FARKLI HAYVAN GÜBRELERİNİN KOMPOSTLANMASI

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, büyükbaş hayvan gübresi (BHG), at gübresi (AG) ve tavuk gübresinin (TG) kompostlanabilirliği araştırılmıştır. Kompost deneylerinde ayçiçeği sapı (AS), düzenleyici katkı maddesi olarak kullanılmış ve üç farklı reaktör (G1, G2, G3) çalıştırılmıştır. Tüm reaktörlerde %80 oranında hayvan gübresi, %20 oranında AS karıştırılmıştır. G1 reaktörüne hayvan gübresi olarak BHG, G2 reaktörüne AG ve G3 reaktörüne ise TG ilave edilmiştir. Proses 21 gün boyunca devam etmiş olup sıcaklık, pH, elektriksel iletkenlik, organik madde, nem, C/N oranı, Toplam Kjeldahl Azotu ve Toplam Fosfor parametreleri izlenmiştir. G1, G2 ve G3 reaktörlerinde süreç boyunca en yüksek sıcaklıklar sırasıyla 58,7 ˚C, 44,6 ˚C ve 54 ˚C olarak tespit edilmiştir. G1 reaktöründe, diğer reaktörlere göre en yüksek C/N oranı azalması (%42,4), en fazla OM kaybı (%57) gerçekleşmiş ve en yüksek sıcaklığa (58,7 ˚C) ulaşılmıştır. Reaktörler arasında en yüksek mineralizasyonun gerçekleştiği en verimli reaktörün G1 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Farklı karakteristik özelliklere sahip hayvan gübrelerinin kompostlanabilirlikleri incelendiğinde, en yüksek verimlilik BHG ile çalıştırılan G1 reaktöründe, onu takiben TG kullanılan G3 reaktöründe elde edilmiş olup en düşük verim AG’nin kullanıldığı G2 rektöründe elde edilmiştir. Farklı katkı maddeleri ve farklı karışım reçetelerinde hayvan gübreleri ile daha yüksek verimde kompost reaktörleri çalıştırılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Kompostlama
• Büyükbaş hayvan gübresi
• At gübresi
• Tavuk gübresi

Composting of Different Animal Manures

Abstract

In this study, the compostability of cattle manure (CAM), horse manure (HM) and chicken manure (CM) was investigated. In the compost experiments, sunflower stalk (SS) was used as a bulking agent and three different reactors (G1, G2, G3) were operated. In all reactors, 80% of animal manure and 20% of SS were mixed. CAM was added to the G1 reactor, HM to the G2 reactor and CM to the G3 reactor as animal manure. Temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, moisture, C/N ratio, total kjeldahl nitrogen and total phosphorus were monitored during the 21-day process. The highest temperatures during the composting process were determined as 58.7 ˚C, 44.6 ˚C and 54 ˚C in the G1, G2 and G3 reactors, respectively. In the G1 reactor, the highest C/N ratio decrease (42.4%), the highest OM loss (57%) was occurred and the highest temperature (58.7 ˚C) was reached compared to other reactors. It was determined that the most efficient reactor with the highest mineralization was found to be G1 among the reactors. When the compostability of animal manures with different characteristics were examined, the highest efficiency was obtained in the G1 reactor operated with CAM, followed by the G3 reactor using CM, and the lowest efficiency was obtained in the G2 reactor where HM was used. It is thought that higher efficiency compost reactors can be operated with different bulking agents and different mixture recipes.

Keywords

• Composting
• Cattle manure
• Horse manure
• Chicken manure

References

1. 1. Afonso, S., Arrobas, M., Pereira, E.L. ve Rodrigues, M.A. (2021) Recycling nutrient-rich hop leaves by composting with wheat straw and farmyard manure in suitable mixtures, Journal of Environmental Management, 284, 112105. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112105
2. 2. APHA, AWWA, WEF, (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Washington, D.C.
3. 3. Barrington, S., Choiniere, D., Trigui, M. ve Knight W. (2002) Effect of carbon source on compost nitrogen and carbon losses, Bioresource Technology, 83(3),189-194. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00229-2
4. 4. Bernal, M.P., Alburquerque, J.A. ve Moral, R. (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review, Bioresource Technology, 5444-5453. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
5. 5. Bremner, J.M. ve Mulvaney, C.S. (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 594-624.
6. 6. Chan, M.T., Selvam, A. ve Wong, J.W.C. (2016) Reducing nitrogen loss and salinity during ‘struvite’ food waste composting by zeolite amendment, Bioresource Technology, 200, 838-844. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.093
7. 7. Chen, Z. ve Jiang, X. (2014) Microbiological safety of chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers: A Review, Agriculture, 4(1), 1-29. doi:10.3390/agriculture4010001
8. 8. Chen, W., Liao, X., Wu, Y., Liang, J.B., Mi, J., Huang, J., Zhang, H., Wu, Y., Qiao, Z., Li, X. ve Wang, Y. (2017) Effects of different types of biochar on methane and ammonia mitigation during layer manure composting, Waste Management, 61, 506-515. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.014

