Ulna'nın Foramen Nutricium Morfolojisi ve Ulnar Kırıklarda Vida Hasarını En Aza İndirme

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ulnar kırıkların tespiti sırasında foramen nutricium’un (NF) zarar görmesini en aza indirmek için NF’nin morfolojik ve morfometrik özelliklerinin derinlemesine incelenmesidir. Bu çalışma, 110 kuru ulna örneği (47 sağ, 63 sol) kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ulna uzunluğu (UL), NF ile olekranonun en proksimal noktası arasındaki mesafe (NFO) ve NF ile interosseöz kenar arasındaki mesafe (NFIB) ölçüldü. NF'nin sayısı, konumu, yönü, durumu ve boyutu değerlendirildi. Ayrıca, foraminal indeks (FI) hesaplandı. Ayrıca, bölümümüzde 73 yaşındaki bir Türk kadavrası üzerinde deneysel olarak ön kol kırığı oluşturuldu ve ulnar açık redüksiyon internal fiksasyon uygulandı. Plaka ve vidaların çıkarılmasından sonra, plaka fikstürünün NF üzerindeki etkisi değerlendirildi ve ileri tedavi kararları için incelendi. Ortalama UL, NFO, NFIB ve FI sırasıyla 244,16 ± 17,65 mm, 93,76 ± 18,11 mm, 8,23 ± 3,67 mm ve 38,29 ± 6,45% olarak ölçüldü. Genel olarak, ulna kemiklerinde anterior yüzeyde, yukarıya doğru, 2/5 bölgesinde ve 22-gauge boyutundan daha küçük olan 1 NF tespit edildi. En proksimal ilk, ikinci ve üçüncü vidalar ile interosseöz kenar arasındaki mesafeler sırasıyla 4,39 mm, 6,20 mm ve 6,56 mm olarak ölçüldü. Vidaların kadavradaki kırık ulna üzerindeki NF'ye zarar vermediği bulundu. Kuru kemik ve kadaverik sonuçlarımıza göre, NF'nin morfolojik ve morfometrik özellikleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak, plakanın vidalanmasında önemlidir; bu vidalama mümkünse şaftın distal kısımlarına ve ulnanın anterior kenarına yakın bir yerde yapılmalı, böylece besleyici foramenin zarar görmesi en aza indirilerek kemiğin kan akışının korunması sağlanmalıdır.

Keywords

• ulna
• foramen nutricium
• kırık
• vidalama
• kadavra
• anatomi

Ulnar Nutrient Foramen Morphology and Minimizing Screw Damage in Ulnar Fractures

Abstract

The aim of this study is providing an in-depth investigation of the morphological and morphometric characteristics of the nutrient foramen (NF) to minimize the damaging of the NF during fixation of ulnar fractures. This study was performed by using a sample of 110 dry ulnae (47 right, 63 left). The ulnar length (UL), distance between the NF and the most proximal point of olecranon (NFO), as well the distance between the NF and interosseous border (NFIB) were taken under measurement. The number, location, direction, position, and size of NF was evaluated. Also, the foraminal index (FI) was calculated. In addition, forearm fracture was created experimentally on a cadaver belonging to a 73-year-old Turkish female in our department, and ulnar open reduction internal fixation was performed. After the removal of the plate and screws, the effect of plate fixation on the NF was evaluated and examined for further treatment decisions. The mean UL, NFO, NFIB and FI were measured to be 244.16 ± 17.65 mm, 93.76 ± 18.11 mm, 8.23 ± 3.67 mm, and 38.29 ± 6.45%, respectively. In general, 1 NF was detected on the ulnae, which was located anterior surface, directed upwards, on 2/5 zone and smaller than 22-gauge size. The distances between the most proximal first, second and third screws and interosseous border were measured to be 4.39 mm, 6.20 mm, and 6.56 mm, respectively. The screws were found not to have damaged the NF on fractured ulna of cadaver. According to our dry bone and cadaveric results, being knowledgeable about the morphologic and morphometric characteristics of NF is important in screwing the plate, which should be done to the distal parts of shaft if possible and near the anterior border of ulna for minimizing the damage to the nutrient foramen in order to preserve the blood supply of the bone.

