Technical Brief
BibTex RIS Cite

GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Year 2022, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 523 - 534, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.971346

Abstract

Akredite laboratuarların yaygınlaşmaya başlaması sonrasında gaz debi ölçümü alanında kalibrasyon yöntemleri, referans sistemler, ölçümler ve izlenebilirlik gibi konularında ortaya çıkan sorular ve çözüm beklentileri artmaktadır. Bu alanlardaki kalibrasyonların uluslararası düzeyde kabul gören yöntemler ve standartlar doğrultusunda yapılması, gerçekleştirilen karşılaştırmaların sonuçlarının yorumlanması, akreditasyon uygulamalarının etkinliğinin doğru değerlendirilmesi ve hata ve belirsizlik hesaplamaları oldukça önemlidir. Gaz sayacı üretimi ve gaz dağıtımı şirketleri kendi bünyelerinde kurdukları akredite laboratuarlarda gaz sayacı kalibrasyonları, ayar istasyonları ve doğrulama ünitelerinin izlenebilirliğini sağlama çalışmaları yapmaktadır. Referans cihazların kalibrasyonu, izlenebilirliği ve belirsizlik hesaplamaları konularında kalibrasyon firmalarından gelen soruların uluslar arası standartlar ve uygulamalar da yer alan cevapları TÜBİTAK UME Akışkanlar Mekaniği Laboratuarında ki tecrübeler dahilinde bu makalede paylaşılacaktır.

References

  • 1. BIPM JCGM.106, (2012). Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment.
  • 2. BS EN 12261, (2018). Turbine gas meters.
  • 3. BS EN 12405, (2010). Gas Meters - Conversion Devices.
  • 4. BS EN 12480, (2018). Rotary displacement gas meters.
  • 5. Cimerman, F., Jarm, M., Sirok, B., Blagojevic, B., (2016), Taking in Account Measuring Errors of Volume Conversion Devices in Measuring Volume of Natural Gas, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 62- 2, 95-104, Doi:10.5545/sv-jme.2015.2948.
  • 6. Cox, M. G., (2002), The Evaluation of Key Comparison Data, Metrologia 39, 589-595.
  • 7. Cox, M.G., (2007), The Evaluation of Key Comparison Data, determining the largest consistent subset, Metrologia 44, 187-200.
  • 8. Directive 2014/32/EU, (2014). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments.
  • 9. EA-4/02, (2021). Expression of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration.
  • 10. EN1359/A1, (2006). Gas meters – Diaphragm meters.
  • 11. GUM, (1995). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
  • 12. ILAC G24, (2007). Guidelines for the determination of calibration intervals of measuring instuments.
  • 13. ILAC G8:09, (2019). Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity.
  • 14. ISO 14253-1, (2017). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring instruments-Part1:Decision rules for verifying conformity or nonconformity with specifications.
  • 15. ISO 5168, (2005). Measurement of fluid flow - Procedures for the Evaluation of uncertainties.
  • 16. ISO 9300, (2005). Measurement of gas flow by means of critical flow venturi nozzles.
  • 17. ISO/IEC 17025, (2017). General requriements for the competence, impartiality and consistent operation of laboratories.
  • 18. OIML G19, (2017). The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment decisions in legal metrology.
  • 19. OIML R137 1&2, (2012). Gas meters Part 1: Metrological and technical requirements.
  • 20. PTB Testing Instructions Volume 25, (2003). Gas Meters-Test Rigs With Critical Nozzles, Braunschweigh.

Conformity Assessment of Error and Uncertainty in Gas Flowmeter Measurements

Year 2022, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 523 - 534, 30.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.971346

Abstract

The demand for solution to problems related with the calibration methods, reference systems, measurements and traceability issues in gas flow measurement area increased after the accredidated laboratories becoming widespread in country. It is important to realize the calibrations according to methods described by international standards, to comment on intercomparison results, to evaluate the effectiveness of accreditation requriements and to calculate measurement error and uncertainty. Most of the gas meter manufacturers and gas distribution companies have their own adjustment and calibration laboratories for measurement and traceability purposes. The calibration of reference devices, traceability and uncertainty considerations are discussed in this paper with the answers in international standards and laboratory experience at TÜBİTAK UME.