9. 9. Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Zeng, Z., Xu, R., Wang, S., Li, H. ve Zhang, J. (2019) Changes of heavy metal fractions during co-composting of agricultural waste and river sediment with inoculation of phanerochaete chrysosporium, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 378, 120757. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120757
10. 10. Chung, W.J., Chang, S.W., Chaudhary, D.K., Shin, J., Kim, H., Karmegam, N., Govarthanan, M., Chandrasekaran, M. ve Ravindran, B. (2021) Effect of biochar amendment on compost quality, gaseous emissions and pathogen reduction during in-vessel composting of chicken manure, Chemosphere, 283, 131129. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131129
11. 11. Dai, X., Wang, X., Gu, J., Bao, J., Wang, J., Guo, H., Yu, J., Zhao, W. ve Lei, L. (2021) Responses of bacterial communities and antibiotic resistance genes to nano-cellulose addition during pig manure composting, Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113734. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113734
12. 12. Dhyani, V., Awasthi, M.K., Wang,Q., Kumar, J., Ren, X., Zhao, J., Chen, H., Wang, M., Bhaskar, T. ve Zhang, Z. (2018) Effect of composting on the thermal decomposition behavior and kinetic parameters of pig manure-derived solid waste, Bioresource Technology, 252, 59-65. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.083
13. 13. Diaz, L.F., Bertoldi, M., Bidlingmaier, W. ve Stentiford, E. (2007) Compost Science and Technology, Elsevier Publishers.
14. 14. Dietrich, M., Fongen, M. ve Foereid B. (2021) Anaerobic digestion affecting nitrous oxide and methane emissions from the composting process, Bioresource Technology Reports, 15(6), 100752. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100752
15. 15. Dui-an, L.Ü.,Yan, B., Wang, L., Deng, Z. ve Zhang, Y. (2013) Changes in phosphorus fractions and nitrogen forms during composting of pig manure with rice straw, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(10), 1855-1864. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60400-1
16. 16. Ezemagu, I. G., Ejimofor, M. I., Mekiti, M. C., ve Diyoke, C. (2021) Biofertilizer production via composting of digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion of post biocoagulation sludge blended with saw dust: physiochemical characterization and kinetic study, Environmental Challenges, 5, 100288. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100288
17. 17. Forbes, M.G., Dickson, K.L., Saleh, F., Waller, W.T., Doyle, R.D. ve Hudak, P. (2005) Recovery and fractionation of phosphorus retained by lightweight expanded shale and masonry sand used as media in subsurface flow treatment wetlands, Environmental Science & Technology, 39(12), 4621-4627. doi:10.1021/es048149o
18. 18. Ge, M., Shen, Y., Ding, J., Meng, H., Zhou, H., Zhou, J., Cheng, H., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Wang, H., Cheng, Q., Li, R. ve Liu, J. (2022) New insight into the impact of moisture content and pH on dissolved organic matter and microbial dynamics during cattle manure composting, Bioresource Technology, 344, 126236. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126236
19. 19. Gigliotti, G., Proietti, P., Said-Pullicino, D., Nasini, L., Pezzolla, D., Rosati, L. Ve Porceddu, P.R. (2012) Co-composting of olive husks with high moisture contents: organic matter dynamics and compost quality, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 67, 8-14. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.11.009
20. 20. Haouas, A., Modafar, C.E., Douira, A., Ibnsouda-Koraichi, S., Filali-Maltouf, A., Moukhli, A. ve Amir, S. (2021) Evaluation of the nutrients cycle, humification process, and agronomic efficiency of organic wastes composting enriched with phosphate sludge, Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 127051. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127051
21. 21. Hebert, L., Cauchard, J., Doligez, P., Quitard, L., Laugier, C. ve Petry, S. (2010) Viability of Rhodococcus equi and Parascaris equorum eggs exposed to high temperatures, Current Microbiology, 60, 38-41. doi:10.1007/s00284-009-9497-5
22. 22. Iqbal, M.K., Shafiq, T. ve Ahmed, K. (2010) Characterization of bulking agents and its effects on physical properties of compost, Bioresource Technology, 101(6), 1913-1919. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.030
23. 23. Khalil, A.I, Hassouna, M.S., El-Ashqar, H.M.A. ve Fawzi, M. (2011) Changes in physical,chemical and microbial parameters during the composting of municipal sewage sludge, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 27(10), 2359–2369. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011- 07048
24. 24. Khan, E., Khaodhir, S. ve Ruangrote, D. (2009) Effects of moisture content and initial pH in composting process on heavy metal removal characteristics of grass clipping compost used for stormwater filtration, Bioresource Technology, 100(19), 4454-4461. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.062
