Research Article

Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 30, 2022
EN

Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies

Abstract

The accuracy data presented in the technical specifications of the geodetic surveying instruments produced by various companies are controversial. To be able to say anything about the accuracy of these data, they must be obtained under similar conditions, tested by process, adjusting and appropriate statistical methods, and then compared. In this study, Geodetic GNSS receivers produced by different companies were tested according to horizontal accuracies. However, vertical observations were also obtained, only horizontal accuracies were compared.. For this purpose, a horizontal control network was established and long-term static sessions were held with the instruments of each company in this network. The data obtained as a result of the sessions were converted into data files in the same format and adjusted separately by processing with the commercial software of one of the instruments. As a result of adjustment, the results obtained from the instruments of each company were compared according to the horizontal accuracy criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Reference1 Charles D. Ghilani, Paul R. Wolf (2006). Adjustment Computation Spatial Data Analysis
  2. Reference2 Zahraa Hussein (2019). GNSS Geodetic Network Design using Least Squares Adjustment Method Paperback
  3. Reference3 Pietro Catania et all, (2020). Positioning Accuracy Comparison of GNSS Receivers Used for Mapping and Guidance of Agricultural Machines. Agronomy
  4. Reference4 Mariusz Rychlicki et all. (2020). Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers
  5. Reference5 Ismail W. (2015). Evaluating the Differences and Accuracies Between GNSS Applications
  6. Reference6 Using PPP, Research Project, University of Southern Queensland
  7. Reference7 Topcon Tools Software Handbook

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

May 31, 2022

Acceptance Date

June 21, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Yavuz, E. (2022). Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 5(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909
AMA
1.Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022;5(1):68-77. doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909
Chicago
Yavuz, Erol. 2022. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 (1): 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909.
EndNote
Yavuz E (June 1, 2022) Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 1 68–77.
IEEE
[1]E. Yavuz, “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”, UUJES, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–77, June 2022, doi: 10.47137/uujes.1123909.
ISNAD
Yavuz, Erol. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5/1 (June 1, 2022): 68-77. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909.
JAMA
1.Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022;5:68–77.
MLA
Yavuz, Erol. “Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies”. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2022, pp. 68-77, doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909.
Vancouver
1.Erol Yavuz. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022 Jun. 1;5(1):68-77. doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909

An international scientific e-journal published by the University of Usak