Keywords

• ulna
• nutrient foramen
• fracture
• screw
• cadaver
• anatomy

References

1. 1. Sauder DJ, Athwal GS. Management of isolated ulnar shaft fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23(2):179-184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2007.01.004
2. 2. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
3. 3. Brookes M, Revell WJ. Blood supply of bone: scientific aspects. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
4. 4. Kizilkanat E, Boyan N, Ozsahin ET, Soames R, Oguz O. Location, number and clinical significance of nutrient foramina in human long bones. Ann Anat. 2007;189(1):87-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2006.07.004
5. 5. Zahra SU, Kervancıoğlu P, Bahşi İ. Morphological and Topographical Anatomy of Nutrient Foramen in The Lower Limb Long Bones. Eur J Ther. 2018;24(1):36-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2017.147
6. 6. Sharma MD, Mathurm A, Nagar AK, Barjatiya R, Chauhanm P, Shekhawat S. Study of Morphometric Variations in the Nutrient Foramina of Fibula in Central Rajasthan. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2016;3(1):65-71.
7. 7. Challa P, Nanna RK. A Study of Nutrient Foramina in Human Upper Limb Long Bones. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2019;8(9):610-613. doi:https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2019/135
8. 8. Pereira G, Lopes P, Santos A, Silveira F. Nutrient foramina in the upper and lower limb long bones: morphometric study in bones of Southern Brazilian adults. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(2):514-20. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022011000200035

9. 9. Bonafede M, Espindle D, Bower AG. The direct and indirect costs of long bone fractures in a working age US population. J Med Econ. 2013;16(1):169-178. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.3111/13696998.2012.737391
10. 10. Thompson JE. Anatomical methods of approach in operations on the long bones of the extremities. Ann Surg. 1918;68(3):309.
11. 11. Nakamura T, Moy OJ, Peimer CA. Relationship between fracture of the ulnar styloid process and DRUJ instability: a biomechanical study. J Wrist Surg. 2020;10(02):111-115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719041
12. 12. Alter TH, Noh KJ, Monica JT. Management of Isolated Ulnar Shaft Fractures. JBJS reviews. 2023;11(6):e22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.22.00254
13. 13. Dervisevic L, Dervisevic A, Ajanovic Z, et al. Anatomical variations of nutrient foramina on the long bones of the upper extremities-Importance and application in everyday clinical practice. Acta Marisiensis Seria Med. 2023;69(1):55-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2023-0011
14. 14. Ülkir M, Karaçoban L, Günes BE. Morphologic and Morphometric Evaluation of Nutrient Foramina of Tibia. J Anat Soc India. 2023;72(3):239-245. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/jasi.jasi_87_22
15. 15. Kinose S, Kanaya Y, Kawasaki Y, et al. Anatomic characterization of the radial and ulnar nutrient arteries in humans. Ann Anat. 2018;216(March):23-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.10.004
16. 16. Cihan ÖF, Toma S. Morphology and Topography of the Nutrient Foramina in the Shoulder Girdle and Long Bones of the Upper Extremity. Eur J Ther. 2023;29(3):359-369. doi:https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther.20232902-395.y
17. 17. Desai U, Damor B. Morphometric Study of Nutrient Foramina in Typical Adult Human Long Bones of Superior Extremity with its Clinical and Surgical Importance: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 07/01 2022;11(3):14-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.7860/IJARS/2022/43270.2796
18. 18. Öztürk K, Dursun A, Ayazoğlu M, Kastamoni Y. An Investigation of the Nutrient Foramen in the Long Bones of theUpper and Lower Limbs in Turkish Population. Med Rec. 2022;4(2):179-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1049282
19. 19. Priya DC, Durga JL, Chandrupatla M. A morphological study of nutrient foramina of human ulna and their clinicalimportance. IJRR. 2019;6(6):75-79.
20. 20. Ukoha UU, Umeasalugo KE, Nzeako HC, Ezejindu DN, Ejimofor OC, Obazie IF. A study of nutrient foramina in longbones of Nigerians. NJMR. 2013;3(04):304-308.
21. 21. Veeramuthu M, Elangovan M, Manoranjitham. Nutrient foramina: a study in the long bones of human upper extremities.Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(3.3):4394-9. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.348
22. 22. Yılar K, Sağlam L, Coşkun O, Ertaş A, Gayretli Ö. Analysis ofthe nutrient foramen in human dry ulnae of Turkish population:An anatomical study and current literature review. Eur J Ther. 2023;29(2):163-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther.20232902-348.y
23. 23. Chavda SR, Rathwa AJ, Akbari V. A study on variations ofnutrient foramen of ulna in Saurashtra region with its clinical relevance. Int J Anat Res. 2018;6(4.2):5844-47. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.358
24. 24. Rangasubhe P, Havaldar PP. An osteological study on nutrient foramina of human dry adult ulna bones. Int J Anat Res. 2019;7(1.2):6149-6153.doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.425
25. 25. Ashwini S, Kumar P, Shetty S. An osteological study ofnutrient foramina in radius and ulna with its embryological andclinical significance. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(2.3):3891-3895. doi:https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.197