25. 25. Komiyama, T. ve Ito, T. (2019) The characteristics of phosphorus in animal manure composts, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 65(3), 281-288. doi:10.1080/00380768.2019.1615384
26. 26. KT, 05.03.2015 tarihli ve 29286 sayılı Resmi Gazete, Kompost Tebliği.
27. 27. Lalremruati, M. ve Devi, A.S. (2021) Changes in physico-chemical properties during composting of three common household organic solid wastes amended with garden soil, Bioresource Technology Reports, 15, 100727. doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100727
28. 28. Li, H., Wang, Y., Shi, L.Q., Mi, J., Song, D. ve Pan, X.J. (2012) Distribution and fractions of phosphorus and nitrogen in surface sediments from Dianchi Lake, China, International Journal of Environmental Research, 6(1), 195-208. doi:10.22059/IJER.2011.486
29. 29. Li, J., Akdeniz, N., Kim., H.H.M., Gates, R.S., Wang, X. ve Wang, K. (2021a) Quantification of sustainable animal manure utilization strategies in Hangzhou, China, Agricultural Systems, 191, 103150. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103150
30. 30. Li, M.X., He, X.S., Tang, J., Li, X., Zhao, R., Tao, Y.Q., Wang, C. ve Qiu, Z.P. (2021b) Influence of moisture content on chicken manure stabilization during microbial agent enhanced composting, Chemosphere, 364, 128549. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128549
31. 31. Liao, H., Zhao, Q., Cui, P., Chen, Z., Yu, Z., Geisen, S., Friman, V.P. ve Zhou, S. (2019) Efficient reduction of antibiotic residues and associated resistance genes in tylosin antibiotic fermentation waste using hyperthermophilic composting, Environment International, 133(B), 105203. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105203
32. 32. Liu, B., Yu, K., Ahmed, I., Gin, K., Xi, B., Wei, Z., He, Y. ve Zhang, B. (2021) Key factors driving the fate of antibiotic resistance genes and controlling strategies during aerobic composting of animal manure: A review, Science of The Total Environment, 791, 148372. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148372
33. 33. Manu, M.K., Kumar, R. ve Garg, A. (2017) Performance assessment of improved composting system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum, Bioresource Technology, 234, 167-17. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.023
34. 34. Mclean, E.O. (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
35. 35. Nakasaki, K., Hirai, H., Mimoto, H., Quyen, T. N. M., Koyama, M., ve Takeda, K. (2019) Succession of microbial community during vigorous organic matter degradation in the primary fermentation stage of food waste composting, Science of The Total Environment, 671, 1237-1244. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.341
36. 36. Okalebo, J.R., Gathua, K.W. ve Woomer, P.L. (1993) Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis : A Working Manual, Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme, Nairobi.
37. 37. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V. ve Watanabe, F.S. (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station Scientific Journal Series, 418, 18-19.
38. 38. Özlü, E., Sandhu, S.S., Kumar, S. ve Arriaga, F.J. (2019) Soil health indicators impacted by long-term cattle manure and inorganic fertilizer application in a corn-soybean rotation of South Dakota, Scientific Reports 9, 11776. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48207-z
39. 39. Raj D. ve Antil, R. S. (2011) Evulation of maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared from agro-industrial wastes, Bioresource Technology, 102(3), 2868-2873. doi:10.106/j.biortech.2010.1.077
40. 40. Rhoades, J.D. (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
41. 41. Said-Pullicino, D., Erriquens, F.G. ve Gigliotti, G. (2007) Changes in the chemical characteristics of water-extractable organic matter during composting and their influence on compost stability and maturity, Bioresource Technology, 98, 1822-1831. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.018
42. 42. Sanchez-Monedero, M.A., Roig, A., Paredes, C. ve Bernal, M.P. (2001) Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures, Bioresource Technology, 78(3), 301-308. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00031-1
43. 43. Shan, G., Li, W., Gao, Y., Tan, W. ve Xi, B. (2021) Additives for reducing nitrogen loss during composting: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 307(10), 127308. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127308
44. 44. Song, B., Manu, M.K., Li, D., Wang, C., Varjani, S., Ladumor, N., Michael, L., Xu, Y. ve Wong, J.W.C. (2021) Food waste digestate composting: feedstock optimization with sawdust and mature compost, Bioresource Technology, 341, 125759. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125759
45. 45. Sun, W., Huang, G.H., Zeng, G., Qin, X. ve Yu, H. (2011) Quantitative effects of composting state variables on C/N ratio through GA-aided multivariate analysis, Science of The Total Environment, 409(7), 1243-1254. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.023
