Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids

Volume: 11 Number: 3 December 30, 2019
EN TR

Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids

Abstract

Turkey's energy consumption has risen in conjunction with its economic growth over the past decades. However, approximately 70 % of the electricity demand is supplied by fossil-based fuels, which are mainly imported from other countries. Thus, it became very important for the country to find alternative ways of meeting the energy requirement. Due to its geographical position, the renewable energy potential of Turkey is fairly well, which is currently contributing to the energy generation but not at the desired level. One of them is the geothermal energy that Turkey has many geothermal areas, and they are relatively appropriate for electricity production. This study aims to investigate the performance of a geothermal based transcritical Rankine cycle for various supercritical working fluids. The geothermal reservoir is located in the west part of Turkey, and the geothermal water temperature is about 156 °C. Using the actual data, comparative thermodynamic analyses are carried out for determining the best working fluid. Results show that the highest power generation rate is calculated for the cycle using R170 with 6125 kW, followed by R744. In addition, the highest irreversibility is calculated for R125 with an exergy destruction rate of 8397 kW.

Keywords

References

  1. ASHRAE (2009). Ashrae Handbook Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 880pp.
  2. Babatunde A.F., Sunday, O.O. (2018). A Review of Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Applications. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 413, 012019.
  3. Bandean, D.C., Smolen, S., Cieslinski, J.T. (2011). Working fluid selection for Organic Rankine Cycle applied to heat recovery systems. World Renewable Energy Congress, 8-13 May 2011, Linköping Sweeden, 772-779.
  4. Bejan, A. (1997). Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  5. Cengel, Y.A., Boles, M.A. (2006). Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill, New York,
  6. Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A. (2007). Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. Elsevier Science. Heberle, F., Hofer, M., Brüggemann, D. (2017a). A Retrofit for Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles based on Concentrated Solar Thermal Systems. Energy Procedia. 129, 692-699.
  7. Heberle, F., Hofer, M., Ürlings, N., Schröder, H., Anderlohr, T., Brüggemann, D. (2017b). Techno-economic analysis of a solar thermal retrofit for an air-cooled geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Renewable Energy, 113, 494-502
  8. Jumel, S., Feidt, M., Le, V.L., Kheiri, A. (2012). Working fluid selection and performance comparison of subcritical and supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low temperature waste heat recovery. ECEEE 2012 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, 559-569.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Mechanical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2019

Submission Date

September 6, 2019

Acceptance Date

November 23, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 11 Number: 3

APA
Kızılkan, Ö. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 155-169. https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ
AMA
1.Kızılkan Ö. Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. IJTS. 2019;11(3):155-169. https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ
Chicago
Kızılkan, Önder. 2019. “Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids”. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi 11 (3): 155-69. https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ.
EndNote
Kızılkan Ö (December 1, 2019) Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi 11 3 155–169.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Kızılkan, “Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids”, IJTS, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 155–169, Dec. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ
ISNAD
Kızılkan, Önder. “Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids”. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi 11/3 (December 1, 2019): 155-169. https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ.
JAMA
1.Kızılkan Ö. Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. IJTS. 2019;11:155–169.
MLA
Kızılkan, Önder. “Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids”. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 11, no. 3, Dec. 2019, pp. 155-69, https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ.
Vancouver
1.Önder Kızılkan. Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. IJTS [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 1;11(3):155-69. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA93ZS73MZ