References

  • 1. BIPM JCGM.106, (2012). Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment.
  • 2. BS EN 12261, (2018). Turbine gas meters.
  • 3. BS EN 12405, (2010). Gas Meters - Conversion Devices.
  • 4. BS EN 12480, (2018). Rotary displacement gas meters.
  • 5. Cimerman, F., Jarm, M., Sirok, B., Blagojevic, B., (2016), Taking in Account Measuring Errors of Volume Conversion Devices in Measuring Volume of Natural Gas, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 62- 2, 95-104, Doi:10.5545/sv-jme.2015.2948.
  • 6. Cox, M. G., (2002), The Evaluation of Key Comparison Data, Metrologia 39, 589-595.
  • 7. Cox, M.G., (2007), The Evaluation of Key Comparison Data, determining the largest consistent subset, Metrologia 44, 187-200.
  • 8. Directive 2014/32/EU, (2014). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments.
  • 9. EA-4/02, (2021). Expression of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration.
  • 10. EN1359/A1, (2006). Gas meters – Diaphragm meters.
  • 11. GUM, (1995). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
  • 12. ILAC G24, (2007). Guidelines for the determination of calibration intervals of measuring instuments.
  • 13. ILAC G8:09, (2019). Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity.
  • 14. ISO 14253-1, (2017). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring instruments-Part1:Decision rules for verifying conformity or nonconformity with specifications.
  • 15. ISO 5168, (2005). Measurement of fluid flow - Procedures for the Evaluation of uncertainties.
  • 16. ISO 9300, (2005). Measurement of gas flow by means of critical flow venturi nozzles.
  • 17. ISO/IEC 17025, (2017). General requriements for the competence, impartiality and consistent operation of laboratories.
  • 18. OIML G19, (2017). The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment decisions in legal metrology.
  • 19. OIML R137 1&2, (2012). Gas meters Part 1: Metrological and technical requirements.
  • 20. PTB Testing Instructions Volume 25, (2003). Gas Meters-Test Rigs With Critical Nozzles, Braunschweigh.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section Technical Notes
Authors

Hakan Kaykısızlı 0000-0003-2167-6133

Publication Date April 30, 2022
Submission Date July 14, 2021
Acceptance Date March 10, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 27 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kaykısızlı, H. (2022). GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.971346
AMA Kaykısızlı H. GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. UUJFE. April 2022;27(1):523-534. doi:10.17482/uumfd.971346
Chicago Kaykısızlı, Hakan. “GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27, no. 1 (April 2022): 523-34. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.971346.
EndNote Kaykısızlı H (April 1, 2022) GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27 1 523–534.
IEEE H. Kaykısızlı, “GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ”, UUJFE, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 523–534, 2022, doi: 10.17482/uumfd.971346.
ISNAD Kaykısızlı, Hakan. “GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27/1 (April 2022), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.971346.
JAMA Kaykısızlı H. GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. UUJFE. 2022;27:523–534.
MLA Kaykısızlı, Hakan. “GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 523-34, doi:10.17482/uumfd.971346.
Vancouver Kaykısızlı H. GAZ SAYACI ÖLÇÜMLERİNDE HATA VE BELİRSİZLİK UYGUNLUĞU DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. UUJFE. 2022;27(1):523-34.

Announcements:

30.03.2021-Beginning with our April 2021 (26/1) issue, in accordance with the new criteria of TR-Dizin, the Declaration of Conflict of Interest and the Declaration of Author Contribution forms fulfilled and signed by all authors are required as well as the Copyright form during the initial submission of the manuscript. Furthermore two new sections, i.e. ‘Conflict of Interest’ and ‘Author Contribution’, should be added to the manuscript. Links of those forms that should be submitted with the initial manuscript can be found in our 'Author Guidelines' and 'Submission Procedure' pages. The manuscript template is also updated. For articles reviewed and accepted for publication in our 2021 and ongoing issues and for articles currently under review process, those forms should also be fulfilled, signed and uploaded to the system by authors.