46. 46. Sundberg, C., Smars, S. ve Jönsson, H. (2004) Low pH as an inhibiting factor in the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic phase in composting, Bioresource Technology, 95(2), 145-150. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.01.016
47. 47. Şevik, F., Tosun, İ. Ve Ekinci, K. (2018) The effect of FAS and C/N ratios on co-composting of sewage sludge, dairy manure and tomato stalks, Waste Management, 80, 450-456. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.051
48. 48. Thomas, C., Idler, C., Ammon, C. ve Amon T. (2020) Effects of the C/N ratio and moisture content on the survival of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli during chicken manure composting, Waste Management, 105, 110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.031
49. 49. TÜİK (2020) Hayvansal Üretim İstatistikleri, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hayvansal-Uretim-Istatistikleri-Aralik-2020-37207
50. 50. Uçaroğlu, S. (2014) Use of sunflower stalks as a bulking agent in sewage sludge composting, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23(6), 1302-1308. doi:10.3291/F-2013-546pj2014
51. 51. USEPA. (1993) Standards fort he use and Disposal of Sewage, 40 CFR Parts 257, 403, and 503 (FRO-4203-3), Final Rule, Fed. Register, 58, 9248, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
52. 52. Wang, L., Li, Y., Prasher, S.O., Yan, B., Ou, Y., Cui, H. ve Cui, Y. (2019) Organic matter, a critical factor to immobilize phosphorus, copper, and zinc during composting under various initial C/N ratios, Bioresource Technology, 289, 121745. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121745
53. 53. Wang, G., Kong, Y., Liu, Y., Li, D., Zhang, X., Yuan, J. ve Li, G. (2020) Evolution of phytotoxicity during the active phase of co-composting of chicken manure, tobacco powder and mushroom substrate, Waste Management, 114, 25-32. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.034
54. 54. Wang, L., Zheng, J. ve Huang, X. (2021) Co-composting materials can further affect the attenuation of antibiotic resistome in soil application, Waste Management, 135, 329-337. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.016
55. 55. Waskom, R.M. (1999) Best management practices for manure utilization, 568A, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, Fort Collins
56. 56. Wei, L., Shutao, W., Jin, Z. ve Tong, X. (2014) Biochar influences the microbial community structure during tomato stalk composting with chicken manure, Bioresource Technology, 154, 148-154. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.022
57. 57. Wei, Y., Liang Z. ve Zhang Y. (2022) Evolution of physicochemical properties and bacterial community in aerobic composting of swine manure based on a patent compost tray, Bioresourca Technology, 343, 126136. doi:10.1016/j.bitech.2021.126136
58. 58. Wong, J.W.C., Karthikeyan, O.P. ve Selvam, A. (2017) Biological nutrient transformation during composting of pig manure and paper waste, Environmental Technology, 38(6), 745-761. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1211747
59. 59. Wu, X., Wang, J., Shen, L., Wu, X., Amanze, C. ve Zeng, W. (2021) ) Effect of bamboo sphere amendment on the organic matter decomposition and humification of food waste composting, Waste Management, 133, 19-27. doi:10.1016/J.wasman.2021.07.030
60. 60. Yan, Z., Song, Z., Li, D., Yuan, Y., Liu, X. Ve Zheng, T. (2015) The effects of initial substrate concentration, C/N ratio, and temperature on solid-state anaerobic digestion from composting rice straw, Bioresource Technology, 177, 266-273. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.089
61. 61. Yu, H., Xie, B., Khan, R. ve Shen, G. (2019) The changes in carbon, nitrogen components and humic substances during organic-inorganic aerobic co-composting, Bioresource Technology, 271, 228-235. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.088
62. 62. Zhang, X., Fang, Q., Zhang, T., Ma, W., Velthof, G.L., Hou, Y., Oenema, O. ve Zhang, F. (2020) Benefits and trade-offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: A meta-analysis, Global Change Biology, 26(2), 888-900. doi:10.1111/gcb.14826
63. 63. Zhen, X. F., Luo, M., Dong, H. Y., Li, S. B., Li, M. C., ve Kang, J. (2021) Variations of N-P-K contents in livestock and livestock manure composting. Applied Ecology And Envıronmental Research, 19(1), 249-261. doi:10.15666/aeer/1901_249261
64. 64. Zhu, P., Qin, H., Zhang, H., Luo, Y., Ru, Y., Li, J., San, K.W., Wang, L., Yu, X. ve Guo, W. (2021) Variations in antibiotic resistance genes and removal mechanisms induced by C/N ratio of substrate during composting, Science of The Total Environment, 798, 149288. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149288
65. 65. Zorpas, A.A., Arapoglou, D. ve Panagiotis, K. (2003) Waste paper and clinoptilolite as a bulking material with dewatered anaerobically stabilized primary sewage sludge (DASPSS) for compost production, Waste Management, 23(1), 27-35. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00042-9