Research Article

Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes

Volume: 5 Number: 2 June 15, 2019
EN

Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between body composition, vertical jump, sprint, static strength, and anaerobic power of athletes.

 Methods: 19-27 years old (training 2 hours/day, 4 days/week, training at least 4 years) 28 male (23.11 ± 1.71 years; 1 fitness, 1 mountain climber, 1 swimmer, 15 football, 2 basketball, and 8 tennis players), 19 female (21.95 ± 2.37 years; 3 Zumba, 1 cross country runner, 5 basketball, 2 football, 6 tennis, and 2 volleyball players) athletes participated voluntarily. Body composition compartments, height, skinfold thicknesses, Vertical Jump and 30 m sprint by using timer gates were measured. Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) was used to determine peak anaerobic power (WAnTPP) and mean anaerobic power (WAnTMP). 

Results: There was no significant relationship between fat compartment of body composition and vertical jump or 30 m sprint performances for male athletes. In addition to that, there were no relationship between the fat compartment and any of the performance parameters of vertical jump, sprinting, WAnT results for female athletes.
Conclusion: Sport specific strength requirements to be discussed for performance determinants have yet been incomplete and versatile research subject. To predict the sport performance, follow-up and performance focused battery should be studied by all affecting parameters such as physiological, neurological, detailed body composition compartments.

Keywords

References

  1. Ache-Dias, J., Pupo, J. D., Gheller, R. G., Külkamp, W., & Moro, A. P. (2016). Output Prediction From Jump Height and Body Mass Does Not Appropriately Categorize or Rank Athletes. J Str Cond Res , 30 (3), 818-24.
  2. Alemdaroğlu, U. (2012). The Relationship Between Muscle Strength, Anaerobic Performance, Agility, Sprint Ability and Vertical Jump Performance in Professional Basketball Players. J Hum Kinet , 31, 99-106.
  3. Aouadi, R., Jlid, M. C., Khalifa, R., Hermassi, S., Chelly, M. S., Van Den Tillaar, R., et al. (2012). Association of anthropometric qualities with vertical jump performance in elite male volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness , 52 (1), 11-7.
  4. Arslan, E., & Aras, D. (2016). Comparison of body composition, heart rate variability, aerobic and anaerobic performance between competitive cyclists and triathletes. J Physical Ther Sci , 28 (4), 1325-9.
  5. Aslan, C. S., Büyükdere, C., Köklü, Y., Özkan, A., & Şahin Özdemir, N. F. (2011). Elit altı sporcularda vücut kompozisyonu, anaerobik performans ve sırt kuvveti arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi , 8 (1), 1612-28.
  6. Bar-Or, O. (1987). The wingate anaerobic test: an update on methodology reliability and validity. Sports Med , 4, 381-94.
  7. Beneke, R., Pollmann, C. H., Bleif, I., Leithauser, R., & Hütler, M. (2002). How anearobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans? Eur J Appl Physiol , 87, 399-92.
  8. Berthoin, S., Dupont, G., Mary, P., & Gerbeaux, M. (2001). Predicting sprint kinematic parameters from anaerobic field tests in physical education students. J Str Cond Res , 15 (1), 75-80.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sports Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 15, 2019

Submission Date

January 23, 2019

Acceptance Date

May 26, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Küçükkubaş, N., Günay, A., Löklüoğlu, B., & Kakil, B. (2019). Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS, 5(2), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.517037
AMA
1.Küçükkubaş N, Günay A, Löklüoğlu B, Kakil B. Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes. Int J Sport, Exerc & Train Sci. 2019;5(2):68-78. doi:10.18826/useeabd.517037
Chicago
Küçükkubaş, Nigar, Ali Günay, Berkay Löklüoğlu, and Berkay Kakil. 2019. “Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 5 (2): 68-78. https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.517037.
EndNote
Küçükkubaş N, Günay A, Löklüoğlu B, Kakil B (June 1, 2019) Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 5 2 68–78.
IEEE
[1]N. Küçükkubaş, A. Günay, B. Löklüoğlu, and B. Kakil, “Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes”, Int J Sport, Exerc & Train Sci, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 68–78, June 2019, doi: 10.18826/useeabd.517037.
ISNAD
Küçükkubaş, Nigar - Günay, Ali - Löklüoğlu, Berkay - Kakil, Berkay. “Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS 5/2 (June 1, 2019): 68-78. https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.517037.
JAMA
1.Küçükkubaş N, Günay A, Löklüoğlu B, Kakil B. Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes. Int J Sport, Exerc & Train Sci. 2019;5:68–78.
MLA
Küçükkubaş, Nigar, et al. “Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes”. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS, vol. 5, no. 2, June 2019, pp. 68-78, doi:10.18826/useeabd.517037.
Vancouver
1.Nigar Küçükkubaş, Ali Günay, Berkay Löklüoğlu, Berkay Kakil. Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes. Int J Sport, Exerc & Train Sci. 2019 Jun. 1;5(2):68-7. doi:10.18826/useeabd.517037

Cited By