance on both sides of the body.

Keywords

• Dynamic elements with rotation
• Rotation direction preferences
• Individual routines
• Performance analysis
• Rhythmic gymnastics

References

1. Bahr, R., & Holme, I. (2003). Risk factors for sports injuries - a methodological approach. British journal of sports medicine, 37(5), 384-392.
2. Batista, A., Garganta, R., & Ávila-Carvalho, L. (2017). Dance steps, dynamic elements with rotation and throw and mastery elements in rhythmic gymnastics routines. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9(2), 177-189.
3. Bessi, F., Hofmann, D., von Laßberg, C., & Heinen, T. (2016). Directional tendencies in artistic gymnastics. In T. Heinen, I. Čuk, R. Goebel, & K. Velentzas (Eds.), Gymnastics performance and motor learning: Principles and applications, Nova Science Publishers, p. 119-138.
4. Denton, J. (1997). Overuse foot and ankle injuries in ballet. Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery, 14(3), 525-532.
5. Fédération Internationale De Gymnastique (FIG), 2022-2024 Code de Pointage, Gymnastique Rythmique, Version 2022-04-25. Retrieved May 26, 2023. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/fr_2022-2024%20RG%20Code%20of%20Points.pdf
6. Feeley, B. T., Agel, J., & LaPrade, R. F. (2016). When Is It Too Early for Single Sport Specialization? The American journal of sports medicine, 44(1), 234-241.
7. Frutuoso, A. S., Diefenthaeler, F., Vaz, M. A., & Freitas, C. (2016). Lower limb asymmetries in rhythmic gymnastics athletes. International journal of sports physical therapy, 11(1), 34-43. PMID: 26900498; PMCID: PMC4739046
8. Gateva, M. (2023). Technical preparation in rhythmic gymnastics, The Body, Part I, Bulged Ltd., Sofia, p. 7-11.

9. Grueva-Pancheva, T. (2022). Predisposing factors and prevention for overuse injuries in ankle and foot complex in rhythmic gymnasts. Proceeding Book, International Scientific Congress, Applied sports sciences, National Sports Academy “Vassil Levski”, 2-3 December, Sofia, Bulgaria, p. 450-455.
10. Gulati, R., Rychlik, K., Wild J. T., & LaBella C. R. (2022) Rhythmic gymnasts’ injuries in a pediatric sports medicine clinic in the United States: a 10-year retrospective chart review, The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 50 (5), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 913847.2022.2040890
11. Gymnastics events, Fédération Internationale De Gymnastique (FIG), Access address: https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/events/results. php?idEvent= 17269 date of access 29 May 2023.
12. Heinen, T., Bermeitinger, C., & von Laßberg, C. (2016). Laterality in individualized sports. In F. Loffing, N. Hagemann, B. Strauss, & C. MacMahon (Eds.), Laterality in sports: Theories and applications, Elsevier Academic Press, p. 227-247.
13. Heinen, T., Jeraj, D., Vinken, P. M., & Velentzas, K. (2012). Rotational preference in gymnastics. Journal of human kinetics, 33, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0042-4
14. Jastrejevskaya, N. (1995). Rhythmic Sportive Gymnastics. Theory and Practice, FIG, p. 142.
15. Jastrjembskaia, N., & Titov, Y. (1999). Rhythmic gymnastics. Human Kinetics, p. 127-227.
16. Kutlay, E., & Tatlıbal, P. (2023). An Analysis of Rotation Directions and Support Foot Preferences in Body Rotation Difficulties of Rhythmic Gymnasts. JETT, 14(2), 190-201. https://doi.org/10. 47750/jett.2023.14.02.019
17. Kutlay, E., Kocahan, T., Arpınar, P., Nalçakan, R. G. (2001). Ritmik Cimnastikte Spor Yaralanmaları, Ege Üniversitesi Beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu performans dergisi, 7(3-4), 26-36.
18. Loffing, F., Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & MacMahon, C. (2016). Laterality in sports: More than two sides of the same coin, Laterality in sports: Theories and applications, Elsevier Academic Press, p. 1-7.
19. Parrington, L., & Ball, K. (2016). Biomechanical considerations of laterality in sport. In F. Loffing, N. Hagemann, B. Strauss, & C. MacMahon (Eds.), Laterality in sports: Theories and applications, Elsevier Academic Press, p. 279-308.
20. Purenović-Ivanović, T., Popović, R., Stanković, D., & Bubanj, S. (2016). The importance of motor coordination abilities for performance in rhythmic gymnastics. Facta Universitatis. Series: Physical education and sport, 14(1), 63-74.
21. Soligard, T., Schwellnus, M., Alonso, J. M., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., Dijkstra, H. P., & et al. (2016). How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. British journal of sports medicine, 50(17), 1030-1041.
22. Starosta, W. (2018). Movements symmetrization – an effective method of injury prevention, health strengthening and prolonged sports careers of athletes, Movement in human life and health, Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference of Sport Kinetics, 24-27 June, p. 35-45, Poreč, Croatia.
23. Tayne, S., Bejarano-Pineda, L., & Hutchinson, M. R. (2021). Gymnastics (Artistic, Rhythmic, Trampoline). In S.R. Piedade, J. Espregueira-Mendes, M.R. & Hutchinson (Eds.), Specific Sports-Related Injuries, Springer, Cham. p. 65-79.
24. Utesch, T., Mentzel, S. V., Strauss, B., & Büsch, D. (2016). Measurement of laterality and its relevance for sports. In F. Loffing, N. Hagemann, B. Strauss, & C. MacMahon (Eds.), Laterality in sports: Theories and applications, Elsevier Academic Press, p. 65-86.
25. Zetaruk, M. N., Violán, M., Zurakowski, D., Mitchell, W. A., & Micheli, L. J. (2006). Injuries and training recommendations in elite rhythmic gymnastics. Apunts. Medicina De L'esport, 41, 100-106. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Apunts/article/view/164833
26. Zhu, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, M., Li, P., Xiang, Y., Ouyang, J., & et al. (2023). A perspective on rhythmic gymnastics performance analysis powered by intelligent fabric. Advanced Fiber Materials, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00197-w